ThePakistan–United States trade deal was concluded with a bilateral deal inWashington D.C. after intensive negotiations in July 2025, involvingPakistan's Finance MinisterMuhammad Aurangzeb andForeign MinisterIshaq Dar, alongsideU.S. Trade RepresentativeJamieson Greer andCommerce SecretaryHoward Lutnick.[1][2]
On 30–31 July 2025, PresidentDonald Trump publicly confirmed the agreement via social media, calling it a "historic" energy partnership.[3][4] Prime MinisterShehbaz Sharif hailed it as a "landmark deal" enhancing their enduring partnership.[5][6]
In May 2025, theUnited States involved betweenIndia andPakistan, marking a thaw in regional tensions that laid the groundwork for renewed bilateral talks betweenWashington D.C. andIslamabad. Historically, trade relations had remained limited, with prior frameworks such asGSP orTIFA offering modest benefits but lacking enforceability.
The deal emerged amid shifting geopolitical dynamics inSouth Asia—especially growing U.S. tensions with India, Pakistan's pursuit of energy security, and Washington's strategy to diversify its regional partnerships.[7][8]
Simultaneously, Pakistan's military leadership, especially Army Chief Field MarshalAsim Munir, contributed to a diplomatic outreach that improved U.S.–Pakistan ties, including counterterrorism cooperation and a personal rapport withDonald Trump.[7][9]
The deal includes reciprocal tariff reductions. U.S. import duties on key Pakistani exports—such as textiles, leather goods, surgical instruments, IT services, and agricultural products—are to be lowered, providing Pakistan enhanced access to U.S. markets.[10][11] Pakistan, in turn, rolled back a 5% digital services tax, signaling goodwill toward facilitating U.S. digital firms’ access.[12][6]
A central pillar of the agreement is U.S.–Pakistan cooperation to explore and develop Pakistan’s underexplored oil reserves—particularly in offshore Balochistan and onshore regions such asSindh,Punjab andKhyber Pakhtunkhwa.[4][2] Trump stated that selecting an oil company to lead this initiative will be done with transparency, adding that “maybe they’ll be selling oil toIndia someday”.[13][14]
Secondary aspects of the agreement include cooperation in sectors like mining, IT, cryptocurrency, and digital infrastructure.[15]
TheLahore Chamber of Commerce & Industry (LCCI) called the deal a game-changer, citing improved trade balance, job creation, and export growth opportunities.[10]
ThePakistan Stock Exchange (KSE-100) rallied—rising by 978 points—as investors welcomed the trade and energy partnership.[16]
Analysts expressed skepticism about the actual volume ofPakistan's oil reserves: despite Trump's optimism, proven reserves remain modest, with extraction challenges persisting, especially amidsecurity concerns inBalochistan.[17][4]
Editorial caution has been raised about the clarity of benefit-sharing mechanisms, transparency, and the roles of federal vs. provincial authorities in resource management.[18]
Strategic watchers note that the accord signals a U.S. realignment inSouth Asia—possibly using Pakistan as a counterbalance toIndia andChina, and securing access to rare earths and critical minerals alongsidehydrocarbons.[19][17][20][15]
Indian commentators viewed the U.S.–Pakistan rapprochement skeptically—the former diplomatVikas Swarup described it as a "strategic mistake," linking it to broader geopolitical realignments.[21]
The agreement aligns with simultaneous U.S.–Pakistan counterterrorism collaboration: the U.S. designated theBalochistan Liberation Army (BLA) as a terrorist organization, a move lauded byKarachi and carried out amid discussions surrounding the trade accord.[22]
The commercial viability of Pakistan’s oil potential remains uncertain, constrained by geopolitical volatility, investor hesitation, and logistical hurdles.[17]
Governance remains a concern—including equitable integration of provincial stakeholders and transparency in licensing.[18]
There is anticipation for the first shipment of U.S.crude oil to Pakistan, likely in October 2025 viaCnergyico andVitol, symbolizing the deal's early implementation.[23][11]
The potential of exports toIndia remains speculative, heavily contingent on regional diplomacy and stability.[13][14]
| ||
| Premiership |
|  |
| Chief Ministership | ||
| Life and politics | ||
| Family |
| |
| Related | ||
