Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Political eras of the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Model of American politics

icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Political eras of the United States" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(March 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of a series on the
Political eras of the United States
Popular votes to political parties during presidential elections
Political parties derivation. Dotted line means unofficially.
Timeline of the development of American political parties and the various party eras

Political eras of the United States refer to a model ofAmerican politics used in history and political science to periodize thepolitical party system existing in the United States.[1]

TheUnited States Constitution is silent on the subject of political parties. TheFounding Fathers did not originally intend for American politics to be partisan. InFederalist Papers No. 9 andNo. 10,Alexander Hamilton andJames Madison, respectively, wrote specifically about the dangers of domesticpolitical factions. In addition, the firstPresident of the United States,George Washington, was not a member of any political party at the time of his election or throughout his tenure as president.[2] Furthermore, he hoped that political parties would not be formed, fearing conflict and stagnation, as outlined in hisFarewell Address.[3]

Generally, the political history of America can be divided into eras of partisanhegemonic control of the federal government. These hegemonic eras are:

The political significance of these five defined eras can be reinforced by the feature of each era beginning with near-unanimousElectoral College presidential victories for the respective party or parties:

Using these hegemonic eras as a framework, the more detailed specifics of party realignments and the seven party systems they take place in are described in detail below:

First Party System: Federalist & Democrat Hegemony

[edit]
Main article:First Party System

The "First Party System" began in the 1790s with the 1792 re-election of George Washington and the1796 election of John Adams, and ended in the 1820s with the presidential electionsof 1824 andof 1828, resulting inAndrew Jackson's presidency.

George Washington's cabinet

[edit]
See also:Presidency of George Washington

The beginnings of the Americantwo-party system emerged from George Washington's immediate circle of advisers, which split into two camps:

Ironically, Hamilton and Madison wrote theFederalist Papers against political factions, but ended up being the core leaders in this emerging party system. Although distasteful to the participants, by the time John Adams and Thomas Jefferson ran for president in 1796, partisanship in the United States came to being.[8][9]

Era of Good Feelings

[edit]
Main article:Era of Good Feelings

This era was dominated by the Democratic-Republican party as the Federalists became irrelevant. The disastrousPanic of 1819 and theSupreme Court'sMcCulloch v. Maryland reanimated the disputes over the supremacy of state sovereignty and federal power, between strict construction of the US Constitution and loose construction.[10] TheMissouri Crisis in 1820 made the explosive political conflict between slave and free soil open and explicit.[11] Only through the adroit handling of the legislation bySpeaker of the HouseHenry Clay was a settlement reached and disunion avoided.[12][13][14]

Jacksonian democracy

[edit]
Main article:Jacksonian democracy

"Jacksonian democracy" is a term to describe the 19th-centurypolitical philosophy that originated with the seventh U.S. president, The United States presidential election of 1824 brought partisan politics to a fever pitch, with General Andrew Jackson's popular vote victory (and his plurality in the United States Electoral College being overturned in theUnited States House of Representatives).[citation needed]

With the decline in political consensus, it became imperative to revive Jeffersonian principles on the basis of Southern exceptionalism.[15][16] The agrarian alliance, North and South, would be revived to formJacksonian Nationalism and the rise of the Democratic-Republican Party.[17][18] As a result, the Democratic-Republican Party split into a Jacksonian faction that was regionally and ideologically identical to the original party, which became the modernDemocratic Party in the 1830s, and a Henry Clay faction that regionally and ideologically resembled the old Federalist Party, which was absorbed by Clay'sWhig Party.[citation needed] The term "Jacksonian democracy" was in active use by the 1830s.[19]

Second Party System: Democrat Hegemony

[edit]
Main article:Second Party System

Many historians and political scientists use "Second Party System" to describe American politics between the mid-1820s until the mid-1850s. The system was demonstrated by rapidly rising levels of voter interest (with high election day turnouts), rallies, partisan newspapers, and high degrees of personal loyalty to parties.[20][21] It was in full swing with the 1828 United States presidential election, since the Federalists shrank to a few isolated strongholds and the Democratic-Republicans lost unity during the buildup to theAmerican Civil War.[22]

This party system marked the first in a series ofpolitical realignments, a process in which a prominent third party coalition, often one that wins >10% of the popular vote in multiple states in a presidential election, realigns into one of the major parties, allowing that major party to dominate the federal government and/or presidency for the following decades. The first and most significant Second Party System realignment was a realignment of the differing factions of the Democratic-Republican Party of the more slave sparse Southern areas and the non-coastal Northern counties, particularly those factions that voted for Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay andWilliam H. Crawford, into the new Jacksonian/Democratic Party.

