Movatterモバイル変換

John 9:32
Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind.

He saw a man
The act of seeing here is intentional and compassionate. In the cultural context of the time, many would overlook or ignore those with disabilities, often associating them with sin or divine punishment. Jesus' attention to the man signifies His mission to seek and save the lost, as stated inLuke 19:10. This moment also prefigures the spiritual insight that Jesus offers, contrasting with the physical blindness of the man.

blind from birth
This detail emphasizes the severity of the man's condition, as congenital blindness was considered incurable. In the Jewish understanding, such a condition might be seen as a result of sin, either of the individual or their parents, as suggested by the disciples' question inJohn 9:2. The healing that follows serves as a powerful sign of Jesus' divine authority and His role as the Light of the World (John 8:12), bringing both physical and spiritual sight. This miracle also connects to the prophecy inIsaiah 35:5, which speaks of the eyes of the blind being opened in the Messianic age.

A man which was blind from his birth.--The fact was well known, and was probably publicly proclaimed by the man himself or his parents (John 9:20) as an aggravation of his misery, and as a plea for the alms of passers by. Of the six miracles connected with blindness which are recorded in the Gospels, this is the only case described as blindness from birth. In this lies its special characteristic, for "since the world began, was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind" (John 9:32). . . .

(8)The Lord confirms by a sign the declaration that he is the Light of the world,by giving eyesight as well as light. That which had been proclaimed as a great truth of his Being and mission, viz. that he was the Light of the world, was now to be established and confirmed to the disciples by a signal miracle. The "higher criticism" finds explanation of this and other similar miracles at Bethsaida and Jericho, in the prophecy ofIsaiah 42:19;Isaiah 43:8;Isaiah 35:5;Isaiah 29:18. Volkmar holds that the story of Zacchaeus is thus rewritten! Thoma thinks that we have a spiritualization of the "miracle" on Saul of Tarsus. It would be waste time to point out the differences which are patent to the simplest criticism.Verse 1. -And - theκαί suggests relation both in subject-matter, in time, place, occasion, and theme, with that which had preceded -as Jesus was passing by, going along his way, he saw a man blind from birth (cf.ἐκ κοιλίας μητρὸς αὐτοῦ,Acts 3:2;Acts 14:8). He was obviously a well-known beggar, who had often proclaimed the fact that he was blind from birth (see ver. 8). Such a condition and history rendered the cure more difficult and hopeless in the view of ordinaryprofessors of the healing art, and the juxtaposition of such a symbolic fact with the near activity of those who were boasting of their Abrahamic privilege and their national and mere hereditary advantages, is one of the instances of the unconscious poesy of the gospel history. There he sits, the very type of the race which says, "Wesee," but which to Christ's eye was proclaiming its utter helplessness and blindness, not asking even to be illumined, and revealing the fundamental injury done to the very race and nature of man, and calling for all the healing power that he had been sent into the world to dispense. The man who had been struck blind, or whose eyesight had been slowly dosed by disease, became the type of the effect of special sins upon the character and life; thuse.g.,vanity conceals radical defects and weaknesses;pride hides from the sinner's own view his own transgressions; temporary blindness to great faults is one of the symptoms ofgross sin like David's, and prejudice is proverbially blind and deaf; but here is a man who is nothing less than the type of a congenital bias to evil, of hereditary damage done to human nature. Unless Christ can pour light upon those who areborn blind, he is not the Savior the world needs.

Parallel Commentaries ...