California Proposition 90 was a 2006ballot initiative in the state ofCalifornia, United States. Passing of the initiative would have made two changes to California law:

• Eminent domain could not be used by government except to provide facilities for public use, to abate specific public nuisances, and to act in a declared state of emergency. (This was a reaction to theSupreme Court's decision inKelo v. City of New London.)
• Government would be required to reimburse property owners whose property value is decreased as a result ofany government regulation or action.

The measure was defeated by a vote of 47.6% in favor and 52.4% opposed.^[1] In theJune 2008 election the more narrowly definedProposition 99 was passed.

The initiative was similar to the controversialOregon Ballot Measure 37 (2004).

• League of Women Voters of California Education Fund: In-Depth Nonpartisan Analysis of Proposition 90

This article relating tolaw in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is astub. You can help Wikipedia byadding missing information.

• v
• t
• e

• 2006 California ballot propositions
• Eminent domain
• Failed amendments to the Constitution of California
• Initiatives in the United States
• United States law stubs

• Webarchive template wayback links
• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Use mdy dates from July 2021
• Pages using sidebar with the child parameter
• All stub articles