• Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007) Neural network modelling of non-linear hydrological relationships. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1563–1579.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1563-2007

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Acreman MC, Sinclair CD (1986) Classification of drainage basins acording to their physical characteristics; an application for flood frequency analysis in Scotland. J Hydrol 84:365–380.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(86)90134-4

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ahn KH, Palmer R (2016) Regional flood frequency analysis using spatial proximity and basin characteristics: quantile regression versus parameter regression technique. J Hydrol 540:515–526.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.047

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ali G, Tetzlaff D, Soulsby C, McDonnell JJ, Capell R (2012) A comparison of similarity indices for catchment classification using a cross-regional dataset. Adv Water Resour 40:11–22.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.008

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Archfield SA, Pugliese A, Castellarin A, Skøien JO, Kiang JE (2013) Topological and canonical kriging for design flood prediction in ungauged catchments: an improvement over a traditional regional regression approach? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(4):1575–1588.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1575-2013

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aziz K, Rai S, Rahmen A (2015) Design flood estimation in ungauged catchments using genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network (GAANN) technique for Australia. Nat Hazards 77:805–821.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1625-x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aziz K, Haque MM, Rahman A, Shamseldin AY, Shoaib M (2016) Flood estimation in ungauged catchments: application of artificial intelligence based methods for Eastern Australia. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1272-0

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bardossy A (2007) Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:703–710

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bardossy A, Lehmann W (1997) Spatial distribution of soil moisture in a small catchment. Part 1: geostatistical analysis. J Hydrol 206:1–15.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00152-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beygelzimer A, Kakadet S, Langford J, Arya S, Mount D, Li S (2013) Package ’FNN’: fast nearest neighbor search algorithms and applications.http://cran.r-project.org/package=FNN

• Bhunya PK, Panda SN, Goel MK (2011) Synthetic unit hydrograph methods: a critical review. Open Hydrol J 5:1–8.https://doi.org/10.2174/1874378101105010001

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bitterli T, Aviolat P, Brändli R, Christe R, Fracheboud S, Frey D, George M, Matousek F, Tripet JP (2007) Groundwater resources. In: Hydrological Atlas of Switzerland, Bern, p 8.6

• Blöschl G (2006) Geostatistische Methoden bei der hydrologischen Regionalisierung. In: Godina R, Blöschl G (eds) Methoden der hydrologischen Regionalisierung, vol 197. Wiener Mitteilungen, Wien, pp 21–40

  Google Scholar 

• Blöschl G, Sivapalan M, Wagener T, Viglione A, Savenije H (2013) Runoff prediction in ungauged basins. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Boscarello L, Ravazzani G, Cislaghi A, Mancini M (2016) Regionalization of flow-duration curves through catchment classification with streamflow signatures and physiographic-climate indices. J Hydrol Eng.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001307

• Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24(421):123–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Breiman L (2001) Random Forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brunner MI, Seibert J, Favre AC (2016) Bivariate return periods and their importance for flood peak and volume estimation. Wire’s Water 3:819–833.https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1173

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brunner MI, Sikorska AE, Furrer R, Favre AC (2017a) Uncertainty assessment of synthetic design hydrographs for gauged and ungauged catchments. Water Resour Res(accepted)

• Brunner MI, Viviroli D, Sikorska AE, Vannier O, Favre AC, Seibert J (2017b) Flood type specific construction of synthetic design hydrographs. Water Resour Res.https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019535

• Bundesamt für Statistik (2003) Geodaten der Bundesstatistik.https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/dienstleistungen/geostat/geodaten-bundesstatistik.html

• Burn DH (1989) Cluster analysis as applied to regional flood frequency. J Water Resour Plan Manag 115:567–582

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burn DH (1990) Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach. Water Resour Res 26(10):2257–2265.https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i010p02257

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burn DH, Boorman DB (1992) Catchment classification applied to the estimation of hydrological parameters at ungauged catchments. Tech. rep, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire

• Burn DH, Boorman DB (1993) Estimation of hydrological parameters at ungauged catchments. J Hydrol 143:429–454.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90203-L

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Camezind-Wildi R (2005) Empfehlung Raumplanung und Naturgefahren. Tech. rep., Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung, Bundesamt für Wasser und Geologie, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, Bern

• Castellarin A, Burn DH, Brath A (2001) Assessing the effectiveness of hydrological similarity measures for flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 241(3):270–285.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00383-8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Castiglioni S, Castellarin A, Montanari A, Skøien JO, Laaha G, Blöschl G (2011) Smooth regional estimation of low-flow indices: physiographical space based interpolation and top-kriging. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(3):715–727.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-715-2011

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cavadias GS, Ouarda TBMJ, Bobée B, Girard C (2001) A canonical correlation approach to the determination of homogeneous regions for regional flood estimation of ungauged basins. Hydrol Sci J 46(4):499–512.https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660109492846

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (1999) Flood estimation handbook. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire

• Chapman TG, Maxwell AI (1996) Baseflow separation–comparison of numerical methods with tracer experiments. 23rd hydrology and water resources symposium. Hobart, Australia, pp 539–545

• Chebana F, Ouarda T (2009) Multivariate quantiles in hydrological frequency analysis. Environmetrics 22:63–78.https://doi.org/10.1002/env.1027

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cheng L, Yaeger M, Viglione A, Coopersmith E, Ye S, Sivapalan M (2012) Exploring the physical controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves—Part 1: insights from statistical analyses. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:4435–4446.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4435-2012

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chokmani K, Ouarda TBMJ (2004) Physiographical space-based kriging for regional flood frequency estimation at ungauged sites. Water Resour Res 40(12):W12,514.https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002983

• Cipriani T, Toilliez T, Sauquet E (2012) Estimation régionale des débits décennaux et durées caractéristiques de crue en France. La Houille Blanche 4–5:5–13.https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2012024

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer, London

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Cuevas A, Febrero M, Fraiman R (2007) Robust estimation and classification for functional data via projection-based depth notions. Comput Stat 22(3):481–496.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-007-0053-0

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dawson CW, Abrahart RJ, Shamseldin AY, Wilby RL (2006) Flood estimation at ungauged sites using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 319:391–409.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.032

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft Abwasser und Abfall (2012) Merkblatt DWA-M 552. Tech. rep, DWA, Hennef, Germany

• Diggle PJ, Ribeiro PJ Jr (2007) Model-based geostatistics. Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Eckhardt K (2005) How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation. Hydrol Process 19:507–515.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5675

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald Schnee und Landschaft (WSL) (1999) Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar. Ergebnisse der Zwietaufnahme 1993-1995. BUWAL, Bern

• Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Farmer WH (2016) Ordinary kriging as a tool to estimate historical daily streamflow records. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(7):2721–2735.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2721-2016

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Freund Y, Schapire RRE (1996) Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: International conference on machine learning, pp 148–156,https://doi.org/10.1.1.133.1040,http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.51.6252

• Friedman AJ, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordiante descent. J Stat Softw 33(1):1–22

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29(5):1189–1232

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Friedman JH (2002) Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput Stat Data Anal 38(4):367–378

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gaál L, Kysel J, Szolgay J (2008) Region-of-influence approach to a frequency analysis of heavy precipitation in Slovakia. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:825–839.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-825-2008

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ganora D, Claps P, Laio F, Viglione A (2009) An approach to estimate nonparametric flow duration curves in ungauged basins. Water Resour Res 45(10):1–10.https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007472

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Genest C, Favre AC (2007) Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J Hydrol Eng 12(4):347–368.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(347)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gottschalk L (1993) Correlation and covariance of runoff. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 7:85–101

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gottschalk L, Leblois E, Skoien JO (2011) Correlation and covariance of runoff revisited. J Hydrol 398:76–90.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.011

