Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Caucasian campaign of Pompey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Part of Pompey's eastern campaigns
This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
icon
This articlerelies largely or entirely on asingle source. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Caucasian campaign of Pompey" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(May 2023)
icon
This articlerelies excessively onreferences toprimary sources. Please improve this article by addingsecondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: "Caucasian campaign of Pompey" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(February 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Caucasian campaign of Pompey
Part of theThird Mithridatic War

Pompey's campaign in the East 65 BC
Date65 BC
Location
ResultRoman victory
Territorial
changes
Incorporation ofColchis
Part ofa series on the
History of Georgia

Caucasian campaign of Pompey (Georgian:პომპეუსის ლაშქრობა კავკასიაში) was amilitary campaign led byPompey that took place in 65 BC and was a consequence of thethird Mithridatic War fought overGeorgian lands and its neighboring frontiers.Rome sought to expand its influence and establish itself as the overlord of theMiddle East. After conquering theKingdom of Pontus and receiving the subjugation ofTigranes II of Armenia the Romans marched on theKingdom of Iberia, whose king,Artoces had been an ally ofMithridates VI of Pontus, Rome's premier enemy during the 80s, 70s, and early 60s BC.

Background

[edit]

The war againstMithridates VI, king ofPontus, had now lasted for almost twenty-five years (since 89 BC). BothLucius Cornelius Sulla Felix andLucius Licinius Lucullus had fought against him, achieving numerous successes. However, Lucullus' fortune and consensus among his troops had been wavering for too long, so much so that certain complaints about the recent military campaigns conducted in the East, without prior support from the Senate, also reachedRome, where it was decided to replace the Roman proconsul in command of his province, and to send a large part of his soldiers on leave. Lucullus thus found himself exonerated, for having dissatisfied not only his troops, but also for having antagonized the powerful faction of usurers and tax collectors inAsia.[1]

Meanwhile,Tigranes had retreated within his kingdom, reconquering some previously lost parts.[2] while Mithridates also hastened to reconquer part of the ancient territories of Pontus andLesser Armenia.[3] Lucullus, who had initially attempted to follow him, was forced to turn back due to lack of supplies.[4]

Then it was Mithridates who counterattacked theRomans, even managing to kill many of them in battle.[5] First he went against a legate of Lucullus, named Fabius,[6][7] who was almost massacred together with his army, if during the battle Mithridates had not been hit by a stone on the knee and by a dart under his eye, forcing the king himself to move away from the battlefield and suspend the fighting, thus allowing Fabius and the Romans to save themselves.[8] Then Fabius was closed and besieged inCabira and freed only thanks to the intervention of a second legate,Gaius Valerius Triarius, who happened to be in those parts on his march from Asia towards Lucullus.[9]

Therefore, it was the turn of Lucullus' second legate, Triarius, who had come to the aid of Fabius with his army. Triarius, determined to pursue Mithridates, managed to beat the sovereign of Pontus during this first clash, nearComana.[10] Then came winter, which interrupted all military operations on both sides.[11][12]

Once the winter had passed, Mithridates clashed with Triarius again, going to camp nearGaziura in front of the Roman legate.[13] Mithridates tried to lure the Roman legate into battle and in the end Triarius fell into his trap and was heavily defeated near Zela.[14][15] Having obtained these two victories, Mithridates retreated to the country that the Romans called little Armenia (on the hills near Talauro[16]), destroying everything that he was not able to transport, in order to avoid being reached by Lucullus in his march.[17] Then Mithridates decided to invadeCappadocia again, managing to conquer almost all of its old dominions. He then proceeded to fortify his kingdom and damaged nearby Cappadocia, while the Romans did nothing, either because they were busy against the pirates of theMediterranean,[18] or because neither Acilius, nor Lucullus (by now ousted from command), nor Marcius ( new governor ofCilicia), took no action against him.[19]

WhileLucullus was occupied withMithridates andTigranes II, GnaeusPompey managed to cleanse the entire Mediterranean basin from pirates, wresting from them the island ofCrete, the coasts ofLycia,Pamphylia, and Cilicia, demonstrating extraordinary discipline and organizational ability (in 67 BC). Cilicia proper (Trachea and Pedias), which had been a pirate den for over forty years, was thus definitively subjugated. Following these events the city of Tarsus became the capital of the entire Roman province. As many as 39 new cities were then founded. The speed of the campaign indicated that Pompey had been talented as a general at sea, with strong logistical skills.[20]

Pompey was then tasked with conducting a new war againstMithridates VI, king ofPontus, in the East (in 66 BC),[21][22] thanks to thelex Manilia, proposed by the plebeian tribuneGaius Manilius, and politically supported byCaesar andCicero.[23] This command essentially entrusted him with the conquest and reorganization of the entire easternMediterranean, having the power to proclaim which were the client peoples and which were the enemies, with an unlimited power never before conferred on anyone, and attributing to him all the forces military forces beyond the borders of Roman Italy.[24][25]

Pompey, having understood that it was necessary to continue the war against Mithriadates, made the necessary preparations, recalling the Valerian legion into service. Having arrived inGalatia, coming from the south after crossing the "gates of Cilicia",[26] he metLucullus on the way back.[27][28] Meanwhile, Mithridates, since he initially had fewer armed men than Pompey, began to plunder, forcing Pompey to run after him, as well as trying in every way to block his supplies. The king of Pontus, who still had an army of 30,000 infantr[29][30] and 2,000[31]/3,000 cavalry,[32] had positioned himself along the frontier of his kingdom, and since Lucullus had shortly before devastated that region, there were few supply resources so much so that many of its armed forces were forced to desert.[33][34][35] The king, then, being now short of supplies, preferred to withdraw, allowing Pompey to follow him, albeit letting him enter his territories, and thus hoping that the Roman general himself could find himself in the same conditions as him due to the scarcity of supplies. But Pompey had adequately organized his supplies (also building a series of water wells[36]), having conquered theArmenian region of Anaitide shortly before.[37]

Pompey was thus able to continue his march passing through the eastern borders of Mithridates' kingdom, establishing a series of new fortified positions (at regular intervals of 25 km from each other). He therefore designed a circumvallation line that would allow him to besiege the king of Pontus and obtain supplies without major difficulties.[38][39]

The Roman generalLucullus had led the eastern campaign from 73 BC to 67 BC but after a mutiny of his army he had retreated toGalatia inAsia Minor. In 66 BC, theRoman Senate gave command of the war against Mithridates to Gnaeus Pompeius (better known asPompey). That same year Pompey effectively defeatedMithridates at theBattle of the Lycus, with the king escaping throughColchis to theBosporean kingdom north of theBlack Sea. A pursuit party was sent after him, they followed him all the way to Colchis but lost his trail. Pompey meanwhile prepared to advance into Armenia against his second enemy, Tigranes II the Great king of theArmenian empire. When he did Tigranes submitted and was allowed to keep Armenia, but not those lands he had won by conquest (parts of Cappadocia, Cilicia, Syria, Phoenicia, and Sophene). Pompey left Armenia under the military supervision ofAfranius, he sentGabinius south-east towards Mesopotamia and he himself marched the main army north (into the valley of the river Cyrnus) towards the Kingdom of Albania. Here he split his troops into three divisions and put them into winter quarters.[40]

First campaign

[edit]

TheCaucasian Albani decided to act before the Romans could invade. Oroeses, king of the Albani, organized a concerted attack on the divided Roman forces. The attacks were to coincide with the Roman feast ofSaturnalia to maximize their success. Unfortunately, the capably led veteran Roman forces were more than a match for the Albani tribesmen and their attacks were easily repulsed. Oroeses was forced to submit to terms. Pompey then made preparations for the subjugation of both theAlbanian andIberian kingdoms. Fearing imminent invasionArtoces (probably the Artag of Georgian history) king of the Iberians turned to diplomacy and promised the Romans unconditional friendship. Pompey accepted the terms but because he was alerted by his intelligence service that the Iberians were secretly planning an attack, in the spring of 65 BC he marched his forces into Iberia. Artoces, who was still preparing for his surprise attack on the Romans, was caught off guard.

Pompey's forces quickly captured the pass into Iberia and seized the fortress of Harmozike. Artoces panicked and fled, he took shelter on the left bank ofKura river. He burned the bridge to ensure that the Romans could not cross the river. Pompey subjugated the right bank. Artoces requested a truce promising the Romans that he would restore the bridge and supply them with food. Artoces stayed true to his words but upon restoring the bridge, Pompey crossed it with his forces in an attempt to seize the king.

Artoces withdrew to theAragvi River and burned a bridge in the same manner. Some of the Iberian militants hid in the woods and fought the Roman forces likepartisans, shooting down arrows from the trees, killing any passing Roman soldiers. Reportedly, a sizeable number of women also participated in this irregular warfare. They were defeated when Pompey's forces cut down some of the forest and then burned the rest to the ground.

Pompey pursued Artoces into the center of Iberia and brought him tobattle near the river Pelorus. Artoces main strength lay in his archers, but, using tactics reminiscent of the Athenians at theBattle of Marathon, Pompey disabled them by means of a rapid infantry charge, which brought his legionaries to close quarters before the enemy fire could take effect. Greek historianPlutarch called this battlea great battle and noted that Iberian casualties consisted of approximately 9,000 people, while more than 10,000 were taken captive by the Romans.[41]

The Iberians finally lost the war, and their king was forced to turn to diplomacy once more. He sent invaluable objects made ofgold to Pompey and asked for a truce. Pompey demanded Artoces's children as hostages and, as the king was taking too much time to think it over, led his soldiers to Aragvi and crossed it so that he left Artoces no choice. He submitted, gave his children as hostages and signed the peace with the Romans. The Kingdom of Iberia was to bea friend and ally of the Roman Republic and accepted the terms of vassalage.

After subduing Iberia, Pompey headed towards the smallkingdom of Colchis and subjugated its main stronghold and various local peoples on the way through both cunning diplomacy and the use of force. He met up with the admiral Servilius and his fleet inPhasis and commanded them to blockade Mithridates who was still in his Bosporean kingdom, while he returned to Albania to quell a revolt. Pompey gave the rule of Colchis toAristarchus, effectively making it aRoman province, part ofBithynia et Pontus.[40]

Second campaign

[edit]

Pompey's line of march took him south of Iberia, where he no doubt feared serious hindrance from the inhabitants and a shortage of supplies due to the foraging of the previous campaign, and involved a hazardous crossing of the Cyrnus into Albania. Here he used his horses and pack animals as a sort of breakwater to shield his infantry from the full force of the current. The crossing was followed by a long march through rugged desert terrain in pursuit of the Albanian army, a march made all the more difficult by unreliable guides and the fact that many of his soldiers fell ill after drinking too deeply of the chilly waters of the river Cambyses. This led Pompey to take more care over the provision of water and for the next stage of march 10,000 water skins were procured and used.[42]

The Albani were finally caught at the river Abas where adecisive battle was fought. Strabo gives their numbers at 60,000 foot and 22,000 horse with Plutarch giving the same infantry but 12,000 horse,[43] but this must be an exaggeration, since Dio says that Pompey was at pains to disguise his own numerical superiority in order to induce Oroeses to attack. He achieved this by placing his cavalry in front of his infantry and instructed his legionaries to keep out of sight by kneeling and covering up their helmets. It worked, the Albani thought they were just facing his cavalry and charged. The infantry rose, the Roman horse retreated through the infantry lines and then the legionaries broke the Albani charge. According to one account Pompey entered the melee himself and fought King Oroeses brother and slew him.[43] The trap was closed by the cavalry which had wheeled left and right, rode around the back of their own lines, and came round to attack the Albani in the rear. The Albani were decisively defeated.[44]

The victory finally put an end to any threat of armed resistance in the north-east. Many of the tribes of the Caucasus and Caspian sent envoys to conclude peace with Rome.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Plutarco,Vita di Lucullo, 33.1-5.
  2. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 8.1-2.
  3. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 8.1-2.
  4. ^Appiano,Guerre mitridatiche, 88.
  5. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 9.1.
  6. ^Plutarco,Vita di Lucullo, 35.1.
  7. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 9.3-5.
  8. ^Appiano,Guerre mitridatiche, 88.
  9. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 10.1.
  10. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 10.2.
  11. ^Appiano,Guerre mitridatiche, 88.
  12. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 11.1.
  13. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 12.1.
  14. ^Appiano,Guerre mitridatiche, 89.
  15. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 13.1.
  16. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 14.2.
  17. ^Appiano,Guerre mitridatiche, 90.
  18. ^Appiano,Guerre mitridatiche, 91.
  19. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 17.1-2.
  20. ^Plutarco,Vita di Pompeo, 24-29; Appiano di Alessandria,Guerre mitridatiche, 94-96.
  21. ^Appiano,Guerre mitridatiche, 91.
  22. ^Plutarco,Vita di Lucullo, 35.7
  23. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 42.3-43.4.
  24. ^Appiano di Alessandria,Guerre mitridatiche, 97.
  25. ^Livio,Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 100.1.
  26. ^John Leach,Pompeo, il rivale di Cesare, Milano 1983, p.77.
  27. ^Plutarco,Vita di Lucullo, 36.2.
  28. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 46.1.
  29. ^Appiano di Alessandria,Guerre mitridatiche, 97.
  30. ^Plutarco,Vita di Lucullo, 32.1.
  31. ^Plutarco,Vita di Lucullo, 32.1.
  32. ^Appiano di Alessandria,Guerre mitridatiche, 97.
  33. ^Appiano di Alessandria,Guerre mitridatiche, 97.
  34. ^Plutarco,Vita di Lucullo, 32.1.
  35. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 48.2.
  36. ^Plutarco,Vita di Pompeo, 32.2.
  37. ^Cassio Dione Cocceiano,Storia romana, XXXVI, 48.1.
  38. ^Appiano di Alessandria,Guerre mitridatiche, 99.
  39. ^Plutarco,Vita di Pompeo, 32.3.
  40. ^abJohn Leach,Pompey the Great, 4,Conqueror of the East.
  41. ^John Leach,Pompey the Great, p.84.
  42. ^John Leach,Pompey the Great, pp.84-85.
  43. ^abGoldsworthy, Adrian Keith (2006).Kejsare och generaler: männen bakom Roms framgångar (in Swedish). Lund: Historiska media. p. 181.ISBN 978-91-85057-70-2.
  44. ^Plutarch,Life of Pompey, 35.2 and 3; Strabo XI. 4. 5; Dio XXXVII. 4; Frontinus,Stratagems, 2. iii. 14; John Leach, Pompey the Great, p.85.
  • Georgian Soviet Encyclopedia, Vol. 8, pg. 156-157, Tb., 1984
  • Appian - History of the Mithridatic Wars
  • John Leach,Pompey the Great, chapter 4, Conqueror of the East.
Invasions ofGeorgia
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caucasian_campaign_of_Pompey&oldid=1330126144"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp