Clachan Chalanais | |
 The stone circle at the centre of the Calanais Stones | |
  Calanais Stones Location in Scotland | |
| Alternative name | Calanais I |
|---|---|
| Location | Isle of Lewis, Scotland |
| Coordinates | 58°11′51″N6°44′43″W / 58.1975410°N 6.7451448°W /58.1975410; -6.7451448 |
| Type | Stone circle androws |
| History | |
| Material | Stone |
| Founded | c. 2750 BC |
| Periods | Neolithic,Bronze Age |
TheCalanais Stones (or "Calanais I":Scottish Gaelic:Clachan Chalanais orTursachan Chalanais) are an arrangement ofstanding stones placed in acruciform pattern with a centralstone circle, located on theIsle of Lewis, Scotland. They were erected in the lateNeolithic era, and were a focus for ritual activity during theBronze Age. They are near the village ofCallanish (Gaelic:Calanais) on the west coast ofLewis in theOuter Hebrides,Scotland.
The Calanais Stones (grid referenceNB213330) are situated on a low ridge above the waters ofLoch Roag with the hills ofGreat Bernera as a backdrop.[1]
Numerous other ritual sites lie within a few kilometres (miles).[1] These include at least three other circles, several arcs, alignments and single stones; many visible from the main site.[2] The most impressive –Callanish II andCallanish III – lie just over a kilometre (1000 yards) southeast of the main Calanais Stones, and originally consisted of circles of stones at least eight in number.[1] The existence of other monuments in the area implies that Calanais was an active focus for prehistoric religious activity for at least 1,500 years.[3] (seeCallanish III,Callanish IV,Callanish VIII andCallanish X). Historic Environment Scotland states that the stones were erected around 2750 BC, pre-datingStonehenge.[3][4]
The Calanais Stones are managed byHistoric Environment Scotland. There is a Calanais Stones Visitor Centre operated by Urras Nan Tursachan (The Standing Stones Trust).
The Calanais Stones consist of astone circle of thirteen stones with a monolith near the middle. Fiverows of standing stones connect to this circle. Two long rows of stones running almost parallel to each other from the stone circle to the north-northeast form a kind ofavenue. In addition, there are shorter rows of stones to the west-southwest, south and east-northeast. The stones are all of the same rock type, namely the localLewisian gneiss. Within the stone circle is a chambered tomb to the east of the central stone.[5]
The central monolith stands 0.8 (32 inches) metres west of the true centre of the stone circle. The stone is 4.8 metres (16 feet) high, 1.5 metres (5 feet) wide and 0.3 metres (1 foot) thick.[6] The largest sides of the stone are almost perfectly oriented to the north and south.[6] The monolith has the shape of a ship's rudder and probably weighs about seven tonnes.[6]
The stone circle consists of thirteen stones and has a diameter of 11.4 metres (37 feet). The stone circle is not a perfect circle, but is a ring with a flattened east side (13.4 metres; 44 feet north–south by 12 metres; 40 feet east–west). The stones have an average height of three metres (10 feet). The ring covers an area of 124 square metres (148 sq. yd.). This is quite small compared to similar circles, including the nearbyCallanish II which is 2.5 times as large.[6]
The avenue connects to the stone circle from the north-northeast. The avenue is 83.2 metres (90 yards) long.[6] The avenue has 19 stones remaining: nine stones are on the eastern side, ten on the western side.[7] The largest stone is 3.5 metres (12 feet) high and stands on the western end of the row. The two rows are not exactly parallel to each other but fan out: at the north end the rows are 6.7 metres (22 feet) apart, while the distance between the rows is 6 metres (20 feet) at the south end.[7] From the circle the height of the stones decreases towards the middle of the avenue; from there the height increases again. The stones of the eastern side of the avenue have only three-quarters of the height of the stones on the western side.[7]
As well as the two stone rows of the avenue, there are three stone rows connecting to the circle. One comes from the east-northeast, one from the south, and one from the west-southwest. The east-northeast row today consists of five stones and is 23.2 metres (76 feet) long.[7] The southern row consists of five stones and is 27.2 metres (90 feet) long.[7] The west-southwest row consists of four stones and is 13 metres (43 feet) long.[7]
None of the stone rows is aimed at the centre of the stone circle. The east-northeast row is aligned to a point 2 metres (6 feet) south of the centre; the south row points to 1 metre (3 feet) west of the centre and the west-southwest row points to 1 metre (3 feet) south of the centre.[7]
