Created per discussion atWikipedia talk:Simplified Ruleset#Guidelines Box Template, and above. --Quiddity21:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about two-level header palettes for tables like this? See test example.[1] They could be incorporated into color schemes with high-level pages like those shown atUser:Rfrisbie/Palettes.Rfrisbie^talk17:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subjectively, I like it. However, that medium blue might be too low contrast with the black text for some people to read the title? There's a "test this page for color blindness accessibility" link somewhere, but I can't find it right now. --Quiddity18:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Color blindness, good morning! ;)

colorfilter.wickline.org Wow! Useful looking, will link.

The contrast seems fine, I'd say go for it. (Although, in a different mood, I might argue that it isnt minimalist enough, and that we shouldn't be promoting bold colour usage too much. :\ But I'm an overly-cautionary worrier ;) --Quiddity23:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe let's try it out, and see what the response is. --Quiddity04:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another approach[2] that uses the styles forWikipedia:Contents. The advantage to going "lighter" for two-level headers is that the top header can remain the same as for one-level headers. A change probably needed for templates like this is the lighter level seems to need borders to set it off from the main background. What do you think?Rfrisbie^talk17:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, even better, higher contrast and less visually arresting. :) --Quiddity18:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it up to you all what you want to do with this group of templates. :-)Rfrisbie^talk18:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The template links to thePrinciples page which, as a newcomer, I unfortunately find rather confusing and not providing much insight. I have left a more verbose description of my concerns on thecorresponding talk page. Depending on the appropriate course of action, the link should be removed or replaced. I appreciate any feedback or guidance on how to proceed.CSMProject (talk)16:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]