Package MKinfer includes a collection of functions for thecomputation of various confidence intervals(Altman et al. 2000; Hedderich and Sachs 2018)including bootstrapped versions(Davison andHinkley 1997) as well as Hsu(Hedderichand Sachs 2018), permutation(Janssen1997), bootstrap(Davison and Hinkley1997), intersection-union(Sozu et al.2015) and multiple imputation(Barnard andRubin 1999) t-test; furthermore, computation ofintersection-union z-test as well as multiple imputation Wilcoxon tests.Graphical visualizations: volcano plot, Bland-Altman plots(Bland and Altman 1986; Shieh 2018), meandifference plot(Böhning, Böhning, and Holling2008), plot of test statistic for permutation and bootstrap testsas well as objects of class htest.
We first load the package.
There are several functions for computing confidence intervals. Wecan compute 12 different confidence intervals for binomial proportions(DasGupta, Cai, and Brown 2001); e.g.
## ## wilson confidence interval## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## prob 0.1429739 0.3741268## ## sample estimate:## prob ## 0.24 ## ## additional information:## standard error of prob ## 0.05896867## ## clopper-pearson confidence interval## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## prob 0.1306099 0.3816907## ## sample estimate:## prob ## 0.24## [1] 0.1306099 0.3816907## attr(,"conf.level")## [1] 0.95For all intervals implemented see the help page of function binomCI.One can also compute bootstrap intervals via function boot.ci of packageboot(Davison and Hinkley 1997) as well asone-sided intervals.
There are several functions for computing confidence intervals. Wecan compute different confidence intervals for the difference of twobinomial proportions (independent(Newcombe1998a) and paired case(Newcombe1998b)); e.g.
## ## wilson confidence interval (independent proportions)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## difference of independent proportions -0.03813715 0.19256## ## sample estimate:## difference of proportions ## 0.08928571 ## ## additional information:## proportion of group 1 proportion of group 2 ## 0.08928571 0.00000000## ## wilson-cc confidence interval (paired data)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## difference of proportions (paired data) -0.1141915 -0.05543347## ## sample estimate:## difference of proportions ## -0.08491281 ## ## additional information:## proportion of group 1 proportion of group 2 ## 0.2699014 0.3548143For all intervals implemented see the help page of functionbinomDiffCI. One can also compute boostrap intervals via functionboot.ci of package boot(Davison and Hinkley1997) as well as one-sided intervals.
We can compute confidence intervals for mean and SDDavison and Hinkley (1997).
## ## Exact confidence interval(s)## ## 95 percent confidence intervals:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## mean 1.191657 3.166406## sd 2.902170 4.329395## ## sample estimates:## mean sd ## 2.179031 3.474263 ## ## additional information:## SE of mean ## 0.491335## ## Exact confidence interval(s)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## mean 1.191657 3.166406## ## sample estimates:## mean sd ## 2.179031 3.474263 ## ## additional information:## SE of mean ## 0.491335## ## Exact confidence interval(s)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## sd 2.90217 4.329395## ## sample estimates:## mean sd ## 2.179031 3.474263 ## ## additional information:## SE of mean ## 0.491335## ## Exact confidence interval(s)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## mean 1.347489 3.010574## ## sample estimate:## mean ## 2.179031 ## ## additional information:## SE of mean ## 0.4242641## ## Exact confidence interval(s)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 0 % 95 %## sd 0 4.1751## ## sample estimate:## sd ## 3.474263## ## Bootstrap confidence interval(s)## ## BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CALCULATIONS## Based on 9999 bootstrap replicates## ## CALL : ## boot.ci(boot.out = boot.out, conf = 1 - alpha, type = bootci.type)## ## Intervals : ## Level Normal Basic Studentized ## 95% ( 1.224, 3.132 ) ( 1.217, 3.125 ) ( 1.210, 3.203 ) ## ## Level Percentile BCa ## 95% ( 1.233, 3.141 ) ( 1.253, 3.157 ) ## Calculations and Intervals on Original Scale## ## sample estimates:## mean sd ## 2.179031 3.474263We can compute confidence interval for the difference of means(Altman et al. 2000; Hedderich and Sachs 2018; Davisonand Hinkley 1997).
## ## Confidence interval (paired)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## mean of differences -1.012032 1.290992## ## sample estimates:## mean of differences sd of differences ## 0.139480 2.460419 ## ## additional information:## SE of mean of differences ## 0.5501665## ## Exact confidence interval(s)## ## 95 percent confidence intervals:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## mean -1.012032 1.290992## sd 1.871125 3.593618## ## sample estimates:## mean sd ## 0.139480 2.460419 ## ## additional information:## SE of mean ## 0.5501665## ## Bootstrap confidence interval (paired)## ## BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CALCULATIONS## Based on 9999 bootstrap replicates## ## CALL : ## boot.ci(boot.out = boot.out, conf = 1 - alpha, type = bootci.type)## ## Intervals : ## Level Normal Basic Studentized ## 95% (-0.9113, 1.1883 ) (-0.9098, 1.2033 ) (-1.0894, 1.2635 ) ## ## Level Percentile BCa ## 95% (-0.9243, 1.1888 ) (-0.9407, 1.1788 ) ## Calculations and Intervals on Original Scale## ## sample estimates:## mean of differences sd of differences ## 0.139480 2.460419## ## Classical confidence interval (unpaired)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## difference in means -1.046976 1.039099## ## sample estimate:## difference in means ## -0.003938371 ## ## additional information:## SE of difference in means Cohen's d (SMD) ## 0.509194596 -0.002995563 ## ## mean of x SD of x mean of y SD of y ## 0.2121153 1.0540078 0.2160536 1.7413614## ## Welch confidence interval (unpaired)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## difference in means -1.304332 1.296456## ## sample estimate:## difference in means ## -0.003938371 ## ## additional information:## SE of difference in means Cohen's d (SMD) ## 0.598982955 -0.001934839 ## ## mean of x SD of x mean of y SD of y ## 0.2121153 1.0540078 0.2160536 1.7413614## ## Hsu confidence interval (unpaired)## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## difference in means -1.358932 1.351055## ## sample estimate:## difference in means ## -0.003938371 ## ## additional information:## SE of difference in means Cohen's d (SMD) ## 0.598982955 -0.001934839 ## ## mean of x SD of x mean of y SD of y ## 0.2121153 1.0540078 0.2160536 1.7413614## bootstrap: assuming equal variancesnormDiffCI(x, y,method ="classical",boot =TRUE,bootci.type ="bca")## ## Bootstrap confidence interval (equal variances, unpaired)## ## BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CALCULATIONS## Based on 9999 bootstrap replicates## ## CALL : ## boot.ci(boot.out = boot.out, conf = 1 - alpha, type = bootci.type)## ## Intervals : ## Level BCa ## 95% (-1.0946, 1.1445 ) ## Calculations and Intervals on Original Scale## ## sample estimate:## difference in means ## -0.003938371 ## ## additional information:## SE of difference in means Cohen's d (SMD) ## 0.509194596 -0.002995563 ## ## mean of x SD of x mean of y SD of y ## 0.2121153 1.0540078 0.2160536 1.7413614## bootstrap: assuming unequal variancesnormDiffCI(x, y,method ="welch",boot =TRUE,bootci.type ="bca")## ## Bootstrap confidence interval (unequal variances, unpaired)## ## BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CALCULATIONS## Based on 9999 bootstrap replicates## ## CALL : ## boot.ci(boot.out = boot.out, conf = 1 - alpha, type = bootci.type)## ## Intervals : ## Level BCa ## 95% (-1.0637, 1.1497 ) ## Calculations and Intervals on Original Scale## ## sample estimate:## difference in means ## -0.003938371 ## ## additional information:## SE of difference in means Cohen's d (SMD) ## 0.598982955 -0.001934839 ## ## mean of x SD of x mean of y SD of y ## 0.2121153 1.0540078 0.2160536 1.7413614In case of unequal variances and unequal sample sizes per group theclassical confidence interval may have a bad coverage (too long or tooshort), as is indicated by the small Monte-Carlo simulation studybelow.
M<-100CIhsu<- CIwelch<- CIclass<-matrix(NA,nrow = M,ncol =2)for(iin1:M){ x<-rnorm(10) y<-rnorm(30,sd =0.1) CIclass[i,]<-normDiffCI(x, y,method ="classical")$conf.int CIwelch[i,]<-normDiffCI(x, y,method ="welch")$conf.int CIhsu[i,]<-normDiffCI(x, y,method ="hsu")$conf.int}## coverage probabilies## classicalsum(CIclass[,1]<0&0< CIclass[,2])/M## [1] 0.7## [1] 0.97## [1] 0.97We provide 12 different confidence intervals for the (classical)coefficient of variation(Gulhar, Kibria, andAhmed 2012; Davison and Hinkley 1997); e.g.
## ## Miller (1991) confidence interval## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## CV 0.1708354 0.2286577## ## sample estimate:## CV ## 0.1997465 ## ## additional information:## standard error of CV ## 0.01475088## ## Gulhar et al (2012) confidence interval## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## CV 0.1753788 0.2320406## ## sample estimate:## CV ## 0.1997465## ## Bootstrap confidence interval## ## BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CALCULATIONS## Based on 9999 bootstrap replicates## ## CALL : ## boot.ci(boot.out = boot.out, conf = 1 - alpha, type = bootci.type)## ## Intervals : ## Level Normal Basic ## 95% ( 0.1742, 0.2273 ) ( 0.1734, 0.2269 ) ## ## Level Percentile BCa ## 95% ( 0.1726, 0.2261 ) ( 0.1764, 0.2304 ) ## Calculations and Intervals on Original Scale## ## sample estimate:## CV ## 0.1997465For all intervals implemented see the help page of function cvCI.
We start with the computation of confidence intervals for quantiles(Hedderich and Sachs 2018; Davison and Hinkley1997).
## ## exact confidence interval## ## 95.1 percent confidence interval:## 2.45 % 97.55 %## 95 % quantile 5.19172 10.91936## ## sample estimate:## 95 % quantile ## 8.103405## ## asymptotic confidence interval## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## 95 % quantile 5.19172 13.76781## ## sample estimate:## 95 % quantile ## 8.103405## ## bootstrap confidence interval## ## BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CALCULATIONS## Based on 9999 bootstrap replicates## ## CALL : ## boot.ci(boot.out = boot.out, conf = 1 - alpha, type = bootci.type)## ## Intervals : ## Level Normal Basic ## 95% ( 5.999, 11.784 ) ( 7.321, 11.410 ) ## ## Level Percentile BCa ## 95% ( 4.797, 8.885 ) ( 5.194, 10.919 ) ## Calculations and Intervals on Original Scale## ## sample estimate:## 95 % quantile ## 8.103405Next, we consider the median.
## ## exact confidence interval## ## 95.2 percent confidence interval:## 2.4 % 97.6 %## median 1.215536 1.988352## ## sample estimate:## median ## 1.667614## ## asymptotic confidence interval## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## median 1.353559 2.023909## ## sample estimate:## median ## 1.667614## ## bootstrap confidence interval## ## BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CALCULATIONS## Based on 9999 bootstrap replicates## ## CALL : ## boot.ci(boot.out = boot.out, conf = 1 - alpha, type = bootci.type)## ## Intervals : ## Level Normal Basic ## 95% ( 1.301, 1.968 ) ( 1.311, 1.967 ) ## ## Level Percentile BCa ## 95% ( 1.368, 2.024 ) ( 1.361, 2.018 ) ## Calculations and Intervals on Original Scale## ## sample estimate:## median ## 1.667614Finally, we take a look at MAD (median absolute deviation) where bydefault the standardized MAD is used (see function mad).
## ## exact confidence interval## ## 95.2 percent confidence interval:## 2.4 % 97.6 %## MAD 1.302908 1.999251## ## sample estimate:## MAD ## 1.636092## ## asymptotic confidence interval## ## 95 percent confidence interval:## 2.5 % 97.5 %## MAD 1.226038 1.93558## ## sample estimate:## MAD ## 1.636092## ## bootstrap confidence interval## ## BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL CALCULATIONS## Based on 9999 bootstrap replicates## ## CALL : ## boot.ci(boot.out = boot.out, conf = 1 - alpha, type = bootci.type)## ## Intervals : ## Level Normal Basic ## 95% ( 1.229, 2.043 ) ( 1.201, 2.028 ) ## ## Level Percentile BCa ## 95% ( 1.244, 2.071 ) ( 1.264, 2.087 ) ## Calculations and Intervals on Original Scale## ## sample estimate:## MAD ## 1.636092## ## exact confidence interval## ## 95.2 percent confidence interval:## 2.4 % 97.6 %## MAD 0.8787991 1.348476## ## sample estimate:## MAD ## 1.103529The Hsu two-sample t-test is an alternative to the Welch two-samplet-test using a different formula for computing the degrees of freedom ofthe respective t-distribution(Hedderich andSachs 2018). The following code is taken and adapted from thehelp page of the t.test function.
## ## Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: 1:10 and c(7:20)## t = -5.4349, df = 21.982, p-value = 1.855e-05## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -11.052802 -4.947198## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 5.5 13.5## ## Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: 1:10 and c(7:20, 200)## t = -1.6329, df = 14.165, p-value = 0.1245## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -47.242900 6.376233## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 5.50000 25.93333## ## Hsu Two Sample t-test## ## data: 1:10 and c(7:20)## t = -5.4349, df = 9, p-value = 0.0004137## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -11.329805 -4.670195## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y SD of x SD of y ## 5.50000 13.50000 3.02765 4.18330## ## Hsu Two Sample t-test## ## data: 1:10 and c(7:20, 200)## t = -1.6329, df = 9, p-value = 0.1369## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -48.740846 7.874179## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y SD of x SD of y ## 5.50000 25.93333 3.02765 48.32253## ## Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: extra[group == 1] and extra[group == 2]## t = -1.8608, df = 17.776, p-value = 0.07939## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -3.3654832 0.2054832## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 0.75 2.33## ## Hsu Two Sample t-test## ## data: extra[group == 1] and extra[group == 2]## t = -1.8608, df = 9, p-value = 0.09569## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -3.5007773 0.3407773## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y SD of x SD of y ## 0.750000 2.330000 1.789010 2.002249## ## Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: extra by group## t = -1.8608, df = 17.776, p-value = 0.07939## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group 1 and group 2 is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -3.3654832 0.2054832## sample estimates:## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 ## 0.75 2.33## ## Hsu Two Sample t-test## ## data: extra by group## t = -1.8608, df = 9, p-value = 0.09569## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -3.5007773 0.3407773## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y SD of x SD of y ## 0.750000 2.330000 1.789010 2.002249We compare the result of the Welch t-test and Hsu t-test usingfunction h0plot.
One and two sample bootstrap t-tests with equal or unequal variancesin the two sample case(Efron and Tibshirani1993).
## ## Bootstrap Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: 1:10 and c(7:20)## number of bootstrap samples: 9999## bootstrap p-value < 1e-04 ## bootstrap difference of means (SE) = -7.998886 (1.401919) ## 95 percent bootstrap percentile confidence interval:## -10.742857 -5.142857## ## Results without bootstrap:## t = -5.4349, df = 21.982, p-value = 1.855e-05## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -11.052802 -4.947198## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 5.5 13.5## ## Bootstrap Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: 1:10 and c(7:20, 200)## number of bootstrap samples: 9999## bootstrap p-value = 0.0244 ## bootstrap difference of means (SE) = -20.60254 (10.08466) ## 95 percent bootstrap percentile confidence interval:## -46.633333 -6.033333## ## Results without bootstrap:## t = -1.6329, df = 14.165, p-value = 0.1245## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -47.242900 6.376233## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 5.50000 25.93333## ## Bootstrap Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: extra[group == 1] and extra[group == 2]## number of bootstrap samples: 9999## bootstrap p-value = 0.07841 ## bootstrap difference of means (SE) = -1.574586 (0.799667) ## 95 percent bootstrap percentile confidence interval:## -3.16 -0.01## ## Results without bootstrap:## t = -1.8608, df = 17.776, p-value = 0.07939## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -3.3654832 0.2054832## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 0.75 2.33## ## Bootstrap Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: extra by group## number of bootstrap samples: 9999## bootstrap p-value = 0.08141 ## bootstrap difference of means (SE) = -1.571571 (0.7996128) ## 95 percent bootstrap percentile confidence interval:## -3.1400 0.0005## ## Results without bootstrap:## t = -1.8608, df = 17.776, p-value = 0.07939## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -3.3654832 0.2054832## sample estimates:## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 ## 0.75 2.33Using function h0plot the distribution of the bootstrap results ofthe test statistic can be plotted.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value `binwidth`.One and two sample permutation t-tests with equal(Efron and Tibshirani 1993) or unequal variances(Janssen 1997) in the two sample case.
## ## Permutation Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: 1:10 and c(7:20)## number of permutations: 9999## (Monte-Carlo) permutation p-value < 1e-04 ## permutation difference of means (SE) = -7.978312 (2.253183) ## 95 percent (Monte-Carlo) permutation percentile confidence interval:## -12.228571 -3.657143## ## Results without permutation:## t = -5.4349, df = 21.982, p-value = 1.855e-05## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -11.052802 -4.947198## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 5.5 13.5## permutation confidence interval sensitive to outlier!perm.t.test(1:10,y =c(7:20,200))# without permutation: P = .1245## ## Permutation Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: 1:10 and c(7:20, 200)## number of permutations: 9999## (Monte-Carlo) permutation p-value < 1e-04 ## permutation difference of means (SE) = -20.45353 (15.34121) ## 95 percent (Monte-Carlo) permutation percentile confidence interval:## -36.86667 1.80000## ## Results without permutation:## t = -1.6329, df = 14.165, p-value = 0.1245## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -47.242900 6.376233## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 5.50000 25.93333## ## Permutation Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: extra[group == 1] and extra[group == 2]## number of permutations: 9999## (Monte-Carlo) permutation p-value = 0.07821 ## permutation difference of means (SE) = -1.581176 (0.9020922) ## 95 percent (Monte-Carlo) permutation percentile confidence interval:## -3.32 0.18## ## Results without permutation:## t = -1.8608, df = 17.776, p-value = 0.07939## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -3.3654832 0.2054832## sample estimates:## mean of x mean of y ## 0.75 2.33## ## Permutation Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: extra by group## number of permutations: 9999## (Monte-Carlo) permutation p-value = 0.07341 ## permutation difference of means (SE) = -1.58473 (0.9020479) ## 95 percent (Monte-Carlo) permutation percentile confidence interval:## -3.32 0.16## ## Results without permutation:## t = -1.8608, df = 17.776, p-value = 0.07939## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -3.3654832 0.2054832## sample estimates:## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 ## 0.75 2.33Using function h0plot the distribution of the permutation results ofthe test statistic can be plotted.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value `binwidth`.In case of skewed distributions, one may use function p2ses tocompute an alternative standardized effect size (SES) as proposed byBotta-Dukat(Botta-Dukát 2018).
## [1] 1.754212We compute the multivariate intersection-union z- and t-test.
library(mvtnorm)## effect sizedelta<-c(0.25,0.5)## covariance matrixSigma<-matrix(c(1,0.75,0.75,1),ncol =2)## sample sizen<-50## generate random data from multivariate normal distributionsX<-rmvnorm(n=n,mean = delta,sigma = Sigma)Y<-rmvnorm(n=n,mean =rep(0,length(delta)),sigma = Sigma)## perform multivariate z-testmpe.z.test(X = X,Y = Y,Sigma = Sigma)## ## Intersection-union z-test## ## data: x and y## z = 1.9701, p-value = 0.02442## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is larger than 0 for all endpoints ## 97.5 percent confidence intervals:## 0.025 1## EP.1 0.002019839 Inf## EP.2 0.238607750 Inf## sample estimates:## X Y## EP.1 0.3369843 -0.05702838## EP.2 0.5495473 -0.08105320## ## Intersection-union t-test## ## data: x and y## t = 1.9589, df = 98, p-value = 0.05297## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is larger than 0 for all endpoints ## 97.5 percent confidence intervals:## 0.025 1## EP.1 -0.06386277 Inf## EP.2 0.19836006 Inf## sample estimates:## X Y## EP.1 0.3369843 -0.05702838## EP.2 0.5495473 -0.08105320Function mi.t.test can be used to compute a multiple imputationt-test by applying the approch of Rubin(Rubin1987) in combination with the adjustment of Barnard and Rubin(Barnard and Rubin 1999).
## Generate some dataset.seed(123)x<-rnorm(25,mean =1)x[sample(1:25,5)]<-NAy<-rnorm(20,mean =-1)y[sample(1:20,4)]<-NApair<-c(rnorm(25,mean =1),rnorm(20,mean =-1))g<-factor(c(rep("yes",25),rep("no",20)))D<-data.frame(ID =1:45,response =c(x, y),pair = pair,group = g)## Use Amelia to impute missing valueslibrary(Amelia)## Lade nötiges Paket: Rcpp## ## ## ## Amelia II: Multiple Imputation## ## (Version 1.8.3, built: 2024-11-07)## ## Copyright (C) 2005-2025 James Honaker, Gary King and Matthew Blackwell## ## Refer to http://gking.harvard.edu/amelia/ for more information## ##res<-amelia(D,m =10,p2s =0,idvars ="ID",noms ="group")## Per protocol analysis (Welch two-sample t-test)t.test(response~ group,data = D)## ## Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: response by group## t = -6.9214, df = 33.69, p-value = 5.903e-08## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group no and group yes is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.628749 -1.435125## sample estimates:## mean in group no mean in group yes ## -1.0862469 0.9456901## Intention to treat analysis (Multiple Imputation Welch two-sample t-test)mi.t.test(res,x ="response",y ="group")## ## Multiple Imputation Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## t = -6.6457, df = 25.142, p-value = 5.63e-07## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.668011 -1.405862## sample estimates:## mean (no) SD (no) mean (yes) SD (yes) ## -1.0809584 0.9379070 0.9559786 1.0203219## ## Two Sample t-test## ## data: response by group## t = -6.8168, df = 34, p-value = 7.643e-08## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group no and group yes is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.637703 -1.426171## sample estimates:## mean in group no mean in group yes ## -1.0862469 0.9456901## Intention to treat analysis (Multiple Imputation two-sample t-test)mi.t.test(res,x ="response",y ="group",var.equal =TRUE)## ## Multiple Imputation Two Sample t-test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## t = -6.5736, df = 26.042, p-value = 5.656e-07## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.673828 -1.400046## sample estimates:## mean (no) SD (no) mean (yes) SD (yes) ## -1.0809584 0.9379070 0.9559786 1.0203219## ## Multiple Imputation Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## t = -6.6457, df = 25.142, p-value = 2.815e-07## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is less than 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -Inf -1.5135## sample estimates:## mean (no) SD (no) mean (yes) SD (yes) ## -1.0809584 0.9379070 0.9559786 1.0203219## ## Multiple Imputation Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## t = -6.6457, df = 25.142, p-value = 1## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is greater than 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.560374 Inf## sample estimates:## mean (no) SD (no) mean (yes) SD (yes) ## -1.0809584 0.9379070 0.9559786 1.0203219## ## One Sample t-test## ## data: D$response[D$group == "yes"]## t = 4.5054, df = 19, p-value = 0.0002422## alternative hypothesis: true mean is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## 0.5063618 1.3850184## sample estimates:## mean of x ## 0.9456901## ## Multiple Imputation One Sample t-test## ## data: Variable response## number of imputations: 10## t = 4.6847, df = 18.494, p-value = 0.0001725## alternative hypothesis: true mean is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## 0.5280752 1.3838820## sample estimates:## mean SD ## 0.9559786 1.0203219## ## Multiple Imputation One Sample t-test## ## data: Variable response## number of imputations: 10## t = 9.5851, df = 18.494, p-value = 1## alternative hypothesis: true mean is less than -1## 95 percent confidence interval:## -Inf 1.309328## sample estimates:## mean SD ## 0.9559786 1.0203219## ## Multiple Imputation One Sample t-test## ## data: Variable response## number of imputations: 10## t = 9.5851, df = 18.494, p-value = 6.655e-09## alternative hypothesis: true mean is greater than -1## 95 percent confidence interval:## 0.6026297 Inf## sample estimates:## mean SD ## 0.9559786 1.0203219## ## Paired t-test## ## data: D$response and D$pair## t = -1.3532, df = 35, p-value = 0.1847## alternative hypothesis: true mean difference is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -0.6976921 0.1395993## sample estimates:## mean difference ## -0.2790464## ## Multiple Imputation Paired t-test## ## data: Variables response and pair## number of imputations: 10## t = -1.0455, df = 39.974, p-value = 0.3021## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -0.5680741 0.1807237## sample estimates:## mean of difference SD of difference ## -0.1936752 1.2426515Function mi.t.test also works with package mice.
## ## Attache Paket: 'mice'## Das folgende Objekt ist maskiert 'package:stats':## ## filter## Die folgenden Objekte sind maskiert von 'package:base':## ## cbind, rbind## ## Multiple Imputation Welch Two Sample t-test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## t = -7.2111, df = 29.735, p-value = 5.289e-08## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.6351 -1.4716## sample estimates:## mean (no) SD (no) mean (yes) SD (yes) ## -1.0771373 0.8585436 0.9762127 1.0261920Function mi.wilcox.test can be used to compute multiple imputationWilcoxon tests by applying the median p rule (MPR) approach; see Section13.3 in(Heymans and Eekhout 2019).
## Package 'exactRankTests' is no longer under development.## Please consider using package 'coin' instead.## ## Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test## ## data: response by group## W = 12, p-value = 7.444e-08## alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.664671 -1.329111## sample estimates:## difference in location ## -1.989152## Intention to treat analysis (Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test)mi.wilcox.test(res,x ="response",y ="group")## ## Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## W = 20, p-value = 1.712e-09## alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.489225 -1.317255## sample estimates:## difference in location ## -1.882414## ## Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## W = 20, p-value = 8.562e-10## alternative hypothesis: true mu is less than 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -Inf -1.424056## sample estimates:## difference in location ## -1.882414## ## Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## W = 20, p-value = 1## alternative hypothesis: true mu is greater than 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.371565 Inf## sample estimates:## difference in location ## -1.882414## ## Exact Wilcoxon signed rank test## ## data: D$response[D$group == "yes"]## V = 197, p-value = 0.0001678## alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## 0.4856837 1.3892099## sample estimates:## (pseudo)median ## 0.9151479## ## Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon signed rank test## ## data: Variable response## number of imputations: 10## V = 306, p-value = 1.83e-05## alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## 0.5338009 1.3042666## sample estimates:## (pseudo)median ## 0.9033367## ## Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon signed rank test## ## data: Variable response## number of imputations: 10## V = 325, p-value = 1## alternative hypothesis: true mu is less than -1## 95 percent confidence interval:## -Inf 1.406019## sample estimates:## (pseudo)median ## 0.9710047## ## Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon signed rank test## ## data: Variable response## number of imputations: 10## V = 325, p-value = 2.98e-08## alternative hypothesis: true mu is greater than -1## 95 percent confidence interval:## 0.6708086 Inf## sample estimates:## (pseudo)median ## 0.9710047## ## Exact Wilcoxon signed rank test## ## data: D$response and D$pair## V = 244, p-value = 0.1663## alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -0.6467313 0.1005468## sample estimates:## (pseudo)median ## -0.2795692## ## Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon signed rank test## ## data: Variables response and pair## number of imputations: 10## V = 436, p-value = 0.3641## alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -0.5120206 0.2049652## sample estimates:## (pseudo)median ## -0.1683673Function mi.wilcox.test also works with package mice.
## ## Multiple Imputation Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test## ## data: Variable response: group no vs group yes## number of imputations: 10## W = 16, p-value = 5.3e-10## alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0## 95 percent confidence interval:## -2.533659 -1.452234## sample estimates:## difference in location ## -2.002101The function mdplot can be used to visualize the mean difference (MD)of two groups, assuming two normal distributions. In addition, thesensitivity and specificity based on the optimal cutoff (Youden’s Jstatistic) can be added(Böhning, Böhning, andHolling 2008).
Function md2sens can be used to compute sensitivity and specificityfor given MD and SDs.
library(ggplot2)## (standardized) mean difference to sensitivity/specificity## equal variancesdelta<-seq(from =0.0,to =6,by =0.05)res<-sapply(delta, md2sens)DF<-data.frame(SMD = delta,sensitivity = res[1,],specificity = res[2,])ggplot(DF,aes(x = SMD,y = sensitivity))+geom_line()+ylim(0.5,1.0)+xlab("(standardized) mean difference")+ylab("sensitivity = specificity")+ggtitle("SD1 = SD2 = 1")## unequal variancesdelta<-seq(from =0.0,to =6,by =0.05)res<-sapply(delta, md2sens,sd1 =1,sd2 =2)DF<-data.frame(MD = delta,performance =c(res[1,], res[2,]),measure =c(rep("sensitivity",length(delta)),rep("specificity",length(delta))))ggplot(DF,aes(x = MD,y = performance,color = measure))+geom_line()+ylim(0,1.0)+xlab("mean difference")+scale_color_manual(values =c("darkblue","darkred"))+ggtitle("SD1 = 1, SD2 = 2")Function md2zfactor can be used to compute the z-factor(Zhang, Chung, and Oldenburg 1999) for given MDand SDs.
## (standardized) mean difference to sensitivity/specificity## equal varianceslibrary(ggplot2)delta<-seq(from =2,to =18,by =0.05)res<-sapply(delta, md2zfactor)DF<-data.frame(SMD = delta,zfactor = res)ggplot(DF,aes(x = SMD,y = zfactor))+geom_line()+xlab("(standardized) mean difference")+ylab("z-factor")+ggtitle("SD1 = SD2 = 1")+geom_hline(yintercept =1,linetype ="dotted")## unequal variancesdelta<-seq(from =2.5,to =20,by =0.05)res<-sapply(delta, md2zfactor,sd1 =1,sd2 =2)DF<-data.frame(MD = delta,zfactor = res)ggplot(DF,aes(x = MD,y = zfactor))+geom_line()+xlab("mean difference")+ylab("z-factor")+ggtitle("SD1 = 1, SD2 = 2")+geom_hline(yintercept =1,linetype ="dotted")We provide a simple wrapper function that allows to compute aclassical repeated measures one-way ANOVA as well as a respective mixedeffects model. In addition, the non-parametric Friedman and Quade testscan be computed.
set.seed(123)outcome<-c(rnorm(10),rnorm(10,mean =1.5),rnorm(10,mean =1))timepoints<-factor(rep(1:3,each =10))patients<-factor(rep(1:10,times =3))rm.oneway.test(outcome, timepoints, patients)## ## Repeated measures 1-way ANOVA## ## data: outcome, timepoints and patients## F = 6.5898, num df = 2, denom df = 18, p-value = 0.007122## ## Mixed-effects 1-way ANOVA## ## data: outcome, timepoints and patients## F = 7.3674, num df = 2, denom df = 18, p-value = 0.004596## ## Quade test## ## data: outcome, timepoints and patients## F = 7.2906, num df = 2, denom df = 18, p-value = 0.004795## ## Friedman rank sum test## ## data: outcome, timepoints and patients## X-squared = 12.8, df = 2, p-value = 0.001662We visualize the results using function h0plot.
Volcano plots can be used to visualize the results when many testshave been applied. They show a measure of effect size in combinationwith (adjusted) p values.
## Generate some datax<-matrix(rnorm(1000,mean =10),nrow =10)g1<-rep("control",10)y1<-matrix(rnorm(500,mean =11.75),nrow =10)y2<-matrix(rnorm(500,mean =9.75,sd =3),nrow =10)g2<-rep("treatment",10)group<-factor(c(g1, g2))Data<-rbind(x,cbind(y1, y2))## compute Hsu t-testpvals<-apply(Data,2,function(x, group)hsu.t.test(x~ group)$p.value,group = group)## compute log-fold changelogfc<-function(x, group){ res<-tapply(x, group, mean)log2(res[1]/res[2])}lfcs<-apply(Data,2, logfc,group = group)volcano(lfcs,p.adjust(pvals,method ="fdr"),effect.low =-0.25,effect.high =0.25,xlab ="log-fold change",ylab ="-log10(adj. p value)")Bland-Altman plots are used to visually compare two methods ofmeasurement. We can generate classical Bland-Altman plots(Bland and Altman 1986; Shieh 2018).
data("fingsys")baplot(fingsys$fingsys, fingsys$armsys,title ="Approximative Confidence Intervals",type ="parametric",ci.type ="approximate")## $`mean of differences`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 4.295000 2.261102 6.328898 ## ## $`lower LoA (2.5 %)`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## -24.32967 -27.81137 -20.84797 ## ## $`upper LoA (97.5 %)`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 32.91967 29.43797 36.40137baplot(fingsys$fingsys, fingsys$armsys,title ="Exact Confidence Intervals",type ="parametric",ci.type ="exact")## Warning in qt(conf.alpha/2, df, zp * sqrt(n)): eventuell wurde in 'pnt{final}'## nicht die volle Genauigkeit erreicht## Warning in qt(1 - conf.alpha/2, df, zp * sqrt(n)): eventuell wurde in## 'pnt{final}' nicht die volle Genauigkeit erreicht## Warning in qt(1 - conf.alpha/2, df, zp * sqrt(n)): eventuell wurde in## 'pnt{final}' nicht die volle Genauigkeit erreicht## $`mean of differences`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 4.295000 2.261102 6.328898 ## ## $`lower LoA (2.5 %)`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## -24.32967 -28.07305 -21.09776 ## ## $`upper LoA (97.5 %)`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 32.91967 29.68776 36.66305baplot(fingsys$fingsys, fingsys$armsys,title ="Bootstrap Confidence Intervals",type ="parametric",ci.type ="boot",R =999)## $`mean of differences`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 4.295000 2.219930 6.250611 ## ## $`lower LoA (2.5 %)`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## -24.32967 -29.53826 -20.48664 ## ## $`upper LoA (97.5 %)`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 32.91967 29.37463 37.50405In the following nonparametric Bland-Altman plots, the median is usedinstead of the mean in combination with empirical quantiles for thelower and upper limit of agreement.
data("fingsys")baplot(fingsys$fingsys, fingsys$armsys,title ="Approximative Confidence Intervals",type ="nonparametric",ci.type ="approximate")## $`median of differences`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 4.5 2.0 8.0 ## ## $`lower LoA (2.5 %)`## estimate.2.5% 2.5 % 97.5 % ## -24.025 -48.000 -20.000 ## ## $`upper LoA (97.5 %)`## estimate.97.5% 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 34 28 60baplot(fingsys$fingsys, fingsys$armsys,title ="Exact Confidence Intervals",type ="nonparametric",ci.type ="exact")## $`median of differences`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 4.5 2.0 8.0 ## ## $`lower LoA (2.5 %)`## estimate.2.5% 2.5 % 97.5 % ## -24.025 -41.000 -18.000 ## ## $`upper LoA (97.5 %)`## estimate.97.5% 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 34 27 45baplot(fingsys$fingsys, fingsys$armsys,title ="Bootstrap Confidence Intervals",type ="nonparametric",ci.type ="boot",R =999)## $`median of differences`## estimate 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 4.5 2.0 8.0 ## ## $`lower LoA (2.5 %)`## estimate.2.5% 2.5 % 97.5 % ## -24.025 -30.275 -18.000 ## ## $`upper LoA (97.5 %)`## estimate.97.5% 2.5 % 97.5 % ## 34.000 27.025 38.175The function imputeSD can be used to impute standard deviations forchanges from baseline adopting the approach of the Cochrane handbook(Higgins et al. 2019, sec. 6.5.2.8).
SD1<-c(0.149,0.022,0.036,0.085,0.125,NA,0.139,0.124,0.038)SD2<-c(NA,0.039,0.038,0.087,0.125,NA,0.135,0.126,0.038)SDchange<-c(NA,NA,NA,0.026,0.058,NA,NA,NA,NA)imputeSD(SD1, SD2, SDchange)## SD1 SD2 SDchange Cor SDchange.min SDchange.mean SDchange.max## 1 0.149 0.149 NA NA 0.04491608 0.05829769 0.06913600## 2 0.022 0.039 NA NA 0.01915642 0.02050235 0.02176520## 3 0.036 0.038 NA NA 0.01132754 0.01460887 0.01727787## 4 0.085 0.087 0.026 0.9545639 0.02600000 0.02600000 0.02600000## 5 0.125 0.125 0.058 0.8923520 0.05800000 0.05800000 0.05800000## 6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA## 7 0.139 0.135 NA NA 0.04148755 0.05374591 0.06368696## 8 0.124 0.126 NA NA 0.03773311 0.04894677 0.05803262## 9 0.038 0.038 NA NA 0.01145511 0.01486787 0.01763200Correlations can also be provided via argument corr. This option mayparticularly be useful, if no complete data is available.
## SD1 SD2 SDchange Cor SDchange.min SDchange.mean SDchange.max## 1 0.149 0.149 NA NA 0.04711794 0.06663483 0.08161066## 2 0.022 0.039 NA NA 0.01935975 0.02146159 0.02337520## 3 0.036 0.038 NA NA 0.01186592 0.01666133 0.02035682## 4 0.085 0.087 NA NA 0.02726720 0.03850974 0.04714340## 5 0.125 0.125 NA NA 0.03952847 0.05590170 0.06846532## 6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA## 7 0.139 0.135 NA NA 0.04350287 0.06139218 0.07513654## 8 0.124 0.126 NA NA 0.03957777 0.05593568 0.06849234## 9 0.038 0.038 NA NA 0.01201666 0.01699412 0.02081346Function pairwise.fun enables the application of arbitrary functionsfor pairwise comparisons.
## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## Warning in wilcox.test.default(xi, xj, paired = paired, ...): kann bei## Bindungen keinen exakten p-Wert Berechnen## ## Pairwise comparisons using Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction ## ## data: airquality$Ozone and airquality$Month ## ## 5 6 7 8 ## 6 0.19250 - - - ## 7 3e-05 0.01414 - - ## 8 0.00012 0.02591 0.86195 - ## 9 0.11859 0.95887 0.00074 0.00325## ## P value adjustment method: none## To avoid the warningspairwise.fun(airquality$Ozone, airquality$Month,fun =function(x, y)wilcox.exact(x, y)$p.value)## 6 - 5 7 - 5 8 - 5 9 - 5 7 - 6 8 - 6 ## 1.897186e-01 1.087205e-05 6.108735e-05 1.171796e-01 1.183753e-02 2.333564e-02 ## 9 - 6 8 - 7 9 - 7 9 - 8 ## 9.528659e-01 8.595683e-01 5.281796e-04 2.714694e-03The function is also the basis for our functionspairwise.wilcox.exact and pairwise.ext.t.test, which in contrast to thestandard functions pairwise.wilcox.test and pairwise.t.test generate amuch more detailed output. In addition, pairwise.wilcox.exact is basedon wilcox.exact instead of wilcox.test.
## ## Pairwise Exact Wilcoxon rank sum tests## ## data: airquality$Ozone and airquality$Month## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0## ## groups W diff. in location 2.5% 97.5% p-value adj. p-value## 1 6 - 5 152.0 6.5 -5 18 1.897186e-01 0.5691559000## 2 7 - 5 566.5 37.5 21 51 1.087205e-05 0.0001087205## 3 8 - 5 548.5 31.5 14 53 6.108735e-05 0.0005497862## 4 9 - 5 470.0 5.5 -2 13 1.171796e-01 0.4687184000## 5 7 - 6 182.5 28.5 8 51 1.183753e-02 0.0710251900## 6 8 - 6 176.5 23.5 2 53 2.333564e-02 0.1166782000## 7 9 - 6 128.5 -0.5 -12 10 9.528659e-01 1.0000000000## 8 8 - 7 328.0 -2.5 -21 19 8.595683e-01 1.0000000000## 9 9 - 7 176.5 -30.5 -44 -13 5.281796e-04 0.0042254370## 10 9 - 8 202.0 -23.5 -46 -7 2.714694e-03 0.0190028600Furthermore, function pairwise.ext.t.test also enables pairwiseStudent, Welch, Hsu, bootstrap and permutation t tests.
## ## Pairwise comparisons using t tests with non-pooled SD ## ## data: airquality$Ozone and airquality$Month ## ## 5 6 7 8 ## 6 1.00000 - - - ## 7 0.00026 0.01527 - - ## 8 0.00195 0.02135 1.00000 - ## 9 0.86321 1.00000 0.00589 0.01721## ## P value adjustment method: holm## ## Pairwise Welch Two Sample t-tests## ## data: airquality$Ozone and airquality$Month## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## ## groups t df diff. in means SE 2.5% 97.5%## 1 6 - 5 0.78010090 16.93764 5.8290598 7.472187 -9.940299 21.59842## 2 7 - 5 4.68198923 44.84296 35.5000000 7.582247 20.227090 50.77291## 3 8 - 5 4.07487966 39.27916 36.3461538 8.919565 18.308730 54.38358## 4 9 - 5 1.25274697 52.95697 7.8328912 6.252572 -4.708419 20.37420## 5 7 - 6 3.41859846 24.79227 29.6709402 8.679270 11.788050 47.55383## 6 8 - 6 3.09220573 29.98945 30.5170940 9.869037 10.361530 50.67265## 7 9 - 6 0.26556793 17.61281 2.0038314 7.545457 -13.873600 17.88127## 8 8 - 7 0.08501814 47.63564 0.8461538 9.952627 -19.168900 20.86121## 9 9 - 7 -3.61450643 46.58247 -27.6671088 7.654464 -43.069550 -12.26467## 10 9 - 8 -3.17483051 40.37577 -28.5132626 8.981035 -46.659350 -10.36718## p-value adj. p-value## 1 4.460968e-01 1.0000000000## 2 2.646679e-05 0.0002646679## 3 2.168566e-04 0.0019517090## 4 2.158016e-01 0.8632062000## 5 2.181685e-03 0.0152717900## 6 4.269318e-03 0.0213465900## 7 7.936555e-01 1.0000000000## 8 9.326033e-01 1.0000000000## 9 7.361032e-04 0.0058888260## 10 2.868290e-03 0.0172097400## ## Pairwise Hsu Two Sample t-tests## ## data: airquality$Ozone and airquality$Month## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## ## groups t df diff. in means SE 2.5% 97.5%## 1 6 - 5 0.78010090 8 5.8290598 7.472187 -11.401830 23.05995## 2 7 - 5 4.68198923 25 35.5000000 7.582247 19.884070 51.11593## 3 8 - 5 4.07487966 25 36.3461538 8.919565 17.975970 54.71634## 4 9 - 5 1.25274697 25 7.8328912 6.252572 -5.044523 20.71031## 5 7 - 6 3.41859846 8 29.6709402 8.679270 9.656507 49.68537## 6 8 - 6 3.09220573 8 30.5170940 9.869037 7.759053 53.27514## 7 9 - 6 0.26556793 8 2.0038314 7.545457 -15.396020 19.40369## 8 8 - 7 0.08501814 25 0.8461538 9.952627 -19.651670 21.34397## 9 9 - 7 -3.61450643 25 -27.6671088 7.654464 -43.431770 -11.90245## 10 9 - 8 -3.17483051 25 -28.5132626 8.981035 -47.010050 -10.01648## p-value adj. p-value## 1 0.4577885000 1.000000000## 2 0.0000849598 0.000849598## 3 0.0004086781 0.003678103## 4 0.2218896000 0.887558600## 5 0.0091067660 0.054640600## 6 0.0148398900 0.074199430## 7 0.7972873000 1.000000000## 8 0.9329242000 1.000000000## 9 0.0013234440 0.010587550## 10 0.0039521140 0.027664800## ## Pairwise Bootstrap Welch Two Sample t-tests## ## data: airquality$Ozone and airquality$Month## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## ## groups diff. in means SE 2.5% 97.5% p-value adj. p-value## 1 6 - 5 5.9575517 6.965299 -7.72265 20.56880 0.43324330 1.00000000## 2 7 - 5 35.4748436 7.389274 20.42308 50.07692 0.00020002 0.00200020## 3 8 - 5 36.3571088 8.668791 19.53846 53.65577 0.00040004 0.00360036## 4 9 - 5 7.8721992 6.025929 -4.40630 19.80564 0.23522350 0.94089410## 5 7 - 6 29.6692870 8.267833 13.05214 45.43248 0.00420042 0.02400240## 6 8 - 6 30.4539454 9.443246 11.50214 49.38932 0.00400040 0.02400240## 7 9 - 6 1.9831826 7.050480 -12.91341 15.68238 0.82248220 1.00000000## 8 8 - 7 0.8754337 9.705470 -17.46346 19.88654 0.92589260 1.00000000## 9 9 - 7 -27.7096602 7.465314 -42.40723 -12.95146 0.00060006 0.00480048## 10 9 - 8 -28.4483592 8.739157 -46.08362 -11.52062 0.00220022 0.01540154## ## Pairwise Permutation Welch Two Sample t-tests## ## data: airquality$Ozone and airquality$Month## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0## ## groups diff. in means SE 2.5% 97.5% p-value adj. p-value## 1 6 - 5 5.9171567 7.859164 -7.345085 23.62393 0.49304930 1.00000000## 2 7 - 5 35.4156570 9.003950 17.996150 52.92308 0.00010001 0.00100010## 3 8 - 5 36.2758122 10.191180 16.538460 56.15385 0.00010001 0.00100010## 4 9 - 5 7.7036415 6.314074 -4.539788 19.75066 0.22332230 0.89328930## 5 7 - 6 29.5471551 12.051430 4.897436 52.31197 0.00520052 0.03120312## 6 8 - 6 30.5021455 14.372630 1.205128 57.29487 0.00970097 0.04850485## 7 9 - 6 2.0813652 8.435290 -15.938700 17.11111 0.79797980 1.00000000## 8 8 - 7 0.8314293 9.854760 -18.461540 20.15385 0.93169320 1.00000000## 9 9 - 7 -27.7240971 8.365606 -43.954910 -11.27586 0.00100010 0.00800080## 10 9 - 8 -28.3760056 9.501787 -46.814320 -10.12334 0.00190019 0.01330133## R version 4.5.2 Patched (2025-12-12 r89166)## Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu## Running under: Linux Mint 22.1## ## Matrix products: default## BLAS: /home/kohlm/RTOP/Rbranch/lib/libRblas.so ## LAPACK: /home/kohlm/RTOP/Rbranch/lib/libRlapack.so; LAPACK version 3.12.1## ## locale:## [1] LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C ## [3] LC_TIME=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=C ## [5] LC_MONETARY=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8 ## [7] LC_PAPER=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C ## [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C ## [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=de_DE.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C ## ## time zone: Europe/Berlin## tzcode source: system (glibc)## ## attached base packages:## [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base ## ## other attached packages:## [1] ggplot2_4.0.1 exactRankTests_0.8-35 mice_3.18.0 ## [4] Amelia_1.8.3 Rcpp_1.1.0 mvtnorm_1.3-3 ## [7] MKinfer_1.3 ## ## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):## [1] gtable_0.3.6 shape_1.4.6.1 xfun_0.54 bslib_0.9.0 ## [5] lattice_0.22-7 vctrs_0.6.5 tools_4.5.2 Rdpack_2.6.4 ## [9] generics_0.1.4 tibble_3.3.0 pan_1.9 MKdescr_1.0 ## [13] pkgconfig_2.0.3 jomo_2.7-6 Matrix_1.7-4 RColorBrewer_1.1-3## [17] S7_0.2.1 arrangements_1.1.9 lifecycle_1.0.4 compiler_4.5.2 ## [21] farver_2.1.2 mitools_2.4 codetools_0.2-20 htmltools_0.5.9 ## [25] miceadds_3.18-36 sass_0.4.10 yaml_2.3.11 glmnet_4.1-10 ## [29] gmp_0.7-5 pillar_1.11.1 nloptr_2.2.1 jquerylib_0.1.4 ## [33] tidyr_1.3.1 MASS_7.3-65 cachem_1.1.0 reformulas_0.4.2 ## [37] iterators_1.0.14 rpart_4.1.24 boot_1.3-32 foreach_1.5.2 ## [41] mitml_0.4-5 nlme_3.1-168 tidyselect_1.2.1 digest_0.6.39 ## [45] dplyr_1.1.4 purrr_1.2.0 labeling_0.4.3 splines_4.5.2 ## [49] fastmap_1.2.0 grid_4.5.2 cli_3.6.5 magrittr_2.0.4 ## [53] survival_3.8-3 broom_1.0.11 foreign_0.8-90 withr_3.0.2 ## [57] scales_1.4.0 backports_1.5.0 rmarkdown_2.30 nnet_7.3-20 ## [61] lme4_1.1-38 evaluate_1.0.5 knitr_1.50 rbibutils_2.4 ## [65] rlang_1.1.6 glue_1.8.0 DBI_1.2.3 minqa_1.2.8 ## [69] jsonlite_2.0.0 R6_2.6.1