Top cited articles
Time to first decision:
0 days*
Time to first decision with review:
74 days*
Acceptance to publication:
24 days*
Impact Factor:
9.8
Total content views:
347,034
Total Altmetric mentions:
5,036
Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from CochraneRapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature searchOverdiagnosis in malignant melanoma: a scoping reviewRapid access to innovative medicinal products while ensuring relevant health technology assessment. Position of the French National Authority for HealthHow methodological pitfalls have created widespread misunderstanding about long COVIDRapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessmentSchool closures during COVID-19: an overview of systematic reviewsRapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidenceRapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge usersEnhancing title and abstract screening for systematic reviews with GPT-3.5 turbo
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysisPatient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trialDigitally enabled decentralised research: opportunities to improve the efficiency of clinical trials and observational studiesOpen access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: benefits, challenges and limitationsIntegrating large language models in systematic reviews: a framework and case study using ROBINS-I for risk of bias assessmentEcological study estimating melanoma overdiagnosis in the USA using the lifetime risk methodApplying the time needed to treat to NICE guidelines on lifestyle interventionsMetro Mapping: development of an innovative methodology to co-design care paths to support shared decision making in oncologyRapid reviews methods series: assessing the appropriateness of conducting a rapid reviewDifferences in shared decision-making: the East-West divide