Talk:Philadelphi Corridor
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of yourcommon.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;} Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related totheArab–Israeli conflict, which issubject to theextended-confirmed restriction. You are not anextended-confirmed user, soyou must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make anedit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates totheArab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
This page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
 | On 14 January 2024, it was proposed that this article bemoved fromPhiladelphi Route toPhiladelphi Corridor. The result ofthe discussion wasmoved. |
Using the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs as a source smh2A00:23C5:1203:CE01:1D6B:213E:5411:3C38 (talk)14:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How wide is it?— Precedingunsigned comment added by81.101.0.145 (talk)11:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since this article presents only the offical explanation-for-idiots as to why hundreds ofhouses have been demolished, it is factually incorrect and propagandistic. Thereforethe notice stays.Zero
It looks like the edits from66.30.24.91 are from aHuman Rights Watch web page, I'm reverting them because it is a copyright violation.Edward 11:22, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Every rational thinking, intelligent human recognizes that HRW is a blatantly anti-Israel, extreme leftist biased organization. This page is garbage. spnst3
HRW wouldn't be "anti-Israel" if Israel didn't constantly commit human rights violations. HRW used to be "anti-South Africa", too. And since when does opposing apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and military violence targeting civilians make one an extreme leftist?108.199.241.18 (talk)—Precedingundated comment added15:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 | It is requested that amap ormaps beincluded in this article toimprove its quality. Wikipedians from or interested in Egypt, Israel or the Middle East may be able to help! |
Lacking a map, an expanded identification of the location would be helpful. Is the strip on the Gaza or the Egyptian side, or both? How wide is the strip?...Rolin—Precedingunsigned comment added by67.163.182.214 (talk)14:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.Imagine Reason (talk)04:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The lead currently states "Under the Oslo Accords, the portion in the Gaza Strip remained under direct Israeli military control". Why is this relevent for the lead? It creates the impression that Israel still controls the corridor. Or, if it is relevant, we should also note IN THE LEAD that control was handed over to Egypt in 2005. --Omrim (talk)19:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article has provided an incorrect description of the establishment of the corridor sincethis edit in 2010 byUser:Chesdovi. The corridor, and the name Philadelphi Route, did not exist until 2004. The sourceTreaty-Making Power: Approval the Israel-Egypt Philadelphia Accord by the Knesset was being cited incorrectly.
I will fix this now.Onceinawhile (talk)10:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was:moved. Moved, as an uncontested technical request. Any objection within a reasonable time frame should result in the move being reverted.(closed by non-admin page mover)BilledMammal (talk)17:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Philadelphi Route →Philadelphi Corridor – Although Philadelphi Route is the official codename from the original 2004 document; Corridor seems to be the most COMMONNAME name today.Onceinawhile (talk)15:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no source to say that "none of the promises were kept", just a link to the accord itself, so either remove or give source (and maybe reason that may explain the "promise not kept"? I'm sure there's one)
From doc ref 10:"The target datefor opening, 25 November 2005, was met and thecrossing opened on all but one day until the 25June 2006. During the first six months of 2006the crossing was opening nine and a half hours aday with an average of 650 people crossing dailyeach way; almost double the average during the sixmonths prior to the AMA (360 people a day)"
Looks like promise (partially?) kept to me....
193.56.244.99 (talk)11:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Numerous sources state that the Philadelphia Corridor is 14km long, this isn't true, measuring on google maps it's 12.7km. Some sources state 13 km such as here:https://m.jpost.com/israel-news/article-782315https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/egypt-rejects-israeli-proposal-for-increased-oversight-on-boGaza War Unit Tracking (talk)08:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Numerous sources state that the Philadelphia Corridor is 14km long.Selfstudier (talk)11:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While the name was originally a randomly selected code name by the IDF, it has since passed into standard use by reputable sources and is the only name used for the area in English. (In arabic, its also called "The Salah al-Din Axis" according to Arabic wikipedia, but I'm not sure how reliable that really is).Sources for it being used as a regular name:
I recommend that we change the first paragraph to say that its just called the Philadelphi corridor, and later point out that the source of the name is a randomly chosen IDF code word.TimeEngineer (talk)13:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | It isrequested that an edit be made to theextended-confirmed-protected article atPhiladelphi Corridor.(edit ·history ·last ·links ·protection log) This template must be followed by acomplete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please changeX" isnot acceptable and will be rejected; the requestmust be of the form "please changeX toY". The edit may be made by anyextended confirmed user. Remember to change the |
Description of suggested change:
The sentence describing "illegal materials" being moved across the border clarifies in brackets "(including weapons and ammunition)." These materials are almost always illegal at border crossings, so the clarification makes it seem as if the illegal materials it is referencing are comparable to any other border crossing.
However, what distinguishes this corridor is that dual use material is also banned
→https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-use_technology
I believe the reader would get a better understanding of this corridor if it was highlighted that these less common materials are under the umbrella of "illegal materials", rather than focusing on commonly illegal materials like guns or drugs. These other materials include cement, fertilizer, pumps and heavy machinery.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-jul-06-la-fg-israel-gaza-20100706-story.html
https://features.gisha.org/red-lines-gray-lists
Diff:
| − | One purpose of the Philadelphi Route was to prevent the [[border control|movement of illegal materials]] (including | + | One purpose of the Philadelphi Route was to prevent the [[border control|movement of illegal materials]] (including[[Dual-usetechnology|dual-usematerials]]likecement,fertilizerandheavymachinery) and people between Egypt and the Gaza Strip. |
