  |
はてなキーワード:the faとは
MSDMANUAL の Pedophilic Disorder の項、冒頭に要旨が載ってるから読んでみ。
Pedophilic disorderis characterizedby recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with prepubescent children (generally ≤ 13 years); basedon clinical criteria,itis diagnosedonly when the patientis ≥ 16 years and ≥ 5 years older than the childwhois the target ofthe fantasies or behaviors.
「小児性愛障害は、思春期前の児童（通常13歳以下）との性的行為を伴う反復的で強烈な性的興奮を伴う空想、衝動、または行動によって特徴づけられる。臨床基準に基づき、患者が16歳以上であり、かつ空想や行動の対象となる児童より5歳以上年長である場合にのみ診断される。」
要するに、「（中高生の頃、）同級生でシコった」では「（患者が）空想や行動の対象となる児童より5歳以上年長である場合」に該当しないため、「Pedophilic Disorder」とは診断され得ないのだ。
The fact that wegot multiple fairly high-res videos of the bullet hittinghis neck andblood gushingoutdoesmake adifference. Thenewsgets sharedmore andmore people engagewith thenewsout ofshockvalue and morbid fascination, which givesitmore traction.
HadPaul Pelosi been shot while several cameras were filmingit,it would have also become much bigger thanit became.
Edit:lol the comments really bring the average redditor reading comprehensionouton display. People really seem to think I'm saying that Republicans are lovely defenders offree speech orsomething to that effect.It's fuckingweird.
The video elevatesit quite abit.
I rememberRay Rice (nfl player)domestic assault cameout. Some criticism, couple game suspension.
Then the video cameout. Publicoutcry. Fullseason suspension. Cut fromhis team.
Therewas no new info in the video. But seeingsomething happen changesperception.
Edit: for the record Idon't agree with Kirk's ideologyand am not defending ambivalenceon other killings. I justthink ithits different.
Hey everyone. Idon't know where else to post this. Ineed towriteit down before I convince myself Iwas just hallucinating. I’m a grad student inJapan, doing fieldworkon forgotten local folklore. That'swhy Iwasout in theabsolute middle ofnowhere in Gunmaprefecturelast night.
My planwas to visit a tiny, dying village called Yomi-touge (notits realname) that supposedlyhas some unique traditions. Of course, my phonelostsignal hours ago, and mycar'sGPS, which I bought in 2015, decided to have atotal meltdown. Thesun went down. The mountainroads are narrow and winding,and a thick, soupy fogstarted to roll in. The kind of wet, heavyair that makesyoufeellikeyou’rebreathing water. Iwas completely, hopelesslylost.
After whatfeltlike an eternity of drivingat a crawl, Isawit. Alight. A single, brutallybright rectangle oflight cutting through the fog. Aconvenience store.One of thosebig chainsyou see everywhere, aFamilyMart or aLawson, I couldn't tell whichat first.I’ve neverfelt so relieved inmy life. I parked thecar and practically ran inside, thelittle doorchime sounding way too loud in the dead silence.
The insidewas…normal. Toonormal. Thelights were humming with a high-pitchedbuzz that drilled into my skull. The shelves were perfectly stocked. Theair smelled of cheapair freshener andsomething else…somethingsweet and hot,likeozone or burntsugar.
Hewas ayoungguy,maybe myage. Pale, drenched in sweat, with dark circles underhiseyeslike bruises. He moved with a painful stiffness,like every jointwas rusted. He muttered a "Irasshaimase…" without even lookingat me,hiseyes fixedon the counter.Hisarms were covered in these intricate, dark tattoos, winding fromhis wrists up underhis sleeves. I figured hewas just sick, oron a roughshift. Ifelt bad forhim.
I grabbed a can of coffee and went to the counter. "Sorry to botheryou," Istarted inJapanese, "I'm prettylost. Couldyoutell me where I am?"
He looked up, andhiseyesdidn't seem tofocuson me.Itwaslike hewas lookingat ascreen a few inches in front of my face. "We do not provide directional information," he said,hisvoice aflat, rehearsed monotone. "Will that beall foryou?"
Okay,weird, but whatever.Maybeit's store policy.As he reached for my coffee,his sleeve slid up. The tattoosonhisarm… they weren’t just pictures. For a split second, Iswear toGod, the lines ofinkshifted. They writhed,like tiny black worms underhisskin,and a patch ofhis forearmglowed with afaint, sicklyredlight. He flinched, asharp intake ofbreath, and quickly pulledhis sleeve down.
I just froze. I couldn’t have seen that, right? Iwas tired, myeyes were playing trickson me.
The personwho walked in… Idon’t know how to describe them.Itwas aman, I think. Hewas tall and wore an old, soaked trench coat. Buthis face…itwaslike my brain refused to processit.Itwasn't that he had no face,itwas that myeyes wouldslide right offit.Itwas ablur, aglitch, a 404error inhuman form.
Theclerkdidn't seem surprised. Hedidn't even seem to seehimas strange.His posture just became evenmore rigid. Theredglowonhisarm pulsedagain,brighter thistime, visible throughhis sleeve.
The facelessmandidn't speak. He just stood there. Theclerk, without aword, turned. But hedidn'tgo to the coolers. He kepthis back to theman, and heldouthis left hand,palm up. I heard asoft, wet, squelching sound. From a small, dark slit in the center ofhispalm that I hadn't noticed before, a smallcarton of strawberrymilk, the kindyou give tokids, just… emerged.Itwas producedout ofhis hand.Itwas wet with a clear, viscous fluid.
He placediton the counter. "Hereis the requested product," theclerk said,hisvoice straining. "The transactionis complete."
The facelessman picked up the strawberrymilk. He putit inhis coatpocket. And then he just… faded. Hedidn’t walkout the door. He dissolved into the hummingair,likeheat haze. A second later, hewasgone.
Theclerk letout a long, shudderingbreath and swayedonhis feet. He leaned heavilyon the counter,his face sheet-white. He looked utterly, existentially exhausted. Hesaw me staring, my mouth hangingopen, the can of coffeestill in my hand.
For the firsttime, aflicker ofsomething real,somethinghuman, crossedhis face.Itwaspure, undiluted terror.
"You… are not a regular customer," he whispered,hisvoice trembling. "Your… conceptis too stable. Please. Leave."
Ididn'tneed to be told twice. I threw a 500yen coinon the counter and ranout of there so fast I think I broke the sound barrier. Ididn't eventake my coffee. I justgot in mycar and drove, Idon't know in which direction, I just drove.
I'mat a servicestationnow, about 100kmaway. Thesunis coming up. I can't stop shaking.Itwasn't adream.I knowitwasn't. Because when Iwas fumbling for my keys, I realized I had accidentally grabbed thereceipt from the counter.
It’s not for my coffee.It’s for the other transaction.It justhasoneitem listed.It doesn't say "StrawberryMilk."It says:
ITEM: CONCEPTUAL SALVATION (FLAVOR:CHILDHOOD NOSTALGIA) - 1 UNIT
PRICE: ¥0
METHOD: ANNULMENT
Has anyone seen a storelike this? What thehellis happening in the mountains of Gunma? Whatdid I see? AndGod, that poorkid working the counter. Heisn't in trouble. He's a part ofit. He's themachine.
Please, Iam writing toyou with desperation andI will be relieved ifyou couldreply soon.
Mynameis Julian Bikram, I had a fiance and we have been livingtogether since 2019 with adaughter.
Heis agoldbrokerand a foreigner. Hewas attacked in 2022by bandits while hewas in agoldmining site and died after somedays in the hospital.
Since the incident happened, noonehas contacted me fromhis familyasidehis localfriendshere that came for condolence.
Please , I can't keep waiting forhis relatives, thisis 3 years of no contact from them,it's obvious theydon't know us.
I have spoken withhis bankhere, they confirmed hehas a floating balance inhis accountand after much deliberation for them to release the money to me, they said I should give them the contact ofhis relative.
Iamhelplesswith their decision , because idon't knowhis people, they have not contacted us since the incident whichis extremely understandable that theydon't know about us.
Therefore please, iam appealing toyou (basedon thereality thatyou have the samelastnamelikehim) to stand for measthe family member, so that they canaccept to release the money back to me.
The bankis notasking forany payment
They areonlyasking forhis relatives to be awareand agreedwith them to pay me
Please,I want you to help me for the sake of my child's support, even if we canshare the money.
Please, for the sake of humanity, please help me.
Juilan
要約すると
差出人は「ジュリアン・ビクラム」と名乗り、婚約者がいたがその婚約者が2022年に金鉱山で強盗に襲われて死亡したという話をしています。婚約者の家族とは連絡が取れず、銀行に預けられているお金を受け取るためには親族の同意が必要だと銀行に言われたと主張しています。
そこで、あなたが婚約者と同じ苗字を持っているという理由で、代わりに親族として名乗り出てほしいと頼んでいます。報酬としてそのお金を分け合うことを提案し、「人道的な理由で助けてほしい」と懇願しています。
おもろいからやり取りしようかな
【悲報】マーベル「ファンタスティック4」のインタビューで役者たちがキャラ改変と政治を語り大ブーイング！？「なぜ政治の話ばかりするのか？」「スタッフがキャラクターをまったく理解していない！」
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VBE2NQeqZE
ジェンダーポリティクスとかでたらめなことを言うことを投資家が支持するのは異常で、何らかの裏金でも流れているとしか思えない。ジェンダーポリティクスは単なるでたらめで妄想で学問ではない。
単純い利権のためにやっているだけ、ムダ。こいつらの不平等は単なる妄想に過ぎない。全部金と利権だけ。公金チューチュースキームに過ぎない。
ファンタスティックフォーは公開３か月前に再撮影に入っているとのこと。
絶対に売れない映画を大金をかけて作り、映画館をからにするにも拘わらず投資家やファンドが支持するのは、どこかに金が流れていないと説明がつかない。
そもそもゴームズの女はドアマットどころかバリア貼っていたじゃないか。
全員ゴームズを読んだことも見たこともないとしか言いようがない。こんな馬鹿どもを出せばそら怒るわ。
Fandom Pulse
@fandompulse
Vanessa Kirby Confirms 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' ExploresGenderPolitics With Sue Storm
Culture Crave 🍿
@CultureCrave
JosephQuinnonhis adaptation ofJohnny Storm in #FantasticFour
"Kevin Feige and I were speaking about previous iterations ofhim ... Hewas brandedas thiswomanizing, devil-may-careguy, butis thatsexy thesedays? Idon't think so. Thisversion ofJohnnyis less callous with other people's feelings"
ジョセフ・クインが『ジョニー・ストーム』の翻案について語る#FantasticFour
「ケヴィン・ファイギと私は、以前のジョニーについて話していました…彼は女好きで、何事にも動じない男というレッテルを貼られていましたが、今どきそれが魅力的でしょうか？私はそうは思いません。今のジョニーは、他人の気持ちにそれほど冷淡ではありません」
翻案もなにもそもそもゴームズ見ていないとしか言いようがないレベルで程度が低い。
THE FANTASTIC FOURDirector And Cast Reveal SomeHUGE Changes To TheHuman Torch And InvisibleWoman
とても良い質問です。
実は、こうした社会的な対立や論争について、タルムードは深い知恵を与えてくれます。タルムードはまさに「議論」の書でありながら、その目的は対立ではなく、真理の追求と平和的共存です。
まず前提として、タルムードには「エルケ・アヴォット（פרקי אבות, Ethics ofthe Fathers）」という倫理的な教えがあり、その中でこう説かれています：
"אֵיזֶהוּ חָכָם? הַלּוֹמֵד מִכָּל אָדָם."
つまり、たとえ自分と考えが異なる人であっても、その人から学ぶ姿勢を持つことが重要だとされています。SNSでの男女論争は、しばしば「勝ち負け」や「正しさの押し付け」になりがちですが、タルムード的な視点では「相手の声を聴く」「違いから学ぶ」ことが平和への第一歩です。
さらに、タルムードはよく「争いは天の名のためにあるべし」という考え方を持っています。
つまり、争いがあったとしても、それが純粋に真理を求めるためであれば価値がある。しかし、自己の名誉や他人を傷つけるための争いは避けなければならない、と。
1.相手の意見を尊重し、聴く姿勢を持つ。→「すべての人から学ぶ者」になる。
2.議論は目的を見失わないこと。→「天の名のための争い」はよいが、私的な感情での争いは避ける。
"הֱוֵי מִתַּלְמִידָיו שֶׁל אַהֲרֹן, אוֹהֵב שָׁלוֹם וְרוֹדֵף שָׁלוֹם."
人間一人ひとりには無限の価値があるとタルムードは教えます（サンヘドリン37a）。
ですので、SNSの論争を鎮めるためには「勝つこと」ではなく、「共に知恵を深め合うこと」が目的だと意識を変えることが大切です。
当然白人ではないうえに、白雪姫を完全に侮辱しているため、それと区別するために茶雪姫と呼ばれる。
StillDevonTracey
@TheXReportCard
REU
@REU54948702
白雪姫の実写映画の評価と、演者の映画に関係ないとこでの主義主張は全く関係ないよ
ガルガドットがイスラエル支持してても女王に相応しい美しさであることに変わりなく、フリーパレスチナを唱えるレイチェルゼグラー がオリジナル白雪姫を馬鹿にしたのも変わりない
850 件の表示
イスラエル出身、元軍人、そして当然パレスチナでイスラエルが虐殺しても正当化しており、パレスチナ関係者を敵に回している。一方ゼグラーはパレスチナを支持している。彼女はある意味プロパガンダであり、スパイとも言っていい。スパイが隠れていなくてもできる仕事がプロパガンダ。映画では善戦したという評価にはなるが、総合すると映画には誰一人として支持できる人間が存在しないのである。
スティーヴン・スピルバーグ監督の『ウエスト・サイド・ストーリー』で銀幕デビューを飾った彼女は、南米コロンビアの血をひくラテン系。
茶雪姫はスピルバーグの推薦もあった。
映画外の問題もさることながら、ストーリーが破綻している。まず王子さまは出てこない。７人の小人はCG、なのに悪役の小人は人間。リーダーのように描かれるが掃除させるとブータれるクソガキ。白雪姫にするため、吹雪の夜に生まれたとか後付けの設定。
何がsheherhersじゃ。お前はクローン２号かなにかか？人に向かって代名詞を指定するんじゃない。ポリコレとか言っているけど全く意味がない。コミュ障でしょ。
下のリンクによると11月にトランプが当選すると泣きを入れたらしいが、当然、発言には責任を取るのがあたりまえ。これだけZ世代だのなんだの言っておいて謝罪だけで済むわけないだろ。21歳でヨチヨチするほど世界は甘くない。
Zegler inNovember apologized forher political comments, saying the presidential election causedher to lashoutnegatively.
