Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Union density

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Theunion density orunion membership rate conveys the number oftrade union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees in a given industry or country.[1] This is normally lower thancollective agreement coverage rate, which refers to all people whose terms of work arecollectively negotiated. Trade unions bargain with employers to improve pay, conditions, and decision-making in workplaces; higher rates of union density within an industry or country will generally indicate higher levels of trade unionbargaining power, lower rates of density will indicate less bargaining power.[1]

Causes the collective agreement coverage rate, which refers to all people whose terms of work are collectively negotiated

[edit]

The causes of higher or lower union membership are widely debated. Common causes are often identified as including the following:

  • whether a jurisdiction encouragessectoral collective bargaining (higher coverage) orenterprise bargaining (lower coverage)
  • whether collective agreements to create aclosed shop or allowautomatic enrollment in union membership are lawful
  • whether the government, for instance, through aMinistry orDepartment of Labour, actively promotes collective agreement coverage with the power to impose terms if employers refuse to bargain with the workforce
  • whether a country enables collective agreements to be extended by government regulations to all workers when the coverage rate reaches a majority in a sector, or to a similar level
  • whether laws on collective bargaining and strikes are more or less favourable
[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding missing information.(August 2016)

By country

[edit]
NowOlder
France8%[2]
United States
Sweden68%
Australia14.3%
Spain13.7%[3]

In the United States in 2015 there were 14.8m union members, and 16.4m people covered by collective bargaining or union representation. Union membership was 7.4% in private sector, but 39% in the public sector. In the five largest states,California has 15.9% union membership,Texas 4.5%,Florida 6.8%,New York 24.7% (the highest in the country), andIllinois had 15.2%.[4]

In December 2021, 14.3% of the Australian workforce were union members; this was a decline of more than 5 percentage points since 2010 and nearly 10 percentage points since 2005.[5]

In Sweden union density was 68% in 2019.[6][7] In all the Nordic countries with aGhent system—Sweden, Denmark andFinland—union density is almost 70%. In all these countries union density has declined.[8][9][10]

In France while the overall union density is 8%, in companies over 50 employees this level reaches 43%.

US Bureau of Labor in 2010 notes a difference ofmedian income of 200 dollars between union-members (917), and non-union members (717) without indicating if higher salaries link to more unionisation, or the reverse or in mutuality.[11]

[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding missing information.(August 2016)


See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ab"Trade union density and collective bargaining coverage: International Statistical Inquiry 2008-09"(PDF).International Labour Organisation. 2008. p. 2. Retrieved17 October 2019.
  2. ^"Syndicats : 1,8 million d'adhérents en France".Franceinfo (in French). 2015-10-18. Retrieved2022-06-12.
  3. ^"La afiliación sindical en España alcanza su nivel más bajo en 30 años".La Vanguardia (in Spanish). 2019-12-22. Retrieved2022-06-12.
  4. ^SeeBureau of Labor Statistics, ‘Union Members – 2015’ (28 January 2016)
  5. ^Sakkal, Paul (December 2021)."'Mugged by reality': Unions urged to shift focus from federal Labor to state action".The Age. Fairfax Media. Retrieved2 December 2021.
  6. ^Excluding full-time students working part-time. See Anders Kjellberg (2020)Kollektivavtalens täckningsgrad samt organisationsgraden hos arbetsgivarförbund och fackförbund, Department of Sociology, Lund University. Studies in Social Policy, Industrial Relations, Working Life and Mobility. Research Reports 2020:1, Appendix 3 (in English) Tables A-G
  7. ^Anders Kjellberg (2020)Den svenska modellen i en oviss tid. Fack, arbetsgivare och kollektivavtal på en föränderlig arbetsmarknad – Statistik och analyser: facklig medlemsutveckling, organisationsgrad och kollektivavtalstäckning 2000-2029. Stockholm: Arena Idé 2020
  8. ^On Sweden, see Anders Kjellberg (2011)"The Decline in Swedish Union Density since 2007"Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies (NJWLS) Vol. 1. No 1 (August 2011), pp. 67–93
  9. ^On Sweden and Denmark, see Anders Kjellberg and Christian Lyhne Ibsen (2016)"Attacks on union organizing: Reversible and irreversible changes to the Ghent-systems in Sweden and Denmark" in Trine Pernille Larsen and Anna Ilsøe (eds.)(2016)Den Danske Model set udefra (The Danish Model Inside Out) - komparative perspektiver på dansk arbejdsmarkedsregulering, Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag (pp.279-302)
  10. ^Anders Kjellberg (2025)”Changes in union density in the Nordic countries”, Nordic Economic Policy Review, pp. 124-129 (Nordregio and the Nordic Council of Ministers)
  11. ^"The Difference Between a Union and a non-Union Workplace".www.linkedin.com. Retrieved2022-06-12.

References

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Union_density&oldid=1337725285"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp