 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Economic recovery" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(May 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Aneconomic recovery is the phase of thebusiness cycle following arecession. The overall business outlook for an industry looks optimistic during the economic recovery phase.
During the recovery period, the economy goes through a process of economic adaptation and change to new circumstances, including the reasons that caused therecession in the first place, as well as the newpolicies and regulations enacted bygovernments andcentral banks in reaction to therecession.
When displaced workers find newemployment and failing enterprises are bought up or broken up by others, the labor,capital goods, and othereconomic resources that were tied up in businesses that failed and went under after therecession are re-employed in new industries. Recovery is the process by which the economy heals itself from the harm it has sustained, paving the way for future growth.
"Terms such as 'recovery', 'reconstruction', and 'rebuilding' might suggest a return to the status quo before the conflict. Typically, however, developmental pathologies such as extremeinequality,poverty,corruption,exclusion, institutional decay, poor policy design and economic mismanagement will have contributed toarmed conflicts in the first instance and will have been further exacerbated during conflict. Accordingly, post-conflict recovery is often not about restoring pre-war economic or institutional arrangements; rather, it is about creating a new political economy dispensation. It is not about simply building back, but about building back differently and better. As such, economic recovery . . . is essentially transformative, requiring a mix of far-reaching economic, institutional, legal and policy reforms that allow war-torn countries to re-establish the foundations for self-sustaining development."[1]
Leading indicators include thestock index, which often increases ahead of an economic recovery. This is generally becausestock markets are guided by potential hopes.
Other important indicators areunemployment rate andemployment-population ratio (EPR). In the recovery phase we can talk about total recovery after the unemployment rate reaches its prerecession norm, because at this state the economy reached its prereccesion optimal level of unemployment. The norm for unemployment is in most of countries considered to be between 4-6 %.
On the other hand, both unemployment rate and EPR are usually a lagging measure. Since many employers will not recruit additional workers until they are sufficiently sure that there is a long-term demand for new hiring,unemployment frequently stays strong even though the economy starts to recover and it is equalized by the end of recovery phase.
GDP is typically used to predict economic phases, with two-quarters of successive negativeGDP growth signaling acontraction. There is also a perception, that the Economic recovery phase ends, when the country's GDP reaches its prerecession level, so the economy will reach the level of GDP equal to the latest peak, and at this point starts an economic expansion. There is also a difference in the definition of previous peak. There we can measure eitherReal GDP, or potential real GDP, which is the highest level that can be sustained over a prolonged period without causing excessive inflation. (As the Congressional Budget Office explains - CBO. )
Consumer morale andinflation are two other economic factors to remember.[2]
Keynes dismissed theclassical view that the economy must naturally return toequilibrium. Instead, he concluded that if an economic slowdown occurs, for whatever reason, the panic and gloom that it generates among firms and consumers seem to become self-fulfilling, leading to a prolonged period of low economic growth andunemployment. In reaction,Keynes proposed a countercyclicalmonetary strategy in which, during times of economic adversity, the government could engage in deficit spending to compensate for a fall inconsumption and increaseconsumer spending in order to sustainaggregate demand.
According toKeynes,depression can trigger a vicious loop in whichunemployment lowersdemand to the point that no new jobs can be generated. By stimulatingdemand,government action builds a positive cycle.[3]
Given the importance of monetary deflation and thegold standard in triggering theGreat Depression, it is not shocking thatcurrency depreciation and monetary growth were the primary causes of global recovery. However,devaluation did not explicitly increaseproductivity. Rather, it helped countries to increase theirmoney supply without having to worry about gold flows orexchange rates. Countries that took advantage of this freedom recovered faster. TheUnited States' monetary growth, which began in early 1933, was especially dramatic. Between 1933 and 1937, theAmerican money supply rose by almost 42 percent.
This monetary expansion was largely the result of a massive gold inflow to theUnited States, which was prompted in part by increasing political tensions inEurope prior toWorld War II. By cuttinginterest rates and makingcredit more readily accessible,monetary inflation increased spending. It also providedinflationary rather thandeflationary expectations, allowing prospectivecreditors more hope that their incomes and earnings would be able to fund theirdebt payments if they were to borrow.Fiscal policies played a minor role in promoting recovery in theUnited States.
Franklin D. Roosevelt'sNew Deal, which began in early 1933, included a host of newfederal measures aimed at spurring recovery. It remains to be seen if they have any positive impact oncustomer and company opinion. AnyNew Deal projects may have hampered rehabilitation.The United States' recovery was cut short by another distinctcontraction that began in May 1937 and lasted until June 1938.[5]
TheUnited States responded to the2008 financial crisis by cuttinginterest rates close to zero, buyingmortgage loans andgovernment debt, andbailouts of several distressedfinancial institutions. With interest rates too low,bond returns have become much less appealing to buyers as compared tostocks. The government's reaction sparked thestock market, with theS&P 500 returning 250 percent over a ten-year stretch.The housing market in most big cities in the United States recovered, and theunemployment rate plummeted as firms started to recruit and spend more.
Othercentral banks reacted in a similar manner to the United States. All governments boosted their spending to spurdemand and sustain jobs in the economy; pledgeddeposits andbank bonds to bolster interest in financial companies; and boughtequity stakes in somebanks and otherfinancial institutions to avoidbankruptcies, which might have escalated the financial market crisis.
Despite the fact that the world economy suffered the most severerecession since theGreat Depression, policy responses avoided a globaldepression.
As a result of the recession, authorities tightened their supervision of banks and other financial institutions. Among the several recent global rules, banks must now analyze the value of theloans they provide more carefully and use more resilient financing sources.[6]
The adoption of theDodd-Frank Wall Street Regulation and Consumer Protection Act, a major piece offinancial reformlegislation enacted by theObama administration in 2010, was one result of the crisis. Dodd-Frank altered every part of theUnited Statesfinancial regulatory system, affecting everyregulatory agency and every financial service company.
The methods by which countries' governments promoted economic recovery can be generally divided into two groups;centralized anddecentralized governments.
ThoughThe United States faced several economic challenges amid the ongoing global pandemic, 2021 was a successful year in the USA economy. The country likely[clarification needed] reached the fastesteconomic growth since 1984, and has seen record jobs gains and a considerable drop in unemployment. All of this is due to the policies implemented during the pandemic.[citation needed]
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the USA government decided to implement multiple aid programs, which are collectively known as 'Biden Boom'[by whom?]. Of which 2 major programs were theAmerican Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the COVID-19 vaccine program. Much of this aid was disbursed to the families who were most negatively financially impacted by the pandemic. These policies addressed weaknesses in thesocial safety net that became more apparent during the pandemic. The U.S. economy gained an average of 565 000 jobs per month and 6.2 Million during 2021. As a result of high job gains theunemployment rate fell by 2.5% and reached 3.9% at the end of 2021. Because of low unemployment and a rise in income, The United States managed to surpass their pre-pandemiclevel of economic output. The U.S. was also the first country fromG7 to recover allGDP lost during the pandemic. The economic growth was estimated to be 5.5 percent for year 2021.[7]
Other countries implemented similar policies, but they were not as effective. Report produced by theUN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) in 2022 states, that there is still a large number of problems, namely new waves of COVID-19 infections, persistentlabour market[clarification needed], lingeringsupply-chain challenges, and rising inflationary pressures, which slows globaleconomic growth. The slowdown is expected to continue in upcoming years. After a boom driven by higher spendings made by government[who?] in 2021 and the economic growth of 5.5%, global output is assumed[needs update] to grow by only 4.0% in 2022 and 3.5% in 2023.[8]
Large centralized economies needed to be careful about their decisions, because they could overwhelm small and starting businesses with too muchfunding orregulations.[clarification needed]
At the beginning of the pandemic, Japan's government expanded the stimulus programmes that were initially intended for small enterprises, to include financing for medium and large companies. The programme now involves government-backed lenders in Japan providing specific loans to all companies affected by pandemics. The loans are also better accessible by companies, because of lowerinterest rate (around 1% instead of usual 5%) and there is no need for loans to be coordinated withprivate lenders.[citation needed]
Decentralized and local governments chose a way of higher independence for states andmunicipalities. Businesses had a wide field to operate andmaximize their profits under thepremise that they would make more job opportunities and would bring more money into their local economies.[citation needed]
Aside from letting companies maximize their profits, these governments also had an option to free up and redistribute central governmentresources to localinstitutions. For instance, there was a local government approach to economic recovery in Mexico. The government supported local tourism, which was highly affected by pandemics. Although the Government implemented reduced capacity measures, and health and safety protocols, they did not mandate any protocol that would have made visitor entry difficult. For example, they decided to not require international travelers be vaccinated before their arrival in the country.[9]