Talk:Systemically important financial institution
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theSystemically important financial institution article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How can I edit the title as it should be Systemically Important not Systematically Important?
I have merged the article withGlobal systemically important banks, by hand. Sorry for the crudeness of the method but I thought it quicker, all the more that both articles had a short history and had largely the same content.I also removed thenotability tag : a concept that features proeminently in international macroprudential regulation (Basel III framework) is notableper se as soon as it is the basis of major capital requirements that will soon be enacted.Bokken |木刀09:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this was already merged, could somebody delete the specific article on Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs), coz it is super redundant. I already updated the corresponding part on Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) here. Alternatively, we shall just say in this article that there are 3 types of systemically important financial institutions and put the context in those separate articles... this way is a mess. --Wikijasmin (talk)13:56, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Surprised that this phrase doesn't occur anywhere in the article. It's how the general public is familiar with this concept...AnonMoos (talk)07:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
