Movatterモバイル変換

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers

XLI.

(1)O islands.—See Note onIsaiah 40:15.

Let the people renew their strength . . .—The same phrase as inIsaiah 40:31, but here, perhaps, with a touch of irony. The heathen are challenged to the great controversy, and will need all their “strength” and “strong reasons” if they accept the challenge. In what follows we have to think of the prophet as having, like Balaam, a vision of what shall come to pass in the “latter days” (Numbers 24:20), and seeing not only the forms of the old empires on their way to Hades, as inIsaiah 14:9-12, but the appearance on the scene of the new conqueror.

(2)Who raised up . . .—More accurately,Who hath raised up from the East the man whom Righteousness calls(or,whom He calls in righteousness) to tread in His steps.(Comp.Isaiah 45:2.) The man so raised up to rule over the “islands” and the “peoples”is none other than Koresh (Cyrus), the future restorer of Israel. The thought of Cyrus as working out the righteousness of God is dominant in these chapters (Isaiah 42:6;Isaiah 45:13). In the rapidity of his conquest, the prophet bids men see the proof that he is doing God’s work. So Jeremiah speaks of Nebuchadnezzar as the servant of Jehovah (Jeremiah 27:6). One may notice, if only to reject, the exposition of the Targum, followed by some commentators, which refers the verse to the call of Abraham and the victory of Genesis 14.

He gave them.—Better,He giveth them,the future seen as present. The LXX. and some modern critics follow a reading which gives,he maketh them as dust, their sword as stubble.

(3)He pursued . . .—Tenses in the present, as before.

By the way that he had not gone—i.e., by a new untrodden path. So Tiglath-Pileser and other Assyrian kings continually boast that they had led their armies by paths that none had traversed before them. (Records of the Past,i. 15, v. 16.)

(4)I theLord . . .—The words are the utterance of the great thought of eternity which is the essence of the creed of Israel (comp.Exodus 3:14;Psalm 90:2;Psalm 102:26), and appear in the Alpha and Omega ofRevelation 1:11;Revelation 4:8. The identical formula, “I am He” meets us inIsaiah 43:10;Isaiah 43:13;Isaiah 46:4;Isaiah 48:12. It is probably used as an assertion of an eternal being in the “I AM” ofJohn 8:58.

(5)The isles saw it, and feared . . .—The words paint the terror caused by the rapid conquests of Cyrus, but the terror led, as the following verses show, to something very different from the acknowledgment of the Eternal. As the sailors in the ship of Tarshish called each man on his God (Jonah 1:5), so each nation turned to its oracles and its shrines. The gods had to be propitiated by new statues, and a fresh impetus was given to the manufacture of idols, probably for the purpose of being carried forth to battle as a protection. (Comp.1Samuel 4:5-7; Herod. i. 26.)

(6)Be of good courage.—Literally,Be strong: i.e.,work vigorously.

(7)So the carpenter.—The process is described even more vividly than inIsaiah 40:19. For “the carpenter,” readthe caster,the idol being a metal one. The image of lead or copper is then covered with gold plates, which are laid on the anvil, and are smoothed with the hammer; the soldering is approved by the artist, and then (supreme touch of irony) the guardian deity is fixed with nails, that it may not totter and fall.

(8)But thou, Israel, art my servant . . .—The verse is important as the first introduction of the servant of the Lord who is so conspicuous throughout the rest of the book. The idea embodied in the term is that of a calling and election, manifested now in Israel according to the flesh, now in the true Israel of God, realising its ideal, now, as in the innermost of the three concentric circles, in a person who gathers up that ideal in all its intensity into himself. The three phrases find their parallel in St. Paul’s language as to (1) the seed of Abraham according to the flesh; (2) the true seed who are heirs of the faith of Abraham; (3)theseed, which is none other than the Christ Himself (Romans 9:7;Galatians 3:7;Galatians 3:16). Here we have the national aspect, Israel as he is in the idea of God. So in the later language of Christian thought we have (1) the visible Church falling short of the ideal; (2) the spiritual Church approximating to the ideal; (3) Christ Himself, as identified with His people.

The seed of Abraham my friend.—The word for “friend” implies loving as well as being loved. Of all the names of Abraham, it has had the widest currency (comp.2Chronicles 20:7;James 2:23). For the Arabs of the present time Abraham is stillKhalil Allah—the friend of God, or simply,el Khalil, thefriend.

(9) From the ends of the earth.—Ur of the Chaldees, as belonging to the Euphrates region, is on the extreme verge of the prophet’s horizon.

From the chief men thereof.—Better,from the far-off regions thereof.

I have chosen . . .—Isaiah becomes the preacher of the Divine election, and finds in it, as St. Paul found, the ground of an inextinguishable hope for the nation of which he was a member. As in St. Peter’s teaching, it remained for them to “make their calling and election sure” (2Peter 1:10), though God, in the unchangeableness of His nature, had chosen them before the foundation of the world.

(10)Fear thou not . . .—The thought of the election of God gives a sense of security to His chosen.

I will strengthen thee.—The verb unites with this meaning (as inIsaiah 35:3;Psalm 89:21) the idea of attaching to one’s self, or choosing, as inIsaiah 44:14.

(11, 12)Behold . . .—The choice of the Servant has, as its complement, the indignation of Jehovah against those who attack him, and this thought is emphasised by a four-fold iteration. “They that strive with thee, &c,” represents the Hebrew idiom,the men of thy conflict,which stands emphatically at the end of each clause.

(14)Fear not, thou worm Jacob.—The servant of Jehovah is reminded that he has no strength of his own, but is “as a worm, and no man” (Psalm 22:6). He had not been chosen because he was a great and mighty nation, for Israel was“the fewest of all people” (Deuteronomy 7:7). As if to emphasise this, the prophet in addressing Israel passes from the masculine to the feminine, resuming the former in the second clause ofIsaiah 41:15, where he speaks of its God-given strength.

Thy redeemer . . .—i.e.,theGoelofLeviticus 25:48-49, the next of kin, who was the protector, the deliverer, of his brethren (Leviticus 25:43-49). Looking to the numerous traces of the influence of the Book of Job in 2 Isaiah, it seems not improbable that we have in these words an echo of the hope,“I know that my Redeemer liveth” (Job 19:25).

(15)A new sharp threshing instrument.—The instrument described is a kind of revolving sledge armed with two-edged blades, still used in Syria, and, as elsewhere (Micah 4:13), is the symbol of a crushing victory. The next verse continues the image, as inJeremiah 15:7;Jeremiah 51:2.

(17)When the poor and needy . . .—The promise may perhaps take as its starting-point the succour given to the return of the exiles, but it rises rapidly into the region of a higher poetry, in which earthly things are the parables of heavenly, and does not call for a literal fulfilment any more than “wines of the lees,” ofIsaiah 25:6.

(18)I will open rivers.—The words have all the emphasis of varied iteration. Every shape of the physical contour of the country, bare hills, arid steppes, and the like, is to be transformed into a new beauty by water in the form adapted to each: streamlets, rivers, lakes, and springs. (Comp.Isaiah 35:7.)

(19)I will plant in the wilderness.—A picture as of the Paradise of God (Isaiah 51:3), with its groves of stately trees, completes the vision of the future. The two groups of four and three, making up the symbolic seven, may probably have a mystic meaning. The “shittah” is theacacia,the “oil tree” thewild olive,as distinguished from the cultivated (Romans 11:17), the “fir tree” is probably thecypress,the“pine” stands for theplane,always—as in the opening of Plato’sPhœdrus,and the story of Xerxes in Herod. vii. 31,—the glory of Eastern scenery and the “box-tree” is perhaps thelarch,or a variety of cedar. The “myrtle” does not appear elsewhere in the Old Testament till after the exile (Nehemiah 8:15;Zechariah 1:8;Zechariah 1:10-11), but then it appears as if indigenous. It supplies the proper name Hadassah (Esther) inEsther 2:7.

(20)That they may see.—The outward blessings, yet more the realities of which they are the symbols, are given to lead men to acknowledge Him who alone would be the giver.

(21)Produce your cause.—The scene ofIsaiah 41:1 is reproduced. The worshippers of idols, as the prophet sees them in his vision hurrying hither and thither to consult their oracles, are challenged, on the ground not only of the great things God hath done, but of His knowledge of those things. The history of Herodotus supplies some striking illustrations. Crœus and the Cumœans, and the Phocæans, and the Athenians are all sending to Delphi, or consulting their seers, as to this startling apparition of a new conqueror.

Your strong reasons.—Literally,bulwarks,orstrongholds.So we speak ofimpregnableproofs.

(22)The former things.—Not, as the Authorised Version suggests, the things of the remote past, but those that lie at the head, or beginning of things to come—the near future. Can the false gods predict them as the pledge and earnest of predictions that go farther? Can they see a single year before them? We note that the challenge exactly corresponds to Isaiah’s own method of giving “signs” that his words are not idly spoken (Isaiah 7:10-14;Isaiah 38:7-8). The other meaning is maintained, however, by some critics as more in harmony withIsaiah 43:18. The things “for to come” lie, as it were, in the middle future, the “hereafter” ofIsaiah 41:23, in the more remote. All are alike hidden from the gods of the heathen oracles.

(23)Do good, or do evil.—The challenge reminds us of Elijah’s on Mount Carmel (1Kings 18:27). Can the heathen point to any good or evil fortune which, as having been predicted by this or that deity, might reasonably be thought of as his work? It lies in the nature of the case that every heathen looked to his gods as having sent blessings, or the reverse, but it was only Jehovah who could give the proof supplied by prediction.

(24)Behold, ye are of nothing.—This isthesumming up of the prophet, speaking as in the Judge’s name. The idol was “nothing in the world” (1Corinthians 8:4). The demonic view of the gods of the heathen does not appear, as in St. Paul’s argument (1Corinthians 10:20), side by side with that of their nothingness.

(25)I have raised up one from the north.—The north points to Media, the east to Persia, both of them under the rule of the great Deliverer.

Shall he call upon myname.—The word admits equally of the idea of “invoking” or “proclaiming.” It may almost be said, indeed, that the one implies the other. The words find a fulfilment in the proclamations of Cyrus cited in2Chronicles 36:22-23;Ezra 1:2-4

He shall come upon princes.—The Hebrew nounSaganis a transitional form of a Persian (Delitzch) or Assyrian (Cheyne) title for a viceroy or satrap.

As the potter treadeth clay.—Commonly the image describes the immediate action of Jehovah. (Jeremiah 18:6;Jeremiah 19:10). Here it is used for the supreme dominance of His instrument.

(26)Who hath declared . . .—The words paint once more the startling suddenness of the conquests of the Persian king. He was to come as a comet or a meteor. None of all the oracles in Assyria or Babylon, or in the far coasts to which the Phœnicians sent their ships of Tarshish, had anticipated this.

(27)The first shall say to Zion.—The italics show the difficulty and abruptness of the originals. A preferable rendering is, (1)I was the first that said to Zion, &c. Nooracle or soothsayer anticipated that message of deliverance (Ewald, Del.); or (2)a forerunner shall say. . . The words “Behold them” point to the returning exiles. The second clause fits in better with (2), and explains it. Jehovah sends a herald of good news (not Cyrus himself, but a messenger reporting his victories, or possibly Isaiah himself, as a more distant herald) to Jerusalem, to say that the exiles are returning.

(28) For I beheld, and there was no man—i.e.,no one who had foretold the future. Jehovah, speaking through the prophet, looks round in vain for that.

(29)They are all . . . their works . . .—The first pronoun refers to the idols themselves, the second to the idolaters who make them. In “confusion” we have the familiartohu.