Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


About:Underspecification

An Entity of Type:disease,from Named Graph:http://dbpedia.org,within Data Space:dbpedia.org

In theoretical linguistics, underspecification is a phenomenon in which certain features are omitted in underlying representations. Restricted underspecification theory holds that features should only be underspecified if their values are predictable. For example, in most dialects of English, all front vowels (/i, ɪ, e, ɛ, æ/) are unrounded. It is not necessary for these phonemes to include the distinctive feature [−round], because all [−back] vowels are [−round] vowels, so the roundness feature is not distinctive for front vowels. Radical underspecification theory, on the other hand, also allows for traditionally binary features to be specified for only one value, where it is assumed that every segment not specified for that value has the other value. For example, instead of the features

PropertyValue
dbo:abstract
  • In theoretical linguistics, underspecification is a phenomenon in which certain features are omitted in underlying representations. Restricted underspecification theory holds that features should only be underspecified if their values are predictable. For example, in most dialects of English, all front vowels (/i, ɪ, e, ɛ, æ/) are unrounded. It is not necessary for these phonemes to include the distinctive feature [−round], because all [−back] vowels are [−round] vowels, so the roundness feature is not distinctive for front vowels. Radical underspecification theory, on the other hand, also allows for traditionally binary features to be specified for only one value, where it is assumed that every segment not specified for that value has the other value. For example, instead of the features [+voice] and [−voice], only [+voice] is specified and voicelessness is taken as the default. The concept of underspecification is also used in morphological theory, particularly to refer to cases in which a morpheme does not bear an entire set of feature-values, and is thus compatible with a wide range of potential morphological environments. In this approach to morphology, for example, while the English pronouns he vs. she are specified for gender, the plural pronoun they would be underspecified for gender. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2074758 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageInterLanguageLink
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7486 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1099025513 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • In theoretical linguistics, underspecification is a phenomenon in which certain features are omitted in underlying representations. Restricted underspecification theory holds that features should only be underspecified if their values are predictable. For example, in most dialects of English, all front vowels (/i, ɪ, e, ɛ, æ/) are unrounded. It is not necessary for these phonemes to include the distinctive feature [−round], because all [−back] vowels are [−round] vowels, so the roundness feature is not distinctive for front vowels. Radical underspecification theory, on the other hand, also allows for traditionally binary features to be specified for only one value, where it is assumed that every segment not specified for that value has the other value. For example, instead of the features (en)
rdfs:label
  • Underspecification (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
isdbo:wikiPageRedirects of
isdbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
isfoaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso   This material is Open Knowledge    W3C Semantic Web Technology    This material is Open Knowledge   Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted fromWikipedia and is licensed under theCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp