Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


About:Appling v. Walker

An Entity of Type:Thing,from Named Graph:http://dbpedia.org,within Data Space:dbpedia.org

Appling v. Walker was a state court lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of Wisconsin's domestic partnership registry. The action began as a petition for original action before the Wisconsin Supreme Court asking the Court for a declaration that the registry is unconstitutional and for a permanent injunction against the registry, which began registering couples on August 3, 2009. On November 4, 2009, the Court declined to take the case. Petitioners then refiled in state circuit court and the court ruled in June 2011 that the registry is constitutional. That decision was affirmed by a state appeals court in December 2012, and by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in July 2014.

thumbnail
PropertyValue
dbo:abstract
  • Appling v. Walker was a state court lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of Wisconsin's domestic partnership registry. The action began as a petition for original action before the Wisconsin Supreme Court asking the Court for a declaration that the registry is unconstitutional and for a permanent injunction against the registry, which began registering couples on August 3, 2009. On November 4, 2009, the Court declined to take the case. Petitioners then refiled in state circuit court and the court ruled in June 2011 that the registry is constitutional. That decision was affirmed by a state appeals court in December 2012, and by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in July 2014. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 23719561 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 12115 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1032865969 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:appealedFrom
  • 17280.0
dbp:bot
  • InternetArchiveBot (en)
dbp:case
  • 17280.0
dbp:citations
  • 17280.0
dbp:concurring
  • Abrahamson, Roggensack (en)
dbp:court
dbp:date
  • October 2016 (en)
dbp:dateDecided
  • 2014-07-31 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy
  • Crooks (en)
dbp:fixAttempted
  • yes (en)
dbp:fullName
  • Julaine K. Appling, Jo Egelhoff, Jaren E. Hiller, Richard Kessenich and Edmund L. Webster, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners v. Scott Walker, Kitty Rhoades and Oskar Anderson, Defendants-Respondents, Fair Wisconsin, Inc., Glenn Carlson, Michael Childers, Crystal Hyslop, Janice Czyscon, Kathy Flores, Ann Kendzierski, David Kopitzke, Paul Klawiter, Chad Wege and Andrew Topcik , Intervening Defendants-Respondents (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:imagealt
  • Seal of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin (en)
dbp:judges
dbp:justia
dbp:leagle
dbp:name
  • Appling v. Walker (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges
  • 7 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Appling v. Walker was a state court lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of Wisconsin's domestic partnership registry. The action began as a petition for original action before the Wisconsin Supreme Court asking the Court for a declaration that the registry is unconstitutional and for a permanent injunction against the registry, which began registering couples on August 3, 2009. On November 4, 2009, the Court declined to take the case. Petitioners then refiled in state circuit court and the court ruled in June 2011 that the registry is constitutional. That decision was affirmed by a state appeals court in December 2012, and by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in July 2014. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Appling v. Walker (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
isdbo:wikiPageRedirects of
isdbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
isfoaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso   This material is Open Knowledge    W3C Semantic Web Technology    This material is Open Knowledge   Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted fromWikipedia and is licensed under theCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp