Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

About:Miazga v Kvello Estate

An Entity of Type:Supreme Court of the United States case,from Named Graph:http://dbpedia.org,within Data Space:dbpedia.org

Miazga v Kvello Estate, 2009 SCC 51 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on how the tort of malicious prosecution applies to Crown attorneys and other public prosecutors. Specifically, the court held that there is no requirement for a public prosecutor to have a subjective belief that an accused person is actually guilty. Nor can there be a presumption of malice from a lack of reasonable and probable grounds.

PropertyValue
dbo:abstract
  • Miazga v Kvello Estate, 2009 SCC 51 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on how the tort of malicious prosecution applies to Crown attorneys and other public prosecutors. Specifically, the court held that there is no requirement for a public prosecutor to have a subjective belief that an accused person is actually guilty. Nor can there be a presumption of malice from a lack of reasonable and probable grounds. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 25036242 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 9485 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 963841178 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Miazga v Kvello Estate (en)
dbp:citations
  • 2009 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 2009-11-06 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket
  • 32209 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Mathew Miazga v Estate of Dennis Kvello , Diane Kvello, S.K.1, S.K.2, Kari Klassen, Richard Klassen, Pamela Sharpe, Estate of Marie Klassen , John Klassen, Myrna Klassen, Peter Dale Klassen and Anita Janine Klassen (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 2008-12-12 (xsd:date)
dbp:history
  • Judgment for plaintiffs in the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (en)
dbp:ratio
  • Prior decisions on four required elements for the tort of malicious prosecution upheld, but modified for public prosecutors: 1) public prosecutors are not required to have a subjective belief that an accused person is guilty, and 2) a lack of reasonable and probable grounds does not create an inference that a public prosecutor had malicious intent. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal allowed (en)
dbp:scc
  • 2008 (xsd:integer)
dbp:unanimous
  • Charron J. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Miazga v Kvello Estate, 2009 SCC 51 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on how the tort of malicious prosecution applies to Crown attorneys and other public prosecutors. Specifically, the court held that there is no requirement for a public prosecutor to have a subjective belief that an accused person is actually guilty. Nor can there be a presumption of malice from a lack of reasonable and probable grounds. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Miazga v Kvello Estate (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
isdbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
isdbo:wikiPageRedirects of
isdbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
isfoaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso   This material is Open Knowledge    W3C Semantic Web Technology    This material is Open Knowledge   Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted fromWikipedia and is licensed under theCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp