This articlerelies excessively onreferences toprimary sources. Please improve this article by addingsecondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Stewart v. Abend" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(November 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Stewart v. Abend | |
|---|---|
| Argued January 9, 1990 Decided April 24, 1990 | |
| Full case name | Stewart et al. v. Abend, DBA Authors Research Co. |
| Citations | 495U.S.207 (more) 110 S. Ct. 1750; 109L. Ed. 2d 184; 1990U.S. LEXIS 2184; 58 U.S.L.W. 4511; 14 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1614; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 26,557 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Abend filed suit in District Court, S. Dis. of NY, settled; filed again, District Court, C. Dis. of CA, court granted Stewart's sum. judg. motion based on fair use andRohauer v. Killiam Shows, Inc.,551 F.2d 484, denied other motions; both parties appealed, Ninth Circuit reversed,Abend v. MCA, Inc.,863 F.2d 1465, 1472 (1988);cert. granted,493 U.S. 807 (1989). |
| Holding | |
| The Court held that the successor copyright owner's right to permit the creation of aderivative work passes to the heirs of the author of the work, who are not bound by the original author's agreement to permit such use. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | O'Connor, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Kennedy |
| Concurrence | White |
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia |
| Laws applied | |
| Copyright Acts of 1909 and1976 | |
Stewart v. Abend, 495 U.S. 207 (1990), was aUnited States Supreme Court decision holding that a successorcopyright owner (one who obtains ownership later on, such as the heirs of a copyright owner who dies) has the exclusive right to permit the creation and exploitation ofderivative works, regardless of potentially conflicting agreements by prior copyright holders.[1]
Cornell Woolrich originally wrote the short story "It Had to Be Murder", and sold the publication rights toPopular Publications, Inc., which published the story in itsDime Detective Magazine (February 1942 issue). Three years later, Woolrich sold the movie rights to aproduction company, and agreed by contract to renew those rights when the 28-year copyright (then in force) expired. In 1953 the movie rights were bought for $10,000 by Patron Inc., a production company formed by actorJames Stewart and directorAlfred Hitchcock. The short story was then made into the acclaimed movieRear Window (1954), directed by Hitchcock and starring Stewart.
Woolrich died in 1968, before the expiration of his 28-year copyright, and control of the literary rights passed to his executor,Chase Manhattan Bank. Chase sold the movie rights for $650 to literary agent Sheldon Abend. In 1971 and 1974, ABC aired the film through a licensing agreement with Stewart, Hitchcock, andMCA Inc. Abend, refusing to honor Woolrich's original agreement to renew the copyright and assign it to the owner of the movie rights, sued Stewart in response to this. Ultimately, Abend dismissed his suit and he was awarded $25,000. During the 1980s, Abend claims he sought to create a play and television version of "It Had to Be Murder" withHBO.
The question presented was whether the owner of a legal derivative work infringes the rights of the successor copyright owner, by continued distribution and publication of the derivative work during the renewal term of the pre-existing work. The Court held that the assignment was an unfulfilled contingency that died with the author; the successor can prevent continued use of the derivative work.
In justifying its decision, the Court noted that control of the work reverts to the author—or author’s successors—when renewal comes up. This protects the author (and the heirs) from being deprived of the surprising value of the work.