Rahman rose to prominence in the BNP during his mother's tenure as prime minister in the early 2000s.[7] After theAwami League's landslide victory in the2008 general election,[8] he went into self-imposed exile inLondon,UK, citing concerns for his safety and claiming that he was being persecuted by the authorities.[9][10] He was convicted by the courts during theSheikh Hasina government on multiple charges, including corruption, bribery, money laundering, illegal acquisition of wealth, andgrenade attacks.[11][12] A total of 84 cases were filed against him after 2007.[13] BNP claims that these are politically motivated false charges.[14][15] Later in 2024, following thefall of the Awami League government, the court acquitted him of all charges and quashed his sentence;[16][17] he subsequently returned to Bangladesh in late 2025.[18][19] The BNP won alandslide victory in the2026 general election, with Rahman being elected to theJatiya Sangsad for his first term; he is slated to become the country's prime minister after the finalization of the results.
He has drawn significant controversy in national politics, facing numerous of accusations of corruption, bribery, and money-laundering charges and being linked to several notable controversies, including the use ofHawa Bhaban as a parallel power centre.[c]
Rahman started his political career as a primary member of the upazila branch of the BNPGabtali,Bogura, in 1988.[37][38]
Rahman was active in BNP campaign activities during the1991 national election in constituencies where his mother, Khaleda Zia, was a candidate,[38] which took place during Bangladesh's transition from military rule to an elected government.
Following the BNP's victory in the 1991 national election, Rahman continued to be involved in party activities in Bogra. During the1996 national election, he did not contest any parliamentary seat and instead participated in campaign coordination activities for constituencies in which his mother, Khaleda Zia, was a candidate.[39]
Between 1996 and 2001, during the tenure of the Awami League government, Rahman was involved in opposition political activities. In the 2001 national election, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party won a two-thirds majority.[40]
During the BNP-led government (2001–2006), the2004 Dhaka grenade attack took place at a public rally of the Awami League. The attack targeted senior party leaders, including the then opposition leader, Sheikh Hasina, killing 24 people, among themIvy Rahman, and injuring several hundred others. Rahman was later convicted in connection with the case and sentenced to life imprisonment.[41][42] In 2024, an appellate court overturned the verdict and acquitted him, citing procedural irregularities in the earlier trial.[43]
Exile to United Kingdom (2008–2025)
Tarique giving speech in a BNP program, 2005.
Following the release of his mother, Khaleda, on 11 September 2008, he flew to London for medical treatment at Wellington Hospital, an independent private hospital inSt. John's Wood. The1/11 caretaker government, backed by the army, confirmed that he had given a written promise not to indulge in any future politics and was thus allowed to go abroad.[citation needed]
Senior Vice Chairman of the BNP
On 8 December 2009, Rahman was elected Senior Vice Chairman of the BNP at its5th National Council held in Dhaka.[44][45] A recorded speech by him was broadcast at the council, in which he referred to his arrest and treatment during detention under the military-backed caretaker government that assumed power in January 2007. In the speech, Rahman alleged that he had been subjected to torture and claimed that there had been a conspiracy to kill him under what he described as the guise of a judicial process. He also spoke about his physical condition, stating that he required additional time to complete medical treatment.[46]
BNP chairperson Khaleda Zia later stated that her son would re-enter active politics following his return from abroad after completing medical treatment. While addressing several public meetings during a visit to Bogra, she alleged that the then government was attempting to harass him in order to prevent his return to Bangladesh. Referring to his detention and subsequent medical condition, she said that multiple cases had been filed against him as part of what she described as broader conspiracies, and that doctors had indicated his recovery would take additional time.[47]
On 4 January 2014, in a video message posted on YouTube,[48] Rahman called for a boycott of thenational election scheduled for the following day.[49]
In 2015, Rahman registered a private firm, White and Blue Consultants Limited, described as a public relations and communications company, in the United Kingdom. Incorporation documents filed with Companies House initially listed his nationality as British; however, the records were amended in 2016 to state his nationality as Bangladeshi.[50] The initial listing was cited by several commentators and government officials, includingMd. Shahriar Alam, as evidence supporting claims that Rahman had acquired British citizenship.[51][52] Rahman denied the allegation and issued a legal notice to Shahriar Alam, seeking an apology for remarks alleging that he held British citizenship.[51]
Acting Chairman of the BNP
Tarique Rahman andMuhammad Yunus meeting in London, 2025.
In November 2018, Rahman conducted the interview process throughSkype for the nomination seekers of BNP at the2018 national election.[53][54]
On 13 June 2025, a private meeting was held between Rahman and thechief adviser of theinterim government,Muhammad Yunus, who was on a visit to the United Kingdom.[57][58] After the meeting, the representatives of both sides issued a joint statement.[59] The meeting was cited as a "turning point" by the BNP sources.[60][61]
Return to Bangladesh
On 25 December 2025, Rahman, along with his wifeZubaida Rahman and daughterZaima Rahman, returned to Bangladesh, ending his exile since 2008.[62][63][64] Five days later, Rahman's mother,Khaleda Zia, died after prolonged illness. Rahman will seek to representBogra-6 andDhaka-17 in theJatiya Sangsad.[65] On 9 January 2026, Rahman became the chairman of Bangladesh Nationalist Party.[66][67]
Rahman became the subject of a host of controversies during Zia's third term and the Awami League government ofSheikh Hasina.[70][71] Described as "politically motivated" attacks by the BNP, the courts in Dhaka have cleared him of all charges afterJuly Revolution.[72]
Khamba controversy
During the 2001–2006 tenure of theFour-Party Alliance government, Rahman was frequently accused by political opponents, primarily theAwami League, of involvement in large-scale corruption within the power sector.[73] The centerpiece of these allegations became known as the "Khamba" (electric pole) controversy. Critics alleged that, Rahman and his business associates utilized the "Hawa Bhaban" office to influence the awarding of government contracts for the procurement of thousands of electric poles at inflated prices.
Reports from the period claimed that many of these poles were installed in rural areas without being connected to a functioning electrical grid. Detractors cited these "empty poles" as a physical symbol of systemic graft and mismanagement. In a January 2026 article titled"Bangladesh's Prodigal Son,"Time magazine noted that Rahman continues to be referred to by the derogatory nickname "Khamba Tarique" by his critics. The article also referenced a 2008 U.S. Embassy cable, released via WikiLeaks, which characterized Rahman as a "symbol of kleptocratic government" in Bangladesh.[34]
Rahman has consistently denied these allegations, describing them as a "smear campaign" orchestrated by political rivals and state intelligence agencies to dismantle the leadership of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP).[74]
The allegations consist of Rahman and his associates allegedly accepting bribes from various businessmen and political rivals through Hawa Bhaban, the office of the chairman of the BNP and an alleged parallel power centre during Zia's tenure, laundering the money abroad.[75][76][77] Based on these allegations, theAnti-Corruption Commission of Bangladesh (ACC) began an investigation in 2007, and he was also investigated by the Federal Bureau Investigation (FBI) in theUnited States and the courts inSingapore. They later stated that evidence of money laundering was found against Rahman.[78][75][79][80]
In 2007, the Bangladeshi government launched an investigation against Rahman on charges of bribery and money laundering.[81][78][76][82][83] The investigation led to allegations that he laundered about $20 million abroad.[78][84] In 2010, a case was filed domestically based on the allegations.[85] On 20 March 2025, the court acquitted him in this case.[86][87]
"Tarique and Mamun had equal footing in the crime. So, legally there was no scope to differentiate."
BNP officials and leaders have claimed that this judgement is proof of his innocence, that he had no involvement with corruption, and that all the cases against Rahman were "politically motivated".[92]
On 21 July 2016, Rahman was found guilty by the Bangladesh High Court, overturning a lower court verdict that acquitted him earlier. He was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment and fined Tk 20 crore by the Court.[93][94][95] In its observation of the verdict, the High Court commented:[96]
"Corruption practices and political influence are enabling individuals or groups to commit financial crimes like money laundering. It is time to stop such crimes under the political umbrella for the welfare and development of the country."
Mamun's wider business dealings, closely associated with Rahman's political influence, led to further legal scrutiny. For example, in 2022, the ACC filed a graft case against Mamun's company, One Spinning Mills Limited, and its directors, for alleged loan embezzlement fromSonali Bank.[97]
On 5 December 2024, Rahman and Mamun were acquitted by the high court of Bangladesh.[98][99]
Illegal wealth acquisition
TheACC filed a case against Rahman, his wife Zubaida, and Zubaida's mother, Syeda Iqbal Banu, in 2007 during the military-backed caretaker government on allegations that Rahman and his wife had illegal assets worth more than 48 million taka beyond their declared income.[100]
On 31 March 2009, the investigating officer filed a chargesheet against the three in court. However, the trial against Zubaida's mother was later dismissed. The court recorded the statements of 42 witnesses for the prosecution, including the complainant in the case.[101][102]
A Dhaka court sentenced Rahman to nine years in prison and a fine of Tk 30 million, and his wife, Zubaida, to three years in prison and a fine of Tk 3.5 million.[103] At the same time, the court ordered the confiscation of Rahman's illegal assets worth about Tk 3.5 million in favor of the state.[104]
In October 2024, the interim government ofMuhammad Yunus suspended the sentence of Rahman's wife for one year in a case filed on charges of acquiring wealth outside known sources of income, on the condition of surrender and appeal. On 28 May 2025, Rahman and his wife were acquitted of all charges after being found innocent in the case.[105]
The Zia Charitable Trust corruption case contains allegations filed against Rahman and his mother, among others.[106] The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) filed the case in 2008.[107] It was alleged that a foreign grant of about Tk 2.1 crore was given to the Zia Orphanage Trust in 2004, but it was used for personal purposes instead of being spent on the trust's work.[106][108] This led to allegations of misuse of state resources.
The case named Rahman and his mother, former prime minister Khaleda Zia, accusing them of personally embezzling foreign grant money.[109] Although Zia was directly accused in the case, Rahman's name was discussed in the case due to the political situation at the time and his political position.[110]
The trial of the case began in 2011. Following the investigation and judicial proceedings, on 8 February 2018, a special court in Dhaka sentenced Zia to 5 years in prison and Rahman and the other accused to 10 years in prison.[111][112] The High Court later doubled Zia's jail term in that case.[113][114] Since Rahman was in self-imposed exile in theUnited Kingdom, he did not appear in court, and the verdict was delivered in his absence. The verdict caused a large impact on domestic politics in Bangladesh. Zia appealed to the High Court to suspend her sentence and was released on bail for some time.[115] Rahman, however, was issued an international arrest warrant.[116][117] The BNP and its supporters have claimed that the case is politically motivated, while the Awami League has called it an important legal step.[118][119] The verdict in the case has been the subject of disagreement among various political analysts and legal experts.
On 15 January 2025, Zia and Rahman, along with all the accused, were acquitted in the case.[120][121]
On 21 August 2004, a grenade attack on an Awami League rally in Dhaka killed 24 people and injured about 300, including then-opposition leader Sheikh Hasina.[122][123][124] On 22 August, Motijheel Police Station Sub-Inspector (SI) Faruk Ahmed filed a case as the plaintiff.[125] Rahman was initially not named as an accused in the case. The Awami League condemned the BNP government's handling of the investigation.[126][127][128] The BNP denies any link to the attack.[129][130]
When the reinvestigation of the case began during the caretaker government in 2007, the names of Mufti Abdul Hannan, leader of the banned organization Harkatul Jihad, and Abdus Salam Pintu, deputy minister of the then BNP government, came up.
When the Awami League came to power in 2009, a further investigation was carried out.[131] The investigation revealed the names of Rahman and other high-ranking BNP leaders. In 2011, Rahman was named as the alleged main conspirator in the supplementary charge sheet and was formally charged in the case. He was accused of being the mastermind of the attack by Awami League General SecretaryObaidul Quader; however, the accusation was denied by BNP Secretary GeneralMirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir.[132]
The trial officially began in 2012. After a long hearing, the Dhaka Speedy Trial Tribunal announced its verdict in the 21 August grenade attack case on 10 October 2018.[125] The court identified Rahman as the main conspirator of the attack and sentenced him tolife imprisonment in the verdict for the case.[11][133] However, the verdict was given in his absence as he was abroad. He was shown as a 'fugitive' in the charge sheet. In observing the verdict in this case, the court said:[134][135]
This attack, with the help of the state apparatus, was an attempt to make the Awami League leaderless.
On 22 November 2024, the High Court concluded a hearing on the appeals and death references of the grenade attack cases.[136][137] On 1 December 2024, Rahman,Lutfozzaman Babar, and 47 others were acquitted by the court.[138][139][140] The High Court has recommended that the Home Ministry take the necessary measures to conduct a new investigation into the 21 August grenade attack case through appropriate and expert agencies to ensure justice.[141]
The 10-truck arms case began on 28 April 2004, when a large quantity of arms and ammunition was seized in 10 trucks in Chittagong.[142][143][144] Rahman was accused of being involved in the arms, and it was claimed that the arms were collected for use in gunfights during the BNP government.[145][146] It was alleged that the arms were intended to be smuggled to banned armed groups in India. Rahman and other BNP leaders were investigated for their involvement in the case.[147] It was alleged that Tarique Rahman was involved in the arms smuggling scheme.[148][147][149] The BNP later filed a complaint, considering the case to be politically motivated.[150][151] They claimed that the case was part of a political vendetta and Rahman was deliberately targeted.[150][152] On the other hand, the Awami League government presented the case as a strong step against political crimes.
On 18 December 2024, the High Court acquitted four people in the case, including former State Minister for Home Affairs Lutfuzzaman Babar and former Director General of NSI, retired Major General Rezzakul Haider Chowdhury.[153]
Sedition and other cases
In 2014, Rahman made a speech aboutSheikh Mujibur Rahman at an event in London during a discussion organized by the BNP. He referred to Mujib as a "Razakar"[154][155][156] and "Pakbandhu" (friend of Pakistan), among other words.[157][158][154][159] Following the speech, he is termed as "insolent" and "stupid" by his political rivals,[160][161][162][163] and multiple legal notices[164] and sedition cases were filed throughout the country.[165][166][167]
On 22 January 2014, the Awami League's Jessore district unit's then-organizing secretary, filed a lawsuit, claiming that Rahman had committed sedition by making the comments about Mujib.[168] On 4 April 2017, the police handed in the charge sheet to the court. The court subsequently issued an arrest warrant in the case against Rahman.[168] On 10 March 2025, the District and Sessions Judge's Court Jessore acquitted Rahman and dismissed a sedition case filed in 2014.[168] In addiiton, on 28 February 2015, President of the Subornachar Upazila Awami League, filed a case against Rahman at the Noakhali Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court.[169] On 4 April 2017, the police filed the charge sheet to the court. The court subsequently issued an arrest warrant for Rahman in the matter. On 21 August 2024, the Noakhali Additional District and Sessions Judge Court acquitted him of sedition charges laid on 4 April 2017.[169][170]
In another controversy, on 5 January 2015, Rahman delivered a live statement on theEkushey TV channel.[171] Tejgaon Police Station filed a case claiming that Rahman, in collusion with others, was allegedly involved in publishing false and fabricated information, posing a threat to the sovereignty of the country, and "spreading hatred" against the government.[172][173] On 6 September 2017, police handed in a chargesheet against them.[174] On 31 October 2024, The High Court scrapped the case.[172][175]
^Halder, Chaitanya Chandra; Laskar, Rizanuzzaman (17 November 2011)."Tarique laundered money".The Daily Star.Archived from the original on 26 August 2024. Retrieved6 August 2025.
^Meri, Josef (Yousef) (2008). "Book Publishing in Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies: Technological Academic Solutions for Scholars and Academic Publishers".Review of Middle East Studies.42 (1–2):97–107.doi:10.1017/s0026318400051579.ISSN2151-3481.
^Halder, Chaitanya Chandra; Bin Habib, Wasim; Adhikary, Tuhin Shubhra (18 November 2013)."Tarique acquitted".The Daily Star.Archived from the original on 26 July 2016. Retrieved15 August 2025.
^প্রতিবেদক, নিজস্ব (22 July 2016)."তারেকের সাত বছর জেল".Prothomalo (in Bengali).Archived from the original on 16 September 2024. Retrieved15 August 2025.
^abLiton, Shakhawat; Halder, Chaitanya Chandra; Habib, Wasim Bin; Adhikary, Tuhin Shubhra (11 October 2018)."'State-backed crime' punished".The Daily Star.Archived from the original on 12 October 2018. Retrieved15 August 2025.
^Manik, Julfikar Ali; Halder, Chaitanya Chandra (19 March 2012)."Tarique, Babar indicted".The Daily Star.Archived from the original on 30 June 2019. Retrieved15 August 2025.
_(cropped).jpg)
.jpg)
Media from Commons
Quotations from Wikiquote
Data from Wikidata
