This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(April 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A number of cases were tried before theSupreme Court of the United States during the period of theAmerican Civil War. These cases focused on wartime civil liberties, and the ability of the various branches of the government to alter them. The following cases were among the most significant.

• Ex parte Bollman (1807) was an early case that made many important arguments about the power of the Supreme Court, as well as the constitutional definition of treason.
• Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) Dred Scott, a slave owned by a Dr. Emerson, was taken from Missouri to a free state and then back to Missouri again. Scott sued, claiming that his residence in a free territory granted him freedom. In a 7–2 vote, the Supreme Court decided that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories, making the already repealedMissouri Compromise of 1820 unconstitutional. Furthermore, the Court went on to state that blacks were not citizens of the United States and could not become citizens and therefore they could not sue in a court.

• Ex parte Merryman (1861) was actually not a Supreme Court case, although it was heard by then-Chief JusticeRoger Taney (seecircuit riding). Taney protested Lincoln's secret notice granting military personnel the power to suspend the writ ofhabeas corpus. This case is an example of aU.S. President ignoring a court's ruling on the grounds of necessity.
• InEx parte Vallandigham (1863), a former congressman was tried before amilitary tribunal by GeneralAmbrose Burnside for treason after he delivered an incendiary speech atMount Vernon. Awrit of certiorari brought the case to the Supreme Court under Chief JusticeRoger Taney. The court avoided disagreement with the President or military by arguing that since the extra-legal tribunals were, unsurprisingly, not listed in any documents enumerating courts over which the Supreme Court had authority, Vallandigham had no grounds for appeal.Ex parte Metzger was used as precedent.

• InEx parte Milligan (1866), the Supreme Court led by Chase ruled that, so long as local civilian courts are open, citizens may not be tried by military tribunals. It further observed that, during the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, citizens may only beheld without charges, nottried, and certainly may not be executed by military tribunals.
• InTexas v. White (1869), the Court held in a 5–3 decision thatTexas had remained a state of theUnited States ever since it first joined the Union, despite its joining theConfederate States of America and its being under military rule at the time of the decision in the case. It further held that theConstitution did not permitstates tosecede from the United States, and that the ordinances of secession, and all the acts of the legislatures within seceding states intended to give effect to such ordinances, were "absolutely null." However, this decision did allow some possibility of divisibility "through revolution, or through consent of the States."^[1][2]

• Brian McGinty,Lincoln and the Court (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008)ISBN 978-0674026551
• Mark E. Neely Jr.,Lincoln and the Triumph of the Nation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011)ISBN 0807835188
• Michael A. Ross,Justice of Shattered Dreams: Samuel Freeman Miller and the Supreme Court During the Civil War Era (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2003)ISBN 0807129240
• Jonathan W. WhiteAbraham Lincoln and Treason in the Civil War: The Trials of John Merryman (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2011)ISBN 0807143464

• Political repression in the United States
• United States government oversight of the American Civil War
• Lists of United States Supreme Court cases
• Washington, D.C., in the American Civil War

• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Articles lacking in-text citations from April 2009
• All articles lacking in-text citations
• Use American English from September 2025
• All Wikipedia articles written in American English