• Araújo MB, Luoto M (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:743–753

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baladrón AV, Isacch JP, Cavalli M, Bó MS (2016) Habitat selection by burrowing owlsAthene cunicularia in the pampas of Argentina: a multiple-scale assessment. Acta Ornithol 51:137–150

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barker N, Cumming S, Darveau M (2014) Models to predict the distribution and abundance of breeding ducks in Canada. Avian Conserv and Ecol.https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00699-090207

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Benítez-López A, Viñuela J, Mougeot F, García JT (2017) A multi-scale approach for identifying conservation needs of two threatened sympatric steppe birds. Biodivers Conserv 26:63–83

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blois JL, Zarnetske PL, Fitzpatrick MC, Finnegan S (2013) Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341:499–504

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Boscolo D, Metzger JP (2009) Is bird incidence in Atlantic forest fragments influenced by landscape patterns at multiple scales? Landsc Ecol 24:907–918

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dalgarno S, Mersey J, Gedalof Z, Lemon M (2017) Species-environment associations and predicted distribution of Black Oystercatcher breeding pairs in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia. Canada Avian Conserv Ecol.https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01094-120209

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T (2012) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Edrén SMC, Wisz MS, Teilmann J, Dietz R, Söderkvist J (2010) Modelling spatial patterns in harbour porpoise satellite telemetry data using maximum entropy. Ecography 33:698–708

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Elith J, Graham CH (2009) Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32:66–77

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Evangelista PH, Mohamed AM, Hussein IA, Saied AH, Mohammed AH, Young NE (2018) Integrating indigenous local knowledge and species distribution modeling to detect wildlife in Somaliland. Ecosphere.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2134

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fournier A, Barbet-Massin M, Rome Q, Courchamp F (2017) Predicting species distribution combining multi-scale drivers. Glob Ecol Conserv 12:215–226.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.11.002

  Article  Google Scholar 

• García-Callejas D, Araújo MB (2016) The effects of model and data complexity on predictions from species distributions models. Ecol Model 326:4–12

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Godsoe W, Franklin J, Blanchet FG (2016) Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species’ distribution can be masked by environmental gradients. Ecol Evol 7:654–664

  Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Guisan A, Graham CH, Elith J, Huettmann F (2007) Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Divers Distrib 13:332–340

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hallman TA, Robinson WD (2020) Deciphering ecology from statistical artefacts: competing influence of sample size, prevalence and habitat specialization on species distribution models and how small evaluation datasets can inflate metrics of performance. Divers Distrib.https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13030

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Halstead KE, Alexander JD, Hadley AS, Stephens JL, Yang Z, Betts MG (2019) Using a species-centered approach to predict bird community responses to habitat fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 34:1919–1935

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hudson M-AR, Francis CM, Campbell KJ, Downes CM, Smith AC, Pardieck KL (2017) The role of the North American breeding bird survey in conservation. Condor 119:526–545

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Illan JG, Thomas CD, Jones JA, Wong WK, Shirley SM, Betts, MG (2014) Precipitation and winter temperature predict long-term range-scale abundance changes in Western North American birds. Glob Change Biol 20:3351–3364

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnston A, Fink D, Reynolds MD, Hochachka WM, Sullivan BL, Bruns NE, Hallstein E, Merrifield MS, Matsumoto S, Kelling S (2015) Abundance models improve spatial and temporal prioritization of conservation resources. Ecol Appl 25:1749–1756

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kulhanek SA, Leung B, Ricciardi A (2011) Using ecological niche models to predict the abundance and impact of invasive species: application to the common carp. Ecol Appl 21:203–213

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Landscape Ecology, Modeling, Mapping, and Analysis (2014) GNN Structure Maps.https://lemma.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/structure-maps. Accessed 6 Sep 2016

• Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28:385–393

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol Biogeogr 17:145–151

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayor SJ, Schneider DC, Schaefer JA, Mahoney SP (2009) Habitat selection at multiple scales. Ecoscience 16:238–247

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McGarigal K, Wan HY, Zeller KA, Timm BC, Cushman SA (2016) Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook. Landsc Ecol 31:1161–1175

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meyer CB, Thuiller W (2006) Accuracy of resource selection functions across spatial scales. Divers Distrib 12:288–297

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miguet P, Fahrig L, Lavigne C (2017) How to quantify a distance-dependent landscape effect on a biological response. Methods Ecol Evol 8:1717–1724

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moll RJ, Cepek JD, Lorch PD, Dennis PM, Robison T, Montgomery RA (2020) At what spatial scale(s) do mammals respond to urbanization? Ecography.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04762

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nadeau CP, Urban MC, Bridle JR (2017) Coarse climate change projections for species living in a fine-scaled world. Glob Change Biol 23:12–24

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nichols JD, Thomas L, Conn PB (2009) Inferences about landbird abundance from count data: recent advances and future directions. Model Demogr Process Mark Popul.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78151-8_9

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Oppel S, Meirinho A, Ramirez I, Gardner B, O'Connell AF, Miller PI, Louzao M (2012) Comparison of five modelling techniques to predict the spatial distribution and abundance of seabirds. Biol Conserv 156:94–104

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Oregon Spatial Data Library (2017) Oregon 10m digital elevation model (DEM).https://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/details;id=7a82c1be50504f56a9d49d13c7b4d9aa. Accessed 30 Nov 2015

• Oregon Spatial Data Library (2016) Oregon rivers.https://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/details;id=01606665b1034dc6877fbad58bb9879a. Accessed 28 Jun 2016

• Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pennington DN, Blair RB (2011) Habitat selection of breeding riparian birds in an urban environment: untangling the relative importance of biophysical elements and spatial scale. Divers Distrib 17:506–518

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Qiao H, Soberón J, Peterson AT (2015) No silver bullets in correlative ecological niche modelling: insights from testing among many potential algorithms for niche estimation. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1126–1136

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reino L, Triviño M, Beja P, Araújo MB, Figueira R, Segurado P (2018) Modelling landscape constraints on farmland bird species range shifts under climate change. Sci Total Environ 625:1596–1605

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Shirley SM, Yang Z, Hutchinson RA, Alexander JD, McGarigal K, Betts MG (2013) Species distribution modelling for the people: unclassified landsat TM imagery predicts bird occurrence at fine resolutions. Divers Distrib 19:855–866

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sólymos P, Matsuoka SM, Bayne EM, Lele SR, Fontaine P, Cumming SG, Stralberg D, Schmiegelow FKA, Song SJ (2013) Calibrating indices of avian density from non-standardized survey data: making the most of a messy situation. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1047–1058

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stevens BS, Conway CJ (2019) Predicting species distributions: unifying model selection and scale optimization for multi-scale occupancy models. Ecosphere 10:e02748

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stevens BS, Conway CJ (2020) Predictive multi-scale occupancy models at range-wide extents: Effects of habitat and human disturbance on distributions of wetland birds. Divers Distrib 26:34–48

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sullivan BL, Wood CL, Iliff MJ, Bonney RE, Fink D, Kelling S (2009) eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol Conserv 142:2282–2292

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thorson TD, Bryce SA, Lammers DA, Woods AJ, Omernik JM, Kagan J, Pater DE, Comstock JA (2003) Ecoregions of Oregon

• Timm BC, McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ganey JL (2016) Multi-scale Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) nest/roost habitat selection in Arizona and a comparison with single-scale modeling results. Landsc Ecol 31:1209–1225

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Toms JD, Schmiegelow FKA, Hannon SJ, Villard M-A (2006) Are point counts of boreal songbirds reliable proxies for more intensive abundance estimators? Auk 123:438

  Article  Google Scholar 

• United States Geological Survey (2011) National gap analysis project.https://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/gaplandcover/data/download/. Accessed 7 Dec 2015

• Welsh AH, Lindenmayer DB, Donnelly CF (2013) Fitting and Interpreting Occupancy Models. PLoS ONE 8:e52015

  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wiens JA, Milne BT (1989) Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle’s perspective. Landsc Ecol 3:87–96

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wiens JA, Stralberg D, Jongsomjit D, Howell CA, Snyder MA (2009) Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. P Natl Acad Sci 106:19729–19736

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Wilsey CB, Jensen CM, Miller N (2016) Quantifying avian relative abundance and ecosystem service value to identify conservation opportunities in the Midwestern US. Avian Conserv Ecol.https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00902-110207

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wisz MS, Pottier J, Kissling WD, Pellissier L, Lenoir J, Damgaard CF, Dormann CF, Forchhammer MC, Grytnes JA, Guisan A, Heikkinen RK, Høye TT, Kühn I, Luoto M, Maiorano L, Nilsson MC, Normand S, Öckinger E, Schmidt NM, Termansen M, Timmermann A, Wardle DA, Aastrup P, Svenning JS (2013) The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol Rev 88:15–30

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Yang X, Chapman GA, Young MA, Gray JM (2005) Using compound topographic index to delineate soil landscape facets from digital elevation models for comprehensive coastal assessment. MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, pp 1511–1517

  Google Scholar 

Download references