The opposition, leftover Federalist-aligned voters who formed the Clay and Adams factions in the Coastal North, realigned into theNational Republican Party in 1828. This northern base, alongside the wealthy slave owners of the dense Southern slave centers and the Anti-Masons in Vermont, Massachusetts, Northern New York state and Southern Pennsylvania, realigned into the newly formed Whig Party in 1836. With the fall of the Whig Party in 1856, the remaining Whig coalition (those not effected by the Free Soil movement in New England and the Great Lakes Region) realigned into theKnow Nothing ticket that same year then realigned into theConstitutional Union Party in 1860 at the start of the next party system.

Thepolitical party system of the United States was dominated by two major parties:

  • TheJacksonian Democrats led by Andrew Jackson. The Jacksonian Democrats stood for the "sovereignty of the people" as expressed in popular demonstrations, constitutional conventions, and majority rule as a general principle of governing,
  • The Whig Party, assembled by Henry Clay from the National Republicans and from other opponents of Jackson. Whigs advocated the rule of law, written and unchanging constitutions, public investment of infrastructure and education, and protections for minority interests against majority tyranny.[23]

After taking office in 1829, President Andrew Jackson restructured a number of federal institutions. Jackson's professed philosophy became the nation's dominant political worldview for the remainder of the 1830s, helping his vice president (Martin Van Buren) secure election in thepresidential election of 1836. In thepresidential election of 1840, the "Whig Party" had its first national victory with the election of GeneralWilliam Henry Harrison, but he died shortly after assuming office in 1841.John Tyler (a self-proclaimed "Democrat") succeeded Harrison, as the firstVice President of the United States to ascend to the presidency via death of the incumbent.

Minor parties of the era included:

Third Party System: Republican Hegemony

[edit]
Main article:Third Party System

The"Third Party System" refers to the period which came into focus in the 1850s (during the leadup to the American Civil War) and ended in the 1890s. The issues of focus during this time:Slavery, the civil war,Reconstruction, race, and monetary issues.

The Third Party System was marked by a realignment of the Free Soil Party movement of New England and the Great Lakes Region into theRepublican Party after the1856 election, and a realignment of the more northern portion of Whigs, Constitutional Union voters and Know Nothing voters along the Coastal Midatlantic into the Democratic Party after the1864 election.

It was dominated by the new Republican Party, which claimed success in saving the Union, abolishing slavery and enfranchising thefreedmen, while adopting many Whig-style modernization programs such asnational banks, railroads, high tariffs,homesteads, social spending (such as on greater Civil War veteran pension funding), and aid toland grant colleges. While most elections from 1876 through 1892 were extremely close, the oppositionDemocrats won only the1884 and1892 presidential elections (the Democrats also won the popular vote in the1876 and1888 presidential elections, but lost the electoral college vote), although from 1875 to 1895 the party usually controlled the United States House of Representatives and controlled theUnited States Senate from 1879 to 1881 and 1893–1895. Indeed, scholarly work and electoral evidence emphasizes that after the 1876 election the South's former slave centers, which before the emancipation of Republican-voting African Americans was electorally dominated by voting wealthy slave owners who made up the southern base of Whigs, Know Nothings and Constitutional Unionists, realigned into the Democratic Party due to the end of Reconstruction; this new electoral base for the Democrats would finish realigning around 1904. The overall national support for Reconstruction collapsed around 1876 as well.[24] The northern and western states were largely Republican, except for the closely balanced New York,Indiana,New Jersey, andConnecticut. After 1876, the Democrats took control of the "Solid South".[25]

Historians and political scientists generally believe that the Third Party System ended in the mid-1890s, which featured profound developments in issues ofAmerican nationalism,modernization, and race. This period, the later part of which is often termed theGilded Age, is defined by its contrast with the preceding and following eras.

Fourth Party System: Republican Hegemony

[edit]
Main article:Fourth Party System

The "Fourth Party System" is the term used in political science and history for the period in American political history from the mid-1890s to the early 1930s, It was dominated by the Republican Party, excepting when1912 split in which Democrats (led by PresidentWoodrow Wilson) held the White House for eight years. American history texts usually call the period theProgressive Era. The concept was introduced under the name "System of 1896" byE. E. Schattschneider in 1960, and the numbering scheme was added by political scientists in the mid-1960s.[26]

The realignments that marked the beginning of the Fourth Party System was that of theGreenback Party, which dominated the greater Rust Belt region (which included upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Baltimore), into the GOP after1896, and the realignment of thePopulist Party, which dominated the Midwest, into the Republican Party after the1900 and1904 elections.

The era began in thesevere depression of 1893 and the extraordinarily intenseelection of 1896. It included the Progressive Era,World War I, and the start of theGreat Depression. The Great Depression caused a realignment that produced theFifth Party System, dominated by the DemocraticNew Deal coalition until the 1970s.

The central domestic issues concerned government regulation of railroads and large corporations ("trusts"), the money issue (gold versussilver), the protectivetariff, the role oflabor unions,child labor, the need for a new banking system, corruption in party politics,primary elections, the introduction of thefederal income tax,direct election of senators,racial segregation, efficiency in government,women's suffrage, and control of immigration. Foreign policy centered on the 1898Spanish–American War,Imperialism, theMexican Revolution, World War I, and the creation of theLeague of Nations. Dominant personalities included presidentsWilliam McKinley (R),Theodore Roosevelt (R), and Woodrow Wilson (D), three-time presidential candidateWilliam Jennings Bryan (D), and Wisconsin's progressive RepublicanRobert M. La Follette Sr.

TheFourth Party System ended with theGreat Depression, a worldwide economic depression that started in 1929. A few years after theWall Street Crash of 1929,Herbert Hoover lost the1932 United States presidential election toFranklin D. Roosevelt.

Fifth Party System: New Deal Democrat Hegemony

[edit]
Main article:Fifth Party System

The Fifth Party System describes a period in American history from the 1930s to the early 1980s in which progressives in the North and conservative Democrats in the South joined a broad coalition called the "New Deal Coalition" to share control of government over the more business-aligned Republican Party, particularly as a result of the Republican Party's failure to contain the Great Depression while in power in the early 1930s.

The Fifth Party System began as a result of a realignment of theProgressive Party of the Western Coast and the greater Rust Belt region (which includes New York, Massachusetts, Baltimore and New Jersey), and a realignment of theSocialist Party of the Western Coast and Sun Belt, into the otherwise conservative Democratic Party after the1932 and1936 elections.

Key figures of the Fifth Party System include Franklin D. Roosevelt, the key founder of the New Deal Coalition and president during most of the Great Depression and most ofWorld War II;Harry S. Truman, successor to Franklin Roosevelt;John F. Kennedy; and civil rights championLyndon B. Johnson.

Because there has been no significant change of hands in Congress since the beginning of the Fifth Party System, historians have trouble placing dates and specifications for the modern party systems that succeed this one.

Sixth Party System: Divided Government under conservative dominance

[edit]
Main article:Sixth Party System

The Sixth Party System describes a system that began in 1980, known for the period in which Republicans used the "Southern strategy" to realignDixiecrats from the South into the party, which began in 1964 whenBarry Goldwater became the first Republican sinceReconstruction to win the Deep South (although he lost the overall South)[k] and finalized in 1984 when Reagan kept the South permanently Republican. This allowed the party to gain dominant control of the Presidency after 1968 or 1980, though dominant control of Congress would remain in Democratic hands because of the Southern seats in Congress remaining a solid Democratic bloc until the Republicans flipped the Congressional South in the 1994Republican Revolution. Because of this realignment lag the first half of this party system is heavily dominated byticket-splitting (i.e. the "Nixon Democrats" and "Reagan Democrats"). Then, a second realignment occurred amongstCentrist "Independent" voters from the North and West who supportedJohn B. Anderson andRoss Perot into the Democratic Party from 1996 to 2008, allowing the Democrats to make the Presidency competitive. This half of the party system is dominated bypolarization.[citation needed]

Seventh Party System: The Populist Era

[edit]
Main article:Seventh Party System

Some political scientists suggest that a new party system (Seventh Party System) may be emerging in the United States, especially followingDonald Trump’s2016 election and the resulting realignment of party coalitions.[27]

