Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue

Primary view of object titled 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.
Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.
Showing 1-4 of 11 pages in this report.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

Decisions on the composition of the Air Force aerial refueling fleet were made decades ago, when the primary mission was to refuel long-range strategic bombers. Modifications have been made to many of these tanker aircraft (KC-135s and KC-10s) to make them more effective in refueling fighter aircraft. This report, which will be updated, examines the balance between two different refueling methods in today’s refueling fleet — “flying boom” and “hose-and-drogue.”

Physical Description

8 pages.

Creation Information

Bolkcom, Christopher & Klaus, Jon D. May 11, 2005.

Context

Thisreport is part of the collection entitled: Congressional Research Service Reports and was provided by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to theUNT Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by theUNT Libraries. It has been viewed 3267 times. More information about this report can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this report or its content.

Authors

Publisher

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

Contact Us

Corrections & ProblemsQuestions

What

Descriptive information to help identify this report. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

Decisions on the composition of the Air Force aerial refueling fleet were made decades ago, when the primary mission was to refuel long-range strategic bombers. Modifications have been made to many of these tanker aircraft (KC-135s and KC-10s) to make them more effective in refueling fighter aircraft. This report, which will be updated, examines the balance between two different refueling methods in today’s refueling fleet — “flying boom” and “hose-and-drogue.”

Physical Description

8 pages.

Subjects

Legislative Indexing Vocabulary

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this report in the Digital Library or other systems.

Collections

This report is part of the following collection of related materials.

Congressional Research Service Reports

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is the public policy research arm of Congress. This legislative branch agency works exclusively for Members of Congress, their committees and their staff. This collection includes CRS reports from the mid-1960's through 2018—covering a variety of topics from agriculture to foreign policy to welfare.

What responsibilities do I have when using this report?

When

Dates and time periods associated with this report.

Creation Date

  • May 11, 2005

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • Aug. 3, 2005, 11:52 a.m.

Description Last Updated

  • Jan. 24, 2017, 2:10 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this report last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 3
Total Uses: 3,267

Interact With This Report

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Search Inside

Start Reading

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods:  Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue'.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

International Image Interoperability Framework

IIF Logo

We support theIIIF PresentationAPI

Links for Robots

Helpful links in machine-readable formats.

Bolkcom, Christopher & Klaus, Jon D.Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue,report, May 11, 2005;Washington D.C.. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6702/:accessed July 16, 2025),University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library,https://digital.library.unt.edu; creditingUNT Libraries Government Documents Department.

About This Report

OverviewWhoWhatWhen

Search Inside

Read This Report

Read Now Start ReadingMagnify First Page
Show All Pages11 All Formats2

Print & Share

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

Citing This Report Responsibilities of Use Licensing & Permissions Linking & Embedding Copies & Reproductions
Back to Top of Screen
[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp