Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Slavic Native Faith's theology and cosmology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rodnover theological and cosmological doctrines

Ancestral/genealogical origin (rodovoy iskon) is based onrodolyubiye ("generosity", the love for the kin/family and the love of the kin/family).Rod ("Kin/Genus/Generation") is understood by us as the indissoluble unity of three components: "Rod in Itself" (Rod kak Sam) – "All-Being" (Vse-Sushchiy), "All-God" (Vse-Bog), "All-Keeper" (Vse-Derzhitel') – the single all-pervading spiritual principle; "Heavenly Rod" (Rod Nebesniy) – the power of the ancestors, the celestial forces of the kin; and "Earthly Rod" (Rod Zemnoy) – the aggregate of congeners, the terrestrial family. Native gods (rodniye bogi) are the essences of the faces of the single Rod, his creative powers, comprehended by us in our personal spiritual experience. These forces are manifested both in the surrounding nature and in ourselves. (So, for example, the power of Perun in nature is thunderstorm, in the human heart it is the will to overwhelm.) Through the protective glorification of the gods at the ceremony, we reunite the internal and the external, thereby gaining spiritual harmony, spiritual integrity and bodily health.

VolkhvVeleslav (Ilya Cherkasov)'s explanation of fundamental Rodnover theory and practice, in theIzvednik, 2003.[1]
Part ofa series on
Slavic Native Faith
Kolovrat

Slavic Native Faith (Rodnovery) has atheology that is generallymonistic, consisting in the vision of a transcendental, supremeGod (Rod, "Generator") which begets the universe and lives immanentised as the universe itself (pantheism andpanentheism), present in decentralised and autonomous way in all its phenomena, generated by a multiplicity of deities which are independent hypostases, facets, particles or energies of the consciousness and will of the supreme God itself.[2]

A popular dictum is "God is singular and plural".[3]Polytheism, that is the worship of the gods or spirits, and ancestors, the facets of the supreme Rod generating all phenomena, is an integral part of Rodnovers' beliefs and practices. The universe is described as a "dialectically unfolding manifestation" of the single transcendental beginning, end each subsequent emanation, every deity and entity, is endowed with ontological freedom, spontaneous will to life and co-creation with the supreme law of God (Prav, "Right") in the great oneness of which they are part.[4]

Theswastika-likekolovrat (e.g.) is the symbol of Rodnovery.[5] According to the studies ofBoris Rybakov, whirl and wheel symbols, represent the supreme Rod and its manifestation as the many gods.[6] The vision of Rodnover theology has been variously defined asmanifestationism, androdotheism orgenotheism.

Theological stances

[edit]
Icon of the highest God (Rod) in human shape, in a Sylenkoite temple in Ukraine.

Monism and polytheism: Rod and deities

[edit]
Further information:Rod (Slavic religion) andDeities of Slavic religion

Prior to theirChristianisation, the Slavic peoples werepolytheists, worshipping multiple deities who were subordinate to a supreme but impersonalcreator god. According toHelmold'sChronica Slavorum (compiled 1168–1169), "obeying the duties assigned to them, [the deities] have sprung from his [the supreme God's] blood and enjoy distinction in proportion to their nearness to the god of the gods".[7] Belief in these deities varied according to location and through time, and it was common for the Slavs to adopt deities from neighbouring cultures.[8]

Both in Russia and in Ukraine, modern Rodnovers are divided among those who aremonotheists and those who are polytheists;[9] in other words, some emphasise a unitary principle of divinity, while others put emphasis on the distinct gods and goddesses.[10] Some Rodnovers even describe themselves asatheists,[11] believing that gods are not real entities but rather symbolic and/or archetypal.[12]Monotheism andpolytheism are not regarded as mutually exclusive. The shared underpinning is apantheistic view that isholistic in its understanding of the universe.[11] A common interpretation of ancient Slavic beliefs among modern Rodnovers is that ofmonism, by which the many different gods (polytheism) are seen as manifestations of the single, universal impersonal God—generally identified by the concept ofRod,[13] also known asSud ("Judge") andPrabog ("Pre-God", "First God") amongSouth Slavs.[14] The Rodnover movement ofPeterburgian Vedism calls this concept "One God" (Единый Бог,Yediny Bog) or "All God" (Всебог,Vsebog).[15] Rod is generally equated withOdin ofGermanic Heathenry.[16]

In the Russian and Ukrainian centres of Rodnover theology, the concept of Rod has been emphasised as particularly important.[17] According to the publicationIzvednik, a compilation of views on theology and cosmology of various Rodnover organisations, "the rest of the gods are only his faces, noumena, incarnations, hypostases", it is a God similar to thecosmos of ancient Greek philosophy in that it is "not the master of the universe, but it itself the universe".[1] While most Rodnovers call it Rod, others call its visible manifestationSvarog or Nebo ("Heaven"), and still others refer to its triune cosmic manifestation,Triglav ("Three-Headed One"):Prav→Yav-Nav,Svarog→Belobog-Chernobog,Svarog→Dazhbog-Stribog, orDub→Snop-Did.[18] Rod is also "Time" (Kolo), scanned by the cycle of the Sun, ad reflected in the turning of the hours, the days, the months, the seasons, and the year.[19]

The root *rod is attested in sources about pre-Christian religion referring to divinity and ancestrality.[20] Mathieu-Colas defines Rod as the "primordial God", but the term also literally means the generative power of the family and "kin", "birth", "origin" and "fate" as well.[14] Rod is the all-pervading, omnipresent spiritual "life force", which also gives life to any community of related entities, as defined by the RussianvolkhvsVeleslav (Ilya Cherkasov) and Dobroslav (Aleksey Dobrovolsky). Its negative form,urod, means anything that is wrenched, deformed, degenerated, monstrous, anything that is "outside" the spiritual community of Rod and bereft of its virtues.[21] Sometimes, the meaning of the word is left deliberately obscure among Rodnovers, allowing for a variety of different interpretations.[22]

Manifestationism

[edit]
Hierarchy of the divine, with the two categories proceeding from the supreme God, as illustrated byGeorg F. Creuzer andFranz J. Mone in 1822.[23] All deities are manifestations of either Belobog or Chernobog, and in both categories they may be eitherRazi, rede-givers, orZirnitra, dragon wizards.[24]

Cosmologically speaking, Rod is conceived as the spring of universalemanation, which articulates in a cosmic hierarchy of gods.[25] When emphasising this monism, Rodnovers may define themselves asrodnianin, "believers in God" (or "in nativity", "in genuinity").[26] Already the pioneering Ukrainian leaderVolodymyr Shaian argued that God manifests as a variety of different deities.[27]

This theological explanation is called "manifestationism" by some contemporary Rodnovers, and implies the idea of a spirit–matter continuum; the different gods, who proceed from the supreme God, generate differing categories of things not as their external creations (as objects), but embodying themselves as these entities. In their view, beings are the progeny of gods; even phenomena such as the thunder are conceived in this way as embodiments of these gods (in this case,Perun).[28]

In the wake of this theology, it is common among Slavic Native Faith practitioners to say that "we are not God's slaves, but God's sons",[29] many of them emphasising the ontological freedom of the different subsequent emanations so that the world is viewed as a "dialectical manifestation" of the single transcendental beginning and continuous co-creation of the diversified gods and the entities which they generate.[30] The Russianvolkhv Velimir (Nikolay Speransky), emphasises adualistic eternal struggle between white gods and black gods, elder forces of creation and younger forces of destruction; the former collectively represented by Belobog and the latter by Chernobog, also symbolising the spiritual and the material.[31] Such dualism does not represent absolutegood and evil, but the black gods become evil when acting out of agreement with older and stronger white gods.[32]

Clusters of deities

[edit]
Northwestern Slavic hierarchy of the divine, as proposed byIgnác Jan Hanuš in 1842.[33]

Pantheons of deities are not unified among practitioners of Slavic Native Faith.[34] Different Rodnover groups often have a preference for a particular deity over others.[10] Some Rodnover groups espouse the idea that specific Slavic populations are the progeny of different gods; for instance, groups relying upon the tenth-century manuscriptThe Lay of Igor's Host may affirm the idea that Russians are the grandchildren ofDazhbog (the "Giving God", "Day God").[22] TheUnion of Slavic Rodnover Communities founded and led by Vadim Kazakov recognises a pantheon of over thirty deities emanated by the supreme Rod;[35] these include attested deities from Slavic pre-Christian and folk traditions, Slavicised Hindu deities (such asVyshen, i.e.Vishnu, andIntra, i.e.Indra), Iranian deities (such asSimargl and Khors), deities from theBook of Veles (such as Pchelich), and figures from Slavic folk tales such as the wizardKoschei.[36] Rodnovers also worshiptutelary deities of specific elements, lands and environments,[37] such as waters, forests and the household. Gods may be subject to functional changes among modern Rodnovers; for instance, the traditional god of livestock and poetryVeles is called upon as the god of literature and communication.[28]

Monotheism

[edit]

In Ukraine, there has been a debate as to whether the religion should be monotheistic or polytheistic.[38] In keeping with the pre-Christian belief systems of the region, the groups who inherit Volodymyr Shaian's tradition, among others, espouse polytheism.[38] Conversely, Lev Sylenko'sNative Ukrainian National Faith (RUNVira for short, also called "Sylenkoism") regards itself as monotheistic and focuses its worship upon a single God whom they identify by the name Dazhboh, interpreted as the life-giving energy of the cosmos.[39]

Sylenko characterised Dazhboh as "light, endlessness, gravitation, eternity, movement, action, the energy of unconscious and conscious being".[40] Based on this description, Ivakhiv argued that Sylenkoite theology might better be regarded aspantheistic orpanentheistic rather than monotheistic.[40] Sylenko acknowledged that the ancient Slavs were polytheists but believed that a monotheistic view reflected an evolution in human spiritual development and thus should be adopted.[41] A similar view is espoused by RussianYnglism,[28] while another distinctively monotheistic Rodnover movement that has been compared to Sylenkoism is RussianKandybaism.[42] Lesiv reported about a Sylenkoite follower who said that "we cannot believe in various forest, field and water spirits today. Yes, our ancestors believed in these things but we should not any longer", as polytheism is regarded as obsolete within the religion.[43] Some polytheist Rodnovers have deemed the view adopted by Sylenko's followers as an inauthentic approach to the religion.[44]

Cosmology

[edit]
Black and White. Suprematist CompositionKazimir Malevich, 1915. According to Miroslav Shkandrij, the RussianSuprematist artist was influenced by a dual cosmology found in various folk beliefs, including Belobog and Chernobog.[45]

Dual dynamism: Belobog and Chernobog

[edit]

According to theBook of Veles, and to the doctrine accepted by many Rodnover organisations, the supreme Rod begetsPrav (literally "Right" or "Order"; cf. GreekOrthotes, SanskritṚta) in primordial undeterminacy (chaos), giving rise to the circular pattern ofSvarog ("Heaven", "Sky"; cf. SanskritSvarga), which constantly multiplies generating new worlds (world-eggs).[25] Prav is Rod itself manifesting as the universe.[46] Prav works by means of a dual dynamism, represented by Belobog ("White God"[14]) and Chernobog ("Black God"[14]);[25] described as the "second tier" in the cosmological hierarchy,[47] they are two aspects of "spontaneous division" of the same oneness of Rod, appearing in reality as elder white gods of creation and younger black gods of destruction,[32] the forces of waxing and waning, giving rise to polarities like up and down, bright and dark, masculine and feminine, singular and plural.[25] The younger black gods have always to act in accordance with stronger white gods, otherwise they generate evil.[32] The Belobog–Chernobog duality is also represented on the human plane as thePerunVeles duality, where the former is the principle of martiality and the latter is the principle of mystical philosophy.[48] Man and woman are further symbolised by father Svarog itself and motherLada.[25]

This supreme polarity is also represented by the relation between Rod andRozanica, literally the "Generatrix", the mother goddess who expresses herself as the three goddesses who interweave destiny (Rozanicy, also known asSudenicy among South Slavs, where Rod is also known as Sud, "Judge").[14] She is also known asRaziwia,Rodiwa or simplyDewa ("Goddess"), regarded as the singular goddess of whom all lesser goddesses are manifestations.[49] In kinships, while Rod represents the forefathers from the male side, Rozanica represents the ancestresses from the female side. Through the history of the Slavs, the latter gradually became more prominent than the former, because of the importance of the mother to the newborn child.[50]

The three qualities of reality and theaxis mundi

[edit]

Triglav

[edit]
Scheme of Triglav's cosmology, as conceived by many Rodnovers.
Main article:Triglav (mythology)

In duality, the supreme Rod's luminous aspect (Belobog) manifests ultimately as threefold,Triglav ("Three-Headed One"[14]). The first of the three persons is the aforementioned Svarog ("Heaven"), and the other two are Svarog's further expressions as Perun ("Thunder") and Svetovid (the "Worldseer", itself four-faced). They correspond to the three dimensions of thecosmos, and to the three qualities of soul, flesh and power. Svarog represents Prav itself and soul, Perun representsYav and flesh, and Svetovit representsNav and spiritual power.[51] The Triglav is not a combination of gods, but the theological representation of the triadic principle which underlies reality.[52]

According to Shnirelman, this triune vision and associations were codified by Yury P. Mirolyubov and further elaborated byValery Yemelyanov, both interpreters of theBook of Veles.[51] In olden times, alreadyEbbo documented that the Triglav was seen as embodying the connection and mediation between Heaven, Earth and the underworld.[53]Adam of Bremen described the Triglav ofWolin asNeptunus triplicis naturae (that is to say "Neptune of the three natures/generations") attesting the colours that were associated to the three worlds, then further studied byKarel Jaromír Erben: white for Heaven, green for Earth and black for the underworld.[54] Other names of the two manifestations of Svarog are Dazhbog ("Giving God", "Day God") and Svarozhich (the god of fire, literally meaning "Son of Heaven").[14] According to the studies ofJiří Dynda, the three faces of Triglav are rather Perun in the heavenly plane (instead of Svarog), Svetovid in the centre from which the horizontal four directions unfold, and Veles in the underworld.[55] The netherworld, especially in its dark aspect, is indeed traditionally embodied by Veles, who in this function is the god of waters but also the one who guides athwart them in the function ofpsychopomp (cf. SanskritVaruna).[56] Veles is the master of the material world, who magically creates, destroys and synthesises all contradictory tendences; he is associated with the forests and with animals, chiefly the bear, the wolf and the cattle — the Slavic priests themselves, known asvolkhvs (a derivative ofvolk, "wolf"), are his impersonators.[57]

In his study of Slavic cosmology, Dynda compares thisaxis mundi concept to similar ones found in otherIndo-European cultures. He gives weight to the Triglav as a representation of whatGeorges Dumézil studied as the "Indo-Europeantrifunctional hypothesis" (holy, martial and economic functions reflected by three human types and social classes).[54] The Triglav also represents the interweaving of the three dimensions of time, metaphorically represented as a three-threaded rope.[58] By Ebbo's words, the Triglav issummus deus, the god representing the "sum" of the three dimensions of reality as a mountain or tree (themselves symbols of theaxis mundi).[59] In a more abstract theoretical formulation, Dynda says that the three (Triglav) completes the two by springing out as the middle term between the twosome (Belobog and Chernobog), and in turn the threesome implicates the four (Svetovid) as its own middle term of potentiality.[60] The threefold vertical axle intersecting the fourfold horizontal directions is also mythologically represented as the ninefoldworld tree, whose different "worlds" are accessible to those people who have achieved corresponding stages of enlightenment.[61]

Svetovid

[edit]
Scheme of Svetovid's cosmology, as conceived by many Rodnovers.
Main article:Svetovid

Svetovid ("Worldseer", or more accurately "Lord of Power" or "Lord of Holiness", the root *svet defining the "miraculous and beneficial power", or holy power)[62] is the four-faced god of war and light, and "the most complete reflection of the Slavic cosmological conception", the union of the four horizontal directions of space with the three vertical tiers of the cosmos (Heaven, Earth and the underworld), and with the three times.[60]Helmold defined Svetovid asdeus deorum ("god of all gods");[63] Dynda further defines Svetovid, byJungian words, as a "fourfold (quaternitas) potentiality which comes true in threefoldness (triplicitas)".[60] His four faces are the masculine Svarog ("Heaven", associated to the north direction and the colour white) and Perun ("Thunder", the west and red), and the feminineMokosh ("Wetness", the east and green) and Lada ("Beauty", the south and black). The four directions and colours also represent the four Slavic lands of original sacred topography.[note 1] They also represent the spinning of the four seasons.[64]

Ultimately, Svetovid embodies in unity the supreme duality (Belobog and Chernobog) through which Rod manifests itself as Prav, and the axial interconnection of the three times with the four dimensions of present space. In other words, he represents Prav spiritualising Yav as Nav; or Svarog manifesting as spirit (Perun) in the material world governed by Veles. Dynda says that this conception reflects a common Indo-European spiritual vision of the cosmos, the same which was also elaborated in early and medieval Christianity as God who is at the same time creator (father), creature (son) and creating activity (spirit).[65]

Prav, Yav and Nav—Heaven, Earth and humanity

[edit]

Cosmology of theBook of Veles

[edit]
Main article:Prav-Yav-Nav

According to theBook of Veles, reality has three dimensions, namely the aforementionedPrav, plusYav andNav.[66] The three are identified with different names by different groups.[1] Prav ("Right") itself is the level of the gods, who generate entities according to the supreme order of Rod; gods and the entities that they beget "make up" the great Rod. Yav ("actuality" or "manifestation"[1]) is the level of matter and appearance, the here and now in which things appear in light, coalesce, but also dissolve in contingency; Nav ("probability" or "unmanifestation"[1]) is the thin world of human ancestors, of spirit, consisting in the memory of the past and the projection of the future, that is to say the continuity of time.[25] Prav, the universal cosmic order otherwise described as the "Law of Heaven", permeates and regulates the other two hypostases.[67] They are also described, respectively, as the world of bright gods, the world of mankind, and the world of dark gods.[19]

Genotheism and the worship of ancestors

[edit]

In her theological commentaries to theBook of Veles, the Ukrainian Rodnover leaderHalyna Lozko emphasises the cosmological unity of the three planes of Heaven, Earth and humanity between them. She gives a definition of Rodnover theology and cosmology as "genotheism". God, hierarchically manifesting as different hypostases, a multiplicity of gods emerging from the all-pervading force Svarog, is genetically (rodovid) linked to humanity. On the human plane God is incarnated by the progenitors/ancestors and the kin lineage, in the Earth. Ethics and morality ultimately stem from this cosmology, as harmony with nature is possible only in the relationship between an ethnic group and its own land.[68] The same vision of a genetic essence of divinity is called "rodotheism" by theYnglists.[69]

This is also the meaning of the worship of human progenitors, whether the Slavs' and Aryans' great forefatherOr orOryi,[70] or local forefathers such asDingling worshipped byVladivostok Rodnovers.[71] Divine ancestors are the spirits who generate and hold together kins, theyare the kins themselves. The Russianvolkhv Dobroslav emphasises the importance of blood heritage, since, according to him, the violation of kinship purity brings about the loss of the relationship with the kin's divine ancestor.[72] The Ukrainian Rodnover and scholar Yury Shylov has developed a theory of God as a spiral "information field" that expresses itself in self-conscious humanity, which comes to full manifestation in theIndo-European "Saviour" archetype.[68]

See also

[edit]
Variations

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^The four faces of Svetovid, the four colours and four directions, also correspond to the four Russias of folk cosmology:White Ruthenia,Red Ruthenia, theBlack Sea regions andGreen Ukraine. See:Svetovid in theUkrainian Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary, 1987.

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^abcdeNagovitsyn 2003,passim.
  2. ^Nagovitsyn 2003,passim;Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, p. 181;Rabotkina 2013, p. 240;Chudinov 2015, pp. 39–40.
  3. ^Shnirelman 2000, p. 25.
  4. ^Nagovitsyn 2003,passim;Rabotkina 2013, p. 240;Chudinov 2015, pp. 39–40.
  5. ^Shnirelman 2000, p. 25;Pilkington & Popov 2009, p. 282;Laruelle 2012, p. 306.
  6. ^Ivanits 1989, pp. 14, 17.
  7. ^Jakobson 1985, p. 5.
  8. ^Shnirelman 2017, p. 89.
  9. ^Lesiv 2013a, p. 90;Aitamurto 2016, p. 65;Shnirelman 2017, p. 90.
  10. ^abLaruelle 2008, p. 290.
  11. ^abShnirelman 2017, p. 102.
  12. ^Shizhenskii & Aitamurto 2017, p. 109.
  13. ^Nagovitsyn 2003,passim;Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, p. 181;Chudinov 2015, pp. 39–40;Aitamurto 2016, p. 65;Konopleva & Kakhuta 2019, p. 224;Green 2021, pp. 6–7.
  14. ^abcdefgMathieu-Colas 2017.
  15. ^Gaidukov 1999,passim;Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, p. 164;Popov 2016, 4.4.5.
  16. ^Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, p. 181.
  17. ^Aitamurto 2006, p. 188;Lesiv 2017, p. 142.
  18. ^Shnirelman 2000, p. 26;Nagovitsyn 2003,passim;Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, pp. 181–182;Konopleva & Kakhuta 2019, p. 224.
  19. ^abOzhiganova 2015, p. 33.
  20. ^Aitamurto 2006, p. 188;Pilkington & Popov 2009, p. 288.
  21. ^Aitamurto 2016, p. 65.
  22. ^abAitamurto 2006, p. 188.
  23. ^Creuzer & Mone 1822, p. 197.
  24. ^Creuzer & Mone 1822, pp. 195–197;Heck 1852, pp. 289–290.
  25. ^abcdefRabotkina 2013, p. 240.
  26. ^Pilkington & Popov 2009, p. 269.
  27. ^Lesiv 2013b, p. 130.
  28. ^abcAitamurto 2016, p. 66.
  29. ^Aitamurto 2006, p. 188;Chudinov 2015, p. 40.
  30. ^Chudinov 2015, pp. 39–40.
  31. ^Chudinov 2015, p. 41;Shnirelman 2017, p. 93.
  32. ^abcChudinov 2015, p. 41.
  33. ^Hanuš 1842, p. 182.
  34. ^Laruelle 2008, pp. 289–290.
  35. ^Belov, Maxim; Garanov, Yury (10 February 2015)."Adversus Paganos".astrsobor.ru. Journal of the Ascension Cathedral of Astrakhan. Archived fromthe original on 23 May 2017. Retrieved7 July 2017.
  36. ^Shnirelman 2017, p. 95.
  37. ^Aitamurto 2006, p. 204.
  38. ^abLesiv 2013a, p. 90.
  39. ^Ivakhiv 2005c, p. 225;Lesiv 2013a, p. 90;Lesiv 2013b, p. 130.
  40. ^abIvakhiv 2005c, p. 225.
  41. ^Lesiv 2013a, p. 91.
  42. ^Shnirelman 2002, pp. 207–208.
  43. ^Lesiv 2013a, p. 92.
  44. ^Ivakhiv 2005c, p. 223.
  45. ^Shkandrij, Miroslav. "Reinterpreting Malevich: Biography, Autobiography, Art".Canadian-American Slavic Studies.36 (4). pp. 405–420. (see p. 415).
  46. ^Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, p. 182.
  47. ^Green 2021, pp. 13–14.
  48. ^Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, p. 170.
  49. ^Hanuš 1842, pp. 135, 281.
  50. ^Máchal 1918, p. 249.
  51. ^abShnirelman 1998, p. 8, note 35.
  52. ^Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, pp. 181–182.
  53. ^Dynda 2014, p. 60.
  54. ^abDynda 2014, p. 63.
  55. ^Dynda 2014, pp. 74–75.
  56. ^Dynda 2014, p. 72.
  57. ^Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, pp. 182–183.
  58. ^Dynda 2014, p. 74.
  59. ^Dynda 2014, p. 64.
  60. ^abcDynda 2014, p. 75.
  61. ^Prokofiev, Filatov & Koskello 2006, p. 185.
  62. ^Mathieu-Colas 2017;Jakobson 1985, p. 18.
  63. ^Dynda 2014, p. 59, note 9.
  64. ^Leeming 2005, p. 369:Svantovit.
  65. ^Dynda 2014, p. 76.
  66. ^Shnirelman 2017, p. 101;Green 2021, p. 13.
  67. ^Ivakhiv 2005b, p. 202;Ivakhiv 2005c, p. 230;Laruelle 2008, p. 290;Aitamurto 2016, pp. 66–67.
  68. ^abIvakhiv 2005a, p. 23.
  69. ^"Rodotheism – the veneration of the Kin (Родотеизм – это почитание Рода)".Derzhava Rus. 9 March 2014. Archived fromthe original on 3 July 2017.
  70. ^Ivakhiv 2005a, p. 14;Shnirelman 2007, p. 54.
  71. ^Shnirelman 2007, p. 54.
  72. ^Shnirelman 2007, p. 54–55.

Sources

[edit]
Slavic Native Faith (Rodnoverie) — people and organizations
Poland
Early
New
Russia
and Russian
diaspora
Early
(émigrés and USSR)
New
by organization
Peterburgian
Vedism
Ynglism and adjacent
New
independents
Writers
Slovakia
Ukraine
and Ukrainian
diaspora
Early
New
Approaches

Arts and institutions
By country or region
Movements (list)
Ethnic
Syncretic
In society
Related articles
Theism
Forms
Concepts
Singular god
theologies
By faith
Concepts
God as
Trinitarianism
Eschatology
By religion
Feminist
Other concepts
Names of God in
By faith
Christian
Hindu
Islamic
Jewish
Pagan
East Asian
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Slavic_Native_Faith%27s_theology_and_cosmology&oldid=1309191518"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp