Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Hatiora

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Genus of flowering plants in the cactus family
For the house plants commonly called Easter cactus or Whitsun cactus, seeRhipsalidopsis gaertneri. For other "holiday cacti", seeSchlumbergera.

Hatiora
Hatiora salicornoides
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom:Plantae
Clade:Tracheophytes
Clade:Angiosperms
Clade:Eudicots
Order:Caryophyllales
Family:Cactaceae
Subfamily:Cactoideae
Tribe:Rhipsalideae
Genus:Hatiora
Britton &Rose[1]
Type species
Hatiora salicornoides
(Haw.) Britton & Rose
Species

See text

Synonyms
  • HariotaDC.
  • RhipsalidopsisBritton & Rose
  • Epiphyllopsis(A.Berger) Backeb. & F.M.Knuth

Hatiora is a smallgenus ofepiphytic cacti which belongs to the tribeRhipsalideae within the subfamilyCactoideae of theCactaceae. Recenttaxonomic studies have led to the three species formerly placed insubgenusRhipsalidopsis being removed from the genus, including the well known and widely cultivated ornamental plants known as Easter cactus or Whitsun cactus (cultivars or hybrids of the formerHatiora gaertneri).

Description

[edit]

AllHatiora species are found asepiphytes growing on trees or (rarely)lithophytes growing on rocks. They are found in thetropical rainforests of theMata Atlântica in easternBrazil. The plants are weaklysucculent, growing more or less upright and becoming woody at the base when older. Spines are usually missing. The insect-pollinatedflowers are borne terminally. They are small, with a diameter of about 2 cm (0.8 in),actinomorphic (radially symmetrical), bell-shaped and always coloured (yellow, yellow-orange or pink). Thefruit is aberry. By contrast with species of the genusSchlumbergera, most of which have flattened stems,Hatiora species have stems with a circular cross-section.[2][3]

Taxonomy

[edit]
See also:Rhipsalideae § Taxonomy

Cacti belonging to the tribe Rhipsalideae are quite distinct in appearance and habit from other cacti, as they grow on trees or rocks asepiphytes orlithophytes. However, for a long time there has been confusion as to how the rhipsalid species should be divided into genera. In 1819,Haworth described the first discovered species of the modern genusHatiora under the nameRhipsalis salicornoides. In 1834,A.P. de Candolle recognized the distinctness of this species and transferred it to a new genusHariota, named afterThomas Hariot, a 16th-century botanist. Later a second species,H. gaertneri, was initially named asEpiphyllum russellianum var.gaertneri (Epiphyllum russellianum is nowSchlumbergera russelliana) and then in 1889 asEpiphyllum gaertneri. A third species,H. rosea, was described in 1912 asRhipsalis rosea.[2]

By 1923, many nomenclatural uncertainties and confusion had arisen over the nameHariota.Nathaniel Britton andJoseph Rose created a new nameHatiora as a taxonomicanagram ofHariota. Of the species known at the time, they placedHariota salicornioides inHatiora along withH. cylindrica; they had already placedH. gaertneri inSchlumbergera in 1913 and left it there; and they erected a new genus,Rhipsalidopsis, forH rosea. Two further species which have been assigned toHatiora were placed in various genera, including the originalHariota andRhipsalis.[2] According to Anderson,[2] the confusion among the Rhipsalideae was not clarified until work byWilhelm Barthlott andNigel Taylor in 1995, which placed six species inHatiora, divided between two subgenera.[4]

Phylogenetic studies usingDNA have led to a modification of the Barthlott and Taylor classification and the three species ofHatiora they placed in subgenusRhipsalidopsis have been transferred out of the genus. There is agreement thatHatiora epiphylloides should be placed inSchlumbergera (asSchlumbergera lutea). There is disagreement over the other two species. Some sources also include them in a broadly definedSchlumbergera,[1][5] others place them as the only two species in the genusRhipsalidopsis.[6][3]Hatiora and the most broadlycircumscribedSchlumbergera both branch from the tip and have short segments (less than 7 cm long).Hatiora has stems that are round in cross-section and radially symmetrical (actinomorphic) flowers, whereasSchlumbergera has flattened or otherwise angular stems and its flowers may be radially symmetrical or radially unsymmetrical (zygomorphic).[5]

In the taxonomic treatments of the genus by Barthlott & Taylor (1995)[4] and Hunt (2006),[7]Hatiora was divided into two subgenera with six accepted species, plus a hybrid created in cultivation. SubgenusRhipsalidopsis has subsequently been removed fromHatiora.[1][5][6][3]

  • SubgenusHatiora, now comprising all ofHatiora:[1]
  • SubgenusRhipsalidopsis,split betweenSchlumbergera andRhipsalidopsis[6] (or transferred toSchlumbergera[5])
    • Hatiora epiphylloides(Porto & Werderm.) Buxb. =Schlumbergera lutea
    • Hatiora gaertneri(Regel) Barthlott =Rhipsalidopsis gaertneri (syn.Schlumbergera gaertneri)
    • Hatiora rosea(Lagerh.) Barthlott =Rhipsalidopsis rosea (syn.Schlumbergera rosea )
    • Hatiora ×graeseri(Werderm.) Barthlott ex D.R.Hunt =Rhipsalidopsis ×graeseri(Barthlott ex D.R.Hunt) P.V.Heath (syn.Schlumbergera ×graeseri), an artificial hybrid ofRhipsalidopsis gaertneri andRhipsalidopsis rosea

Species

[edit]
ImageScientific nameDistribution
Hatiora cylindricaBritton & RoseBrazil (Bahia, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro)
Hatiora herminiae(Porto & A.Cast.) Backeb. ex BarthlottBrazil (Minas Gerais and São Paulo)
Hatiora salicornoides(Haworth) Britton & Rose ex L.H.BaileyBrazil (Bahia, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro state, São Paulo state and Paraná)

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcd"Hatiora Britton & Rose",Plants of the World Online, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, retrieved2019-07-07
  2. ^abcdAnderson (2001), pp. 375–377
  3. ^abcLodé, Joël (2015),"Rhipsalidopsis",Taxonomy of the Cactaceaee : a new classification of cacti based on molecular research and fully explained (vols. 1 and 2), Cuevas del Almanzora,ISBN 978-84-617-2974-6, retrieved2019-06-19
  4. ^abBarthlott & Taylor (1995)
  5. ^abcdCalvente, Alice; Zappi, Daniela C.; Forest, Félix & Lohmann, Lúcia G. (2011), "Molecular phylogeny of tribe Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae) and taxonomic implications forSchlumbergera andHatiora",Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,58 (3):456–468,Bibcode:2011MolPE..58..456C,doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.01.001,PMID 21236350
  6. ^abcKorotkova, Nadja; Borsch, Thomas; Quandt, Dietmar; Taylor, Nigel P.; Müller, Kai F. & Barthlott, Wilhelm (2011), "What does it take to resolve relationships and to identify species with molecular markers? An example from the epiphytic Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae)",American Journal of Botany,98 (9):1549–1572,doi:10.3732/ajb.1000502,PMID 21900612
  7. ^Hunt (2006)

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Anderson, Edward F. (2001),The Cactus Family, Pentland, Oregon: Timber Press,ISBN 978-0-88192-498-5
  • Barthlott, W. (1987), "New names in Rhipsalidinae",Bradleya,5 (5):97–100,doi:10.25223/brad.n5.1987.a7,S2CID 91158296
  • Barthlott, W. & Taylor, N.P. (1995), "Notes towards a monograph of Rhipsalidaeae (Cactaceae)",Bradleya,13 (13):43–79,doi:10.25223/brad.n13.1995.a7,S2CID 89883634
  • Britton, N.L. & Rose, J.N. (1919–1923),The Cactaceae : descriptions and illustrations of plants of the cactus family, Washington: Carnegie Institute,OCLC 491535615
  • Friedman, K.A. (1980), "Hatiora Britton & Rose",Cactus and Succulent Journal,52:127–129
  • Hunt, David R., ed. (2006),The New Cactus Lexicon (2 volumes), Milborne Port: dh books,ISBN 978-0-9538134-4-5
  • Taylor, N.P. & Zappi, D.C. (2004),Cacti of Eastern Brazil, London: Kew Publishing,ISBN 978-1-84246-056-6
Wikimedia Commons has media related toHatiora.
Hatiora
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hatiora&oldid=1333722457"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp