Template talk:Brexit topics
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related tothe Troubles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this page:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
I'm going to change things around because inthe current layout it's easy to miss "Issues" which is surely a central article. Also, articles like 1975 EEC membership referendum, 2014 UK European Parliament Election, and 2015 UK General Election seem to be important background but not "key events" in the campaign.MartinPoulter (talk)10:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request toTemplate:United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016 has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
I feel there should be a link to theUnited Ireland article under the Result sub-heading. This will undoubtedly rise up the agenda if the UK as a whole leaves the EU. This is because Northern Ireland voted 55% as a whole in favour of remaining in the EU in the referendum. Also Northern Ireland is the only part of the UK with a land border with one of the remaining 27 EU states.
62.60.23.66 (talk)10:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now:62.60.23.66 Hello. I do agree with you that the unification of Ireland should be mentioned. Perhaps we should wait to see if other editors oppose this first.st170etalk15:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]Perwp:flags ('inappropriate use'), it it unnecessary to have flag cruft on this template. --John Maynard Friedman (talk)16:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This template applies to much more than just the referendum, but the whole process of Brexit. Should we putBrexit itself as the top heading, and have the referendum as one of the first subheadings itself? -Iveagh Gardens (talk)13:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Does anybody disagree with splitting the "Brexit process" block into two sub-blocks. At present, the block consists of
What I am proposing is that this be split (in the same way as "Aftermath of referendum") into
Anyone disagree? --John Maynard Friedman (talk)17:12, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong titlePotential effects should beImpact of Brexit— Precedingunsigned comment added by81.185.254.166 (talk)00:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TheTrade deal negotiation between the UK and EU topic is not addressed.At least one link should be available for such a thing, eventually in theImpact of Brexit section.— Precedingunsigned comment added by88.136.209.235 (talk)20:23, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have added2014 Clacton by-election and2014 Rochester and Strood by-election to the elections in the background section of the template as the UKIP wins undoubtedly showed UKIP continuing to gain strength and helped shape how Europe was discussed in the 2015 General election, including the issue of the referendum.Dunarc (talk)18:52, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have movedThe European Union: In or Out from the Campaign section to the background section. this debate betweenNick Clegg andNigel Farage took place in April 2014, more than two years before the referendum and a year before a referendum was all but guaranteed by the election of a conservative majority government with a referendum as a manifesto commitment. As such it can not be seen as part of the referendum campaign, but as an important background event (albeit one which did arguably do much to shape the campaign and the result which followed it).Dunarc (talk)20:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How is it relevant? --John Maynard Friedman (talk)`
I have added a section toSevington (Kent, M20 J10A) about the planned CCF and created a redirect to it:Sevington customs clearance facility and lorry park. Right now it is too trivial to merit including in this template but I thought it best to leave a note here as a place-holder. --John Maynard Friedman (talk)20:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
