Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1944 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association
Argued January 11, 1944
Decided June 5, 1944
Full case nameUnited States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, et al.
Citations322U.S.533 (more)
64 S. Ct. 1162; 88L. Ed. 1440; 1944U.S. LEXIS 1199; 1944 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 57,253
Holding
Congress can regulate insurance under theCommerce Clause.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Harlan F. Stone
Associate Justices
Owen Roberts · Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Frank Murphy
Robert H. Jackson · Wiley B. Rutledge
Case opinions
MajorityBlack, joined by Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge
DissentStone
DissentFrankfurter
DissentJackson
Roberts and Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Sherman Act
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Paul v. Virginia (1869) (in part).

United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944), is aUnited States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that theSherman Act, the federal antitrust statute, applied to insurance. To reach this decision, the Court held that insurance could be regulated by theUnited States Congress under theCommerce Clause, overturningPaul v. Virginia. Congress responded by enacting theMcCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 which limited antitrust laws' applicability to the business and assured state authority would continue over insurance.

In his partial dissent at 322 U.S. 588, JusticeRobert H. Jackson of the Supreme Court said:

4. Any enactment by Congress either of partial or of comprehensive regulations of the insurance business would come to us with the most forceful presumption of constitutional validity. The fiction that insurance is not commerce could not be sustained against such a presumption, for resort to the facts would support the presumption in favor of the congressional action. The fiction therefore must yield to congressional action, and continues only at the sufferance of Congress.5. Congress also may, without exerting its full regulatory powers over the subject, and without challenging the basis or supplanting the details of state regulation, enact prohibitions of any acts in pursuit of the insurance business which substantially affect or unduly burden or restrain interstate commerce.

See also

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Statutes and
regulations
Supreme Court
case law
Sherman Antitrust Act
Section 1 case law
Sherman Antitrust Act
Section 2 case law
OtherSherman
Antitrust Act
cases
Interstate Commerce Act
case law
Clayton Antitrust Act
case law
FTC Act case law
Robinson–Patman Act
case law
Other cases
Other federal
case law
Ongoing
litigation ‡
Related topics
‡ date of filing
Presentment Clause of Section VII
Commerce Clause of Section VIII
Dormant Commerce Clause
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Lanham Act
Othertrademark cases
Others
Coinage Clause of Section VIII
Legal Tender Cases
Copyright Clause of Section VIII
Copyright Act of 1790
Patent Act of 1793
Patent infringement case law
Patentability case law
Copyright Act of 1831
Copyright Act of 1870
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
International Copyright Act of 1891
Copyright Act of 1909
Patent misuse case law
Copyright Act of 1976
Othercopyright cases
Otherpatent cases
Legal Tender Cases
Others
Compact Clause of Section X
Stub icon

This article related to a case of theSupreme Court of the United States of theStone Court is astub. You can help Wikipedia byadding missing information.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_v._South-Eastern_Underwriters_Ass%27n&oldid=1332988988"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp