| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The1928 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 6, 1928, as part of the1928 United States presidential election which was held throughout all contemporary forty-eight states. Voters chose 20 representatives, or electors, to theElectoral College, who voted forpresident andvice president.
Ever since statehood,Texas had been one of the strongest states in the nation for the Democratic Party, owing to its early historyas a southern state based aroundslavery. Even during Reconstruction when African Americans were briefly enfranchised, the Republican Party won just one statewide election. By the time Texas participated in its first postbellum election in1872, cracks were emerging in Republican Reconstruction plans, so that the Democratic "Redeemers" gained control of Southern legislatures by 1874.[1]
After "Redemption" and the passing of a new constitution in 1876 the GOP became confined largely to areas of abolitionistGerman "Forty-Eighter" settlement inthe Hill Country,[2] and to a few South Texas counties where local Republican bosses could outcompete their Democratic equivalents.[3] TheTerrell Election Law created a poll tax that, from 1902, disenfranchised virtually all remaining African-American voters, the vast majority of Mexican Americans, and also most poor whites.[4] Voter turnout among males over twenty-one fell from over eighty percent to under thirty percent following introduction of the poll tax.[5] The period following this disfranchisement nonetheless saw a substantial amount of typically "Progressive" reform underGovernorsJames Stephen Hogg andThomas M. Campbell, and despite this progressive faction ceding power in 1906 to the conservatives, Texas proved solid in its support for progressive candidateWoodrow Wilson at the1912 Democratic National Convention.[6] In the meantime, Texas continued to vote solidly Democratic: between1904 and1924 no Republican nominee reached 24% of the statewide vote total.[7]
Hoover won Texas by a narrow margin of 3.67 percent. His victory in the state made him the first Republican presidential candidate to carry Texas.[a] He produced a swing of over 32 percent compared to the vote forCalvin Coolidge in 1924; however, there were huge variations. The traditionally RepublicanTexas German counties ofComal andGuadalupe, along with the former 1920Ferguson counties ofLee andWashington voted overwhelmingly for Smith in appreciation of his views on Prohibition:[9] in Comal County, which had beenRobert La Follette's strongest nationwide in 1924,[10] the Democratic vote rose from 13 to 78%, thus supporting La Follette's family's endorsement of Smith after he died.
In contrast, numerous BaptistHigh Plains counties saw Hoover gain over fifty percent relative to Coolidge due to vehement opposition to Catholicism and repeal of Prohibition.[11] Hoover was also helped by a powerful vote from the emerging middle class inDallas–Fort Worth andHouston:[12] his combined margin inHarris,Dallas andTarrant Counties was slightly larger than his statewide plurality.[13]East Texas, the earliest-settled region of the state with greatest white resentment of the Republican Party's association with Reconstruction, andSouth Texas, in which white voters had similar fears of Mexican-American political power, remained normally loyal to Smith.[14]
Texas wouldn't support another Republican presidential candidate until1952 when Texan-bornDwight D. Eisenhower carried the state. This was the last presidential election until2024 in whichMaverick County voted for the Republican candidate.
| 1928 United States presidential election in Texas[15] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Percentage | Electoral votes | |
| Republican | Herbert Hoover | 367,036 | 51.77% | 20 | |
| Democratic | Al Smith | 341,032 | 48.10% | 0 | |
| Socialist | Norman Thomas | 722 | 0.10% | 0 | |
| Communist | William Z. Foster | 209 | 0.03% | 0 | |
| Totals | 708,999 | 100.00% | 20 | ||
| Voter turnout (voting age) | 24.8%[16] | ||||
| County | Herbert Hoover Republican | Al Smith Democratic | Various candidates Other parties | Margin | Total votes cast | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Anderson | 1,814 | 50.94% | 1,747 | 49.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 67 | 1.88% | 3,561 |
| Andrews | 66 | 72.53% | 25 | 27.47% | 0 | 0.00% | 41 | 45.05% | 91 |
| Angelina | 1,209 | 34.41% | 2,305 | 65.59% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,096 | -31.19% | 3,514 |
| Aransas | 161 | 51.44% | 152 | 48.56% | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 2.88% | 313 |
| Archer | 799 | 48.02% | 865 | 51.98% | 0 | 0.00% | -66 | -3.97% | 1,664 |
| Armstrong | 316 | 45.80% | 373 | 54.06% | 1 | 0.14% | -57 | -8.26% | 690 |
| Atascosa | 888 | 56.56% | 682 | 43.44% | 0 | 0.00% | 206 | 13.12% | 1,570 |
| Austin | 466 | 17.94% | 2,129 | 81.98% | 2 | 0.08% | -1,663 | -64.04% | 2,597 |
| Bailey | 410 | 74.28% | 142 | 25.72% | 0 | 0.00% | 268 | 48.55% | 552 |
| Bandera | 936 | 74.52% | 317 | 25.24% | 3 | 0.24% | 619 | 49.28% | 1,256 |
| Bastrop | 850 | 35.65% | 1,534 | 64.35% | 0 | 0.00% | -684 | -28.69% | 2,384 |
| Baylor | 491 | 38.51% | 784 | 61.49% | 0 | 0.00% | -293 | -22.98% | 1,275 |
| Bee | 1,189 | 53.18% | 1,043 | 46.65% | 4 | 0.18% | 146 | 6.53% | 2,236 |
| Bell | 3,366 | 52.17% | 3,079 | 47.72% | 7 | 0.11% | 287 | 4.45% | 6,452 |
| Bexar | 16,477 | 49.69% | 16,626 | 50.14% | 57 | 0.17% | -149 | -0.45% | 33,160 |
| Blanco | 615 | 53.25% | 539 | 46.67% | 1 | 0.09% | 76 | 6.58% | 1,155 |
| Borden | 98 | 57.31% | 73 | 42.69% | 0 | 0.00% | 25 | 14.62% | 171 |
| Bosque | 1,526 | 55.19% | 1,235 | 44.67% | 4 | 0.14% | 291 | 10.52% | 2,765 |
| Bowie | 2,225 | 42.57% | 3,002 | 57.43% | 0 | 0.00% | -777 | -14.87% | 5,227 |
| Brazoria | 1,588 | 59.39% | 1,086 | 40.61% | 0 | 0.00% | 502 | 18.77% | 2,674 |
| Brazos | 738 | 33.23% | 1,480 | 66.64% | 3 | 0.14% | -742 | -33.41% | 2,221 |
| Brewster | 406 | 59.36% | 273 | 39.91% | 5 | 0.73% | 133 | 19.44% | 684 |
| Briscoe | 301 | 46.96% | 336 | 52.42% | 4 | 0.62% | -35 | -5.46% | 641 |
| Brooks | 160 | 32.52% | 332 | 67.48% | 0 | 0.00% | -172 | -34.96% | 492 |
| Brown | 2,033 | 50.46% | 1,992 | 49.44% | 4 | 0.10% | 41 | 1.02% | 4,029 |
| Burleson | 339 | 17.87% | 1,558 | 82.13% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,219 | -64.26% | 1,897 |
| Burnet | 936 | 66.67% | 467 | 33.26% | 1 | 0.07% | 469 | 33.40% | 1,404 |
| Caldwell | 1,189 | 49.54% | 1,211 | 50.46% | 0 | 0.00% | -22 | -0.92% | 2,400 |
| Calhoun | 333 | 46.84% | 375 | 52.74% | 3 | 0.42% | -42 | -5.91% | 711 |
| Callahan | 979 | 51.02% | 940 | 48.98% | 0 | 0.00% | 39 | 2.03% | 1,919 |
| Cameron | 3,544 | 52.45% | 3,202 | 47.39% | 11 | 0.16% | 342 | 5.06% | 6,757 |
| Camp | 494 | 43.56% | 640 | 56.44% | 0 | 0.00% | -146 | -12.87% | 1,134 |
| Carson | 891 | 60.04% | 592 | 39.89% | 1 | 0.07% | 299 | 20.15% | 1,484 |
| Cass | 1,323 | 43.79% | 1,698 | 56.21% | 0 | 0.00% | -375 | -12.41% | 3,021 |
| Castro | 319 | 45.38% | 384 | 54.62% | 0 | 0.00% | -65 | -9.25% | 703 |
| Chambers | 256 | 51.41% | 242 | 48.59% | 0 | 0.00% | 14 | 2.81% | 498 |
| Cherokee | 1,933 | 49.94% | 1,938 | 50.06% | 0 | 0.00% | -5 | -0.13% | 3,871 |
| Childress | 1,438 | 66.45% | 726 | 33.55% | 0 | 0.00% | 712 | 32.90% | 2,164 |
| Clay | 1,327 | 53.36% | 1,160 | 46.64% | 0 | 0.00% | 167 | 6.71% | 2,487 |
| Cochran | 197 | 64.38% | 109 | 35.62% | 0 | 0.00% | 88 | 28.76% | 306 |
| Coke | 450 | 68.60% | 206 | 31.40% | 0 | 0.00% | 244 | 37.20% | 656 |
| Coleman | 1,645 | 53.00% | 1,459 | 47.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 186 | 5.99% | 3,104 |
| Collin | 3,476 | 50.55% | 3,377 | 49.11% | 23 | 0.33% | 99 | 1.44% | 6,876 |
| Collingsworth | 1,179 | 65.98% | 608 | 34.02% | 0 | 0.00% | 571 | 31.95% | 1,787 |
| Colorado | 891 | 33.22% | 1,787 | 66.63% | 4 | 0.15% | -896 | -33.41% | 2,682 |
| Comal | 508 | 21.14% | 1,893 | 78.78% | 2 | 0.08% | -1,385 | -57.64% | 2,403 |
| Comanche | 1,483 | 53.08% | 1,311 | 46.92% | 0 | 0.00% | 172 | 6.16% | 2,794 |
| Concho | 446 | 50.97% | 426 | 48.69% | 3 | 0.34% | 20 | 2.29% | 875 |
| Cooke | 2,262 | 53.99% | 1,924 | 45.92% | 4 | 0.10% | 338 | 8.07% | 4,190 |
| Coryell | 1,123 | 46.21% | 1,306 | 53.74% | 1 | 0.04% | -183 | -7.53% | 2,430 |
| Cottle | 473 | 51.19% | 451 | 48.81% | 0 | 0.00% | 22 | 2.38% | 924 |
| Crane | 127 | 44.41% | 159 | 55.59% | 0 | 0.00% | -32 | -11.19% | 286 |
| Crockett | 291 | 81.97% | 64 | 18.03% | 0 | 0.00% | 227 | 63.94% | 355 |
| Crosby | 1,004 | 57.97% | 728 | 42.03% | 0 | 0.00% | 276 | 15.94% | 1,732 |
| Culberson | 72 | 45.86% | 85 | 54.14% | 0 | 0.00% | -13 | -8.28% | 157 |
| Dallam | 618 | 53.00% | 539 | 46.23% | 9 | 0.77% | 79 | 6.78% | 1,166 |
| Dallas | 27,272 | 60.89% | 17,437 | 38.93% | 78 | 0.17% | 9,835 | 21.96% | 44,787 |
| Dawson | 1,448 | 77.23% | 427 | 22.77% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,021 | 54.45% | 1,875 |
| Deaf Smith | 570 | 58.10% | 411 | 41.90% | 0 | 0.00% | 159 | 16.21% | 981 |
| Delta | 753 | 43.96% | 958 | 55.93% | 2 | 0.12% | -205 | -11.97% | 1,713 |
| Denton | 2,587 | 51.89% | 2,384 | 47.81% | 15 | 0.30% | 203 | 4.07% | 4,986 |
| DeWitt | 1,142 | 41.66% | 1,594 | 58.15% | 5 | 0.18% | -452 | -16.49% | 2,741 |
| Dickens | 741 | 64.10% | 415 | 35.90% | 0 | 0.00% | 326 | 28.20% | 1,156 |
| Dimmit | 626 | 70.81% | 258 | 29.19% | 0 | 0.00% | 368 | 41.63% | 884 |
| Donley | 1,092 | 68.90% | 491 | 30.98% | 2 | 0.13% | 601 | 37.92% | 1,585 |
| Duval | 434 | 25.85% | 1,245 | 74.15% | 0 | 0.00% | -811 | -48.30% | 1,679 |
| Eastland | 3,233 | 56.38% | 2,501 | 43.62% | 0 | 0.00% | 732 | 12.77% | 5,734 |
| Ector | 168 | 52.66% | 151 | 47.34% | 0 | 0.00% | 17 | 5.33% | 319 |
| Edwards | 546 | 89.66% | 59 | 9.69% | 4 | 0.66% | 487 | 79.97% | 609 |
| Ellis | 3,569 | 44.72% | 4,399 | 55.12% | 13 | 0.16% | -830 | -10.40% | 7,981 |
| El Paso | 6,050 | 49.74% | 6,114 | 50.26% | 0 | 0.00% | -64 | -0.53% | 12,164 |
| Erath | 1,923 | 56.94% | 1,372 | 40.63% | 82 | 2.43% | 551 | 16.32% | 3,377 |
| Falls | 877 | 26.04% | 2,484 | 73.75% | 7 | 0.21% | -1,607 | -47.71% | 3,368 |
| Fannin | 2,122 | 45.62% | 2,525 | 54.29% | 4 | 0.09% | -403 | -8.66% | 4,651 |
| Fayette | 689 | 15.87% | 3,647 | 84.01% | 5 | 0.12% | -2,958 | -68.14% | 4,341 |
| Fisher | 1,259 | 60.07% | 837 | 39.93% | 0 | 0.00% | 422 | 20.13% | 2,096 |
| Floyd | 1,176 | 63.84% | 666 | 36.16% | 0 | 0.00% | 510 | 27.69% | 1,842 |
| Foard | 430 | 47.51% | 466 | 51.49% | 9 | 0.99% | -36 | -3.98% | 905 |
| Fort Bend | 631 | 26.77% | 1,724 | 73.14% | 2 | 0.08% | -1,093 | -46.37% | 2,357 |
| Franklin | 386 | 35.12% | 713 | 64.88% | 0 | 0.00% | -327 | -29.75% | 1,099 |
| Freestone | 1,178 | 47.14% | 1,318 | 52.74% | 3 | 0.12% | -140 | -5.60% | 2,499 |
| Frio | 673 | 72.21% | 258 | 27.68% | 1 | 0.11% | 415 | 44.53% | 932 |
| Gaines | 312 | 69.03% | 140 | 30.97% | 0 | 0.00% | 172 | 38.05% | 452 |
| Galveston | 4,401 | 42.43% | 5,951 | 57.38% | 20 | 0.19% | -1,550 | -14.94% | 10,372 |
| Garza | 794 | 73.59% | 285 | 26.41% | 0 | 0.00% | 509 | 47.17% | 1,079 |
| Gillespie | 1,447 | 55.12% | 1,174 | 44.72% | 4 | 0.15% | 273 | 10.40% | 2,625 |
| Glasscock | 124 | 78.48% | 34 | 21.52% | 0 | 0.00% | 90 | 56.96% | 158 |
| Goliad | 554 | 54.10% | 468 | 45.70% | 2 | 0.20% | 86 | 8.40% | 1,024 |
| Gonzales | 1,112 | 45.74% | 1,319 | 54.26% | 0 | 0.00% | -207 | -8.52% | 2,431 |
| Gray | 1,871 | 65.35% | 986 | 34.44% | 6 | 0.21% | 885 | 30.91% | 2,863 |
| Grayson | 6,277 | 57.63% | 4,600 | 42.23% | 15 | 0.14% | 1,677 | 15.40% | 10,892 |
| Gregg | 646 | 39.29% | 996 | 60.58% | 2 | 0.12% | -350 | -21.29% | 1,644 |
| Grimes | 701 | 37.37% | 1,175 | 62.63% | 0 | 0.00% | -474 | -25.27% | 1,876 |
| Guadalupe | 1,442 | 43.46% | 1,872 | 56.42% | 4 | 0.12% | -430 | -12.96% | 3,318 |
| Hale | 2,143 | 65.98% | 1,098 | 33.81% | 7 | 0.22% | 1,045 | 32.17% | 3,248 |
| Hall | 1,409 | 74.08% | 493 | 25.92% | 0 | 0.00% | 916 | 48.16% | 1,902 |
| Hamilton | 927 | 48.38% | 989 | 51.62% | 0 | 0.00% | -62 | -3.24% | 1,916 |
| Hansford | 417 | 56.58% | 319 | 43.28% | 1 | 0.14% | 98 | 13.30% | 737 |
| Hardeman | 1,333 | 59.43% | 910 | 40.57% | 0 | 0.00% | 423 | 18.86% | 2,243 |
| Hardin | 951 | 47.96% | 1,032 | 52.04% | 0 | 0.00% | -81 | -4.08% | 1,983 |
| Harris | 27,188 | 55.70% | 21,536 | 44.12% | 86 | 0.18% | 5,652 | 11.58% | 48,810 |
| Harrison | 1,776 | 46.69% | 2,023 | 53.18% | 5 | 0.13% | -247 | -6.49% | 3,804 |
| Hartley | 179 | 52.34% | 163 | 47.66% | 0 | 0.00% | 16 | 4.68% | 342 |
| Haskell | 1,430 | 48.08% | 1,532 | 51.51% | 12 | 0.40% | -102 | -3.43% | 2,974 |
| Hays | 1,088 | 63.70% | 620 | 36.30% | 0 | 0.00% | 468 | 27.40% | 1,708 |
| Hemphill | 489 | 60.67% | 317 | 39.33% | 0 | 0.00% | 172 | 21.34% | 806 |
| Henderson | 1,128 | 39.52% | 1,726 | 60.48% | 0 | 0.00% | -598 | -20.95% | 2,854 |
| Hidalgo | 4,285 | 51.41% | 4,034 | 48.40% | 16 | 0.19% | 251 | 3.01% | 8,335 |
| Hill | 2,446 | 50.34% | 2,413 | 49.66% | 0 | 0.00% | 33 | 0.68% | 4,859 |
| Hockley | 765 | 75.82% | 235 | 23.29% | 9 | 0.89% | 530 | 52.53% | 1,009 |
| Hood | 640 | 57.09% | 479 | 42.73% | 2 | 0.18% | 161 | 14.36% | 1,121 |
| Hopkins | 1,767 | 48.85% | 1,845 | 51.01% | 5 | 0.14% | -78 | -2.16% | 3,617 |
| Houston | 763 | 36.35% | 1,336 | 63.65% | 0 | 0.00% | -573 | -27.30% | 2,099 |
| Howard | 812 | 54.86% | 665 | 44.93% | 3 | 0.20% | 147 | 9.93% | 1,480 |
| Hudspeth | 123 | 51.25% | 117 | 48.75% | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 2.50% | 240 |
| Hunt | 3,009 | 46.16% | 3,510 | 53.84% | 0 | 0.00% | -501 | -7.69% | 6,519 |
| Hutchinson | 1,115 | 60.43% | 730 | 39.57% | 0 | 0.00% | 385 | 20.87% | 1,845 |
| Irion | 259 | 68.52% | 119 | 31.48% | 0 | 0.00% | 140 | 37.04% | 378 |
| Jack | 1,068 | 70.22% | 450 | 29.59% | 3 | 0.20% | 618 | 40.63% | 1,521 |
| Jackson | 572 | 54.68% | 473 | 45.22% | 1 | 0.10% | 99 | 9.46% | 1,046 |
| Jasper | 611 | 40.44% | 898 | 59.43% | 2 | 0.13% | -287 | -18.99% | 1,511 |
| Jeff Davis | 157 | 58.15% | 112 | 41.48% | 1 | 0.37% | 45 | 16.67% | 270 |
| Jefferson | 9,209 | 56.74% | 7,006 | 43.16% | 16 | 0.10% | 2,203 | 13.57% | 16,231 |
| Jim Hogg | 109 | 29.30% | 263 | 70.70% | 0 | 0.00% | -154 | -41.40% | 372 |
| Jim Wells | 423 | 36.06% | 747 | 63.68% | 3 | 0.26% | -324 | -27.62% | 1,173 |
| Johnson | 3,181 | 61.58% | 1,981 | 38.35% | 4 | 0.08% | 1,200 | 23.23% | 5,166 |
| Jones | 1,995 | 55.95% | 1,563 | 43.83% | 8 | 0.22% | 432 | 12.11% | 3,566 |
| Karnes | 855 | 44.83% | 1,052 | 55.17% | 0 | 0.00% | -197 | -10.33% | 1,907 |
| Kaufman | 1,718 | 39.27% | 2,657 | 60.73% | 0 | 0.00% | -939 | -21.46% | 4,375 |
| Kendall | 663 | 63.63% | 377 | 36.18% | 2 | 0.19% | 286 | 27.45% | 1,042 |
| Kenedy | 12 | 9.23% | 118 | 90.77% | 0 | 0.00% | -106 | -81.54% | 130 |
| Kent | 363 | 69.01% | 163 | 30.99% | 0 | 0.00% | 200 | 38.02% | 526 |
| Kerr | 1,575 | 73.36% | 570 | 26.55% | 2 | 0.09% | 1,005 | 46.81% | 2,147 |
| Kimble | 660 | 80.39% | 157 | 19.12% | 4 | 0.49% | 503 | 61.27% | 821 |
| King | 85 | 65.38% | 45 | 34.62% | 0 | 0.00% | 40 | 30.77% | 130 |
| Kinney | 182 | 47.64% | 200 | 52.36% | 0 | 0.00% | -18 | -4.71% | 382 |
| Kleberg | 751 | 51.94% | 695 | 48.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 56 | 3.87% | 1,446 |
| Knox | 992 | 55.70% | 784 | 44.02% | 5 | 0.28% | 208 | 11.68% | 1,781 |
| Lamar | 2,887 | 57.08% | 2,163 | 42.76% | 8 | 0.16% | 724 | 14.31% | 5,058 |
| Lamb | 1,266 | 74.21% | 440 | 25.79% | 0 | 0.00% | 826 | 48.42% | 1,706 |
| Lampasas | 899 | 60.91% | 567 | 38.41% | 10 | 0.68% | 332 | 22.49% | 1,476 |
| La Salle | 327 | 40.57% | 479 | 59.43% | 0 | 0.00% | -152 | -18.86% | 806 |
| Lavaca | 911 | 24.27% | 2,842 | 75.73% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,931 | -51.45% | 3,753 |
| Lee | 449 | 27.63% | 1,176 | 72.37% | 0 | 0.00% | -727 | -44.74% | 1,625 |
| Leon | 543 | 38.59% | 862 | 61.27% | 2 | 0.14% | -319 | -22.67% | 1,407 |
| Liberty | 1,070 | 53.63% | 918 | 46.02% | 7 | 0.35% | 152 | 7.62% | 1,995 |
| Limestone | 1,642 | 38.64% | 2,608 | 61.36% | 0 | 0.00% | -966 | -22.73% | 4,250 |
| Lipscomb | 776 | 69.35% | 331 | 29.58% | 12 | 1.07% | 445 | 39.77% | 1,119 |
| Live Oak | 484 | 55.82% | 383 | 44.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 101 | 11.65% | 867 |
| Llano | 439 | 46.07% | 514 | 53.93% | 0 | 0.00% | -75 | -7.87% | 953 |
| Loving | 6 | 37.50% | 10 | 62.50% | 0 | 0.00% | -4 | -25.00% | 16 |
| Lubbock | 3,079 | 60.79% | 1,979 | 39.07% | 7 | 0.14% | 1,100 | 21.72% | 5,065 |
| Lynn | 1,268 | 62.49% | 754 | 37.16% | 7 | 0.34% | 514 | 25.33% | 2,029 |
| McCulloch | 1,294 | 63.59% | 741 | 36.41% | 0 | 0.00% | 553 | 27.17% | 2,035 |
| McLennan | 5,744 | 51.81% | 5,330 | 48.07% | 13 | 0.12% | 414 | 3.73% | 11,087 |
| McMullen | 96 | 50.00% | 94 | 48.96% | 2 | 1.04% | 2 | 1.04% | 192 |
| Madison | 364 | 44.61% | 452 | 55.39% | 0 | 0.00% | -88 | -10.78% | 816 |
| Marion | 443 | 40.90% | 640 | 59.10% | 0 | 0.00% | -197 | -18.19% | 1,083 |
| Martin | 330 | 60.77% | 213 | 39.23% | 0 | 0.00% | 117 | 21.55% | 543 |
| Mason | 807 | 76.64% | 244 | 23.17% | 2 | 0.19% | 563 | 53.47% | 1,053 |
| Matagorda | 1,194 | 58.85% | 829 | 40.86% | 6 | 0.30% | 365 | 17.99% | 2,029 |
| Maverick | 311 | 63.34% | 180 | 36.66% | 0 | 0.00% | 131 | 26.68% | 491 |
| Medina | 1,243 | 46.94% | 1,400 | 52.87% | 5 | 0.19% | -157 | -5.93% | 2,648 |
| Menard | 589 | 71.57% | 234 | 28.43% | 0 | 0.00% | 355 | 43.13% | 823 |
| Midland | 347 | 49.57% | 350 | 50.00% | 3 | 0.43% | -3 | -0.43% | 700 |
| Milam | 1,270 | 30.86% | 2,842 | 69.05% | 4 | 0.10% | -1,572 | -38.19% | 4,116 |
| Mills | 774 | 63.65% | 442 | 36.35% | 0 | 0.00% | 332 | 27.30% | 1,216 |
| Mitchell | 1,099 | 59.57% | 746 | 40.43% | 0 | 0.00% | 353 | 19.13% | 1,845 |
| Montague | 1,519 | 51.13% | 1,452 | 48.87% | 0 | 0.00% | 67 | 2.26% | 2,971 |
| Montgomery | 613 | 40.36% | 905 | 59.58% | 1 | 0.07% | -292 | -19.22% | 1,519 |
| Moore | 87 | 41.23% | 124 | 58.77% | 0 | 0.00% | -37 | -17.54% | 211 |
| Morris | 287 | 26.90% | 780 | 73.10% | 0 | 0.00% | -493 | -46.20% | 1,067 |
| Motley | 450 | 56.32% | 349 | 43.68% | 0 | 0.00% | 101 | 12.64% | 799 |
| Nacogdoches | 822 | 30.41% | 1,879 | 69.52% | 2 | 0.07% | -1,057 | -39.10% | 2,703 |
| Navarro | 3,341 | 47.80% | 3,648 | 52.20% | 0 | 0.00% | -307 | -4.39% | 6,989 |
| Newton | 397 | 41.27% | 564 | 58.63% | 1 | 0.10% | -167 | -17.36% | 962 |
| Nolan | 1,475 | 58.76% | 1,035 | 41.24% | 0 | 0.00% | 440 | 17.53% | 2,510 |
| Nueces | 2,481 | 45.36% | 2,985 | 54.58% | 3 | 0.05% | -504 | -9.22% | 5,469 |
| Ochiltree | 556 | 67.31% | 270 | 32.69% | 0 | 0.00% | 286 | 34.62% | 826 |
| Oldham | 172 | 52.28% | 157 | 47.72% | 0 | 0.00% | 15 | 4.56% | 329 |
| Orange | 919 | 42.43% | 1,247 | 57.57% | 0 | 0.00% | -328 | -15.14% | 2,166 |
| Palo Pinto | 2,001 | 63.28% | 1,161 | 36.72% | 0 | 0.00% | 840 | 26.57% | 3,162 |
| Panola | 420 | 24.21% | 1,312 | 75.62% | 3 | 0.17% | -892 | -51.41% | 1,735 |
| Parker | 2,178 | 66.24% | 1,110 | 33.76% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,068 | 32.48% | 3,288 |
| Parmer | 620 | 65.75% | 315 | 33.40% | 8 | 0.85% | 305 | 32.34% | 943 |
| Pecos | 524 | 47.99% | 562 | 51.47% | 6 | 0.55% | -38 | -3.48% | 1,092 |
| Polk | 508 | 33.73% | 994 | 66.00% | 4 | 0.27% | -486 | -32.27% | 1,506 |
| Potter | 3,627 | 57.90% | 2,637 | 42.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 990 | 15.80% | 6,264 |
| Presidio | 254 | 44.64% | 315 | 55.36% | 0 | 0.00% | -61 | -10.72% | 569 |
| Rains | 202 | 26.90% | 544 | 72.44% | 5 | 0.67% | -342 | -45.54% | 751 |
| Randall | 733 | 52.66% | 659 | 47.34% | 0 | 0.00% | 74 | 5.32% | 1,392 |
| Reagan | 387 | 62.82% | 229 | 37.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 158 | 25.65% | 616 |
| Real | 479 | 83.02% | 98 | 16.98% | 0 | 0.00% | 381 | 66.03% | 577 |
| Red River | 1,172 | 41.30% | 1,666 | 58.70% | 0 | 0.00% | -494 | -17.41% | 2,838 |
| Reeves | 344 | 46.61% | 394 | 53.39% | 0 | 0.00% | -50 | -6.78% | 738 |
| Refugio | 383 | 36.34% | 671 | 63.66% | 0 | 0.00% | -288 | -27.32% | 1,054 |
| Roberts | 243 | 70.03% | 104 | 29.97% | 0 | 0.00% | 139 | 40.06% | 347 |
| Robertson | 751 | 33.54% | 1,487 | 66.41% | 1 | 0.04% | -736 | -32.87% | 2,239 |
| Rockwall | 289 | 25.37% | 850 | 74.63% | 0 | 0.00% | -561 | -49.25% | 1,139 |
| Runnels | 1,645 | 52.26% | 1,494 | 47.46% | 9 | 0.29% | 151 | 4.80% | 3,148 |
| Rusk | 1,033 | 37.36% | 1,732 | 62.64% | 0 | 0.00% | -699 | -25.28% | 2,765 |
| Sabine | 419 | 34.18% | 807 | 65.82% | 0 | 0.00% | -388 | -31.65% | 1,226 |
| San Augustine | 467 | 36.26% | 821 | 63.74% | 0 | 0.00% | -354 | -27.48% | 1,288 |
| San Jacinto | 296 | 37.00% | 503 | 62.88% | 1 | 0.13% | -207 | -25.88% | 800 |
| San Patricio | 1,388 | 70.56% | 579 | 29.44% | 0 | 0.00% | 809 | 41.13% | 1,967 |
| San Saba | 682 | 47.56% | 752 | 52.44% | 0 | 0.00% | -70 | -4.88% | 1,434 |
| Schleicher | 227 | 62.36% | 137 | 37.64% | 0 | 0.00% | 90 | 24.73% | 364 |
| Scurry | 1,597 | 77.49% | 462 | 22.42% | 2 | 0.10% | 1,135 | 55.07% | 2,061 |
| Shackelford | 558 | 51.10% | 533 | 48.81% | 1 | 0.09% | 25 | 2.29% | 1,092 |
| Shelby | 676 | 25.53% | 1,961 | 74.06% | 11 | 0.42% | -1,285 | -48.53% | 2,648 |
| Sherman | 248 | 64.42% | 137 | 35.58% | 0 | 0.00% | 111 | 28.83% | 385 |
| Smith | 3,493 | 59.85% | 2,343 | 40.15% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,150 | 19.71% | 5,836 |
| Somervell | 241 | 63.93% | 136 | 36.07% | 0 | 0.00% | 105 | 27.85% | 377 |
| Starr | 79 | 9.69% | 736 | 90.31% | 0 | 0.00% | -657 | -80.61% | 815 |
| Stephens | 1,789 | 60.60% | 1,163 | 39.40% | 0 | 0.00% | 626 | 21.21% | 2,952 |
| Sterling | 122 | 42.21% | 167 | 57.79% | 0 | 0.00% | -45 | -15.57% | 289 |
| Stonewall | 442 | 46.92% | 500 | 53.08% | 0 | 0.00% | -58 | -6.16% | 942 |
| Sutton | 290 | 75.92% | 92 | 24.08% | 0 | 0.00% | 198 | 51.83% | 382 |
| Swisher | 887 | 70.34% | 374 | 29.66% | 0 | 0.00% | 513 | 40.68% | 1,261 |
| Tarrant | 20,481 | 68.99% | 9,208 | 31.01% | 0 | 0.00% | 11,273 | 37.97% | 29,689 |
| Taylor | 4,050 | 68.07% | 1,891 | 31.78% | 9 | 0.15% | 2,159 | 36.29% | 5,950 |
| Terrell | 364 | 80.71% | 85 | 18.85% | 2 | 0.44% | 279 | 61.86% | 451 |
| Terry | 622 | 60.45% | 407 | 39.55% | 0 | 0.00% | 215 | 20.89% | 1,029 |
| Throckmorton | 703 | 69.81% | 304 | 30.19% | 0 | 0.00% | 399 | 39.62% | 1,007 |
| Titus | 469 | 28.99% | 1,149 | 71.01% | 0 | 0.00% | -680 | -42.03% | 1,618 |
| Tom Green | 2,618 | 63.11% | 1,528 | 36.84% | 2 | 0.05% | 1,090 | 26.28% | 4,148 |
| Travis | 4,847 | 51.83% | 4,487 | 47.98% | 17 | 0.18% | 360 | 3.85% | 9,351 |
| Trinity | 456 | 39.93% | 686 | 60.07% | 0 | 0.00% | -230 | -20.14% | 1,142 |
| Tyler | 298 | 30.88% | 666 | 69.02% | 1 | 0.10% | -368 | -38.13% | 965 |
| Upshur | 649 | 29.37% | 1,553 | 70.27% | 8 | 0.36% | -904 | -40.90% | 2,210 |
| Upton | 270 | 58.82% | 189 | 41.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 81 | 17.65% | 459 |
| Uvalde | 1,224 | 62.10% | 747 | 37.90% | 0 | 0.00% | 477 | 24.20% | 1,971 |
| Val Verde | 854 | 57.94% | 620 | 42.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 234 | 15.88% | 1,474 |
| Van Zandt | 1,502 | 45.35% | 1,789 | 54.02% | 21 | 0.63% | -287 | -8.67% | 3,312 |
| Victoria | 663 | 27.94% | 1,710 | 72.06% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,047 | -44.12% | 2,373 |
| Walker | 488 | 39.51% | 747 | 60.49% | 0 | 0.00% | -259 | -20.97% | 1,235 |
| Waller | 376 | 42.68% | 504 | 57.21% | 1 | 0.11% | -128 | -14.53% | 881 |
| Ward | 216 | 45.76% | 256 | 54.24% | 0 | 0.00% | -40 | -8.47% | 472 |
| Washington | 275 | 9.94% | 2,491 | 90.06% | 0 | 0.00% | -2,216 | -80.12% | 2,766 |
| Webb | 767 | 32.16% | 1,615 | 67.71% | 3 | 0.13% | -848 | -35.56% | 2,385 |
| Wharton | 1,151 | 42.69% | 1,545 | 57.31% | 0 | 0.00% | -394 | -14.61% | 2,696 |
| Wheeler | 1,038 | 57.86% | 750 | 41.81% | 6 | 0.33% | 288 | 16.05% | 1,794 |
| Wichita | 7,226 | 59.82% | 4,853 | 40.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,373 | 19.65% | 12,079 |
| Wilbarger | 1,590 | 52.30% | 1,447 | 47.60% | 3 | 0.10% | 143 | 4.70% | 3,040 |
| Willacy | 389 | 49.55% | 396 | 50.45% | 0 | 0.00% | -7 | -0.89% | 785 |
| Williamson | 1,833 | 33.14% | 3,689 | 66.70% | 9 | 0.16% | -1,856 | -33.56% | 5,531 |
| Wilson | 622 | 29.33% | 1,499 | 70.67% | 0 | 0.00% | -877 | -41.35% | 2,121 |
| Winkler | 162 | 34.32% | 310 | 65.68% | 0 | 0.00% | -148 | -31.36% | 472 |
| Wise | 2,141 | 66.20% | 1,093 | 33.80% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,048 | 32.41% | 3,234 |
| Wood | 1,161 | 41.38% | 1,645 | 58.62% | 0 | 0.00% | -484 | -17.25% | 2,806 |
| Yoakum | 86 | 56.58% | 66 | 43.42% | 0 | 0.00% | 20 | 13.16% | 152 |
| Young | 1,826 | 58.88% | 1,275 | 41.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 551 | 17.77% | 3,101 |
| Zapata | 19 | 6.03% | 296 | 93.97% | 0 | 0.00% | -277 | -87.94% | 315 |
| Zavala | 571 | 71.38% | 229 | 28.63% | 0 | 0.00% | 342 | 42.75% | 800 |
| Totals | 372,324 | 51.88% | 344,542 | 48.00% | 867 | 0.12% | 27,782 | 3.87% | 717,733 |
However, with all other prominent Democrats sitting the election out,[18] the party nominatedAl Smith, four-termGovernor of New York as its nominee for 1928, with little opposition, despite disagreement among Texas Democrats likeGovernor Moody, plus"Pa" and"Ma" Ferguson.[19] Smith had been the favorite for the 1924 nomination, but had lost due to opposition to his Catholic faith and "wet" views onProhibition: he wished to repeal or modify theVolstead Act.
Once Smith was nominated – despite his attempt to dispel fears by nominating "dry" Southern DemocratJoseph T. Robinson as his running mate[20] – extreme fear ensued in the South, which mostly had little to no experience of the Catholic immigrants from southern and eastern Europe who were Smith's local constituency. Southern fundamentalist Protestants believed that Smith would allowpapal and priestly leadership in the United States, which Protestantism was a reaction against.[21] There was also much opposition to Smith's support for repealing Prohibition, most notably from ministerJ. Frank Norris, who became the center of the anti-Smith campaign, saying that
Texas is the battleground for this, the most titanic struggle in the political, moral and religious life of the nation.[22]
TheSouthern Baptist Convention similarly said that
We enter into a sacred covenant and solemn pledge that we will support for the office of President, or any other office, only such men as stand for our present order of prohibition.[23]
Smith's campaign managers responded to this criticism by saying that the "Hoovercrats" were "Republicans,Klansmen andBolsheviks".[24]