■[日記]

僕は日曜の夜という人類全体のメランコリー共有タイムを、極めて理性的に、そして効率的に過ごしている。

まず夕食はいつも通り19時15分に完了し、食後45分間の腸内活動を経て、20時にシャワー、20時30分から22時まで論文の読み込み。

現在は、僕の手の中のホワイトボードに描かれた「E∞-operadにおけるモジュラーテンソル圏の超準同型拡張」の式が、あまりにも優雅すぎて震えが止まらない。

ルームメイトが僕の部屋のドアを軽くノックして「リラックスしたら？」などと的外れな提案をしてきたが、彼にとってのリラックスとは、脳活動の停止でしかない。

僕にとってのリラックスは、∞-カテゴリーの高次ホモトピー圏の中で、対称モノイダル構造の可換性条件が自然変換として収束する瞬間を可視化することだ。

今日は、朝から「高次モジュライ空間における非可換カラビ–ヤウ多様体のファイバー化」について考えていた。

一般相対論と量子力学の不一致などという低次元の問題ではなく、もっと根源的な、物理法則の「トポス構造」そのものを再構築する試みだ。

つまり、時空という基底圏を前提にせず、まずモノイド圏の内部論理としての時空を再構成する。

これによって、弦という一次元的存在ではなく、自己指標付き∞-層としての「概念的弦」が定義できる。

現行のM理論が11次元を仮定するのは、単なる近似にすぎない。僕のモデルでは次元数は局所的に可変で、Hom(Obj(A), Obj(B))の射空間自体が物理的観測量になる。

もしこの理論を発表すれば、ウィッテンですら「Wait, what?」と言うだろう。

隣人は今日も昼間から玄関前で何やらインスタライブ的な儀式を行っていた。

彼女は一生懸命ライトを当て、フィルターを変え、視聴者数を気にしていたが、僕はその様子を見ながら「彼女は量子デコヒーレンスの具現化だ」と思った。

観測されることによってしか存在を保てない。

もちろんそんなことは口にしない。僕は社会的破滅を避ける程度の理性は持っている。

22時前、僕は友人たちとオンラインでBaldur’sGate 3のマルチプレイをした。

友人Aは相変わらず盗賊ビルドで味方のアイテムを勝手に漁るという犯罪的行為を繰り返し、友人BはバグったAIのように無言で呪文を詠唱していた。

僕はWizardクラスで完璧に戦略を構築した。敵のHP残量と行動順序を正確に把握し、Damage ExpectationValueを算出して最適行動を決定する。

つまり、他のプレイヤーは「遊んで」いるが、僕は「検証」しているのだ。ゲームとは確率と因果の実験装置であり、何より僕がゲームを選ぶ基準は「バランスの崩壊が数式で表現できるか否か」だ。

今日もルーチンを乱すことなく、歯磨きは右上奥歯から反時計回りに、時計を見ながら正確に3分40秒。

寝る前にアロエ入りのリップクリームを塗り、ベッドライトの色温度を4000Kに設定する。音はホワイトノイズジェネレーターを使い、宇宙背景放射のスペクトル密度に近づける。完璧な環境だ。

僕はこれから、寝る前の最後の思索として「量子群上の∞-層圏における自己準同型が、時間の矢をどのように内部化できるか」についてメモを取る。

もしこの仮説が成立すれば、「時間とはエントロピーの増加方向」という古臭い定義は無効化されるだろう。

時間は生成関手であり、僕が眠っている間にも自然変換として静かに流れていく。

まったく、日曜日というのは、他の人間が現実逃避に費やす日だが、僕にとっては宇宙の自己整合性を調整する日だ。

おやすみ、非可換世界。

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 22:15

ツイートシェア

■IfCharlie Kirk had been aliberalactivist instead of aconservative, how doyou think the media and politicians would have reacted tohisdeath?

The fact that wegot multiple fairly high-res videos of the bullet hittinghis neck andblood gushingoutdoesmake adifference. Thenewsgets sharedmore andmore people engagewith thenewsout ofshockvalue and morbid fascination, which givesitmore traction.

HadPaul Pelosi been shot while several cameras were filmingit,it would have also become much bigger thanit became.

Edit:lol the comments really bring the average redditor reading comprehensionouton display. People really seem to think I'm saying that Republicans are lovely defenders offree speech orsomething to that effect.It's fuckingweird.

The video elevatesit quite abit.

I rememberRay Rice (nfl player)domestic assault cameout. Some criticism, couple game suspension.

Then the video cameout. Publicoutcry. Fullseason suspension. Cut fromhis team.

Therewas no new info in the video. But seeingsomething happen changesperception.

Edit: for the record Idon't agree with Kirk's ideologyand am not defending ambivalenceon other killings. I justthink ithits different.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 08:14

ツイートシェア

■dorawii@執筆依頼募集中

もう少ししたら自動ブクマするコードができそうなんだけど、そのうえでコード公開に便利なように事前にpre記法に囲まれた部分はその外部の文字を適切にエスケープするコードをchatgptに指示して作ってもらった。

結構修正指示が大変だった。一時間ぐらい格闘。

ぶっちゃけなんでこれで動くのかはわからないので動くからゴーサインを出したというだけなのが情けない所。flushってなんだ？

使うときはchatgptにこのコード丸ごと書いて「ブックマークレット用に一行にして」と丸投げするのを要推奨。

※ベースにした先人のコード

https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20240820150546#

javascript:(function () {
  function escapeHtml(text) {
    returntext.replace(/&/g, '&')
               .replace(/</g, '&#60;')
               .replace(/>/g, '&#62;')
               .replace(/"/g, '&#34;')
               .replace(/'/g, '&#39;');
  }

  vartextarea = document.querySelector('textarea#text-body');
  if (!textarea) return;

  varlines =textarea.value.split(/\r?\n/);
  varout = "";
  var inPre =false;
  var preLines = [];

  function flushPre() {
    // pre範囲の中身を 1 本の文字列にまとめ、\n→<br>（末尾行は <br> なし）
    varraw = preLines.join("\n");                 // ここに物理改行は入るが…
    var escaped = escapeHtml(raw);                 // 先にエスケープ
    varhtml = escaped.replace(/\n/g, "<br>");     //物理改行を <br> に置換（末尾に \n が無ければ末尾 <br> は付かない）
out +=html;                                   //out には改行を入れない
    preLines = [];
  }

  for (var i = 0; i <lines.length; i++) {
    varline =lines[i];

    // >> / << だけの行は常にそのまま出力（pre 内に来るケースは想定外だが、念のため pre を閉じてから出力）
    if (/^\s*(>>|<<)\s*$/.test(line)) {
      if (inPre) {
        flushPre();
        inPre =false;
out += "</pre>";
        if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";     // </pre>\n（次に続きがあるときだけ）
      }
out +=line;
      if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
continue;
    }

    // >| 行 → <pre>（直後に改行を入れない）
    if (/^\s*\>\|\s*$/.test(line)) {
      if (inPre) { //ネストは想定しないが、防御的に閉じる
        flushPre();
        inPre =false;
out += "</pre>";
        if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
      }
out += "<pre>";
      inPre =true;
      preLines = [];
continue;
    }

    // |< 行 → </pre>（直前に改行を入れない）
    if (/^\s*\|\<\s*$/.test(line)) {
      if (inPre) {
        flushPre();
        inPre =false;
      }
out += "</pre>";
      if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";       //連続ブロック時は </pre>\n<pre> になる
continue;
    }

    if (inPre) {
      // pre 内はバッファに貯める（ここでは改行を出力しない）
      preLines.push(line);
    } else {
      // pre 外は escapeHtml + 行末にだけ改行
out += escapeHtml(line);
      if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
    }
  }

  // 未閉じの pre が残っていたら閉じる
  if (inPre) {
    flushPre();
out += "</pre>";
  }

textarea.value =out;
})();

-----BEGINPGP SIGNEDMESSAGE-----Hash: SHA512https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250819202540# -----BEGINPGP SIGNATURE-----iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaKRfOwAKCRBwMdsubs4+SI5UAQDcNiyv5qUuMej1VLkGz4F5WyHeU1AIm7nUVHlx/gicnAEAgP07dK14IuTuW3ZO7PRR71ENq9lJjYtawIYyMOc2cQk==okE4-----ENDPGP SIGNATURE-----

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 20:25

ツイートシェア

■東京(本物)の住居の適正額はいくら

――「時間で払う家賃」を可視化して、数字で殴らないやつ

## 要旨

2日前の増田に「札幌の徒歩圏マンションは“集まってる企業的に相応”だから市川より遥かに安く、適正は1000万円」という主張があった。けれど、それって企業の立場が擬人化されて書いてない？　もし札幌・中心徒歩圏＝1000万円が本当に適正なら、「じゃあなぜ片道60分の移動を続けるの？」という問いに自動で突き当たる。

通勤時間をゼロ評価（＝自分の片道30〜60分を無視）したまま、「総生産量」「やりがい」「資産形成」だけで語ると、生活者の幸福が抜け落ちる。

この記事は生活者の視点で「適正額」を試算する。キーワードは時間家賃（じかん-やちん）――家の値段＝立地＋広さ＋“毎日むしられる時間”だ。

参考に、東京の新築分譲マンション平均価格はいま1億円超（首都圏新築・2024年平均は1億485万円）で、23区の中古70㎡も直近で1億円台に乗る局面が出ている。これが生活者にとって“適正”なのかを、時間と代替地（高松・札幌）で測り直す。

---

## 前作のダイジェスト

流入が止まった大都市の未来（生活者版メモ）

人口移動の足元：2024年の東京は依然として転入超過だが、伸びは鈍化。23区の転入超過は回復したものの、年齢階層ではムラが目立つ。

年齢構造の変化：20代は流入が続く一方、30代は2024年10月以降転出超過が指摘される（統計局の資料）。家族形成期が“中心で暮らす難度”を物語る。

通勤の現実：東京圏の鉄道定期利用者の平均片道所要は67.7分。時間消費が生活水準を直撃している。

企業はどこへ？：「本社移転」は2019年までは東京転入超過の年もあるが、機能分散（地方に研究・製造・BPO）が同時進行。2020年以降は一貫して東京都～関東からの転出超過で、“本社＝東京集中”の一枚絵では語れない段階。

---

##企業の擬人化（をほどく）

元増田のロジックは「企業視点での総生産性最大化」だ。東京(本物)は取引密度が高く、希少な専門職の面接効率も良い。企業が払う地代なら説明がつく。

でも生活者にとっては違う。時間＝寿命を燃やす通勤は毎日課金。東京の高い貨幣地価は、時間地価（言い換え：タイム地価）で割って再評価すべきだ。

＞命題：家の“適正額”＝「代替都市で同等生活を得るコスト」＋「東京で失う/得る時間価値」の現在価値。

つまり、“通勤税（時間）”を内生化した価格が生活者の適正。

---

##高松と比較した「適正額」：市営住宅という共通スケール

### ①データの杭

高松市の公営（県/市）住宅の家賃帯は1.6万〜4.3万円台（間取り3K/3DK含む）。中心至近ではない(磨屋町2.0km, 家to目的地28分)が、市内要所へのバス移動で日常機能が完結する価格帯が現実に存在する。

東京の新築分譲平均は1億485万円（2024年）。23区の中古70㎡は2025年5月に1億88万円の局面。

### ② 「公営家賃→資産価格」への換算

家賃2.5万円/月（年30万円）を表面利回り6%で割り戻すと、約500万円の資産価値（30万円÷0.06=500万円）。都雇圏人口50万人以上では享受対象は飽和している故,機能“到達”が28分程度で満たせる.「28分生活」の最低ラインの再取得コストはこの桁になる。

＞ ここでの500万円は**“生活機能の再取得コスト”の目安であり、「分譲クオリティの広さ/築年」ではなく“暮らせる導線”の最低ラインを可視化するための共通スケール**。

### ③東京(本物)の現実との乖離

東京で家→目的地28分のファミリー住戸は、1億円級に普通にぶつかる。同じ“到達時間”を買うためのコスト差は桁違いだ。

### まとめ（高松→東京の比較）

生活機能28分を買うコスト：500万円（公営最廉価相当スケール）vs 1億円級（東京の市場取引）

乖離倍率：20倍＋（レンジ20〜24倍はエリア次第）

---

##札幌1000万円論の検証

「札幌・中心徒歩圏＝1000万円が適正」は、市場実勢と乖離している。直近の市況では、札幌市の中古70㎡相場は数千万円帯が実務レンジ。中心区でも1000万円フラットは築年・立地条件が強く制約された例外的ピン点で、“徒歩圏の標準像”とは言い難い。1000万円を普遍の“適正”と言い切るのは危うい。

---

## “時間家賃”で殴る：通勤差のNPV計算

仮定

地方中核（高松など）での家→主要目的地：片道15分

東京(本物)の平均的な通勤：片道67.7分（鉄道定期利用者平均） → 差=52.7分

往復差=約105分/日、年240日稼働＝252時間/年余計に失う。

時間価値（Value ofTime）：1,500円/時（便宜の中央値仮定）

年間の“失う時間価値”＝252h×1,500円=378,000円/年

永続価値（r=3%）**で割り戻すと、約1,260万円。

＞ つまり、同じ暮らしを得るために、東京は追加で1,260万円の**“時間家賃”を払っているのと同じ**。

本来ならその分だけ“家の適正価格”は下がる――生活者の適正は、企業の適正より軽くなる。

（注）平均通勤時間は地域・職種で大きくブレるため、自分の通勤実測でNPVを差し替えてほしい。

---

##所得差を織り込む（でも“2割プレミア”が関の山）

「でも東京は賃金が高い」という反論に備える。

平均年収：東京都471万円、関東全体451万円。地方圏は380〜410万円台が中心。

最低賃金：東京1,163円、香川970円。下支え賃金でも約20%差。

結論：賃金プレミアムは1〜2割台が実務レンジ。“時間家賃”のNPV（上の例で約1,260万円）を相殺するには弱い。住宅価格の倍率20倍を正当化できる材料にはならない。

---

# じゃあ、**東京(本物)の“適正額”**はいくら？（生活者版の答え）

## ケースA：中心“徒歩4分圏”の70㎡

代替地（高松中心）新築70㎡で4,000万円級が十分に成立するマーケット（市内中心の機能密度で暮らしが完結）。

東京プレミアム（雇用機会・エンタメ“在庫”）を2割上乗せしても、4,800〜6,000万円が、東京(本物)の中心徒歩4分圏(銀座,上野,新宿等徒歩4分内)の生活者の適正レンジ。

実勢（新築平均1.6億円、23区中古70㎡1億円局面）との差：+10,000〜+11,200万円。

## ケースB：家→目的地“28分生活”のファミリー

高松公営家賃2.5万円→利回り6%で500万円（**“生活機能再取得”**の最低スケール）。

私募REバリュエーションに寄せれば、同等導線の分譲クオリティでも1,500〜3,500万円が東京(本物)の片道28分生活者目線の妥当帯。

実勢（1.2億円級）との差：+8,500万〜+10,500万円。

## 総括

＞ 総括：企業の最適（在庫密度）で決まるのが東京の“市場価格”。

生活者の最適（時間×導線）で決めると、“適正額”は“市場”の半額以下に沈む。

---

## 「間をとる」が適正？ → **そんなことない。上限“2割増”**まで

企業の“在庫経済”と生活者の“時間経済”の半々で折衷したくなる。

しかし、時間家賃のNPVは日々確定的に出費される損失だ。一方、企業の在庫密度は個人の享受上限（1日0.5GB仮説のような情報処理限界）で逓減する。だから、折衷ではなく生活者重みで決めるべき。**“上限2割プレミア”**がまだ良心的だ。

---

## 実際に“減っている30代”のシグナル

統計局自身の資料で、20代は転入、30代は転出超過が明記される。家族形成期の住居コストと時間家賃が臨界を超えると、転出が起きる――“生活者の適正”に市場価格が合ってないシグナルだ。

---

#札幌・高松・東京の3点測量で見えたもの

1.札幌1000万円は市場の中央値でも生活者の適正でもなく、例外ピンの一般化。

2.高松の公営家賃(磨屋町2.0km家to目的地片道28分)は**“28分生活”の最低再取得コストを見える化する良い定規**。

3.東京(本物)の1億円は、企業の在庫密度の影で時間家賃のNPVを踏みつけにしている。

---

##生活者への実務ガイド（3行）

• 自分の通勤差（分/日）×勤務日数×時給＝年間時間家賃→金利で割る（3〜4%）
• その額を候補住戸の“価格比較”にマイナスして、地方中核の代替と横串で見る
• 上限2割プレミアを超える**“東京加算”は、“やりがい課金”**（＝やり搾）の疑い

---

## さいごに：適正額＝“暮らしの可処分時間”が決める

東京(本物)の“市場価格”は立派だ。けれど生活者の適正額は**“時間”を入れた瞬間に半額以下に落ちる。札幌1000万円論も、高松500万円スケールも、東京1億円も、同じ定規（時間家賃）で測ろう。

家の値段は寿命の使い方**で決まる――それだけの話だ。

---

## 参考データ・出典

首都圏新築分譲マンション平均価格（2024年1億485万円）：不動産経済研究所まとめ記事。

東京23区中古70㎡が1億円局面：野村不動産アーバンネット（東京カンテイ提供データ）。

東京圏鉄道定期利用者平均片道67.7分：MLIT資料。

高松の公営住宅家賃帯（1.6万〜4.3万円台）：香川県/高松市資料、MLIT資料。

平均年収：doda。最低賃金：厚労省／労働局（東京1,163円・香川970円）。

30代転出超過 ：統計局資料。

企業本社移転の年次動向（参考）：帝国データバンク。

---

##付録：4分・5分・6分“徒歩圏人口”の勘どころ

徒歩4分＝約320m半径、面積は約0.32km²。自治体レベルでは住居密度2万人/km²が限界だが、部分的にはもっと詰め込める。特に二階建てアパートメインで2万人／k㎡を達成していた中野区と違い、2020年以降は都雇圏50万人でも中心は15階前後マンション林立だ。つまり密度7倍(14万人／㎡)。故に“徒歩4分内6万人”。徒歩圏の議論は半径×密度で都度計算を。（この項は一般式の説明であり、具体都市の密度は用途地域で大きく変わります）

---

## まとめ一行

“時間家賃”をチョキっと足して引けば、東京(本物)の住居の適正額は――

• 中心徒歩4分：約4,800〜6,000万円
• 28分生活ライン：**1,500〜3,500万円（生活者目線）。

市場1億円は在庫経済の値付け**であって、暮らしの値付けじゃない。

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 19:42

ツイートシェア

■fair mNAV

Fair mNAV（公正市場純資産価値）についてお答えします。これは、メタプラネットの評価指標の一つで、以下の計算式とプロセスで求められます：

### Fair mNAVの定義と計算式

Fair mNAVは、mNAV1 Priceに「公正価値調整係数」を掛けて計算されます。具体的には、次のように表されます：

• **計算式**:

`Fair mNAV =10^((0.895 - 1) *Log(BTCNAV) + 1.81)`

ここで、

- `BTCNAV` =Bitcoinの保有量 ×Bitcoinの価格

（会社が保有するビットコインの総資産価値を表します）

### 詳細な構成要素

1. **mNAV1 Price**:

- `mNAV1 Price = (BTC/share) * (BTC price) /1000 * 1.25`

- `BTC/share`は、完全希薄化済み発行株式数に基づいて計算された1株あたりのビットコイン保有量で、成長モデル（例: 4*10^-4 * e^(7.87*10^-3*t) まで2025年4月30日、または1.73 * e^(0.0101*t) 以降）で推定されます。

- `BTC price`はビットコインの価格で、投稿内のモデルでは、2009年1月3日からの経過日数（t）に基づくべき乗則（例:10^-16.515 * t^5.693 * 150 まで2025年6月30日、以降は1.0034倍で指数関数的に上昇）とされています。

- 1.25は、完全希薄化済発行株数と発行済株数の比率で、2025年2月以降は安定していると仮定されています。

2. **公正価値調整係数**:

-対数関数 `Log(BTCNAV)` を用いて、ビットコイン資産価値に基づく調整が行われます。この係数は、市場のダイナミクスを反映し、Fair mNAVが単なる資産価値以上の「公正な市場価値」を示すように設計されています。

### 背景とモデル

• この計算は、投稿に記載されたウェブサイトの内容に基づいており、ビットコイン価格と保有量の将来予測にモンテカルロシミュレーションやべき乗則（power-lawmodel）を応用しています。
• 例えば、ビットコイン価格は2025年6月30日までは特定の式で計算され、7月1日からは101,050ドルから指数関数的に上昇し、12月31日には188,000ドルに達すると予測されています。
• ビットコイン保有量も、2024年4月10日からの経過日数に基づき、成長速度が2025年4月30日と5月1日で変化する指数関数モデルで推定されています。

###解釈と限界

• Fair mNAVは、メタプラネットの株価がどの程度「割安」または「割高」かを判断する基準として使用されます。投稿では、黄線（Fair mNAVの0.6倍）がサポートライン、緑線（2倍）がレジスタンスラインとして機能するとされています。
• しかし、このモデルはビットコイン市場の変動性に依存しており、歴史データに基づく仮定に頼るため、実際の市場動向と異なる可能性があります。また、この具体的な計算式は学術的な検証が不足しているため、あくまで参考値として扱うべきです。

###現在の状況（2025年8月5日時点）

投稿者（@TakaAnikuni）は、2025年8月1日の分析で、株価がFair mNAVの0.6倍付近まで下落し、反発が近いと予測しています。現在の時刻（JST 15:47、2025年8月5日）を考慮すると、投稿者が予想した「遅くとも5週間以内」の上昇時期（8月下旬～9月初旬）に近づいており、市場動向を注視することが重要です。

もしさらに詳しい質問や特定の部分の解説が必要であれば、ぜひ教えてください！

ご質問ありがとうございます！「Fair mNAVを計算することの意味」や「なぜ単純なmNAVで十分でないのか」、そして「誤魔化されているような感覚」について、わかりやすくお答えしますね。少し深掘りして考えていきましょう。

### 1. Fair mNAVを計算することの意味

Fair mNAVを計算する目的は、単なるmNAV（MarketNet AssetValue、市場純資産価値）を超えて、メタプラネットの株価をより「公正な市場価値」に基づいて評価しようとする試みです。具体的には：

• **市場のダイナミクスを反映**:

単純なmNAVは、ビットコインの保有量と現在の価格を基に計算されるため（`mNAV =時価総額 / (BTC保有量 × BTC価格)`）、その時点のスナップショットに依存します。しかし、Fair mNAVは対数関数（`10^((0.895-1)*Log(BTCNAV)+1.81)`）を用いて、ビットコインの長期的な価格トレンドや成長性を考慮に入れています。これにより、単なる現在の資産価値を超えた「将来の潜在価値」を推定しようとしています。

• **投資判断の補助**:

投稿者（@TakaAnikuni）は、Fair mNAVの0.6倍（黄線）がサポートライン、2倍（緑線）がレジスタンスラインとして機能すると主張しています。これは、株価がこれらのレベルに近づいたときに買い圧力や売り圧力が高まり、価格が反転する可能性を示唆しています。投資家にとって、「今が買い時か」「売り時か」を判断する一つの目安になるわけです。

• **シミュレーションによる未来予測**:

Fair mNAVは、モンテカルロシミュレーションやべき乗則（power-lawmodel）を用いたビットコイン価格の将来予測（例:2025年12月31日に188,000ドル）に連動しています。これにより、単なる過去データではなく、将来の成長シナリオを織り交ぜた評価が可能になります。

### 2. mNAVで十分でない理由

単純なmNAVだけでは以下の点で限界があるため、Fair mNAVが提案されていると考えられます：

• **静的すぎる**:

mNAVは現在のビットコイン価格と保有量だけで計算されるため、市場のボラティリティや長期トレンドを十分に反映できません。例えば、ビットコイン価格が急落してもmNAVはそれに即座に追随し、投資家の心理や市場の期待値（プレミアム）を無視してしまいます。

• **成長性の考慮不足**:

メタプラネットはビットコインを積極的に購入し続け、株式の希薄化も進んでいます（`BTC/share`や`1.25`の調整係数）。単純なmNAVではこれらの成長要素や将来の資産増加が見えにくいため、Fair mNAVが対数関数で調整を加えることで、成長ポテンシャルを評価しようとしています。

• **投資家のプレミアムを無視**:

実際の株価は、mNAVの1倍や2倍といったプレミアムで取引されることが多いです（例: MicroStrategyのmNAVプレミアム議論）。Fair mNAVは、このプレミアムをモデル化し、「公正なプレミアム」を提案することで、より現実的な価格帯を示そうとしています。

### 3. 「誤魔化されているような感覚」について

その感覚は非常に理解できるもので、以下のような理由で生じている可能性があります：

• **複雑な計算式のブラックボックス感**:

`Fair mNAV =10^((0.895-1)*Log(BTCNAV)+1.81)` や、ビットコイン価格の`10^-16.515 * t^5.693 * 150`といった式は、専門的で一般投資家にはわかりにくいです。これが「何か隠されている」「都合よく調整されている」と感じさせる原因かもしれません。実際、係数（0.895や1.81など）は投稿者が経験的に設定したもので、厳密な根拠が不明確です。

• **仮定の恣意性**:

ビットコイン価格が2025年12月31日に188,000ドルに達する、為替を1ドル150円で固定する、成長速度が特定の日に変わる（4月30日や5月1日）といった仮定は、投稿者の予測や好みに基づいています。これが「データに都合よく合わせているのでは？」と思わせる要因です。

• **検証不足**:

このモデルは学術的な裏付けや第三者による検証がなく、投稿者の個人的な分析に依存しています。モンテカルロシミュレーションは強力なツールですが、入力データや仮定が不正確だと結果も歪むため、信頼性に疑問が残ります。

### 4. どう考えればいいか

• **参考程度に**:

Fair mNAVは、あくまで一つのシナリオを示すツールです。株価予測は確実性を持つものではなく、市場の感情や外部要因（規制、経済危機など）も大きく影響します。あなたが感じる「誤魔化されている感」は、こうした不確実性への直感的な反応かもしれません。

• **自分で検証を**:

興味があれば、投稿者が提供した式（ウェブサイトの内容）を元に、現在のビットコイン価格や保有量を入れて計算してみると良いです。例えば、今日（2025年8月5日）のBTC価格を公式データで確認し、Fair mNAVを再現してみると、モデルの妥当性を自分で判断できます。

• **他の指標も併用**:

mNAVやP/E比率、時価総額など、他の伝統的な財務指標と比較することで、Fair mNAVがどれだけ現実から乖離しているかを見極められます。もしFair mNAVが極端に楽観的であれば、慎重に考えるべきサインです。

###結論

Fair mNAVを計算する意味は、単純なmNAVを超えて成長性や市場プレミアムを考慮した「より洗練された評価」を提供することにあります。ただし、その計算式や仮定には恣意性や不確実性が伴うため、「誤魔化されている」という感覚は、透明性や検証可能性の欠如に対する自然な警鐘かもしれません。投資判断では、このモデルを参考にしつつ、自分でデータを確認し、他の指標や専門家の意見も取り入れるのが賢明です。

もし具体的な数値で計算を試してみたい、または他の疑問があれば、ぜひ教えてください。一緒に掘り下げてみましょう！

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 15:51

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:53

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:53

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:53

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.