 | This articlerelies excessively onreferences toprimary sources. Please improve this article by addingsecondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Conclave capitulation" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(August 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Aconclave capitulation was a compact or unilateral contract drawn up by theCollege of Cardinals during apapal conclave to constrain the actions of thepope elected by the conclave. The legal termcapitulation more frequently refers to the commitment of a sovereign state to relinquish jurisdiction within its borders over the subjects of a foreign state. Before balloting began, all cardinals present at the conclave would swear to be bound by its provisions if elected pope.[1] Capitulations were used by the College of Cardinals to assert its collective authority and limitpapal supremacy, to "make the Church anoligarchy instead of amonarchy."[2] Similarelectoral capitulations were used on occasion from the 14th to the 17th centuries in Northern and Central Europe to constrain an elected king, emperor, prince, or bishop.
The College had made informal attempts to influence the actions of popes before drafting formal capitulations.[3] The first capitulation was drafted in the conclave of 1352, which electedPope Innocent VI,[4][5] and most conclaves for the next 300 years produced similar documents.[6]
In 1353, Innocent VI declared these first Capitulations invalid with hisApostolic Constitution,Sollicitudo, citing a Constitution ofPope Gregory X,Contingit,[5] which prohibited papal conclaves from dealing with issues other than the election of a Pope. This papal response would be repeated for most future Capitulations, which were generally disregarded.[6] For this reason, papal historian Frederic Baumgartner calls capitulations "an exercise in futility."[7] Another papal historian, Van Dyke, surmises that by the election ofPope Sixtus IV (1471), "all the Popes for forty years had signed and promptly broken" the "Capitulation of the Conclave."[8] Jugie considers the "regular recourse to capitulation" to be "above all, an admission of weakness."[4] Despite their ineffectiveness, Capitulations still give an insight into the thinking of the Cardinals as they prepared to vote for a pope.
Although not the last Capitulations, that of the conclave of 1513 (which electedPope Leo X) was a turning point forpapal supremacy and attempts to control it through formal treaties; never again did the College attempt tolimit its size through capitulations; although individual cardinals remained powerful, the College as a whole never regained its power as the "senate" of the Church.[9]
In 1676, Pope-electInnocent XI made the College swear to the capitulation that had been drafted by the previous conclave before accepting his election.[10]
Though the practice was defunct,Pope John Paul II's 1996 ConstitutionUniversi Dominici Gregis banned conclave capitulations as well as thepapal veto, which had already been eliminated by Pius X.[11] He wrote: "I likewise forbid the Cardinals before the election to enter into any stipulations, committing themselves of common accord to a certain course of action should one of them be elevated to the Pontificate. These promises too, should any in fact be made, even under oath, I also declare null and void."[12]
| Conclave year | Pope elected | Terms | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1352[6] | Innocent VI | College of Cardinals limited to 20; no new cardinals until only 16 remained Two-thirds of College needed to approve creating, excommunicating, depriving of suffrage, or reducing the property or revenue of cardinals, or to request subsidies from sovereigns or national clergies College granted veto power of papal decisions and policies All papal revenue shared with College | First conclave capitulation[4] Declared invalid by Innocent VI in 1353 |
| 1431[3] | Eugene IV | Half of papal revenue was to be shared with theCollege of Cardinals No major issues were to be decided without the consent of the College | Eugene IV issues a bull to put the capitulation into effect, but later withdrew it Attempted to undo the reforms ofPope Martin V, which had deprived the College of control of church revenues[13] |
| 1458[14] | Pius II | Welfare for the poorer cardinals; and a crusade against the Ottoman Turks | |
| 1464[15][16] | Paul II | Continue the crusading war against the Turks Leave Rome only with the consent of the majority of cardinals; Italy with the consent of all College of Cardinals limited to 24 New Pope limited to onecardinal-nephew Creation of cardinals or advancement ofbenefices required the consent of the College | Similar to 1431 and 1454 capitulations Most of the three-day conclave was spent drafting the capitulation[17] Cardinal Trevisan did not subscribe Paul II created threecardinal-nephews |
| 1471[18] | Sixtus IV | Continue the crusading war against the Turks | Fewer limitations on papal power Frontrunner CardinalBasilios Bessarion fell out of favor by rejecting the capitulation[19] |
| 1484[20] | Innocent VIII | Cardinals protected from retaliation by secular rulers in connection with the conclave New Pope limited to onecardinal-nephew College of Cardinals limited to 24 | |
| 1492[21] | Alexander VI | Limits on the creation of new cardinals | No other terms known |
| August–September 1503[22] | Pius III | Papal stipend of 2,400 ducats a year for cardinals with annual income less than 6,000 ducats General council was to be held within two years, and every five years thereafter[23] | College of Cardinalsnot limited to 24 |
| October 1503[24] | Julius II | General council to be held within two years Cardinals to be consulted on creation of new cardinals and other matters Agreement of a supermajority of cardinals for the pope to declare war | Shortest conclave ever |
| 1513[25] | Leo X | College of Cardinals limited to 24[26] Continue the crusading war against the Turks without taxing cardinals Reformation of theRoman Curia along the unfinished terms ofJulius II Roman Curia was not to leave Rome Two-thirds of College required to close theLateran Council,[26] to impeach or nominate a cardinal, nominate alegatea latere, to confer certain ecclesiastical offices (Julius II had excommunicated four cardinals[27]) Laity mostly excluded from governing ofPapal States Secret articles conferred benefits on cardinals: 200 ducat monthly allowance to a cardinal with annual income less than 6000 Cardinals could not be appointed legate without their consent Benefices of St. Peter and St. John the Lateran could only be conferred on Roman citizens | Imperial Ambassador considered the capitulation unlikely to be followed as it would make the cardinal elected only "half a Pope" Slightly unreliable copy found in diary ofParis de Grassis Leo X's violation of the capitulation marked the end of attempts tolimit the size of the College or authority of Popes through capitulations; College was transformed from a "senate" to a group of advisers[9] |
| 1522[7] | Adrian VI | Unknown | Called "an exercise in futility as always" by Baumgartner[7] |
| 1549-1550[28] | Julius III | Similar to that of 1523 | Ippolito II d'Este delayed negotiations on the capitulation for three days in an attempt to buy time for more French cardinals to reach the conclave Drafted by six cardinals elected from the College[29] |
| 1559[30] | Pius IV | Pope prohibited from waging war on a Catholic prince (asPope Paul IV had done with Spain) Lateran Council was to be reconvened | |
| 1585[31] | Sixtus V | Continue the crusading war against the Turks, make peace with Catholic monarchs, complete the construction of St. Peters (which had been ongoing for seven decades) | Little mention of privileges ornumber of cardinals |
| September 1590[32] | Urban VII | None known | |
| 1669-1670[10] | Clement X | Reform of the clergy, independence from secular rulers, restoration of advisory role of cardinals | |
| 1676[10] | Innocent XI | Same as that of 1670 | Unique in that Pope-elect made cardinals swear to the previous capitulation before accepting his election |