This article'slead sectionmay be too short to adequatelysummarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead toprovide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.(November 2022)
Political culture describes howculture impactspolitics. Everypolitical system is embedded in a particular political culture.[1]Political culture is what the people, the voters, the electorates believe and do based on their understanding of the political system in which they have found themselves. These may be regarded as being bad or good placed side by side with global best practices or norms.
Gabriel Almond defines it as "the particular pattern of orientations toward political actions in which every political system is embedded".[1]
Lucian Pye's definition is that "Political culture is the set of attitudes, beliefs, and sentiments, which give order and meaning to a political process and which provide the underlying assumptions and rules that govern behavior in the political system".[1]
María Eugenia Vázquez Semadeni defines political culture as "the set of discourses and symbolic practices by means of which both individuals and groups articulate their relationship to power, elaborate their political demands and put them at stake."[2]
Trust is a major factor in political culture, as its level determines the capacity of the state to function.[3]Postmaterialism is the degree to which political culture is concerned with issues which are not of immediate physical or material concern, such ashuman rights andenvironmentalism.[1]Religion has also an impact on political culture.[3]
Parochial – Where citizens are only remotely aware of the presence of central government, and live their lives near enough regardless of the decisions taken by the state, distant and unaware of political phenomena. They have neither knowledge nor interest in politics. This type of political culture is in general congruent with a traditional political structure.
Subject – Where citizens are aware ofcentral government, and are heavily subjected to its decisions with little scope for dissent. The individual is aware of politics, its actors and institutions. It is affectively oriented towards politics, yet it is on the "downward flow" side of the politics. In general congruent with a centralized authoritarian structure.
Participant –Citizens are able to influence the government in various ways and they are affected by it. The individual is oriented toward the system as a whole, to both the political and administrative structures and processes (to both the input and output aspects). In general congruent with a democratic political structure.
Almond and Verba wrote that these types of political culture can combine to create thecivic culture, which mixes the best elements of each.
Individualistic culture – In which politics is a marketplace between individuals seeking to maximize theirself-interest, with minimal community involvement and opposition to the government, as well as a high degree ofpatronage.See also:Neopatrimonialism.
Moralistic culture – Whereby government is seen as important and as a way to improve peoples' lives.
Traditionalistic culture – One which seeks to preserve the status quo under which elites have all the power and citizen participation is not expected.
Ronald Inglehart proposes that political culture can dictate political systems, and points out a correlation between Protestantism (or more generally societies with high Secular-Rational values and high Self Expression values on the Inglehart-Weltzel values map) and stable democratization.[4] However, the recurrent post-elections clashes in largely protestant Sub-Saharan countries, such as Kenya or Uganda, shows that religious affiliations seem to poorly affect the political behaviour of populations.
Russia is alow-trust society, with even the highest trusted institutions ofchurch and themilitary having more distrustful than trusting citizens, and with low participation incivil society.[3][5] This means that Russia has a weakcivic political culture. Furthermore, the authoritarian traditions of Russia mean that there is little support for democratic norms such as tolerance of dissent andpluralism.[6] Russia has a history of authoritarian rulers fromIvan the Terrible toJoseph Stalin, who have engaged in massive repression of all potential political competitors, from theoprichnina to theGreat Purge. The resulting political systems ofTsarist autocracy and Soviet communism had no space for independent institutions.[citation needed]
The political culture of theUnited States was heavily influenced by the background of its early immigrants, as it is asettler society.Samuel P. Huntington identified American politics as having a "Tudor" character, with elements of English political culture of that period, such ascommon law, strongcourts, localself-rule, decentralizedsovereignty across institutions, and reliance on popularmilitias instead of astanding army, having been imported by early settlers.[7] Another source of political culture was the arrival ofScotch-Irish Americans, who came from a violent region of Britain, and brought with them a strong sense ofindividualism and support for theright to bear arms.[8] These settlers provided the support forJacksonian democracy, which was a revolution of its time against the established elites, and remnants of which can still be seen in modern Americanpopulism.[8]
Due toIndia's colonization by the British Empire, the contemporary political culture has beeninfluenced by western ideas that were not present before, so we also follow western political culture. These influences includedemocracy andparliamentary systems, two institutions that stood ideologically opposite of thecaste system that dictated society before.[12] Because of India'smulticultural demography, the political culture varies by group and region.India's successful democratization lead to power being given to both theurbanized and well-educated class who focused on national appeal, as well as more traditional, rural, and lower class political actors.[13] In themodern era, theclass system of India has begun to break down, and members of lower classes are now entering higher political and economic positions. This is especially true for lower class women, who historically have been excluded from such activities.[14]
^abcdefghijMorlino, Leonardo (2017).Political science : a global perspective. Berg-Schlosser, Dirk., Badie, Bertrand. London, England. pp. 64–74.ISBN978-1-5264-1303-1.OCLC1124515503.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
^[Vázquez Semadeni, M. E. (2010).La formación de una cultura política republicana: El debate público sobre la masonería. México, 1821-1830. Serie Historia Moderna y Contemporánea/Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas; núm. 54. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/El Colegio de Michoacán.ISBN978-607-02-1694-7]
^Schmidt-Pfister, Diana (2008), "What Kind of Civil Society in Russia?", in White, Stephen (ed.),Media, Culture and Society in Putin's Russia, Studies in Central and Eastern Europe, Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 37–71,doi:10.1057/9780230583078_3,ISBN978-0-230-58307-8
^abFukuyama, Francis. (30 September 2014).Political order and political decay : from the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Continuation of: Fukuyama, Francis. (First ed.). New York.ISBN978-0-374-22735-7.OCLC869263734.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
^Wasserstrom, Jeffrey (1994).Popular Protest & Political Culture in Modern China. New York, New York: Westview Press. p. 2.ISBN978-0-8133-2043-4.
Almond, Gabriel A., Verba, SidneyThe Civic Culture. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1965.
Aronoff, Myron J. “Political Culture,” inInternational Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences,Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, eds., (Oxford: Elsevier, 2002), 11640.
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. “The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:203-26.
Barzilai, Gad.Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.
Bednar, Jenna and Scott Page. 2007. “Can Game(s) Theory Explain Culture? The Emergence of Cultural Behavior within Multiple Games”Rationality and Society 19(1):65-97.
Clark, William, Matt Golder, and Sona Golder. 2009.Principles of Comparative Government. CQ Press. Ch. 7
Diamond, Larry (ed.)Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries.
Greif, Avner. 1994. “Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies.”The Journal of Political Economy 102(5): 912-950.
Kertzer, David I.Politics and Symbols. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
Kertzer, David I.Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988.
Kubik, Jan.The Power of Symbols Against The Symbols of Power. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.
Inglehart, Ronald andChristian Welzel,Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Ch. 2
Laitin, David D.Hegemony and Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.
Igor Lukšič,Politična kultura. Ljubljana: The University of Ljubljana, 2006.
Wilson, Richard "The Many Voices of Political Culture: Assessing Different Approaches," inWorld Politics 52 (January 2000), 246-73
Gielen, Pascal (ed.), 'No Culture, No Europe. On the Foundation of Politics'. Valiz: Amsterdam, 2015.