Template talk:Atmospheric, Oceanographic and Climate Models
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Since the NAM is a specific instance of the WRF, does it actually belong underRegional and mesoscale models? It undoubtedly merits inclusion in the template, but labeling it as amodel itself is a bit of a misnomer.Model run would be a better descriptor, but I'm not sure how to fit that into the template.Jason Patton (talk)15:28, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The U.S. Navy is modeling high seas and offshore wind and waves. Seehttps://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/ww3_cgi/index.htmlI suggest this for inclusion in this template.—Precedingunsigned comment added byHalwyman (talk •contribs)18:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Biosphere model andIce-sheet model might need some clarification in regards to this template.prokaryotes (talk)10:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest to include frameworks such asESMF and protocols (interoperability projects) such asCMIP5.prokaryotes (talk)10:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Should wave models be included in this template? It feels odd to me that WAVEWATCH isn't listed in here, at the least. I'm particularly thinking with regard to the coupling of atmospheric, oceanic, and wave models.Tfocker4 (talk)15:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
