Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Hewlett-Packard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theHewlett-Packard article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1,2,3
This level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCompaniesTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcompanies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconOregonMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofOregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
The currentcollaborations of the month areWomen's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed atOregon Women of Achievement (modern) orWomen of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).
WikiProject iconCalifornia:San Francisco Bay AreaMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bySan Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed asHigh-importance).
WikiProject iconComputing:SoftwareHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomputers,computing, andinformation technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Software (assessed asHigh-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byComputer hardware task force (assessed asHigh-importance).
WikiProject iconTechnology
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oftechnology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Discussion atTalk:HP Inc. § Requested move 13 May 2024

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion atTalk:HP Inc. § Requested move 13 May 2024.InfiniteNexus (talk)19:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo years incorrect

[edit]

Logopedia has the correct years of the logos:

1954-1964 -> 1954-1960

1964-1981 -> 1964-19792601:190:400:4A10:2D3B:5C8D:E9D8:6B9 (talk)01:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is HP still technically Hewlett-Packard? (Not to be confused with Hewlett-Packard Enterprise)

[edit]

Good evening.

I am aware Hewlett-Packard split into two standalone companies; Hewlett-Packard Enterprise which focuses on servers and business solutions and HP Inc which focuses on laptops and printers.

The point of this question is HP Inc still technicallyHewlett-Packard as their products carry the original HP logo and their printers still use the cartridges with the nozzles embedded into them like their old 1990s inkjet printers? Like my old 2015 inkjet printer that carried theHewlett-Packard[sic] labelling on it, even though my 2022 replacement printer that uses the same ink cartridges except the machine itself just has the HP logo (no mention of 'Hewlett-Packard' on it?

Can someone please enlighten me on this? Thanks.The Frogman740 (talk)19:13, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's HP Inc. is the legal successor to Hewlett-Packard.
If you want to say what "is" Hewlett-Packard now, the best answer is probably "Agilent andKeysight andHewlett Packard Enterprise andHP Inc." - listing Agilent and Keysight first, as that's where their original instrumentation business is, and HP Inc. last, as the "PC and printers/scanners" business was a business they entered after the instrumentation business and the minicomputer/enterprise computing business. Given that HP Inc. apparently has the calculator business, maybe it could be moved earlier in the list, although it's probably only a small part of the business.
That answer could also be interpreted as "nothing", i.e. there isno one company that encompasses all the businesses that Hewlett-Packard has been in.Guy Harris (talk)22:06, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reopening merge proposal

[edit]

Can we look at reopening the merge proposal ofHP Inc. where the content of that article is merged into Hewlett-Packard and then moved to HP Inc. in order to preserve long history etc? We have had multiple merge proposal and comments from users in support and opposing, but no consensus was reached, but wondering if we can reopen this? I found anarticle on Reuters that says "Hewlett-Packard, which will be renamed HP and comprise the computers and printers business, will continue to trade under its current ticker symbol." PingingBrandonXLF andChiffonr,Steven (Editor) (talk)21:39, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By "long history" do you mean "edit history" or "corporate history"? If the latter, maybe mergeAgilent andKeysight andHewlett Packard Enterprise back in while you're at it; there really isn't any company that "is" Hewlett-Packard any more.Guy Harris (talk)22:08, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The three-way split is correct. The late, lamented Hewlett-Packard should not have its incredible history folded into any subsequent company page. Hewlett-Packard died somewhere between the Agilent spinoff of 1999, the suicidal Compaq merge of 2002, and the final death throes split in 2015. HP Inc can't hold a candle to the old company. It does not deserve stewardship of the old history.Binksternet (talk)23:37, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree I agree with the merger.HP Inc. is simply the new name assumed byHewlett-Packard Company after the split of the enterprise branch intoHewlett-Packard Enterprise Company.[1][2][3]Paranoid25 (talk)20:16, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. Agilent, HP Inc. and HPE are all named as successors to HP in a lawsuit by Stanford.[1] Agilent has been described by others as the successor to HP.[2]"Indeed, some observers noted with past splits that some of the better parts of HP’s DNA have traveled with the test group. Parent company HP continues to struggle..." Ex-HP engineer Bob Steward wrote,"So I felt a great sadness at losing that association when we were spun off as Agilent. The new Agilent CEO, Ned Barnholt, tried to recreate that company culture and that old instrumentation spirit. At the time we felt that we were getting the best part of the HP products, and certainly the best culture because we could see the culture already being sacrificed at HP for the sake of the IBM-like computer business and the consumer marketplace of PCs and printers. We were the ones holding on to the values..." Ex-HP engineer Roy Verley wrote about HP spinning off Agilent, saying"The larger piece, essentially the computer business, would retain the HP name while the smaller piece, the original test and measurement business, would be spun off and renamed. For many long-time HP employees, this seemed backward. T&M was HP’s original business, the one most closely associated with the founders and the one most likely to carry on HP’s core values." This "backward" sentiment is expressed by many other authors.Binksternet (talk)20:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter how others describe it, what matters is how it actually is, as reported by official company sources and government websites.Paranoid25 (talk)12:58, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Haha! Nice one. This is an encyclopedia based onWP:SECONDARY sources. Your suggested sources are primary, which are interesting to the narrative but not defining to the topic.Binksternet (talk)17:09, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but in any case you cited sources that speak ofpeople's opinions, not facts. And in any case the government sources are secondary.Paranoid25 (talk)17:57, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Notsure. See my comment in§ Is HP still technically Hewlett-Packard? (Not to be confused with Hewlett-Packard Enterprise). HP Inc. is thelegal successor to Hewlett-Packard, but it contains none of the businesses that HP entered between 1939 and the early 1980s - those were spun off as other companies such asAgilent andHewlett Packard Enterprise.Guy Harris (talk)11:50, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^"HP Board of Directors Approves Separation".investor.hp.com. Retrieved2026-02-01.
  2. ^"HP Inc. Reports Hewlett-Packard Company Fiscal 2015 Full-Year and Fourth Quarter Results".investor.hp.com. Retrieved2026-02-01.
  3. ^"Document".www.sec.gov. Retrieved2026-02-01.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hewlett-Packard&oldid=1338482843"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp