This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofFashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Not absolutely! They are calledpajamas if they are designed for sleeping. These "onesies" which have become so popular are rather being used as loungewear or for jogging or short walks. But thin one-piece suits for babies and toddlers also called onesies. Hasn't the term "adult onesie" been taken over from the term n the meaning of infant bodysuit? --Jacek79 (talk)19:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible that the termonesie has been being used for a couple of years for anti-advertising (and sometimes for advertising) these loose-fit hooded loungewear jumpsuits ("adult onesie")? Of course, an infant onesie is something slightly different. --Jacek79 (talk)20:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What's really interesting is these aren't actually onesies at all. These are bunny suits (minus the hood). A onesie has no legs. But, given how intellectually decrepit this whole cultural thing is, it's not inconsistent that it would associate itself with the wrong word entirely.68.2.235.85 (talk)18:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "supported"? Do you mean that they like them? Wear them? Are paid advertisers? This information is not in the references provided. Please find a reliable source. —Anne Delong (talk)22:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They are supporting the body. They are construed that way, holding up parts which are hanging down. However I have no source to prove this so perhaps there's no reason to write about it in here.90.141.227.3 (talk)14:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is this article name really good? What's nation specific about the garment? Shouldn't it preferably be called 'adult onsie' or something like that?Cecil Huber (talk)23:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Onesie (UK) →Onesie – I don't understand why the word should have a national designation to it. Is it a national uniform? I don't think so. If the unchanged wordonesie for some reason shouldn't be used, use another distinguishing word instead, like "adult" or "adult size".Cecil Huber (talk)07:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: IMO, this should NOT be treated as an uncontroversial technical move. It was the OP who changed theOnesie redirect fromInfant bodysuit toOnesie (UK) just a few days before posting this RM discussion.[2] Thus, this discussion should also include if there is consensus to change the primary topic of "onesie", which dates back to at least 2009.[3]Zzyzx11 (talk)00:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The former status quo was not very good, since the garment in this article is what is called a onesie nowadays. The tradmark for infant's bodysuits is not onesie but Onesies. Either way, do you really think "UK" is a good way to sort this suit out from the what the trademark may stand for?Cecil Huber (talk)22:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong opposeinfant bodysuit is the proper destination. The garment in this article isnot what is called a onesie nowadays. Prove that this "onesie" is what is meant in Australia, South Africa and the United States. --65.94.76.126 (talk)00:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, I can live with that solution. What do you think should happen to the headline "onesie", should that become a disambiguation page?Cecil Huber (talk)16:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, when I first read this, I thought this article was going to go toInfant bodysuit, which is not the common name here in the US, but Onesie is. If the term is used differently in the UK, there should be a disambig page with links to both articles.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk)20:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of arequested split.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The "Onesies" brand should be in a separate articleOnesies (brand), since it is not about these adult babysuits, it is about the infant babysuit brand. So, it shouldn't be in this article at all, since it is a different topic. --65.94.76.126 (talk)00:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested split.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Probably because there is no article about this kind of suit on the French Wikipedia. If you know French well enough, I think you would be welcome to create one.Cecil Huber (talk)22:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Some person or perhaps more than one who are not logged in, keeps removing sourced information from this page without explanation. The information is about the origin of these kinds of suits, so its relevant to have it here. If you think it should be removed, please explain why.
Also, someone added information about some other origin of the suit in January this year. That information gave no name and had no source, so it had to go. If you have any reference to back the claim up, add it, or it will not have its place in this article.Cecil Huber (talk)22:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The impact was so hard, a german noname columnist wrote a comment in a very special niche of a niche in an online newspaper... Seriously, there was no such thing as an impact and nobody cared, cares or even knows about "onesies" in Germany except for fetish creeps and party gags --95.91.238.67 (talk)23:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
