Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Indirect single transferable voting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Version of the single transferable vote system

Indirect single transferable voting[1] or Gove system[2][3] is a version ofsingle transferable vote (STV), where the vote transfer is determined by the candidate's instructions, not voter's marked preferences. This system produces many of the benefits of STV without the complexity of having voters markranked votes. Under indirect STV, there would be no need to concentrate the votes in one place for vote transfers to be performed.[4][5]

Indirect STV was invented by Walter Baily, of Leeds, and put forward in his 1872 book PR in Large Constituencies.[6]

Archibald E. Dobbs of Ireland, author ofRepresentative Reform for Ireland (1879), wrote of indirect STV in his 1871 bookGeneral Representation.[7][8][9]

Legislator William H. Gove, of Salem, Massachusetts, defended it publicly in the 1890s.[2][10][11]

Indirect STV, as defined here, is not used currently in government elections.

Indirect single transferable voting is distinct from anindirect election by the single transferable vote, which means an election by a legislative body orelectoral college (instead of the enfranchised population) using the single transferable vote election system. Indirect election by the single transferable vote is used to elect some members in some states ofIndia and for election of some positions within the Indian national assembly.[citation needed] The indirect single transferable voting is used to elect some members of theSenate of Pakistan. (Election of many Senate members is done by elected provincial members, using STV of the usual form.)[12][1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abWaqar, M. (2020). Gender Quotas and Political Dynasties: Explaining Women's Substantive Representation in Pakistan's National Assembly (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University).
  2. ^abThe Proportional Representation Congress Stoughton Cooley The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Vol. 4 (Nov., 1893), pp. 112-117 (6 pages)
  3. ^My big, bold ranked-choice voting proposal
  4. ^Indirect STV Election: A Voting System for South Africa
  5. ^Hoag and Hallett, Proportional Representation (1926), p. 53-56
  6. ^Baily's book online:https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044080049836&seq=12
  7. ^Eisner, Jason (2015).Indirect STV Election: A Voting System for South Africa(PDF) (Report). Retrieved27 February 2023.
  8. ^Hoag, Effective Voting (1914)
  9. ^Jenifer Hart, Proportional Representation (1992), p. 72
  10. ^Gove, William H. 1894. “The Relation of the Gove System to Other Methods of Proportional Representation.” Proportional Representation Review 2, no. 6 (December 1894): 41–7.
  11. ^https://jacksantucci.com/docs/papers/partyattack.pdf In America, why does proportional voting have to attack political parties? Jack Santucci, April 5, 2018]
  12. ^Senate Elections 2018, How to Vote under the System of Proportional Representation by Means of a Single Transferable Vote (Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad) (https://ecp.gov.pk/storage/files/1/Senate%20English%20Book.pdf)
Part of thepolitics andEconomics series
Single-winner
Proportional
Systems
Allocation
Quotas
Mixed
Semi-proportional
Criteria
Other
Comparison
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indirect_single_transferable_voting&oldid=1330167144"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp