Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Adjective phrase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Type of phrase
This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This articlemay be in need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia'slayout guidelines. Please help byediting the article to make improvements to the overall structure.(December 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Anadjective phrase (oradjectival phrase) is aphrase whosehead is anadjective. Almost any grammar or syntax textbook or dictionary of linguistics terminology defines the adjective phrase in a similar way, e.g. Kesner Bland (1996:499), Crystal (1996:9), Greenbaum (1996:288ff.), Haegeman and Guéron (1999:70f.), Brinton (2000:172f.), Jurafsky and Martin (2000:362). Theadjective can initiate the phrase (e.g.fond of steak), conclude the phrase (e.g.veryhappy), or appear in a medial position (e.g.quiteupset about it). The dependents of the head adjective—i.e. the other words and phrases inside the adjective phrase—are typicallyadverb or prepositional phrases, but they can also beclauses (e.g.louder than you are). Adjectives and adjective phrases function in two basic ways, attributively orpredicatively. An attributive adjective (phrase) precedes the noun of anoun phrase (e.g.avery happy man). A predicative adjective (phrase) follows alinking verb and serves to describe the preceding subject, e.g.The man isvery happy.

Attributive vs. predicative

[edit]

The adjective phrases are underlined in the following example sentences. The head adjective in each of these phrases is in bold, and how the adjective phrase is functioning—attributively or predicatively—is stated to the right of each example:[1]

  1. Sentences can containtremendouslylong phrases. –Attributive adjective phrase
  2. This sentence is nottremendouslylong. –Predicative adjective phrase
  3. A playerfaster than you was on their team gaining weight. –Attributive adjective phrase
  4. He isfaster than you. –Predicative adjective phrase
  5. Sam ordered averyspicy butquitesmall pizza. –Attributive adjective phrases
  6. The pizza isveryspicy butquitesmall. –Predicative adjective phrases
  7. The people,angry because of the high prices, were protesting. –Attributive adjective phrase
  8. The people areangry with the high prices. –Predicative adjective phrase

The distinguishing characteristic of an attributive adjective phrase is that it appears inside the noun phrase that it modifies.[2] An interesting trait of these phrases in English is that an attributive adjective alone generally precedes the noun, e.g.aproud man, whereas a head-initial or head-medial adjective phrase follows its noun, e.g.a manproud of his children.[3] A predicative adjective (phrase), in contrast, appears outside of the noun phrase that it describes, usually after a linking verb, e.g.The man isproud of his children.

Adjective vs. adjectival

[edit]

There is a tendency to call a phrase anadjectival phrase when that phrase is functioning like an adjective phrase, but is not actually headed by an adjective. For example, inMr Clinton is a man of wealth, the prepositional phraseof wealth modifiesa man in a manner similar to how an adjective phrase would, and it can be reworded with an adjective, e.g.Mr Clinton is a wealthy man. A more accurate term for such cases isphrasal attributive orattributive phrase.

Constituency tests

[edit]

Constituency tests can also be used to identify adjectives and adjective phrases. Here are the three constituency tests, according toX-bar theory, that prove the adjective phrase is both a constituent, and an AP.[4]

In the following tests, consider the sentence:Sam ordered a very spicy pizza.

  1. Coordination tests can be used to confirm ifvery spicy is an adjective phrase.
    Sam ordered avery spicy (and/but)quite small pizza. (Sam ordered aAP and AP pizza)
    This phrase passed the coordination test because it was grammatical, and the adjective phrases were not creating ambiguous meanings when a conjunction (and/but) is used.
  2. Ellipsis tests can also be used to confirm ifvery spicy is an adjective phrase.
    Sam ordered avery spicy pizza, but the pizza Betty ordered was notvery spicy.
    This phrase passed the Ellipsis test, because no ambiguity is created and the adjective phrase could be elided (deleted).
  3. Amovement test, specificallypseudoclefting, can be used to confirm ifvery spicy is an adjective phrase.
    Sam ordered avery spicy pizza that wasvery spicy.
    Movement tests not only prove that the constituent moved is a stand-alone constituent, but also proves that this phrasevery spicy is an AP if drawn in a syntax tree. Thus, because this adjective phrase could be moved to the right (pseudocleft), it's sufficient proof that it is both aconstituent and an adjective phrase.

Semantic ambiguity

[edit]

Although constituency tests can prove the existence of an AP in a sentence, the meanings of these AP may beambiguous. This ambiguity must be considered when considering thesemantic versuspragmatic meaning. The following examples prove two things:[5]

  1. Adjective phrases that are pre-nominal create ambiguous interpretations.
  2. Head adjectives that move to post-nominal position creates unambiguous interpretations.

Note: This section can be added into theadjectives page, but ambiguity can also apply to adjective phrases. Additionally, comma placements and intonations may have a role in figuring out ambiguity, but English has a written form of communication that is more ambiguous than spoken communication.

The following examples show the different interpretive properties of pre- and post-nominaladjectives which are insideadjective phrases.

Intersective versus non-intersective interpretation of AP

[edit]
  1. Ambiguous sentence: I've never met amorebeautiful dancer than Mary
    1. Intersective: I've never met a dancer who is more beautiful (as a person) than Mary
    2. Non-intersective: I've never met anyone dancing more beautifully than Mary
  2. Unambiguous sentence: I've never met a dancermorebeautiful than Mary
    1. Intersective: I've never met a dancer who is more beautiful (as a person) than Mary
    2. *Non-intersective: *I've never met anyone dancing more beautifully than Mary

This example showed then entire adjective phrase moving, creating the same ambiguity as example 1. Therefore, the placement of the adjective relative to the subject is important for creating unambiguous statements.[6]

Restrictive versus non-restrictive interpretation of AP

[edit]
  1. Ambiguous sentence: All theshortblessed people were healed.
    1. Non-restrictive: All the short people were healed
    2. Restrictive: Only the people that were short and blessed were healed
  2. Unambiguous sentence: All theshort peopleblessed were healed.
    1. *Non-restrictive: All the people were healed (* = not possible for this interpretation)
    2. Restrictive: All the people that were short and blessed were healed

The adjectiveblessed is ambiguous in pre-nominal position because it creates a restrictive and a nonrestrictive interpretation (a), while in post-nominal position it only displays a restrictive interpretation (b).[7] Plus, when the main adjective of the adjective phrase is moved to post-nominal position, only one interpretation is possible.

There is cross-linguistic validity, according to the multiple articles referenced in Cinque's article, which studied this adjective placement in Italian as well. Cinque discovered that exactly the same pattern was seen in Italian, because ambiguous interpretations only appeared when the adjective phrase was placed in pre-nominal position. Next, other research articles also confirm that thisword order phenomenon exists inMandarin Chinese, creating ambiguous interpretations. For example, an adjective phrase with the head adjectiveprivate in pre-object position, creates two interpretations. On the other hand, an adjective phrase with the head adjectiveprivate placed in post-object position only creates one interpretation.[8]

Tree diagram representations

[edit]

The structure of adjective phrases (and of all other phrase types) can be represented using tree structures. There are two modern conventions for doing this, constituency-based trees ofphrase structure grammars[9] and dependency-based trees ofdependency grammars.[10] Both types of trees are produced here. The important aspect of these tree structures—regardless of whether one uses constituency or dependency to show the structure of phrases—is that they are identified as adjective phrases by the label on the top node of each tree.

Head-final adjective phrases

[edit]

The following trees illustrate head-final adjective phrases, i.e. adjective phrases that have their head adjective on the right side of the phrase:

Head-final adjective phrases

The labels on the nodes in the trees are acronyms: A = adjective, Adv = adverb, AP = adjective phrase, N = noun/pronoun, P = preposition, PP = prepositional phrase. The constituency trees identify these phrases as adjective phrases by labeling the top node with AP, and the dependency trees accomplish the same thing by positioning the A node at the top of the tree.

Head-initial adjective phrases

[edit]

The following trees illustrate the structure of head-initial adjective phrases, i.e. adjective phrases that have their head on the left side of the phrase:

Head-initial adjective phrases

Head-medial adjective phrases

[edit]

The following trees illustrate the structure of head-medial adjective phrases:

Head-medial adjective phrases

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^See Ouhalla (1994:34, 39) and Crystal (1997:9) concerning the distinction between adjectives and adjective phrases used attributively and predicatively.
  2. ^For an overview of the differences in the use of adjective phrases, i.e. their distribution, see Greenbaum (1996:290ff.).
  3. ^See Haegeman and Guéron (1999:71) and Osborne (2003) concerning the distribution of pre- and post-noun modifiers in noun phrases.
  4. ^These examples are generated based on the examples in this textbook:Sportiche, D., Koopman, H. J., & Stabler, E. P. (2014).An introduction to syntactic analysis and theory. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  5. ^Cinque, Guglielmo. (2014). The semantic classification of adjectives. A view from syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics. 35. 1-30.
  6. ^Larson, Richard K. 1995. Olga is a beautiful dancer. Ms., Stony Brook University text of a paper delivered at the 1995 Winter Meeting of the LSA, New Orleans (http:// semlab5.sbs.sunysb.edu/~rlarson/lsa95.pdf).
  7. ^Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua18: 1–34.
  8. ^Paul, Waltraud. 2010. Adjectives in Mandarin Chinese: the rehabilitation of a much ostracized category. In Adjectives. Formal analyses in syntax and semantics. ed. Cabredo-Hofherr, P., and O. Matushansky, 115-152. Amsterdam: Benjamins
  9. ^For examples of phrase structure trees similar to the ones produced here, see for instance Brinton (2000), Radford (2004), Culicover and Jackendoff (2005), and Carnie (2013).
  10. ^For examples of dependency trees similar to the ones produced here, see for example Tesnière (1959), Starosta (1988), and Eroms (2000).

References

[edit]
  • Brinton, L. 2000.The structure of modern English: A linguistic introduction.
  • Bolinger, D. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua18: 1–34.
  • Carnie, A. 2013.Syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Cinque, G. (2014). The semantic classification of adjectives. A view from syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics. 35. 1-30.
  • Crystal, D. 1997.A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics, 4th edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Culicover, Peter and Ray Jackendoff. 2005.Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  • Eroms, H.-W. 2000.Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Greenbaum, S. 1996.The Oxford English grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Haegeman, L. and J. Guéron 1999.English Grammar: A generative perspective. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Jurafsky, M. and J. Martin. 2000.Speech and language processing. Dorling Kindersley (India): Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Kesner Bland, S. 1996.Intermediate grammar: From form to means and use. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Osborne, T. 2003. The left elbow constraint.Studia Linguistica 57, 3: 233–257.
  • Ouhalla, J. 1994.Transformational grammar: From principles and parameters to minimalism. London: Arnold.
  • Radford, A. 2004.English syntax: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sportiche, D., Koopman, H. J., & Stabler, E. P. (2014). An introduction to syntactic analysis and theory. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Starosta, S. 1988.The case for lexicase. London: Pinter Publishers.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adjective_phrase&oldid=1328570306"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp