Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Providence Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theProvidence Park article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCollege footballLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcollege football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBaseballLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofbaseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconOregonHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofOregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
The currentcollaborations of the month areWomen's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed atOregon Women of Achievement (modern) orWomen of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).
WikiProject iconSports:Facilities
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byFacilities and venues task force.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconFootball:American & CanadianLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofAssociation football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed asLow-importance).
WikiProject iconEvent Venues (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues
WikiProject iconWomen's sport:WOSOicon
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
???This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe Women's football / soccer task force.
Note icon
This article has beenautomatically rated by abot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the|auto= parameter.

Fair use rationale for Image:Pge park logo2.gif

[edit]

Image:Pge park logo2.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk)20:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Years and Names

[edit]

I am inferring: Multnomah Stadium 1926-unkn, Civic Stadium unkn-unkn, and PGE Park 2001-present. Please clarify.Pasadena91 (talk)20:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move.Vegaswikian (talk)01:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeld-Wen FieldJELD-WEN FieldJELD-WEN Field — JELD-WEN is an acronym and the stadium is known as JELD-WEN Field. According to the Portland Timbers, "All references to the Timbers' home stadium now should be JELD-WEN Field." (http://www.portlandtimbers.com/news/2011/03/timbers-jeld-wen-announce-exclusive-naming-rights-partnership-jeld-wen-field).Seenorimagined (talk)03:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think this should be taken up at theJeld-Wen article first? If the company's main article isn't capitalized that way then this stadium's article surely shouldn't be.DemonJuice (talk)03:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I requested for it to be changed as well. I realized I jumped the gun by changing this article text first though.Seenorimagined (talk)03:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, Wikipedia'snaming standards prescribe common usage, not proclamations from the company.At a glance, nobody is using JELD-WEN, it appears most are using Jeld-Wen, and some are using the unhyphenated Jeld Wen.tedder (talk)04:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This sounds like theLego situation. What is this Jeld-Wen an acronym of? OK, here it is:[1]Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots04:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Thecompany talk page move request says "Jeanette Coughlin thought of the name JELD-WEN, an acronym for the names of Dick's [JELD-WEN's founder's] immediate family, and a shortened version of Wendt [his last name]". I guess that was better than Dick-Jean.tedder (talk)05:24, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia does not like acronyms. A few random examples, besidesLego, includeAmoco,Citgo andPetco. I have to say I don't agree with it, but that's the consensus. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots05:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, probably comes from the technical issues with capitalization. In any case, this one is clear because of common usage.tedder (talk)05:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Huh?

[edit]

"bringing top capacity to about 22,000, but with only 17,000 available for use on a regular basis."This line, under the heading 2011 Renovation, makes no sense! Will its capacity be 22,000 after the construction is finished? Does it increase to 22,000 if you pull out your spare bleachers?—Precedingunsigned comment added by72.102.190.183 (talk)17:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image editing

[edit]

So just wanted to let everyone know, it appears we're having a problem with images being added and removed without really following the policy or MOS- i've been seeing semi-repetitive additions, along with several that have no encyclopedic value, and a couple with formatting errors. We need images that illustrate the stadium, and to paraphrase the MOS, add informational value to the page... these numerous close cropped shots of individuals or small groups, that keep getting forced in, really don't work towards that goal, especially when we have so many better options72.35.149.153 (talk)

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onProvidence Park. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online03:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onProvidence Park. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online06:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left atTalk:Providence Park/CommentsTalk:Providence Park/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Followingseveral discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is very close to B-Class for the college football wikiproject. According to the assessment page,here, it needs more references and external links to move up a class, and as such could be close to Good Article status.Phydend (talk)19:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 05:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

World Football League

[edit]

Article should mentionPortland Storm/Portland Thunder of theWorld Football League in my opinion since they played at the venue in 1974 and 1975.2600:1004:B146:B248:FCF7:B658:E72:8635 (talk)02:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onProvidence Park. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)13:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)21:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)22:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source

[edit]

---Another Believer(Talk)22:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update

[edit]

---Another Believer(Talk)00:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Providence_Park&oldid=1313044022"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp