| 13 May Incident Peristiwa 13 Mei ڤريستيوا 13 مي 五一三事件 13 மே சம்பவம் | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
.jpg) A desertedJalan Bukit Bintang while the capital was under curfew due to the incident | ||||
| Date | 13 May 1969; 56 years ago (1969-05-13) | |||
| Location | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | |||
| Caused by | Results of the1969 Malaysian general election, when the rulingAlliance Party lost seats to theChinese-majorityDemocratic Action Party andParti Gerakan. | |||
| Methods | Widespreadrioting,looting, assault,arson, protests, property damage, murder | |||
| Resulted in | Declaration of astate of emergency by theYang di-Pertuan Agong
| |||
| Parties | ||||
| ||||
| Lead figures | ||||
| Casualties and losses | ||||
| ||||
The13 May incident was a period of violentracial conflict that erupted inKuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on 13 May 1969, followingthat year's general election. The clashes primarily involved theMalay andChinese communities and were caused by political and ethnic tensions after opposition parties such as theDemocratic Action Party (DAP) andGerakan made substantial electoral gains in the election, challenging the rulingAlliance Party's dominance.[1]
In response, theking, on the government's advice, declared astate of emergency, suspendedparliament, and entrusted civilian administration to theNational Operations Council (NOC) under Deputy Prime MinisterTun Abdul Razak. While official sources cited 196 fatalities, other sources suggest the toll was much higher—from nearly 600 to over a thousand.[1][2][3] Thousands were injured or displaced, and curfews were enforced to restore order.[4][5]
The event was significant in Malaysian politics, as it forced the first prime minister,Tunku Abdul Rahman, to step down from office and hand power toAbdul Razak Hussein. It was also a pivotal moment that reshaped Malaysia'ssocioeconomic policies, as Abdul Razak's government shifted their domestic policies to favour Malays with the implementation of theNew Economic Policy (NEP), and theUnited Malays National Organisation (UMNO) restructured the political system to advance Malay dominance throughaffirmative action in accordance with the ideology ofKetuanan Melayu (lit. "Malay supremacy").[6]
The incident has remained a sensitive and, at times,taboo topic in Malaysian society, with open discussion often avoided by prevailing political sensitivities.[7] Ethnic relations between the Malay and Chinese communities have stabilised since the incident but remain fragile, occasionally strained by political rhetoric and socioeconomic disparities.[8]
On 31 August 1957,Malaya gained its independence fromcolonial rule. The country, however, suffered from a sharp division of wealth between the Chinese, who dominated most urban areas and were perceived to be in control of a large portion of the nation's economy, and the Malays, who were generally poorer and lived in more rural areas. The special privileged position of Malay political power, however, is guaranteed underArticle 153 of the constitution, written during Malayan independence.[9]
There were heated debates between Malay groups wanting radical measures to institutionalise Malay supremacy (Ketuanan Melayu), while Chinese groups called for their "racial" interest to be protected, and non-Malay opposition party members arguing for a 'Malaysian Malaysia" rather than Malay privilege.[10] In 1963, amid a background of racial tension, Malaysia was formed as a federation that incorporated Malaya (Peninsular Malaysia),Singapore,North Borneo, andSarawak.
There had been several incidents of racial conflict between Malays and Chinese before the 1969 riots. For example, in Penang, hostility between the races turned into violence during the centenary celebration ofGeorge Town in 1957, which resulted in several days of fighting and several deaths,[11] and there were further disturbances in 1959 and 1964 as well as ariot in 1967, which originated as a protest againstcurrency devaluation but turned into racial killings.[12][13] In Singapore, antagonism between the races led to the1964 race riots, which contributed to the separation of Singapore from Malaysia on 9 August 1965.
In the1969 general election, the governing coalition of theAlliance Party faced a strong challenge from opposition parties, in particular the two newly formed and mainly Chinese parties, theDemocratic Action Party (DAP) andParti Gerakan. The election was preceded by outbreaks of racial incidents that contributed to a tense atmosphere. A Malay political worker was killed by a Chinese gang in Penang, while a ChineseLabour Party activist was shot and killed in a clash with police in Kuala Lumpur.[14] Radical opponents called for a boycott of the election and threatened violence, but the funeral procession of the shot activist, which drew large crowds of more than ten thousand and was held before election day, passed largely peacefully despite a number of disruptive incidents.[15][16][17]
The general election was held on 10 May 1969, without any incidents. The result showed that the Alliance had won less than half of the popular vote, a large setback for the ruling coalition.[18] On the national level, the Alliance had gained a majority of seats in parliament, albeit a significantly reduced one. The number of seats won by the Chinese component of the Alliance, theMalaysian Chinese Association, had been reduced by half. On the state level, the Alliance had only gained the majority inSelangor by co-operating with the sole independent candidate as the opposition had tied with the Alliance for control of theSelangor state legislature (although immediately after the election, it was unclear that the Alliance would still have control). The Alliance lost control ofKelantan (to thePan-Malaysian Islamic Party) andPerak, and the opposition Gerakan won control of the state government in Penang.[19]
On the nights of 11 and 12 May, the DAP and Gerakan celebrated their success in the election, with permission being sought byTan Chee Khoon from the police. In particular, a large Gerakan procession welcomed the Gerakan leader,V. David.[20] Opposition parades passed through Malay communities such asKampung Baru and were alleged to be highly provocative, with non-Malays taunting Malays while bearing slogans such as "Semua Melayu kasi habis" (finish off all the Malays) and "Kuala Lumpur sekarang Cina punya" (Kuala Lumpur now belongs to the Chinese).[15][21] Some opposition supporters were said to have driven past the residence of the Selangor chief minister and demanded that he abandon the house in favour of a Chinese person.[22]
Celebrations by opposition parties were seen as an attack on Malay political power. Although the election results still favoured the Malays despite losses, the Malay newspaperUtusan Melayu suggested in an editorial that the results had jeopardised the future of Malay rule and that prompt action was required to shore it up.[23] On 12 May, members ofUMNO Youth indicated to Selangor'sMenteri Besar,Harun Idris, that they wanted to hold a victory parade.UMNO then announced a procession that would start from Idris's residence.Tunku Abdul Rahman would later call the retaliatory parade "inevitable, as otherwise the party members would be demoralised after the show of strength by the Opposition and the insults that had been thrown at them".[21] Malays were brought from the rural areas into Kuala Lumpur, which was then a predominantly Chinese city. Thousands of Malays, some of them armed, arrived to join the parade.[22]
The UMNO procession was planned for 7:30 pm on 13 May. That morning, Malays began to gather at the residence of Harun Idris on Jalan Raja Muda, on the edge ofKampung Baru, although some were already there as early as Sunday evening. They came from various parts of the state, such asMorib (Harun's constituency) andBanting, and some were said to have came from parts ofPerak.[24] According to theNational Operations Council's (NOC) official report, at around 6:30 pm, fistfights broke out inSetapak between a group of Malays fromGombak travelling to the rally and Chinese bystanders who taunted them, and this escalated into bottle- and stone-throwing.[25] News of the fighting then reached the gathering crowd in Jalan Raja Muda, and shortly before 6:30 pm, many Malays broke off from the rallying point at Idris's house and headed through adjoining Chinese sections.[15] The Malays, armed withparangs andkris, burned cars and shops, killed, and looted in the Chinese areas.[15] According toTime, at least eight Chinese people were killed in the initial attack.[3] Once violence broke out, it spread rapidly and uncontrollably throughout the city within 45 minutes,[26] toJalan Campbell,Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman (Batu Road),Kampung Datuk Keramat,Kampung Pandan,Cheras, andKampung Kerinchi.[27]
.png)
According to John Slimming, who wrote an account of the riot in 1969, the Chinese were taken by surprise and did not retaliate for more than an hour.[28] The NOC's official report, however, suggested that Chinese secret society elements had prepared for trouble and were in action when the violence started in Kampung Baru.[29] On Batu Road, Chinese and Indian shopkeepers began to form themselves into an improvised defence force, while a Malay mob attempting to storm theChow Kit Road area was met with armed secret society gang members and ran.[30] The Chinese attacked Malays who were found in Chinese areas, and Malay patrons in cinemas were singled out and killed.[30] The Chinese also attempted to burn down the UMNO headquarters on Batu Road and besieged theSalak South police station.[28][31] TheSungai Besi police station was attacked, by mobs of unknown ethnicity, according to a report inThe Straits Times.[32]
.jpg)
Early in the evening, the rioters were met by police, who usedtear gas in an attempt to control them. A 24-hour curfew for Kuala Lumpur was imposed at 7:00 pm.[33] Later, between 8:30 and 9:00 pm, a shoot-to-kill order was given by Inspector General of PoliceMohamed Salleh bin Ismael. This was followed by another shoot-to-kill order from the Chief of Armed Forces, GeneralTunku Osman Jiwa.[34] The army was deployed, and they entered the areas affected by rioting at around 10:00 pm.[35] Many people who were unaware of the curfew order were shot. Some were also shot while standing in their own doorways and gardens. Foreign correspondents reported seeing members of theRoyal Malay Regiment firing into Chinese shophouses for no apparent reason.[34]
By 5:00 am the next morning, the authorities atKuala Lumpur Hospital reported that there were about 80 dead at the facility. Members of the hospital staff also reported that the initial casualties between 7:00 and 8:30 pm had all been Chinese suffering from parang slashes and stab wounds, but that between 8:30 and 10:30 pm, the victims were equally divided between Chinese and Malays. However, after about 10:30 pm, the casualties were almost all Chinese, with nearly all of them suffering from gunshot wounds.[34]
.png)
The army gathered at crucial road junctions and patrolled the main streets, but even though a curfew had been announced, young men in areas such as Kampung Baru andPudu ignored the order. Although most of the killings occurred on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning, the burning and looting of Chinese shops and houses by Malays continued, with most incidents of serious arson occurring on Thursday night and Friday; over 450 houses were burnt.[36] People displaced by the riots, most of them Chinese, were sent to official refugee centres in different parts of town—the Malays toStadium Negara and the Chinese toStadium Merdeka, Chinwoo Stadium, and Shaw Road School. By Sunday, the number of Chinese refugees had increased to 3,500 in Merdeka Stadium, 1,500 in Chinwoo Stadium, and 800 in Shaw Road School, while the Malays in Stadium Negara had decreased from 650 on Thursday to 250 on Sunday.[37] Over a thousand refugees were still left in Merdeka Stadium a month after the riot.[38]
The curfew was relaxed briefly but quickly reimposed on Thursday morning. It was lifted again for three hours on Saturday morning. The curfew was gradually relaxed as the situation slowly returned to normal, but by the end of the month, it was still in force from 3:00 pm until 6:30 am.[39]
The violence was concentrated in urban areas, and except for minor disturbances inMalacca,Perak,Penang, and neighbouringSingapore, where the populations of Chinese people were larger, the rest of the country remained calm.[40]
On 28 June 1969, rioting broke out again inSentul when Malays attacked Indians, and 15 were killed.[41]
According to disputed police figures, a total of 196 people were killed in the riots.[42] The official figures gave 143 of the dead as Chinese, 25 Malay, 13 Indian, and 15 others (undetermined),[43] although unofficial figures suggested a higher number of Chinese deaths.[44] The police were authorised to bury any dead bodies found or dispose of them in any way they could without inquests or inquiries, and many of these were disposed of undocumented, which made estimation of the number of deaths difficult. Some were reported to have been thrown into theKlang River, and some were believed to have been disposed of in pools in tin mines.[45] A mass burial of the victims was also captured on film at theSungai Bulohleper colony near Kuala Lumpur.[46] Western diplomatic sources at that time put the toll at close to 600,[26] and Slimming estimated the number to be around 800 in the first week by including hundreds who were officially missing; other observers and correspondents suggested four-figure numbers.[47][48]
According to official figures, 439 individuals were also recorded as injured.[17] 753 cases of arson were logged, and 211 vehicles were destroyed or severely damaged.
Immediately after the riot, the government assumed emergency powers and suspendedparliament, which would reconvene again in 1971. It also briefly suspended the press and established theNational Operations Council (NOC).[49]
_Ordinance%2c_1969_(cropped).jpg)
The government ordered an immediate curfew throughout the state of Selangor. Security forces, comprising some 2,000Royal Malay Regiment soldiers and 3,600 police officers, were deployed and took control of the situation. On 14 and 16 May, astate of emergency and accompanyingcurfew were declared throughout the country. On 15 May, the NOC, also known as theMajlis Gerakan Negara (MAGERAN), headed byAbdul Razak Hussein, was established following a proclamation of emergency by thesultan of Malaysia,Ismail Nasiruddin of Terengganu. Parts of the constitution were also suspended.[50] With parliament suspended, the NOC became the supreme decision-making body for the next 18 months. State and District Operations Councils took over state and local governments. The NOC implemented security measures to restore law and order in the country, including the establishment of an unarmed vigilante corps, a territorial army, and police force battalions.[50]
Newspaper publications were suspended on 15 May[51] but resumed on 18 May,[52][53] and a new censorship law wasgazetted on 21 May.[54][55][56] Foreign publications were banned, citizens found in possession of foreign news clippings were detained, and foreign reporters were criticised over allegations of racial bias by the army.[57] The restoration of order in the country was gradually achieved. Curfews continued in most parts of the country but were gradually scaled back. Peace was restored in the affected areas within two months. In February 1971, parliamentary rule was re-established.[50] However, the emergency proclamation was only annulled by the parliament in December 2011, 42 years later,[58][59][60][61] with all remaining emergency ordinances lapsing in June 2012.[62]
The NOC released a report on 9 October 1969, which cited "racial politics" as the primary cause of the riots, but it was reluctant to assign blame to the Malays.[63]
The Malays who already felt excluded in the country's economic life, now began to feel a threat in their place in the public services. No mention was ever made by non-Malay politicians of the almost closed-door attitude to the Malays by non-Malays in large sections of the private sector in this country.[64]
Certain non-Malay racialist election speakers constantly worked up non-Malay passions against Malay policemen and officers, alleging partial treatment of the enforcement of the law. They contributed directly to the breakdown in respect for the law and authority amongst sections of the non-Malay communities.[63]
It also attributed the cause of the riots in part to both theMalayan Communist Party and secret societies:
The eruption of violence on 13 May was the result of an interplay of forces... These include a generation gap and differences in interpretation of the constitutional structure by the different races in the country...; the incitement, intemperate statements and provocative behaviours of certain racialist party members and supporters during the recent General Election; the part played by the Malayan Communist Party (MCP) and secret societies in inciting racial feelings and suspicion; and the anxious, and later desperate, mood of the Malays with a background of Sino-Malay distrust, and recently, just after the General Elections, as a result of racial insults and threat to their future survival in their own country'
— Extract from The 13 May Tragedy, a report by the National Operations Council, October 1969.[65]
It however said that the "trouble turned out to be a communal clash between the Malays and the Chinese" rather than an instance ofcommunist insurgency.[63] The report also denied rumours of lack of evenhandedness by the security forces in their handling of the crisis.[66]
Tunku Abdul Rahman, in a book released two weeks before the report, blamed the opposition parties for the violence, as well as the influence of the communists, and thought that the incidents were sparked by Chinese communist youths. He absolved the majority of the Malays, Chinese, and Indians of any responsibility and considered the Malays who converged in Kuala Lumpur on 13 May to be merely responding to "intolerable provocations".[67]
TheRukun Negara, the de facto Malaysianoath of allegiance, was a reaction to the riot. It was introduced on 31 August 1970 as a way to foster unity among Malaysians.
The Malay nationalistMahathir Mohamad, who was then a lesser-known politician and lost his seat as an UMNO candidate in the 10 May election, blamed the riot on the government and especially on Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman for being "simple-minded" and not planning for a prosperous Malaysia where the Malays have a share of the economic stake. Abdul Rahman in turn blamed "extremists" such as Mahathir for the racial clashes, which led to Mahathir's expulsion from UMNO.[68] This propelled him to write his seminal workThe Malay Dilemma, in which he posited a solution to Malaysia's racial tensions based on aiding the Malays economically through anaffirmative action programme.
After the riots, Abdul Rahman was forced into the background, with the day-to-day running of the country handed to the deputy prime minister, Abdul Razak Hussein, who was also the director of the NOC. On 22 September 1970, when the parliament reconvened, Abdul Rahman resigned his position as prime minister, and Razak Hussein took over.[69]
In his 2007 book,May 13: Declassified Documents on the Malaysian Riots of 1969,Kua Kia Soong argued that, based on declassified British embassy dispatches, the riot was acoup d'état staged against Tunku Abdul Rahman by UMNO political leaders in association with the army and the police.[70] He characterised the 13 May incident as more than spontaneous communal unrest, arguing that it reflected deeper structural inequalities and manipulation that was exploited by political elites to justify a consolidation of Malay political ascendancy.[2]
Malaysian academicShamsul Amri Baharuddin has critiqued essentialist narratives of Malay identity and highlighted how the incident helped propagate constructed notions of "Malayness" that reinforced state policies and public discourse.[71]
In an attempt to form a broader coalition, theBarisan Nasional was formed in place of the Alliance Party, with former opposition parties such as Gerakan,PPP, andPAS invited to join the coalition.[72]
After the 1969 riot, UMNO also began to restructure the political system to reinforce its power. It advanced its own version ofKetuanan Melayu, whereby "the politics of this country has been, and must remain for the foreseeable future, native [i.e., Malay] based: that was the secret of our stability and our prosperity and that is a fact of political life which no one can simply wish away."[73] This principle ofKetuanan Melayu has been repeatedly used in successive elections by UMNO to galvanise Malay support for the party,[74] and it remained the guiding principle of successive governments.[75]
There are two burial grounds for the victims of the riot, one in theSungai Bulohleprosarium compound and the other in the Taman Ibukota Muslim Cemetery inGombak.[76]
According to the NOC report, 103 victims were buried in Sungai Buloh,[77] of which 99 were Chinese; 2 were Indian; and 2 were Malay.[76][78] They were interred between 18 May and 2 June 1969.[77][76] Among the 103 victims, 18 were marked as "unidentified", with only their ethnicity, sex, and date of death specified on the tombstones.[76] However, some contemporary news reports have put the total count of tombstones in Sungai Buloh at either 102,[79] 112,[80] or 114.[81][82]
18 victims were interred at Taman Ibukota Muslim Cemetery on 18 May 1969, based on the NOC report.[77] According to the cemetery record, however, only 11 victims of the riot were buried.[76]
In 2017, illegal land clearing was carried out near the Sungai Buloh burial site, with the intention to develop it into a parking lot, which was stopped by the authorities after it attracted public attention from civil society groups.[80][83] Since then, there have been multiple calls for the government to preserve the cemetery and declare it a heritage site.[84][85] In September 2024, theSelangor government gazetted the Sungai Buloh burial ground as a reserved land for a non-Muslim cemetery and placed it under the care of the Friends of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Heritage Association, a non-governmental organisation.[79][86]
.jpg)
_-_KL_under_curfew_after_the_13_May_riot_(cropped).jpg)
.jpg)
The police station at Sungei Besi was attacked.
| Kuala Lumpur |
|
|---|---|
| Perak | |
| Penang | |
| Sarawak | |
| Sabah | |
| Other |
|
_(cropped).jpg)