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Green IRA, Stephenson D (1986) Criteria for comparison of single event models. Hydrol Sci J 31(3):395–411.https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668609491056

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greene W (2002) Econometric analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  Google Scholar 

• GREHYS (1996) Presentation and review of some methods for regional flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 186:63–84.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03042-9

• Grimaldi S, Petroselli A (2015) Do we still need the Rational Formula? An alternative empirical procedure for peak discharge estimation in small and ungauged basins. Hydrol Sci J 60(1):67–77.https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.880546

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haberlandt U, Klöcking B, Krysanova V, Becker A (2001) Regionalisation of the base flow index from dynamically simulated flow components—a case study in the Elbe River Basin. J Hydrol 248:35–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00391-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haddad K, Rahman A (2012) Regional flood frequency analysis in eastern Australia: Bayesian GLS regression-based methods within fixed region and ROI framework—quantile regression vs. parameter regression technique. J Hydrol 430–431:142–161.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.012

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Halkidi M, Batistakis Y, Vazirgiannis M (2001) On clustering validation techniques. J Intell Inf Syst 17(2/3):107–145.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012801612483

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harrell FE (2015) Regression modeling strategies. With applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. Springer, Cham

• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2008) The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics. Springer, Stanford

  Google Scholar 

• He Y, Bardossy A, Zehe E (2011) A review of regionalisation for continuous streamflow simulation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:3539–3553.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3539-2011

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hechenbichler K, Schliep K (2004) Weighted k-nearest-neighbor techniques and ordinal classification. Mol Ecol 399:17

  Google Scholar 

• Hofner B, Mayr A, Robinzonov N, Schmid M (2009) Model-based Boosting in R. A Hands-on Tutorial Using the R Package mboost. Tech. rep., Department of statistics. University of Munich, Munich

• Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1993) Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis. Water Resour Res 29(92):271–281

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hrachowitz M, Savenije HHG, Blöschl G, McDonnell JJ, Sivapalan M, Pomeroy JW, Arheimer B, Blume T, Clark MP, Ehret U, Fenicia F, Freer JE, Gelfan A, Gupta HV, Hughes DA, Hut RW, Montanari A, Pande S, Tetzlaff D, Troch PA, Uhlenbrook S, Wagener T, Winsemius HC, Woods RA, Zehe E, Cudennec C (2013) A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review. Hydrol Sci J 58(6):1198–1255.https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hundecha Y, Ouarda TBMJ, Bardossy A (2008) Regional estimation of parameters of a rainfall-runoff model at ungauged watersheds using the spatial structures of the parameters within a canonical physiographic-climatic space. Water Resour Res 44(W01):427.https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005439

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ilorme F, Griffis VW (2013) A novel procedure for delineation of hydrologically homogeneous regions and the classification of ungauged sites for design flood estimation. J Hydrol 492:151–162.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.045

  Article  Google Scholar 

• James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning. With applications in R. Springer, New York.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Jensen H, Lang H, Rinderknecht J (1997) Extreme point rainfall of varying duration and return period 1901–1970. In: Hydrological Atlas of Switzerland, FOEN, Bern, chap 2.4

• Ji Z, Li N, Xie W, Wu J, Zhou Y (2013) Comprehensive assessment of flood risk using the classification and regression tree method. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 27(8):1815–1828.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0716-z

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Kiers HAL, Smilde AK (2007) A comparison of various methods for multivariate regression with highly collinear variables. Stat Methods Appl 16:193–228.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-006-0025-5

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kjeldsen TR, Jones DA (2010) Predicting the index flood in ungauged UK catchments: on the link between data-transfer and spatial model error structure. J Hydrol 387(1–2):1–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.024

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kokkonen TS, Jakeman AJ, Young PC, Koivusalo HJ (2003) Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina. Hydrol Process 17(11):2219–2238.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1329

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Laaha G, Blöschl G (2006) A comparison of low flow regionalisation methods-catchment grouping. J Hydrol 323(1–4):193–214.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.001

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Laaha G, Skoien JO, Blöschl G (2014) Spatial prediction on river networks: comparison of top-kriging with regional regression. Hydrol Process 28:315–324.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9578

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lang M, Ouarda T, Bobée B (1999) Towards operational guidelines for over-threshold modeling. J Hydrol 225:103–117

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Le Cessie S, van Houwelingen JC (1992) Ridge estimators in logistic regression. J Appl Stat 41(1):191–201.https://doi.org/10.2307/2347628

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2(3):18–22

  Google Scholar 

• Longobardi A, Villani P (2008) Baseflow index regionalization analysis in a Mediterranean area and data scarcity context: role of the catchment permeability index. J Hydrol 355:63–75.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.011

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lu GY, Wong DW (2008) An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Comput Geosci 34(9):1044–1055.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.07.010

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Matheron G (1971) The theory of regionalized variables and its applications, vol 5. École nationale supérieure des Mines, Paris

  Google Scholar 

• McIntyre N, Lee H, Wheater H, Young A, Wagener T (2005) Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments. Water Resour Res 41(12):1–14.https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004289

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mediero L, Jiménez-Alvarez A, Garrote L (2010) Design flood hydrographs from the relationship between flood peak and volume. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:2495–2505.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2495-2010

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Merz R (2006) Regionalisierung von statistischen Hochwasserkenngrössen. In: Godina R, Blöschl G (eds) Methoden der hydrologischen Regionalisierung, vol 197. Wiener Mitteilungen, Wien, pp 109–130

  Google Scholar 

• Merz R, Blöschl G (2003) A process typology of regional floods. Water Resour Res 39(12):1340.https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001952

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Merz R, Blöschl G (2004) Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. J Hydrol 287(1):95–123.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028

  Article  Google Scholar 

• MeteoSwiss (2013) Documentation of MeteoSwiss grid-data products: Daily precipitation (final analysis): RhiresD. Tech. rep., MeteoSwiss,http://www.meteoschweiz.admin.ch/web/de/services/datenportal/gitterdaten/precip/rhiresd.Par.0007.DownloadFile.tmp/proddocrhiresd.pdf

• Mevik BH, Wehrens R (2007) The pls package: principal component and partial least squares regression in R. J Stat Softw 18(2):1–23.https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v018.i02

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meylan P, Favre AC, Musy A (2012) Predictive hydrology. A frequency analysis approach. Science Publishers, St. Helier, Jersey, British Channel Islands

• Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Vining GG, Robinson TJ (2010) Generalized Linear Models, vol 4. Wiley, Hoboken

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Nathan RJ, McMahon TA (1990) Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalisation. J Hydrol 121:217–238

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nied M, Pardowitz T, Nissen K, Ulbrich U, Hundecha Y, Merz B (2014) On the relationship between hydro-meteorological patterns and flood types. J Hydrol 519:3249–3262.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.089

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Osborne JW (2010) Improving your data transformations: applying the Box-Cox transformation. Pract Assess Res Eval 15(12):1–9

  Google Scholar 

• Ouarda T, Cunderlik JM, St-Hilaire A, Barbet M, Bruneau P, Bobée B (2006) Data-based comparison of seasonality-based regional flood frequency methods. J Hydrol 330(1):329–339.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.023

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ouarda TBMJ, Haché M, Bruneau P, Bobée B (2000) Regional flood peak and volume estimation in northern Canadian basin. J Cold Reg Eng 14:176–191.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2000)14:4(176)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ouarda TBMJ, Girard C, Cavadias GS, Bobée B (2001) Regional flood frequency estimation with canonical correlation analysis. J Hydrol 254:157–173

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Oudin L, Andréassian V, Perrin C, Michel C, Moine NL (2008) Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. Water Resour Res 44:W03, 413.https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006240

• Oudin L, Kay A, Andréassian V, Perrin C (2010) Are seemingly physically similar catchments truly hydrologically similar? Water Resour Res 46(W11):558.https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008887

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parajka J, Merz R, Blöschl G (2005) A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:157–171.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-157-2005

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parajka J, Andréassian V, Archfield SA, Bardossy A, Blöschl G, Chiew F, Duan Q, Gelfan A, Hlavconva K, Merz R, McIntyre N, Oudin L, Perrin C, Rogger M, Salinas JL, Savenije HG, Skoien JO, Wagener T, Zehe E, Zhang Y (2013) Prediction of runoff hydrographs in ungauged basins. In: Blöschl G, Sivapalan M, Wagener T, Viglione A, Savenije H (eds) Predictions in ungauged basins. A synthesis across processes, places and scales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 227–269

• Pebesma E (2004) Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput Geosci 30:683–691.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peters A, Hothorn T, Ripley BD, Therneau T, Atkinson B (2015) Package ‘ ipred ’ : improved predictors.http://cran.r-project.org/package=ipred

• Petroselli A, Grimaldi S (2015) Design hydrograph estimation in small and fully ungauged basins: a preliminary assessment of the EBA4SUB framework. J Flood Risk Manag.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12193

• Pilgrim DH (1986) Bridging the gap between flood research and design practice. Water Resour Res 22(9):165–176

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prinzio MD, Castellarin A, Toth E (2011) Data-driven catchment classification: application to the pub problem. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:1921–1935.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1921-2011

  Article  Google Scholar 

• R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing.http://www.r-project.org/

• Rahman A, Charron C, Ouarda TBMJ, Chebana F (2017) Development of regional flood frequency analysis techniques using generalized additive models for Australia. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess pp 1–17,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1384-1

• Rai RK, Sarkar S, Singh VP (2009) Evaluation of the adequacy of statistical distribution functions for deriving unit hydrograph. Water Resour Manage 23:899–929.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9306-0

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rasmussen PF, Bobée B, Bernier J (1993) Une méthodologie générale de comparaison de modèles d’estimation régionale de crue. Revue des sciences de l’eau 7:23–41.https://doi.org/10.7202/705187ar

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Razavi T, Coulibaly P (2013) Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: review of regionalization methods. J Hydrol Eng 18(8):958–975.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000690

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Requena AI, Mediero L, Garrote L (2013) A bivariate return period based on copulas for hydrologic dam design: accounting for reservoir routing in risk estimation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:3023–3038.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3023-2013

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ridgeway G (2007) Generalized boosted models: a guide to the gbm package. Compute 1(4):1–12.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1996.tb00390.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rosbjerg D, Blöschl G, Burn DH, Castellarin A, Croke B, Baldassarre GD, Iacobellis V, Kjeldsen TR, Kuczera G, Merz R, Montanari A, Morris D, Ouarda T, Ren L, Rogger M, Salinas JL, Toth E, Viglione A (2013) Prediction of floods in ungauged basins. In: Blöschl G, Sivapalan M, Wagener T, Viglione A, Savenije H (eds) Runoff prediction in ungauged basins. A synthesis across processes, places and scales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, chap 9, pp 189–226

• Salinas JL, Laaha G, Rogger M, Parajka J, Viglione A, Sivapalan M, Blöschl G (2013) Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins—Part 2: flood and low flow studies. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:2637–2652.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2637-2013

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Samuel J, Coulibaly P, Metcalfe RA (2011) Estimation of continuous streamflow in ontario ungauged basins: comparison of regionalization methods. J Hydrol Eng 16(5):447–459.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000338

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sauquet E (2006) Mapping mean annual river discharges: geostatistical developments for incorporating river network dependencies. J Hydrol 331:300–314.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.018

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sauquet E, Catalogne C (2011) Comparison of catchment grouping methods for flow duration curve estimation at ungauged sites in France. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:2421–2435.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2421-2011

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sefton CEM, Howarth SM (1998) Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and wales. J Hydrol 211(1–4):1–16.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00163-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Serinaldi F, Grimaldi S (2011) Synthetic design hydrographs based on distribution functions with finite support. J Hydrol Eng 16:434–446.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000339

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(34):591–611

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shiau J, Wang HY, Tsai CT (2006) Bivariate Frequency Analysis of floods using copulas. J Am Water Resour Assoc pp 1549–1564,https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb06020.x

• Shu C, Burn DH (2004) Artificial neural network ensembles and their application in pooled flood frequency analysis. Water Resour Res 40(9):1–10.https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002816

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shu C, Ouarda T (2008) Regional flood frequency analysis at ungauged sites using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. J Hydrol 349:31–43.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.050

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sikorska AE, Viviroli D, Seibert J (2015) Flood type classification in mountainous catchments using crisp and fuzzy decision trees. Water Resour Res 51(10):7959–7976.https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017326

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Singh PK, Mishra SK, Jain MK (2014) A review of the synthetic unit hydrograph: from the empirical UH to advanced geomorphological methods. Hydrol Sci J.https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.870664

• Sivapalan M (2003) Prediction in ungauged basins: a grand challenge for theoretical hydrology. Hydrol Process 17:3163–3170.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5155

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Skoien JO, Merz R, Blöschl G (2006) Top-kriging—geostatistics on stream networks. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:277–287.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-277-2006

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Skoien JO, Blöschl G, Laaha G, Pebesma E, Parajka J, Viglione A (2014) An R package for interpolation of data with a variable spatial support, with an example from river networks. Comput Geosci 67:180–190

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smithers JC (2012) Methods for design flood estimation in South Africa. Water SA 38(4):633–646.https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v38i4.19

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Steinschneider S, Yang YCE, Brown C (2014) Combining regression and spatial proximity for catchment model regionalization: a comparative study. Hydrol Sci J 6667:1–18.https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.899701

• Strobl C, Malley J, Tutz G (2009) An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging and random forests. Psychol Methods 14(4):323–348.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016973

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Takezawa K (2012) Introduction to nonparametric regression. Wiley, Hoboken,https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2001349

• Tibshirani R (1997) The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Stat Med 16(4):385–395.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970228)16:4%3c385::AID-SIM380%3e3.0.CO;2-3

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Tung YK, Yeh KC, Yang JC (1997) Regionalization of unit hydrograph parameters: 1. Comparison of regression analysis techniques. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 11:145–171

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Viglione A, Merz R, Blöschl G (2009) On the role of the runoff coefficient in the mapping of rainfall to flood return periods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6(1):627–665.https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-6-627-2009

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Viviroli D, Mittelbach H, Gurtz J, Weingartner R (2009a) Continuous simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of Switzerland—Part II: parameter regionalisation and flood estimation results. J Hydrol 377:208–225.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.022

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Viviroli D, Zappa M, Gurtz J, Weingartner R (2009b) An introduction to the hydrological modelling system PREVAH and its pre-and post-processing-tools. Environ Model Softw 24:1209–1222.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.04.001

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Statistics in practice. Wiley, Chichester

• Weisberg S (2005) Applied Linear Regression, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Yamamoto JK (2007) On unbiased backtransform of lognormal kriging estimates. Comput Geosci 11:219–234.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-007-9046-x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yue S, Rasmussen P (2002) Bivariate frequency analysis: discussion of some useful concepts in hydrological application. Hydrol Process 16:2881–2898.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1185

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yue S, Ouarda T, Bobée B, Legendre P, Bruneau P (2002) Approach for describing statistical properties of flood hydrograph. J Hydrol Eng 7(2):147–153.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:2(147)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang Y, Chiew FHS (2009) Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments. Water Resour Res 45(W07):412.https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007504

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references