This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Higher education This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofhigher education,universities, andcolleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join thediscussion, and see the project'sarticle guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education ScienceLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofScience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Is this just a concept or is there an actual team, or what? The lead needs to clarify what this is. The article's too long to try to figure out what the team is, and the references and External links don't help. The "Further reading section is a confusing, too long to be helpful. There's really not enough reference sources to explain.Star767 (talk)02:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional inline references and external sources have been added to the article (including the National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Science of Team Science web site, established in early 2013), to help clarify and document the content of the article and the SciTS field more generally.Hetz3486—Precedingundated comment added07:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not appear to be about something that's sufficiently specific and noteworthy to demand encyclopedic inclusion. As is, this may merit removal, or a complete rewrite. The bulk of the "Science of Team Science" work seems to have been a set of minor conferences between 2013 and 2015:https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/the-science-of-team-science

I have added the "Notability" tag and would suggest considering this article for deletion.JohnLoeber (talk)21:37, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is ongoing reference to the topic of SciTS though I agree that it appears to have been more popular in the past. IMO SciTS would likely be used as reference in grant proposal applications to speak to using best practices based on SciTS.

It might be useful to include a list specific topic areas of SciTS like leadership, conflict resolution, etc. along with study results… but I’m not sure I want to take that on at my current experience level with editing. Haha

Will watch page and collaborate if someone is interested in developing this topic more.Taymodnz (talk)13:45, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class Higher education articles
• WikiProject Higher education articles
• Start-Class science articles
• Low-importance science articles
• Science articles needing attention