CONTEST is theUnited Kingdom'scounter-terrorism strategy,[1] first developed bySir David Omand and theHome Office in early 2003 as the immediate response to9/11,[2] and a revised version was made public in 2006. Further revisions were published on 24 March 2009,[3] July 2011, June 2018,[4] and July 2023.[5] The aim of the strategy is "to reduce the risk to the UK and its interests overseas from terrorism so that people can go about their lives freely and with confidence."[6][7]
The UK government's definition of "Terrorism" is set out within theTerrorism Act 2000,[8] and theCounter Terrorism Policing (CTP) unit has been set up to implement CONTEST.[9]
CONTEST is composed of the "four Ps" – Prevent, Pursue, Protect, and Prepare – which aim to reduce terrorism at all levels through: Preventing more people from being radicalised; Pursuing suspects operationally and legally; Protecting the public through security measures, and Preparing to manage the response to mitigate the impact of an inevitable attack.Prevent is the most prominent and controversial of these. It includes a duty ("the Prevent duty") for public bodies such as schools and universities to identify and refer those displaying signs of potential extremist or terrorist activity, and a programme ("Channel") to de-radicalise such individuals. It has been criticised by civil rights groups and British Muslims for stigmatising Muslim communities, as well as by conservative pundits for identifying right-wing extremists as potential terrorists.
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fen.m.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg) | This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding missing information.(June 2025) |
The August 2018 revision reportedly puts more focus on ways of prevention and how to best alert the public to terrorist threats.[10] In an article written forThe Observer, formerUK Prime MinisterGordon Brown stated that the strategy is "recognised by our allies to be world-leading in its wide-ranging nature, [and] leaves us better prepared and strengthened in our ability to ensure all peace-loving people of this country can live normally, with confidence and free from fear."[11]
In March 2019, theCourt of Appeal found that the Prevent guidance on inviting controversial speakers at universities was unlawfully unbalanced and must be rewritten.[12]
In January 2020,The Guardian reported thatExtinction Rebellion, theclimate emergency campaign group promoted byGreta Thunberg, had been included on an official list of extremist organisations whose members should be reported to the authorities. TheSouth East Counter Terrorism Unit later said that after review, the document was being withdrawn.[13][14]
Anindependent review of Prevent led byLord Carlile was announced in August 2019 as part of theCounter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019.[15] However it was dropped after a petitioner complained about his potential bias because he had spoken out in favour of the strategy prior to his review, and the Home Office vacated the initiative.[16] In January 2021, thePatel Home Office appointed SirWilliam Shawcross to head the review of the Prevent programme.[17] On 20 February 2024 the Shawcross review was published in final form.[18] At the time Shawcross found that some recommendations had not been implemented and the public was at risk. The scheme had repeatedly "failed" to identify attackers, and there was a "sense of lost purpose". In the wake of theOctober 7 massacre in Israel certain segments of the British population were frightened, especially those concerned with a "dangerous" surge in anti-semitism. TheCooper Home Office said 30 of 34 recommendations had been implemented and the remaining balance were in the works.[19][20] Shawcross said that staff within Prevent were overly concerned with "tackling the rise in Right-wing terrorism", to the detriment of other dangers. He questioned the allocation of resource in Prevent and was troubled by the disparity withMI5's allocation, which stood at 75% caseload was focused on Islamist threats whereas one in ten staff of Prevent were focused on the same issue.[20]
| Year | Prevent Referrals | Channel referrals | Channel cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/2023[21] | 6816 | 1113 | 645 |
| 2021/2022[22] | 6405 | 1486 | 804 |
| 2020/2021[23] | 4915 | 1333 | 688 |
| 2019/2020[24] | 6287 | 1424 | 697 |
| 2018/2019[25] | 5738 | 1320 | 561 |
| 2017/2018[26] | 7318 | 1314 | 564 |
| 2016/2017[27] | 6093 | 1146 | 332 |
| 2015/2016[28] | 7631 | 1072 | 381 |
Prevent is a key strategy in the UK’s counter terrorism frameworks which CONTEST introduced following the7/7 London terrorist attacks in 2005.[29] Prevent aims to reduce the threat of terrorism by preventing people from becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism.[30] It claims to be comprehensive in its aims toderadicalise and rehabilitate vulnerable people.[31][30]
Prevent is built on three core objectives:
Prevent emphasises early intervention to stop vulnerable or easily susceptible individuals in society from being drawn into extremist ideologies. However, there is no single model for someone’s radicalisation journey, so bespoke interventions are vital to effectively reintegrate them back into wider societal ideas.[30] Vulnerability to radicalisation arises from several factors like age, disability, risk of abuse or neglect.[30] As radicalisation has no single pathway, the government aims to address risks early, through a multitude of avenues. Prevent monitors trends in radicalisation; violent and non-violent extremism, with particular attention on the rise ofIslamic extremism andright-wing ideologies posing the biggest threat of terrorism in recent years.[30]
Prevent adopts a multi-agency approach, using local authorities, schools, healthcare providers, police, and other sectors to recognise and support individuals at risk.[30] Anyone, including members of the public, can refer individuals they believe to be at risk of radicalisation to Prevent. TheCounter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015, introduced thePrevent Duty, requiring sectors including schools, local authorities, prisons, and healthcare services to embed Prevent in theirsafeguarding responsibilities.
The Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 created a positive duty for those working in education or health to report those who they deem at risk of radicalization.[33]: 35 As of February 2015,[update] allNational Health Service (NHS) staff are required to undergo basic Prevent Awareness Training.[34] Schools provide the educational dimension of the Prevent duty through theCitizenship lessons on theNational Curriculum.[35] Since July 2015, schools also have a legal responsibility to have "due regard to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism" under the Prevent duty and Child Protection and Safeguarding guidelines.[36] A film associated with Prevent,Reclaim Radical – Radical versus Radicalised, was released in 2017.[37][38]
The Prevent Assessment Framework evaluates referrals, to assess if the individual is at risk of being radicalised and determine if they require intervention.[30] Thederadicalisation intervention programme is known asChannel. It is led by the police andliberal Muslim mentors.[39] Individuals identified as being at risk are referred to a so-calledChannel Panel, a multi-agency-based programme which is chaired by thelocal authority, to assess and support individuals vulnerable to radicalisation.[30]
Prevent is a voluntary consent-based programme offering tailored support and continued monitoring to ensure effective de-radicalisation.[32] Despite the voluntary nature of Channels resulting in only 13% of Prevent referrals adopted in the year ending March 2022; of these 89% finished the program with no further concerns of radicalisation.[32]
In 2020, 6,287 people were referred to Prevent. Of these, 1,424 were referred to Channel and 697 were taken on as cases for Channel. 43% of the cases taken on by Channel were forright wing extremism and 30% forIslamic extremism.[24]
The aim of Pursue is to stop terrorist attacks happening in the UK or against UK interests overseas. The main objectives of Pursue are to detect, understand, investigate, and disrupt terrorist activity.[32] There are multiple types of terrorists that are being pursued under this system, including:
Counter Terrorism Policing work with MI5 to develop intelligence, and with the Crown Prosecution Service to put compelling evidence before the courts.[52] The public can also support law enforcement to pursue potential terrorist activity through calling the anti-terrorist hotline.[32] Action Counters Terrorism (ACT) encourages individuals to report suspicious activity which could be related to terrorism through online reporting, or by contacting the police in confidence on their dedicated phone number.[53]
Government departments and agencies work collaboratively to disrupt terrorist activity. Counter-terrorism policing, MI5, and wider intelligence work together closely to investigate, detect, and disrupt terrorism, alongside the Criminal Justice System.[32] The Ministry of Defence is a key contributor to CONTEST strategy. It particularly supports Pursue through its military capability to disrupt overseas terrorist groups and its support of overseas law enforcement and security agencies. Its support for conflict prevention work has also contributed to the CONTEST objectives.[32] Work overseas is crucial to Pursue, as previous UK attack plots have had support from terrorists overseas, as well as UK individuals being radicalised while overseas. Working with international partners therefore attempts to disrupt the threat before it manifests itself in the UK.[32]
An important element of Pursue is the independent oversight regime, which scrutinises the significant powers and tools used to stop potential terrorist attacks, ensuring they are used proportionately and appropriately.[32][54]
Proportionality (law) must be considered when using broader powers for terrorism investigations. The Secretary of State must be satisfied that the information obtained could not reasonably have been obtained by any other means. The intelligence gain must be sufficiently great to justify an intrusion, as well as any unavoidable collateral intrusion against individuals other than the target.[55] TheRegulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 ensures that investigatory techniques are used in a way that is compatible with the Article 8 right to respect for private and family life, as in theEuropean Convention on Human Rights.[56][57][58]
Pursue is becoming increasingly complex as the threat of terrorism continues to diversify. Between 1 January and 31 December 2022, 169 persons were arrested for terrorism related activity, with 232 persons held in custody for terrorism-connected offences.[32] From 2017 to July 2023, MI5 and the police have disrupted 39 late stage attack plots.[32]
Within Pursue there are different elements of strategy involved: detection, prosecution, punishment, control, and disruption.
Detection involves gaining specific reliable information and evidence. This may require the use of various surveillance methods such as hacking for digital information, or human surveillance through undercover policing. There are specific powers which can be utilised for these purposes, such as the specific power of arrest on suspicion of a terrorist, under section 41 of theTerrorism Act 2000.[8] Additionally those within theInvestigatory Powers Act 2016, such as targeted interception, which involves requesting a warrant from the Secretary of State to intercept transmission of communications.[59]
There is information related to security and intelligence, and special investigation powers which is protected by theOfficial Secrets Act 1989.[60] This provides legal protection against unauthorised disclosure of information and espionage, and protest certain tactics of information gathering.[61]
Under section 41 of theTerrorism Act 2000 a suspect can be detained for a maximum of 14 day before being charged, compared to the maximum of four days under standard arrest powers.[8][62] This allows more time for police to investigate and gather evidence in relation to the potential terrorism offences. Additional powers allow a senior police officer to delay a suspect's access to a solicitor and/or contact with a named person.[63] This is authorised if they believe that exercising this right may result in any of the consequences listed in section 41 of theTerrorism Act 2000, for example sending out a dangerous message which may instigate an act of terrorism.[64]
There are a number of extremist groups which are banned under UK law, as part of the counter-terrorist legislation. Section 3 of theTerrorism Act 2000 allows the Home Secretary to proscribe an organisation if they are concerned in terrorism.[8] This means the organisation commits or participates in acts of terrorism, prepares for terrorism, promotes, or encourages terrorism.[8]
Proscription must be proportionate, which means the following factors must be taken into account when deciding whether to proscribe an organisation:
Between 2018 and 2023 there have been six terrorist groups proscribed, including extreme right-wing groups such asAtomwaffen Division andThe Base (hate group).[32]
TheTerrorism Act 2006 introduced further established terrorist offences including the encouragement of terrorism, preparation of terrorist acts and terrorist training, and offences involving radioactive devices and materials and nuclear facilities and sites.[66] An example of this is 19-year-old Matthew King who pleaded guilty to the preparation of terrorist acts, and has now been sentenced to life imprisonment.[67][68]
In 2021 Shabazz Suleman was arrested and charged with terror offences under theTerrorism Act 2000.[8][69] He has since pleaded guilty to preparing acts of terrorism by travelling to Turkey to join IS in Syria, as well as being charged with being a member of the proscribed group, IS, and receiving training in the use of firearms.[69]
Although there are specific terrorist offences which are criminalised in the UK, the prosecution process remains the same, and prosecutors are tried fairly through the mainstream criminal justice system.[70] The Crown Prosecution Service has a Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division (SCCTD) to deal with the prosecution of terrorism cases.[71] In 2021 Greer emphasised why this process is significant stating that it "... offers the best prospects of securing the legitimacy of counterterrorist law enforcement and of maintaining public confidence in it."[72]
TheCounter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 contains more powers to aid the UK's response to the threat of terrorism; in relation to Pursue it enhances the ability of operational agencies to monitor and control actions of those posing a threat.[73][74]
The Counter-Extremism Strategy was published by the UK Government in 2015 and focuses on disrupting extremism, as well as extremists' rehabilitation and reintegration into society.[75] This is an example of the punishment and control elements of Pursue.
Protect is the third component of the UK’s counter-terrorism strategy, aiming to reduce the country's vulnerabilities to terrorist threats. The primary stated purpose is to strengthen the defences against terrorist attacks through the implementation of safeguarding and infrastructures to protect people and public places. It aims to mitigate the impact of terrorist attacks and reduce the likelihood of further attacks. It is delivered through collaborative counter-terrorism efforts by government departments, intelligence agencies, operational experts, private sectors, and international allies.[32] The main objective is to keep the country safe by detecting dangerous people and material.[31]
The process works by first recognising the threats and then identifying the measures to reduce risks.[76] Protect objectives are outlined as:
It delivers safety mechanism techniques like the use of concrete or metal barriers on crowded pedestrian places like bridges and shopping centres, to minimise the degree of damage.[31] An example is the large bollards placed strategically around busy city centres, and especially on bridges, to prevent the rise of vehicle-based attacks such as the2017 London Bridge attack.[citation needed] It deploys enhancement of protective security for events or crowded spaces through personnel and environmental design principles aim to reduce vulnerability to attacks.[77] With security and staff at major events and venues trained in terrorism awareness and emergency responses procedure.[77]
Protect addresses the risk of attack in all forms of transportation with increased police presence at airports, train, and bus stations. Security measures are applied to crowded spaces through advanced surveillance systems and increased visibility of law enforcement.[31]
Protect also address the threat of terrorism at the UK borders, with measures aimed at identifying and intercepting dangerous individuals and goods. UK borders are under constant scrutiny and protection, with thorough investigation protocols.[31] Under Schedule 7 of theTerrorism Act 2000, law enforcement have the authority to stop, search and detain individuals that show signs of suspicion to be a threat to security.[31][8] Schedule 7 permits examination officers to stop, question, search, and detain anyone transiting through ports, airports, and international rail stations, with the purpose of determining whether those concerned have been involved in the commission, preparation, or instigation of acts of terrorism.[8]
TheAuthority to Carry Scheme 2023 aims to prevent individuals travelling to or from the UK when it is necessary in the public interest, in order to prevent or disrupt those who pose a terrorism-related threat.[78][non-primary source needed]
The central rhetoric of Protect is the reposting potential threats to the public and suspicious activity. Prevention methods, encouraging the public to report suspicious people to the police with campaign like “See it. Say it. Sorted.”[31] As well as “Run, Hide, Tell” in advising the public in acting smart in wake of terrorist attacks.[32] These initiatives aim at strengthening the community vigilance and supporting in the early intervention of suspicious activity.[citation needed]
Prepare is the final strand of CONTEST, with a primary goal to mitigate the impact of terrorist attacks, by ensuring co-ordinated responses and effective support and recovery efforts for the public.[1] Emphasising the importance of readiness and adaptation to the evolving threats of terrorism to ensure immediate response and long-term recovery. Recovery plans assess and mitigating the risk of attacks, managing the aftermath and residual hazards, and providing comprehensive victim support plans.[32]
The main objectives of Prepare are to:
Prepare aims to ensure prompt responses in the event of an attacks by the emergency services, to reduce the levels of danger during an attack and save as many people as possible. Requiring the necessary services to be constantly alert and ready to mobilise to contain an attack.[31] Learning from earlier attacks to ensure an effective cross-organisational systems is in place to act during attacks.[32]
The newest iteration of CONTEST proposed further development in the technology surround the multi-agency response structures.[77] Highlighting the importance of conducting regular “training, testing, exercising and ensuring that effective cross-organisational systems are in place to capture and act.”[32] To ensure all emergency response are prepared and capable to react to a wide range of attacks. Particularly considering the changes in terrorist tactics, identified in the Manchester and the London Bridge attacks in 2017, singling out ‘soft targets’ like public spaces to create as much disturbance as possible as they are hard to defend.[77]
Central to Prepare is the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP), established in 2014 to enhance collaboration among blue light services, Police, Fire and Ambulance.[79]
JESIP works in a multi-agency approach with five key principles:
The public should follow Prepare advice on the nature of terrorist threats overseas, which is communicated through theForeign, Commonwealth and Development Office travel advice and advice on how to safely respond in the event of a terrorist incident.[32]
One example of Prepare is the improved protection implemented for UK tourists in Tunisia following the2015 Sousse attacks.[32][80]
Channel is a programme that seeks to reduce radicalisation by referring reported individuals to other services. People working in health or education are required by law to report individuals that meet certain criteria.[30] A channel referral is a referral to the police,[30]: p21 who continually use information obtained in order to assess risk,[30]: 117 and may make a referral to a channel panel who suggest and prioritise referrals to other services.[30]: p21 Involvement is voluntary and referred individuals can refuse to participate.[30]: 76 If an individual refuses to participate and a risk is identified the police will be informed.[30]: 122 Assessments can be made by a channel panel whether an individual chooses to participate or not.[81]
At theNational Union of Teachers' 2016 conference inBrighton, the union members voted overwhelmingly against the Prevent strategy. They supported its abolition, citing concerns over the implementation of the strategy and causing "suspicion in the classroom and confusion in the staff room."[82]
Prevent has also been accused of reducing academic freedom. In November 2018, theUniversity of Reading highlighted the articleOur Morals: The Ethics of Revolution by ProfessorNorman Geras as potentially harmful. Students were instructed not to download the article on personal devices and not to leave the article where it could be visible "inadvertently or otherwise, by those who are not prepared to view it".[83]
In 2024,Amnesty International began a campaign for Prevent to be scrapped.[84]
Challenges arise in the monitoring of terrorist organisations, due to the increased scope of technology, particularly the enhanced use of artificial intelligence and anonymous online platforms, which are increasingly difficult to regulate.[85]
It was reported in June 2025 that the Prevent Assessment Framework document included a referral basis forcultural nationalists, whom it classified as vulnerable to an "extreme right-wing terrorist ideology".[86] The CTP unit had developed an acronym, ERWT, for those they labelled as "Extreme Right Wing Terrorists".[9]
According to aDaily Telegraph editorial, these people could be indicated by their concern over mass migration. A row erupted as LordToby Young, who is patron to theFree Speech Union, wrote to the Home Secretary urging her to review her definitions. Young was concerned that the referral of an individual who had expressed a "cultural nationalist" view could harm that individual's career prospects. It came to light that Privy CouncillorJacob Rees-Mogg had been categorized as a "cultural nationalist" by Home Office staff.[86][better source needed]
The 'Prevent' strategy was criticised in 2009 byShami Chakrabarti, director ofLiberty, as a domestic spying programme collecting intelligence about the beliefs ofBritish Muslims not involved in criminal activity.[87] TheCommunities and Local Government Committee were also critical of the Prevent programme in 2010, stating that it stigmatised and alienated the Muslims the government wanted to work with.[88]
Prevent has been criticised as legitimising and reinforcingIslamophobia and restrictingfreedom of expression for Muslims in the UK.[89][90]
Prevent has received both criticism and praise due to its alternative 'softer' approach to counter terrorism, emphasising community engagement in preventing extremism.[32] However, the surveillance and targeting of Muslim communities, has been highly criticised. Despite engagement with marginalised Muslims groups, like 'Salafis' and 'Islamist' told as crucial in building trust and address extremism through collaborative community engagement.[91] Countered by the over policing of Muslim communities; fostering distrust in the police and undermining the aims of prevent.[92]
There have been concerns raised in response to the increased policing and surveillance of cities with large Muslim communities like Birmingham and Manchester, leading to accusations of racial or religious profiling.[85] Risking increased alienation, distrust, and animosity from Muslim communities, these measures achieving the opposite of their intended goal, particularly among young Muslims heightening their risk of radicalisation.[93] Many Muslims perceiving the 'War on Terror' as the war on Islam, complicating the government aims of collaborative engagement with policing.[85]
In June 2016, the MPsLucy Allan andNorman Lamb introduced aprivate member's bill to repeal provisions in theCounter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 where it requires staff to report possible signs of extremism or radicalization between primary and nursery school-aged children, following several high-profile cases where the provision was inappropriately used about the Prevent strategy. The Bill did not become law.[94]
In 2017, two brothers, aged seven and five, were paid damages after they were reported to the Prevent programme after telling a teacher they had been given toy guns. The children had been kept from parents for two hours. After a legal challenge, theCentral Bedfordshire Council admitted the children's human rights were breached and they had been racially discriminated against.[95]
According to Chief Superintendent Nik Adams ofCounter Terrorism Policing, there was in April 2020 growing concern over the link of the COVID-19 pandemic and a greater risk of radicalisation. Due to social isolation and increased reliance on the internet, there are concerns over the potential grooming, and later radicalisation, of vulnerable young people. As a result of face-to-face teaching being suspended and most schools and statutory agencies closing throughout the nationwide lockdown, there has been a marked decrease in the number of people referred to the Prevent programme since restrictions were put in place. Whilst the full effect of COVID restrictions are yet to be seen, the police are encouraging schools to place an emphasis on safeguarding those most vulnerable and provide the resources necessary to help combat radicalisation grooming.[96]
At the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact chaired byEmmanuel Macron in Paris on 22–23 June 2023, CONTEST was presented byFiona Hill, formerchief of staff toTheresa May ashome secretary andprime minister, as an exemplar for interdepartmental cooperation for tackling major threats, and a paradigm for how governments should tackleinternational development andclimate change.[97] Hill was speaking at an official summit side event convened by Community Jameel and theIslamic Development Bank at the headquarters of theOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.[98]
Mr. Butt and his brother were also involved in the British program Prevent, which seeks to stop people from becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism, and which refers people suspected of radicalization to programs led by the police.
On Saturday an 18-year-old man, who the BBC has learnt had previously been referred to an anti-extremist programme, was arrested in Dover port.
This article incorporates text from afree content work. Licensed under Open Government Licence v3 (license statement/permission). Text taken from the prior source.