| Bill | |
.svg) | |
| Long title | An Act of the Scottish Parliament to reform the grounds and procedure for obtaining gender recognition; and for connected purposes. |
|---|---|
| Introduced by | Shona Robison[1] |
| Other legislation | |
| Amends | Gender Recognition Act 2004 |
Status: Not passed | |
| History of passage through the Parliament | |
TheGender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill is abill passed by theScottish Parliament. The bill seeks to amend theGender Recognition Act 2004 of theParliament of the United Kingdom, making it simpler for people to change theirlegal gender.[2] On 17 January 2023, theUnited Kingdom government used section 35 of theScotland Act 1998 to block the bill from receivingroyal assent, the first time section 35 has been used.[3]
In July 2002, theEuropean Court of Human Rights ruled in theGoodwin v United Kingdom case that atrans person's inability to change the sex on theirbirth certificate was a breach of their rights underArticle 8 (privacy) andArticle 12 (marriage) of theEuropean Convention on Human Rights. Following this judgement, the UK government had to introduce new legislation to comply, which became law as theGender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA). To obtain a gender recognition certificate (GRC) under the GRA, an applicant must a) provide evidence of a diagnosis ofgender dysphoria; b) have lived in their "acquired gender" for two years; and c) make astatutory declaration that they intend to live in the acquired gender until death.[4]
In a June 2020 report, theEuropean Commission classified the legal procedures for gender recognition of 28 European countries into five categories based on the barriers to access. This placed the UK's Gender Recognition Act 2004 in the second from bottom category with "intrusive medical requirements" that lag behind international human rights standards.[5] The procedures have also been described as costly, bureaucratic, and time-consuming for trans people, with successful applicants having to wait two years until they can change their legal gender.[6]
The issue of gender recognition isdevolved in Scotland, which allows the Scottish parliament, if it wishes, to legislate for a different policy from that of England and Wales.[4] In 2004, the Scottish Parliament passed amotion to consent to Westminster's GRA, so that a uniform system of gender recognition would be in place throughout the UK.[7] A 2018 consultation in England and Wales found that a majority of the over 100,000 respondents were in favour of removing most of the requirements for a GRC; despite this, in 2020, the government in Westminster announced that it would not legislate to relax the requirements.[4] Separately, the Scottish government also consulted on reforming the law: an initial consultation on the principles of the bill which took place between November 2017 and March 2018 found a majority of the 15,500 respondents in favour of the bill;[8] and the second consultation on a draft bill, taking place between November 2019 and March 2020, also found majority support.[9][10]
TheScottish National Party (SNP) committed to "review and reform gender recognition law, so it's in line with international best practice for people who are transgender" in their manifesto for the2016 Scottish Parliament election, which they won.[11][12] After the consultations ended, the Scottish government intended to introduce the bill to Parliament in 2020, but was forced by theCOVID-19 pandemic in Scotland to delay consideration until after the2021 Scottish Parliament election.[13][14]
The 2021 election saw the SNP returned to government, this time in a coalition with theScottish Greens rather than as aminority government; both parties featured the bill in their manifestos. TheBute House Agreement between the two parties committed to introducing a Gender Recognition Reform Bill before the end of May 2022.[14][15][8]
The bill was introduced on 2 March 2022, by Shona Robison, the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Housing and Local Government. The bill lowers the age people can change their legal gender from 18 to 16, removes the requirement of a medical diagnosis ofgender dysphoria, and reduces the waiting time from two years to six months of living in an acquired gender.[16] Also issued on the same day were a delegated powers memorandum,[17] policy memorandum,[18] financial memorandum,[19] and statement of legislative competence.[20]
The bill was subject to a mandatory consultation–its third–by the Scottish Parliament's Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. This committee was designated as the lead committee and ran thirteen evidence sessions.[21][22] The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee of the Scottish Parliament, issued a report to the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, on 16 May 2022, regarding thedelegated powers memorandum for the bill, which reported they were content with the delegated powers provisions contained within the bill.[23] The Finance and Public Administration Committee held a consultation on the financial memorandum, which received six responses, all of which were forwarded to the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. The committee took no action based on the results of its consultation and recommended no changes to the financial memorandum.[24]
The Stage 1 report, from the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, recommended that the general principles be approved.[25]
The bill was voted on by the full parliament on 27 October 2022 and passed by a majority of 88 to 33, with 4 abstentions and 4 members not voting.[26][27]
A number of amendments were proposed made to the bill at Stage 2,[28][29] the majority of which were not passed.[30] The Finance and Public Administration Committee published an updated financial memorandum on 7 December 2022 on the bill and noted the updates at its meeting on 13 December 2022.[31][24]
The bill was heard at Stage 3 on 20–21 December 2022 for amendments to the bill. The final debate and vote was held on 22 December 2022.[32]
On 19 December 2022, the day before the Stage 3 debate began, the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee held an evidence session on the bill.[33][34][35] They heard from twoUnited Nations representatives,Victor Madrigal-Borloz, an expert ongender identity andUnited Nations Independent Expert on Protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, andReem Alsalem,United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women.[36][37] Madrigal-Borloz described the Scottish bill as a "significant step forward", while Alsalem said it "would potentially open the door for violent males who identify as men to abuse the process of acquiring a gender certificate and the rights that are associated with it", a view that was disputed by Madrigal-Borloz, who said it would bring Scotland in line with international human rights standards.[38]
The bill was voted on by the full parliament on 22 December 2022 and passed by a majority of 86 to 39, with 0 abstentions and 4 members not voting.[39] The announcement of the result was accompanied by cheers from supporters in the chamber, and shouts of "shame on you" from protesters in the public gallery.[40]
| Statutory Instrument | |
.svg) | |
| Citation | SI 2023/41 |
|---|---|
| Introduced by | Alister Jack,Secretary of State for Scotland |
| Dates | |
| Made | 17 January 2023 |
| Laid before Parliament | 17 January 2023 |
| Commencement | 18 January 2023 |
| Other legislation | |
| Made under | Scotland Act 1998 |
Status: Current legislation | |
| History of passage through Parliament | |
| Text of statute as originally enacted | |
On 16 January 2023, Scotland SecretaryAlister Jack announced that he would make an order under section 35 of theScotland Act 1998, which would prevent the bill from proceeding toroyal assent. Jack cited concerns that the bill would adversely impact the UK-wideEquality Act 2010 as the reason for the tabling of the motion before the Westminster Parliament; equal opportunities are a reserved matter under the Scotland Act.[41][42][43] The order using the negative procedure was made on 17 January 2023 and entered into force on the next day. The negative procedure means that the order is in force unless either house of Parliament votes to disagree with the order within 40 days. The final day to vote a disagreement was 27 February 2023.[44] This was the first time royal assent was not granted to a bill passed by the Scottish Parliament since its creation in 1999.[45] As similar powers regarding theSenedd andNorthern Ireland Assembly have never been used, this is the first post-legislative veto of a bill sinceQueen Anne refused assent to theScottish Militia Bill in 1708.[46][original research]
On 17 January 2023, Jack made a formal statement to theHouse of Commons that he was using section 35 of the Scotland Act 1988 and set out his reasons for doing so.[47] On 18 January the statement of Jack that was made in the Commons was presented and debated in theHouse of Lords.[48]
On 17 January 2023,Stephen Flynn, the SNP leader at Westminster, requested and was granted an emergency debate on the use of the Section 35 order. The debate was on the question "This House has considered the Government's decision to use section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 with regard to the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill."[49] The debate lasted for two hours and the house voted 318 to 71 in favour of the UK government position that the house had considered the matter.[50]
UK Prime Minister and Labour Party leader,Keir Starmer has said he will continue the block on the Gender Recognition Reform Bill.[51][52]
On 24 January 2023, Flynn tabled aPrayer against the section 35 Order which was worded as follows: "That a humble Address be presented to His Majesty, praying that The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill (Prohibition on Submission for Royal Assent) Order 2023, dated 17 January 2023, a copy of which was laid before this House on 17 January 2023, be annulled".[54][55]
On 12 April 2023,Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice in the devolvedScottish government,Shirley-Anne Somerville, announced the intention to launch a request for ajudicial review of the UK government's use of Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 against the bill.[56][57] The hearing of the court case began on 19 September 2023 at the Court of Session in Edinburgh[58] and was completed the following day. The court's ruling was delivered on 8 December 2023;the judge rejected the Scottish Government's legal challenge.[59] In his analysis forThe Herald, the newspaper's political editor, Tom Gordon, wrote of the ruling, "Make no mistake. This is not a narrow defeat for the Scottish Government and Mr Yousaf's decision to go to court come-what-may. It is a comprehensive demolition job".[60]
On 20 December 2023, Somerville announced that the Scottish government would not appeal the ruling, but would not withdraw the bill from the Scottish parliament. She said: "For the avoidance of doubt, this bill is not in the bin and is waiting an incoming UK government that has more respect for devolution."[61]
On 10 May 2024, First Minister andSNP Leader,John Swinney formally abandoned Nicola Sturgeon's self-ID gender plans after saying they cannot be implemented. He toldSky News that "The reality of the situation we face is that the Supreme Court has said that we can't legislate in that area. We can't take forward that legislation".[62][63]
The bill was supported byfeminist,LGBTQ, and human rights campaign organisations such asAmnesty International,Stonewall,Rape Crisis Scotland,Equality Network,Engender,Scottish Trans Alliance, andScottish Women's Aid.[64][25] The vast majority of SNP andScottish Labour parliamentarians, as well as all Scottish Green andScottish Liberal Democrat MSPs supported the bill,[65] as did three of theScottish Conservative members.[66]
The bill is similar tothe one adopted in theRepublic of Ireland. InNorthern Ireland, the bill was supported bySinn Féin, theAlliance Party, and theSocial Democratic and Labour Party, whose politicians and MPs raised the possibility of adopting a similar bill.[66]
The bill was opposed by some political, social, feminist and religious organisations such as the Scottish Conservatives,[67] theLGB Alliance, Fair Play for Women,[68] the CatholicBishops' Conference of Scotland[69][70] andFor Women Scotland, a group founded to oppose the bill.[71] Nine SNP members voted against the bill at stage 3,[72] which was reported inEuronews as "the biggest rebellion against the government by its own party in the last 15 years".[73] TheMinister for Community Safety, the SNP'sAsh Regan, resigned before the Stage 2 vote, saying she was concerned the bill could have "negative implications for the safety and dignity of women and girls".[74] Reganleft the party within a year, joining theAlba Party.[75]
Soon after the passage of the bill, academic commentary began to moot the possibility of an invocation of section 35 of theScotland Act 1998 to block the bill. On 21 December 2022, Dr Michael Foran, a lecturer in public law at theUniversity of Glasgow, floated the idea that the bill could be blocked as it infringed on the operation of reserved matters.[76][77] On 23 December 2022, Prime MinisterRishi Sunak said that it would be "completely reasonable" for the United Kingdom government to block the bill, citing concerns for "women and children's safety".[78][79] On 16 January 2023, in response to continued reports that the government was planning to block the bill, Scotland's first ministerNicola Sturgeon called the prospect an "outrage", and stated the UK government was using transgender people as a "political weapon".[80] Following Jack's announcement in theHouse of Commons of the UK that the bill would be blocked, Sturgeon said that the dispute would "inevitably end up in court" and that the Scottish government would "vigorously defend" the bill.[81]
Kemi Badenoch, theminister for women and equalities, suggested that gender recognition certificates and associated government documents would no longer be recognised in England and Wales if they were from places "where there is a clear indication that the country now no longer has a system at least as rigorous as those in the Gender Recognition Act 2004".[82] On 17 January 2023, the Westminster government released a policy statement on their decision to invoke Section 35. In the statement they set out three primary reasons why they believed the Scottish bill impinged upon reserved matters: firstly, a potential impact on provision of single-sex services authorised under theEquality Act 2010 as a result of creating "two parallel and very different regimes" for issuing gender recognition certificates; secondly, a potential increased risk of fraudulent applications; thirdly, potential impacts on the operation of the Equality Act 2010.[83][84]
Alister Jack and Kemi Badenoch were invited by the Scottish Parliament's Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee to give evidence about their decision to block the bill; both declined to attend.[85][86]
Lord Hope of Craighead, formerly deputy president of theUK Supreme Court defended the legality of the UK government's decision and said that the possibility of success of a legal challenge against the decision by the Scottish Government was "very low".[87] Former Labour shadow attorney generalBaroness Chakrabarti, also defended the legality of the government's decision.[88][better source needed] Former Labour Lord ChancellorLord Falconer of Thoroton has tweeted that the UK government's reasons are not justified.[89]
Nancy Kelley, the chief executive ofStonewall, and Colin Macfarlane, the director of Stonewall Scotland, said that Sunak was risking "re-toxifying" his government's record on LGBTQ rights and introducing "an effective trans travel ban". Kelley and Macfarlane were quoted as saying "the UK government sees trans people as a threat to be contained, not citizens to be respected".[82] A Cabinet Office spokesperson responded by saying that trans people "have not and will not be banned" from entering the UK.[82] In contrast toLabour Party leaderKeir Starmer, who criticised the bill as "cavalier",Scottish Labour leaderAnas Sarwar supported the bill.[90][91] Maggie Baska inPinkNews notes that Starmer "faced backlash from other politicians, LGBTQ+ advocates and trans people over his comments on the GRR bill".[92]
For Women Scotland is a grassroots women's group founded in June 2018 amid growing unease about how women's rights would be affected by the Scottish Government's plans to reform the Gender Recognition Act to allow for self-declaration of sex.
The full text ofGender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill at Wikisource
Media related toProtests against the blocking of Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill at Wikimedia Commons
