This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theUnited Air Lines Flight 553 article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL

Archives:1Auto-archiving period:12 months

This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

IllinoisMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofIllinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale. Disaster managementMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofDisaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale. Aviation:Accidents This article is within the scope of theAviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists ofopen tasks andtask forces. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation:criterion not met Coverage and accuracy:criterion met Structure:criterion met Grammar and style:criterion not met Supporting materials:criterion not met This article is supported bythe Aviation accident project. ChicagoMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related toChicago or theChicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theOn this day section onDecember 8, 2019.

I propose deleting the unsourced statement that "some claim" the FBI destroyed evidence in the crash. There is no source for this phrase, and I would also say that this page adequately addresses the fact that there are conspiracy theorists who believe this crash was caused by the U.S. government. At the same time, the page sources and adequately covers the fact that the crash was extensively investigated, and links to the findings of that investigation.

I would also join those who would oppose cluttering up this article with unsourced conspiracy theory statements, or those sourced to websites that are of questionable verifiability. Let's keep this page, like all of WP, appropriately encyclopedic.NYDCSP15:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The unsupportable comments about conspiracies should be eliminated.EditorASC09:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The US federal government is behind everything .2601:192:100:3DD0:B4CC:2A54:99F5:BE87 (talk)09:46, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe there's areliable source provided to conclusivley state that "the official cause reported by the NTSB abovecannot be regarded as credible", as changed from "the official cause reported by the NTSB aboveare not regarded as credibleby some parties", perthis edit (which I also believe is anon-neutral point of view). Hence,my revision, perWP:BRD.JoeSperrazza (talk)23:29, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was in two minds as to whether to include references to the Oglesby book. On balance I decided to do so, despite the following concerns:

• He questions "why flight 553 was reassigned to runway 31L, which is shorter [than runway 13R] and lacks a glidescope".
  • In fact 31L and 13R are exactly the same length because they are the same runway, just used in opposite directions. This shows a less-than-rigorous attitude to fact-checking.
  • Both runways 31L and 13R had glideslopes. A very simple fact to check from available publications such as Jeppeson.
• He misinterprets the Ruckelhaus letter "Approximately 50 FBI agents responded to the crash scene, the first ones arriving within 45 minutes of the crash" as "50 FBI agents arrived at the scene within an hour". A careful reading of the source can only justify the conclusion that at least two agents arrived within 45 minutes and 50 in total attended within 20 hours.
• He describes Skolnick as having been confined to a wheelchair from birth. In fact his disability came about after he suffered polio at age 6. Obviously this is unimportant to the accident, but it further undermines his "reputation for fact checking" perWP:RS, especially considering the two were once colleagues.
• Most disappointing of all, is the lack of a clear description of the sabotage theory (who/why/how).

82.1.57.194 (talk)18:46, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Oglesby seems to have checked the facts, because he is right in both cases.

1. The official (declared) landing distance available (LDA) of RWY 31L was shorter than the LDA of RWY 13R.
2. RWY 31L did lack a glideslope indeed. This is why the flight had to perform this non-precision/localizer approach to RWY 31L in the first place. (The absence of the glideslope signal was acknowledged by two crew members during the approach.)

--195.246.100.57 (talk)19:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onUnited Airlines Flight 553. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20090617092346/http://bjo.bmj.com:80/cgi/issue_pdf/admin_pdf/57/4.pdf tohttp://bjo.bmj.com/cgi/issue_pdf/admin_pdf/57/4.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}23:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
• Mid-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
• Start-Class Disaster management articles
• Mid-importance Disaster management articles
• Start-Class aviation articles
• Start-Class Aviation accident articles
• Aviation accident task force articles
• WikiProject Aviation articles
• Start-Class Chicago articles
• Mid-importance Chicago articles
• WikiProject Chicago articles
• Selected anniversaries (December 2019)

• Aviation articles needing attention to referencing and citation
• Aviation articles needing attention to grammar
• Aviation articles needing attention to supporting materials
• Selected anniversaries articles