This shift is often linked to the broader international wave ofpopulism, which challenges liberal-democratic institutions and party structures.[28]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Era is ushered in by the Presidency of Virginian GeneralGeorge Washington, a prominent leader of theAmerican Revolution.
  2. ^Era is ushered in by the Presidency of Virginian Vice PresidentThomas Jefferson, a prominent leader of theAmerican Revolution.
  3. ^When Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson began his Presidency in March 1801 the Senate held a two-day special Senate session with an ongoing Federalist majority, which briefly stalled the inauguration of the first unified Democratic-Republican government, though the session was only called by outgoing President John Adams so that the Senate could provide advice to the new President.[4][5] After the Senate ended its two-day session the Democratic-Republicans had unified government control through the Presidency alone, and by the time the Congress began its first regular session in December 1801 to start official business the Democratic-Republicans had gained the Senate majority and thus, with the House and with President Jefferson, had unified government control throughout that first session, for the remaining 8 years of Jefferson’s presidency, and for the next several years.
  4. ^The Democratic-Republicans were known during their time as "Republicans" by most of their own members and as "Democrats" by their Federalist opponents - the name "Democratic-Republican" was rarely used at that time and is used retroactively by academics to distinguish it from its ideological successor the conservativeDemocratic Party, the opposing & liberalNational Republican Party, and the opposing & abolitionistRepublican Party.
  5. ^Before the accelerated rise of dense slave centers in theBlack Belt in the late 1810s (before these counties had high % slave population), the Democratic-Republicans dominated the entirety of the South. As the Black Belt quickly became more densely filled with slaves (and Black Belt counties grew in % slave population), the future Whig opposition party made electoral inroads in the Jeffersonian/Jacksonian South by winning the support of the wealthier slave owners that dominated these slave dense counties. It remains a constant that the Democratic-Republicans and their ideological successors the Democrats both dominated slave-sparce Southern populations.
  6. ^After serving in Congress’ House of Representatives, Lincoln was elected to the Illinois legislature in 1854, but before that term began in January 1855 he declined to serve in the state legislative seat so that he would be eligible to be a candidate in the upcoming U.S. Senate election.[6][7] Thus Lincoln’s most recent position before the Presidency was as Congressman.
  7. ^Era is ushered in by the Presidency of Illinoisan Congressman[f]Abraham Lincoln, a prominent leader of theAmerican Civil War.
  8. ^Era is ushered in by the Presidency of New York GovernorFranklin D. Roosevelt, a prominent leader of theGreat Depression andWorld War II.
  9. ^New York then California were Nixon’s home states during his Presidency, though his primary home state was California where he was born and served as Senator.
  10. ^Era is ushered in by the Vice Presidency and Presidency of
    New York/Californian[i]Richard Nixon, a prominent figure of theVietnam War and theWatergate Scandal.
  11. ^Since Reconstruction, Hoover in1928 and Eisenhower in1956 were the only Republicans to win the overall South though they both lost the Deep South.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Chambers, William Nisbet; Burnham, Walter Dean; Sorauf, Frank J. (Frank Joseph) (1975).The American party systems : stages of political development. Internet Archive. New York : Oxford University Press.ISBN 978-0-19-501916-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  2. ^Chambers, William Nisbet (1963).Political Parties in a New Nation.
  3. ^Washington's Farewell Address
  4. ^"Congressional Record, March 1801"(PDF).Congressional Record:147–151. March 1801.
  5. ^"Explanation of the Types of Sessions of Congress".The Green Papers. June 2001.
  6. ^"Notice that Abraham Lincoln declines to serve in the General Assembly (1854)".Office of the Illinois Secretary of State.
  7. ^Oates, Stephen (1977).With Malice Toward None: A Biography of Abraham Lincoln. pp. 118–120.
  8. ^Richard Hofstadter,The Idea of a Party System: The Rise of Legitimate Opposition in the United States, 1780–1840 (1970)
  9. ^Gordon S. Wood,Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815 (Oxford History of the United States)
  10. ^Dangerfield 1965, p. 97–98
  11. ^Wilentz 2006, p. 217,219
  12. ^Wilentz 2006, p. 42
  13. ^Brown 1970, p. 25
  14. ^Wilentz 2006, p. 240
  15. ^Brown 1970, p. 23,24
  16. ^Varon, Elizabeth R. (2008).Disunion!: The Coming of the American Civil War, 1789–1859. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. p. 39,40.
  17. ^Brown 1970, p. 22
  18. ^Dangerfield 1965, p. 3
  19. ^TheProvidence (Rhode Island)Patriot August 25, 1839, stated: "The state of things in Kentucky..is quite as favorable to the cause of Jacksonian democracy." cited in "Jacksonian democracy",Oxford English Dictionary (2019)
  20. ^Brown 1999. sfn error: no target: CITEREFBrown1999 (help)
  21. ^Wilentz 2006.
  22. ^William G. Shade, "The Second Party System" in Paul Kleppner, et al.Evolution of American Electoral Systems (1983) pp 77–112.
  23. ^Frank Towers, "Mobtown's Impact on the Study of Urban Politics in the Early Republic.".Maryland Historical Magazine 107 (Winter 2012) pp: 469–75, p 472, citing Robert E, Shalhope,The Baltimore Bank Riot: Political Upheaval in Antebellum Maryland (2009) p. 147
  24. ^James E. Campbell, "Party Systems and Realignments in the United States, 1868–2004,"Social Science History Fall 2006, Vol. 30, Iss. 3, pp. 359–86
  25. ^Foner 1988.
  26. ^To cite a standard political science college textbook: "Scholars generally agree that realignment theory identifies five distinct party systems with the following approximate dates and major parties: 1. 1796–1816, First Party System: Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists; 2. 1840–1856, Second Party System: Democrats and Whigs; 3. 1860–1896, Third Party System: Republicans and Democrats; 4. 1896–1932, Fourth Party System: Republicans and Democrats; 5. 1932–, Fifth Party System: Democrats and Republicans." Robert C. Benedict, Matthew J. Burbank and Ronald J. Hrebenar,Political Parties, Interest Groups and Political Campaigns. Westview Press. 1999. Page 11.
  27. ^Vance, Chris (January 12, 2021)."The Seventh Party System - Niskanen Center".Niskanen Center - Improving Policy, Advancing Moderation. RetrievedNovember 20, 2025.
  28. ^"The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy".Journal of Democracy. RetrievedNovember 20, 2025.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Brown, Richard H. (1970). "The Missouri Crisis, Slavery, and the Politics of Jacksonianism".South Atlantic Quarterly:55–72. Cited inGatell, Frank Otto, ed. (1970).Essays on Jacksonian America. New York City: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Brown, David. "Jeffersonian Ideology and the Second Party System"The Historian. Vol. 62#1. (1999). pp. 17–44
  • Jensen, Richard J. "Historiography of American political history."Encyclopedia of American Political History: Studies of the Principal Movements and Ideas 1 (1984): 1+online.
  • Kleppner, Paul.The Third Electoral System: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures (U North Carolina Press, 1979)
  • Kleppner, Paul.Who Voted? The Dynamics of Electoral Turnout, 1870-1980 (1982
  • Kleppner, Paul, ed.The Evolution of American Electoral Systems (Greenwood, 1981)
  • Schlesinger, Jr. Arthur. The Age of Jackson (1945), influential classiconline
  • Schlesinger, Jr. Arthur, ed. History of U.S. Political Parties (4 vol 1973), 3550 pages. The most comprehensive scholarly history, Includes primary source documents as well as scholarly analysis of each party in each era.online
  • Wilentz, Sean (2006).The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln.
United States
Types
Sources
By scale
By source
By topic
Approaches,
schools
Concepts
General
Specific
Periodization of
modern history
By country or region
Africa
Americas
Latin America
United States
Eurasia
Ancient Rome
China
France
Germany
India
Ireland
Italy
Poland
Russia
Spain
Turkey
United
Kingdom
British
Empire
Oceania
By war, conflict
Pre-18th century
conflicts
18th and 19th
century conflicts
Coalition Wars
(1792–1815)
World War I
Treaty of
Versailles
Interwar period
World War II
Eastern Front
The Holocaust
Pacific War
Western Front
Cold War
Post-Cold War
Related
By person
Political
leaders
Historical
rankings
Others
Other topics
Economics
Religion
Science /
Technology
Organizations, publications
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_eras_of_the_United_States&oldid=1337093567"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp