František Mareš | |
|---|---|
 František Mareš, ca. 1912 | |
| Member of the Senate | |
| In office 1920–1925 | |
| Personal details | |
| Born | (1857-10-20)October 20, 1857 |
| Died | February 6, 1942(1942-02-06) (aged 84) |
| Party | National Democratic Party |
| Occupation | professor,politician |
František Mareš (20 October 1857 – 6 February 1942) was aCzechoslovakprofessor ofphysiology andphilosophy, and anationalistpolitician. He was rector of theCharles University in 1920–21,[1] and a member of theNational Democrats.
Mareš was born in Opatovice. He studied philosophy and medicine in Prague (postgraduate in Vienna), graduating in 1886. He became a professor in 1890. He became a chairman of the Physiology Institute of the Charles University in 1895, continuing in that capacity until 1928. In 1914 and 1920, he was appointed rector of the Charles University for one year. He was many times appointed dean of Faculty of Medicine. He held an honorary doctorate from the Mayo clinic.
During the war and after the independence ofCzechoslovakia fromAustria-Hungary in 1918, Mareš became active in the Czechoslovak nationalist movement. He was an active member of the National Democrats, and became a member of the Revolutionary National Assembly of Czechoslovakia in 1918. In 1920, he was elected to the Senate, until the next election of 1925. At that time he became influenced by fascism, much to the dismay of the National Democratic leadership. In 1934, he was part of the leadership of the National Front (Národní fronta), later National Unity (Národní sjednocení). He was also a contributor toVlajka.
He died in České Budějovice and was entombed in Hluboká nad Vltavou.
Mareš published his research papers mainly in German and French journals. The papers were oriented on metabolism, neurophysiology and winter dormancy in rodents. For medical students he prepared textbooksVšeobecná fysiologie andFysiologie I-IV. His philosophy was briefly based upon theVitalism ofHenri Bergson andHans Driesch. He was a critic ofpositivism, reflected in his bookIdealism and Realism in Natural Sciences (1903). He also defended theRukopis královédvorský, which were later exposed asforgeries byscientific dating methods.