Between the central and the eastern monolith of the stone circle is achambered tomb 6.4 metres (21 feet) long.[8] This was built later than the stone circle and is squashed in between the eastern stones and the central monolith.[8]
There is another stonecairn just on the northeast side of the stone circle.[9] It has been reduced to ground-level and the outline can barely be traced.[9] It is not necessarily an original part of the site.[9]
There were limited excavations from 1980-1981 which provided some information on the development of the site. The first traces of human activity are indicated by a broad ditch (no longer visible above ground) which appears to have belonged to some structure or enclosure.[2] This may have been ritual, but could instead have been domestic.[2] In the centuries around 3000 BC, however, the site was turned over to agriculture, which obliterated most of the earlier traces.[2] After this, the site was allowed to grass over for a time.[2]
The stone circle was set up between 2900 and 2600 BC.[3] It is not clear whether the stone alignments were constructed at the same time as the circle, or later.[3] Some time after the erection of the stones, a small chambered tomb was inserted into the eastern part of the stone circle.[10] The many pottery fragments found indicate that the tomb was used for several centuries.[10] These pottery fragments included not only the local Hebridean pots, but numerous sherds ofbeaker vessels (dating to around 2000–1700 BC) and sherds ofgrooved ware.[10]
Around 1500–1000 BC the complex fell out of use and was despoiled by the later Bronze Age farmers.[10] Fragments of pots appear to have been cast out of the chamber.[10] This may have been just ordinary agriculture, but it may conceivably have been ritual cleansing.[1] There appears to have been a later rebuilding of the tomb, but this may have been for domestic use as there is no evidence for any later ritual use of the monument.[10] Excavations in 1999–2000, to the south of the stones, found fragments of a prehistoric field system buried beneath blanket peat, as well as stone structures, including buildings, walls, clearance cairns and cobbled surfaces. The analyses found that these features were the result of prehistoric farming activity from the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age indicating the whole area was used for farming at that time.[11] Between 1000 BC and 500 BC the stones were covered by a thick layer of turf. It is estimated that the place was abandoned around 800 BC.[12] Only in 1857 was the overlying 1.5 metres (5 feet) ofpeat removed.[13]
The first written reference to the stones was by Lewis native John Morisone, who around 1680 wrote that the stones were men "converted into stone by ane Inchanter" and set up in a ring "for devotione".[14] Sometime around 1695Martin Martin visited the site and was told by the local people that "it was a place appointed for worship in the time of heathenism, and that the chief druid or priest stood near the big stone in the centre, from whence he addressed himself to the people that surrounded him."[2] In his 1726 work on thedruids,John Toland specifically identifiedDiodorus Siculus'Hyperborea with Lewis, and the "spherical temple" mentioned by Diodorus with the Calanais Stones.[15] In 1743,William Stukeley described the stone circle as a druid circle and the avenue like a serpent.[16] In 1819, geologistJohn MacCulloch published the first accurate description.[16] In 1846, the Danish historianJ. J. A. Worsaae made a sketch and plan of the Calanais Stones.[17]
In 1857peat to a depth of five feet (1.5 metres) was cleared away, under the orders of the proprietor of Lewis,James Matheson, revealing the chambered tomb and the true height of the stones.[18] In 1885 the Calanais Stones were taken into state care.[1]
Alexander Thom andGerald Hawkins suggested that the stones were a prehistoric lunar observatory. Others have proposed a relationship between the stones, the moon and theClisham range in Harris. Critics of these theories argue that several alignments are likely to exist purely by chance in any such structure, and many factors such as the weathering and displacement of the stones over the millennia mean there can be no certainty of any alignments, original or otherwise.[19]
According to one tradition, the Calanais Stones were petrified giants who would not convert to Christianity.[8] In the 17th century the people of Lewis were calling the stonesfir bhrèige ("false men").[1] Another legend is that early onmidsummer morning an entity known as the "Shining One" walks the length of the avenue, his coming heralded by the call of the cuckoo.[20]
.JPG)
Archaeologists usually refer to the main monument as "Calanais I", because there are several othermegalithic sites in the vicinity:
There are many other sites nearby; not all are now visible. There was, for instance, a timber circle 0.5 km (0.3 mi) south atLoch Roag.