“Hatredand anger have caused us tomove further and furtheraway frompeace and understanding, and Iamsorry I contributed to thenegative discourse,”she said. “Iam committed to contributing positively toward a bettertomorrow.”
アニメ版は怖すぎる
女性（白雪姫）につきまとう男性（王子）のラブストーリーに焦点があてられていた。奇妙よ、奇妙だわ」と発言。オリジナル版に出てくる王子を“ストーカー”と表現し、そういった男性を登場させる物語を「時代遅れ」と語った
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/23c9258538f2c2487793a3aa427308172392ab20:『白雪姫』を演じたラテン系女優、「王子はストーカー」と発言し炎上も…評価は上々？]
「真実の愛があると夢見ていない。彼女の夢はリーダーになること。亡くなった父親が『恐れを知らず、公正で勇敢で偽らなければなれる』と教えてくれたリーダーになりたいと思っている」
https://www.elle.com/jp/culture/celebgossip/a44812189/snow-white-rachel-zegler-feminism-gaslighting-230815/:実写版『白雪姫』のレイチェル・ゼグラー、アニメ版のプリンセスを批判 「偽フェミニスト」だと反論される]
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jswWg9293MM
このようにどうやって映画館に人が来ないようにするため、社会活動家やお金をもらった批評家、何より主役の素晴らしいネガキャンがあった。
Z世代以前にメスガキでしかない。アイドルにすらなれないのだからガキである。
ディズニー実写版「白雪姫」がこれほど物議を醸す6つの理由。配役への差別的な批判だけではない
白雪姫役にラテン系俳優が起用されたことへの人種差別的批判だけではない。いったい何がここまで物議を醸しているのか。
https://www.huffingtonpost.jp/entry/story_jp_67da03bde4b04eaabffbc824
ゼグラーさんはTwitterで「ネット上で私を擁護してくれる人たちからの愛にはとても感謝しています」と述べた一方、「私のキャスティングに関する無意味な談話にはタグ付けしないでほしい」「本当に見たくない」と投稿。
幼少期のゼグラーさんが白雪姫と「美女と野獣」のベルに扮した写真と共に、「すべての子どもが、何があってもプリンセスでなれることを知っていて欲しい」とコメントを添えた。
人種差別とか言って批判を回避しようとするアホが多過ぎである。これ書いたやつもまとめてクビにすべきだ。一番の被害者はディズニーと映画ファンである。この辺からもZ世代は単なるお調子者のメスガキで責任感が全くないことがわかるし、甘やかされている。
ディズニーは数十のメディアを『白雪姫』プレミア上映に招待しなかったと報じられている。複数の報道機関は、この小規模なイベントは映画をめぐる否定的な感情への反応であると示唆した。
露骨な差別主義者ってディズニーの事なんじゃないか？誰一人取り残さないとかマイノリティへの配慮？
ジョー・ローガン、興行的に失敗した『白雪姫』の調査をDOGEに要請
資金の流れがおかしい。確かに王子もいないし、７人の小人はCGなので、費用がかかっていない。一体どこへ消えたのか。
Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
Teenageboys aregoing absolutely nuts in movie theaters during the newMinecraft Movie, throwingpopcorn in theair and even bringinglive chickens intothe theater.
Thisisthe film crushingSnowWhiteat thebox office rightnow.
The fansgo nuts when Jack Black's character yells "Chicken Jockey," whichis a rare baby zombie that rideson the back of a chicken inMinecraft.
"It’s way too funny.It’s been atotalblast. I’m just laughing my brainsout everytimesomeone sends me a new video," saiddirectorJared Hess.
TheMinecraft Movieis the biggest opening of 2025 so far, crushingSnowWhite.
Itmade $301 million globally in the opening weekend compared toSnowWhite's opening weekend of $86.1 million
10代の少年たちは、映画館で新作『マインクラフト』の上映中に大騒ぎし、ポップコーンを空中に投げたり、生きた鶏を劇場に持ち込んだりしている。
ジャック・ブラック演じるキャラクターが「チキンジョッキー」と叫ぶと、ファンは大騒ぎになる。チキンジョッキーとは、『マインクラフト』でニワトリの背中に乗る珍しいゾンビの赤ちゃんのことである。
「面白すぎる。本当に最高だ。誰かが新しいビデオを送ってくれるたびに、大笑いしちゃう」と監督のジャレッド・ヘスさんは語った。
生きた鶏？とりあえず３倍以上の差がある。
Mr.Alf
@45yy561
Just learned that theMinecraft moviebeat theSnowWhite movie in thebox office in a week.
#MinecraftMovie #Minecraft #SnowWhiteTH
マインクラフトの映画が1週間で白雪姫の映画の興行収入を上回ったことを知りました。
What they had beenbuildingwas a community. A community in which people went to every imaginable length to helpout every single person they could—a place whereinternational trade policy andCDOs were mere distant thoughts.
Butasis they waythe world worksnow, small towns in smallemptystates, a hundred years of communitybuilding or not, are just simply a sacrificethe powers that be are willing tomake inexchange for a mere fewmore bips.
My papawas forced into retirement in 2011, and mynana stayed workingat the school for thenext decade. My papa though,wasn’t quite willing to throw in the towel. He tried increasing the size ofhis herd of brangus, but alas, cattle farminghas been acash-negativeendeavor for several decades.
LikeWhirlpoolall the other manufacturingplants. Therewas no work to befound for the thousands of people combinedplant workers that had been laid off in the wake of 2008. Every single way of making an honest living had up andgone with the wind toMexico and EastAsia.
Therewasnothing left butbeing aGasstation,Dollar General orWalmartcashier, andWalmart paid $7.25 an hour back then.
Butyou’d be hard pressed to even workat agasstation. There areonlytwogasstations immediately around that 1,200-person town; andone of them just wentout of business, the otheris ownedby a Pakistani family.
As aconsequence, the average household income in that townisnow ~$30,000 a year. 90% of the children areon free and reducedlunch,most ofthe families that remain areonstateassistance, and opioid and meth usehas reached unprecedented rates.
And yet, “learn to code” they contemptuously sneer,all while gleefully kicking the door wideopen to aswarm of cheap, barely-proficient immigrants, tanking the tech labor market behind everyone’s back.
4/6
彼らが築き上げてきたのはコミュニティでした。人々が考えられる限りのあらゆる手段を講じて、できる限りのあらゆる人々を助けるコミュニティであり、国際貿易政策やCDOが単なる遠い考えである場所でした。
しかし、現在の世界の仕組みでは、小さな空っぽの州の小さな町は、コミュニティの構築が100年であろうとなかろうと、権力者がほんの少しの利益と引き換えに喜んで払う犠牲に過ぎません。
私の父は 2011 年に強制的に退職させられ、祖母はその後10 年間学校で働き続けました。しかし、父は諦めるつもりはありませんでした。ブランガスの群れを増やそうとしましたが、残念ながら、牛の飼育は数十年にわたって赤字が続いていました。
ワールプール社のような他の製造工場も同様です。2008 年以降に解雇された工場労働者を合わせた数千人に仕事は見つかりませんでした。まともな生計を立てる手段はすべてメキシコや東アジアに消えていきました。
ガソリンスタンド、ダラージェネラル、またはウォルマートのレジ係になるしか選択肢はなく、当時ウォルマートの時給は 7.25ドルでした。
しかし、ガソリンスタンドで働くことさえ難しいでしょう。人口 1,200 人のその町のすぐ近くにはガソリンスタンドが 2 つしかありません。そのうちの 1 つは最近廃業し、もう 1 つはパキスタン人の家族が経営しています。
その結果、その町の平均世帯収入は現在年間約3万ドルです。90%の児童は無料または割引の昼食を食べて、残っている家族のほとんどは州の援助を受けており、オピオイドとメタンフェタミンの使用率は前例のないレベルに達しています。
それでも、彼らは「コーディングを学べ」と軽蔑的に冷笑し、安っぽくてほとんど熟練していない移民の群れに喜んで扉を大きく開け放ち、誰も知らないうちにテクノロジー労働市場を崩壊させている。
https://x.com/FedPoasting/status/1908020399838724436
Bugman Hegel
@FedPoasting
My family, stretching back to the 1600s,has given theirblood, sweat, andtears making this country whatitis.Buildingit up from dirt. Fromnothing.
400 years of living in unimaginably hostile conditions. Braving the disease, deadly weather, tribalnations, treachery, and lawlessness thatis inherent to an ungoverned, unsettled territory. Thisnationwas built, brickby brick,by bravest, toughest,most resilient peopleonthe face of theearth.
And yet, for the past 60 years, the academic sophists in theivory towers, thepigs inWashington, and the good-for-nothing parasites of the banking class have notonly seenitfit tospiton their names, their sacrifices, their community, theirrace, and their religion, but alsospiton their legacies, their children, their grandchildren, and their rightful inheritance. There are not the words in theEnglish language to describe theevil of the orchestrated treachery thatthe UnitedStates government and those so interested, have inflictedon the inheritors of thisnation.
Theblood thatwas spilled carving thisnationout of thegod-forsaken backwatersitwas,was a real, material thing.Blood,like people,is a material thing. Andnations are comprised of people. Americais a people.Ideas can’t shedblood;only people can.Ideas can’t sacrifice;only people can.
To call America an “idea”aloneis to forsakeall of thosewho shed their realblood andlost their real lives to construct the verycomfort and luxury required tosit back and even considercalling such a sacrifice an “idea.”
私の一族は 1600年代まで遡り、血と汗と涙を流してこの国を今の姿に築き上げてきました。土から、何もないところから築き上げてきたのです。
想像を絶するほど過酷な状況で 400 年間暮らしてきました。病気、恐ろしい天候、部族国家、裏切り、そして統治されていない未開拓の領土につきものの無法状態に立ち向かってきました。この国は、地球上で最も勇敢で、最もタフで、最も粘り強い人々によって、レンガを一つずつ積み上げて築かれました。
しかし、過去 60 年間、象牙の塔にいる学問上の詭弁家、ワシントンの豚野郎、銀行家の役立たずの寄生虫たちは、彼らの名前、彼らの犠牲、彼らのコミュニティ、彼らの人種、彼らの宗教に唾を吐くだけでなく、彼らの遺産、彼らの子供、彼らの孫、そして彼らの正当な相続財産にも唾を吐きかけてきました。米国政府とそれに関心を持つ人々がこの国の継承者に与えた組織的な裏切りの悪を表現できる言葉は英語には存在しません。
かつて神に見放された辺境の地であったこの国を切り開くために流された血は、現実の物質的なものでした。血は、人々と同様、物質的なものです。そして国家は人々で構成されています。アメリカは人々です。思想は血を流すことはできません。できるのは人々だけです。思想は犠牲を払うことはできません。できるのは人々だけです。
アメリカを「理念」と呼ぶことは、ただ座ってそのような犠牲を「理念」と呼ぶことを考えるために必要な快適さと贅沢さを築くために、本当の血を流し、本当の命を失ったすべての人々を見捨てることです。
https://x.com/FedPoasting/status/1908020403059949699
Bugman Hegel
@FedPoasting
For thelast six decades, every singlelegacy institution, academic institution, government institution, andNGOhas spent the past decadecalling the very peoplewho built thisnation variousiterations of uniquely, inherently,ontologicallyevil,calling us racists, and rapists, and genociders, and slavers, and oppressors, and backwoods, and inbreds, and reprobates, andwhite trash—all the while not-so-secretly making contingency plans for what to dowith those of us ultimately considered excess biomass.
The American people decidedat the ballotbox.It’stime to pay thepiper.
Bring back manufacturing, slap tariffson imports, close the borders, deport the illegals,fire every singlespiteful government-funded mutant, and remove thedollar fromits positionas world reserve currency. Americans, especially those of uswho consider ourselves “ethnically” Heritage American—do not care how muchit’s going to cost us in the short term; we are willing to sacrifice ifit means wedon’t have tosit andwatch what’s left of our rightful inheritance be burned to the ground.
We want thoseguilty to pay their due penance. We wantheads to roll.
過去 60 年間、あらゆる伝統的な機関、学術機関、政府機関、NGO は、この国を築いたまさにその人々を、さまざまな意味で独特で、本質的に、存在論的に悪であると呼び、私たちを人種差別主義者、強姦者、大量虐殺者、奴隷所有者、抑圧者、田舎者、近親交配者、堕落者、白人ゴミと呼び続けてきました。その間ずっと、余剰バイオマスと見なされる私たちのような人々をどうするかについて、それほど秘密ではない緊急時対応計画を立てていました。
製造業を復活させ、輸入品に関税を課し、国境を封鎖し、不法移民を国外追放し、政府資金で賄われている意地悪な変異種を一人残らず解雇し、ドルを世界の準備通貨の地位から排除する。アメリカ人、特に自分たちを「民族的に」伝統的なアメリカ人だと考える私たちは、短期的にどれだけの費用がかかるかなど気にしない。正当な遺産の残りが焼き尽くされるのをただ座って見過ごす必要がないなら、喜んで犠牲を払うつもりだ。
私たちは罪を犯した者たちに当然の罰を与えてほしい。首が飛ぶことを望んでいる。
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Theassertion thatEnglish constitutes a "hostile language"is emblematic of a profound misunderstanding of the intricate relationshipbetween language, culture, andcommunication. Such a reductionistviewpoint, often stemming from cultural insularity or an oversimplified interpretation of global dynamics, fails to recognize the multifacetedand adaptivenature of languageas a vehicle for connection rather than division.
Language, initsmost fundamental form, servesas a sophisticated instrument forhumanexpression and interaction.It encapsulates the complexities of thought,emotion, and cultural nuance. To labelEnglishas "hostile"is to overlookits roleas a global lingua franca that facilitates dialogue among diverse cultures. This designation notonly undermines the richtapestry ofEnglish-speaking societies but also dismisses the language's capacity forevolutionand adaptation, reflecting the very societiesit serves.
Critics often conflate the global dominance ofEnglish with cultural imperialism, positing thatits prevalence signifies an erosion of local languages and cultures. However, this perspective neglects the agency of non-nativespeakerswho actively adoptand adaptEnglish to meet their communicativeneeds.The expansion ofEnglishis not merely an imposition;itis a testament toits utility and flexibility in diverse contexts.By embracingEnglish, individuals from various linguistic backgrounds enhance their communicative repertoire without relinquishing their cultural identities.
To characterizeEnglishas "hostile" implies an intrinsic aggression or antagonism within the languageitself—a notion thatis fundamentally flawed. Hostilityis not an inherent characteristic of language but rather areflection of the sociopolitical contexts in whichitis employed. The potential for misunderstanding orconflict arises not from the linguisticmedium but from the intentionsand attitudes ofitsspeakers. Thus, vilifyingEnglish misplaces responsibility for interpersonal and intercultural tensions that are often rooted in broader societalissues.
In an increasingly interconnected world,English functionsas acrucialbridge across cultural divides.It enables collaboration in vitalfields suchas science, technology, diplomacy, and commerce, fostering innovation and mutual understanding. Proficiency inEnglish can empower individuals and communitiesby providingaccess to resources and opportunities that mightotherwise remain elusive. Thisempowerment challenges the notion of hostility; instead,it highlights the language's roleas an enabler of progress and cooperation.
In conclusion, the characterization ofEnglishas a "hostile language" represents a reductive oversimplification that fails to capture the complexities inherent in linguistic interaction within our globalizedsociety. Rather than viewing languages through a lens of hostility or division, we should embrace their potential for fostering understanding and collaboration.Itis imperative to cultivate amore nuanced appreciation for the role ofEnglish—andindeedall languages—in shaping our sharedhuman experience.Only through such intellectual rigor can wetranscend divisive narratives andcelebrate the richdiversity that language offers in our interconnected world.
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/528f479f-fd3c-43fd-9463-7c2923560573
ある人の嗅覚倫理に関する論文だけど、文献だけで匂いが影響を与えると書いてるから女性に学位を与えるのは無駄だと言われる。
論文書くなら、裁判官にセンサーを取り付けるなり、何人かの被験者にルールを守った上で反応を調べるとかやりようはあったはず。
アタリマエのことを調べるというのは裁判での証拠提出のときに役立つからもっと調べてほしい。
けど、統計学的手法を駆使するなどして、裁判官が9割型認める内容でないと価値がない。
contemporary relevance. I suggest that smell very often invokes identity in a way that signifies an individual’s worth and status in an inarguable manner that short-circuits consciousreflection. This can be accounted forby acknowledging olfaction’s strongly affectivenature, which produces such strong bodily sensations and emotions that reflexivityisbypassed in favour of a behavioural or cognitive solution thatassuages the intense feelingmost immediately. Olfactorydisgust, therefore, tends to result in rejection, while harmful forms of olfactorydesiremay result in sublimation or subjugation. My thesisis particularly attentive to tensionsand ambivalences that complicate the typically bifurcated affectivespectrum of olfactory experiences, drawing attention to (dis)pleasurable olfactory relations that have socio-political utility. I argue that literary fictionis notonly anarena in which olfactorylogics can be instantiated, but also a laboratory in which possibilities for new kinds of relations and connections can be fostered and tested. ChapterOne exploreshow smell can be used to indicate class antipathies, partlyas they relate tohomelessness,beginning withGeorge Orwell’s seminal non-fictiontext, TheRoad to Wigan Pier (1936), before considering Iain Sinclair’s TheLastLondon (2017) and Bong JoonHo’s Parasite (2019). In ChapterTwo I explorethe fantastical, idealistic, and utopic thinking that surrounds olfaction, which presents smellas fundamentally non-human,byaddressing J. M. Coetzee’sDisgrace (1999), Virginia Woolf’s Flush (1933), Rachel Yoder’s Nightbitch (2021), and Laura Jean McKay’s The Animals in That Country (2020). Chapter Three focuseson the intersectional olfactory dimensions of ‘misogynoir’—the coextensive anti-Black racism and misogyny that Black women experience—and considers Toni Morrison’sTar Baby (1981), Bernice McFadden’sSugar (2000) andRaven Leilani’s Luster (2020). In Chapter Four, I conceptualise an oppressive olfactorylogic, whichis used against women and girls in order to legitimise their harassment or abuse, drawing primarilyon Vladimir Nabokov’sLolita (1955), but also Patrick Süskind’sPerfume (1985). ChapterFivediscussestwo forms of olfactorydesire—perversion and queerness—which have separate moral valences. Iaddress J. M. Coetzee’s The Master of Petersburg (1994),Ann Quin’sBerg (1964), and SamByers’ ComeJoin OurDisease (2020),and argue for fiction’s role in reorienting readers’ habitual relations to olfaction.
2024-06-25
In the ever-evolving travel industry, travelportal have become fundamental tools for businesses looking to enhance customer experienceIt's streamline operations.With traveler increasingly relyingondigital platforms tobookeverything from flights tohotels, theneed for sophisticated,user-friendly,It's high-performing travelportalshas never beenmorecrucial. Thegrowth of this sectoris drivenby numerous factors, including technological advancements, consumer behaviorshifts,It's the quest fororganization. Thisarticle explores thetop trends in travelportals development that every business should pay attention to in 2024It'sbeyond.
1.ArtificialIntelligence andMachine Learning in TravelPortal Development
ArtificialIntelligence (AI) andMachine Learning (ML) have quickly become foundational components of travelportal development. These technologiesare revolutionizing the way businesses personalize services, predict consumer behavior, and optimizebooking processes.AI andML algorithms analyze large data sets to understand customers preferences,allowing for real-time customization of travel recommendations. From dynamic pricing models to
customized travel suggestions,AI help businesses offer an unequaleduser experience.
For instance,AI chatbotsare becoming successively popular for customer service. They cananswer customer queries24/7,assist inbookings,It's even provide real-time travel updates, enhancing the overall customers experience. Furthermore,AI-powered tools suchas a recommendation engines analyze pastbooking behavior to suggest tailoreditineraries, making travel planning much easier foruser.
2.Mobile-First Approach for TravelPortal Development
With the increasing use of smartphones,as amobile first approachis no longer optional for businesses in the travel industry.MoreIt'smoretravelersare relyingon their smartphones forbooking flights, boardinghouse,It'sactivitieson thego. For travelportals tostay competitive, ensuring seamlessmobile optimizationiscrucial.
Amobile optimized travelportal ensures thatusers haveaccess to the same features and functionalitieson theirmobile devicesas they wouldon adesktop.It’s not just about making the site responsive—it’s about creating an intuitive, fast, and easy to navigate experience. This includes featureslikemobile-specific payment options,mobilecheck-in forairlinesIt'shotels,It's easyaccess to customers support.
3. Integration of Blockchain for Secure Transactions
Blockchain technologyis makingwaves across various industries, and the travel sectoris no exception. Blockchain based travelportals offer a significant advantage whenit comes to securityIt's transparency. Blockchain’s ability to provide secure, tamper proof recordmakesit ideal for transactions involvingbookings, payment,It's loyalty program.
By integrating blockchain, travel businesses can ensure secureIt's fast transactions, protect customer data,It's reduce fraud. Blockchain also facilitates easierIt'smoretransparent loyalty program management.Travelers can accumulate rewards points across various service providers,all within the same blockchainframework, creatingas amore cohesiveIt's rewarding experience.
4. Enhanced Payment Solutions andDigital Wallets
One ofthe most significant changes in the travel industryhas been theshift toward contactless payment.Digital wallets, suchas aApple Pay,Google Wallet,It's cryptocurrency wallets,arenow widely accepted in travelportals. These payment solutions offer a faster,more secure,It's convenient way fortravelers to complete transactions.
For businesses, adopting multiple payment gatewaysis essential for attracting global customer.Internationaltraveler can faceissues with currencyexchangeIt's transaction fees, butby offering localized payment methodIt's supporting a wide range ofdigital wallets, businesses can significantlyimprove customerssatisfactionIt's retention.
5.Voice Search and VirtualAssistants
Voice searchisone ofthe fastest growing trends in the tech world, and the travel industryis no exception.Voice search optimizationis becoming an essential part of travelportal development.With therise of virtualassistantslikeAmazon’sAlexa,GoogleAssistant,It'sApple’sSiri,travelersare increasingly usingvoicecommand to search for flights,hotels,It'sdestinations.
For businesses, this means optimizing travelportals forvoice search.Voice-friendlyportal withnatural languageprocessing capabilities can provideusers withmore accurate resultsIt'smakebooking processes quickerIt's easier. Additionally, integrating virtualassistants intoportals can enhance customers servicebyansweringcommon queriesIt'sassisting withbookings.
6. AugmentedReality (AR) andVirtual Reality (VR) Experiences
(AR) and (VR) technologiesare transforming the waytravelers experiencedestinations and plan their trips. IntensifiedRealityallowstraveler toviewdestinations,hotel, or local attractions in realtime through theirmobile devices. For example, anAR feature in a travelportal couldallowuser totake a virtual tour of ahotel room or explore acity’s landmarks in3D.
Virtual Reality,on the other hand, cantransportusers to adestination before they evenbook their trip, providing immersivepreviews of their potentialvacation. Integrating (AR)It's (VR) into travelportal notonly elevates theuser experience but also drivesengagementby offeringsomething truly unique.
7. Customizable and Personalized Travel Packages
Personalizationiskey to standingout in the competitive travel industry.Travelerstoday expect customizable travel packages that cater to their uniqueneed and preferences. From flight choices tohotel rooms,activities,It's local experiences,organizationallows businesses to create tailored experiences that resonatewith their customer.
Advanced travelportal use customer data to offer customized deal, travelitineraries,It'sdestination recommendations.By analyzing pastbooking behaviorsIt's preferences, businesses can deliver highly relevant options, thus increasingthe likelihood of conversion. Offering dynamic packagingallowsusers tomix andmatch services basedon their preferences, creating amore flexibleIt's customizedbooking experience.
8. Sustainability andEco-Friendly Travel Options
As a coincidental concernscontinue torise,moretravelersare becoming mindful of theircarbon footprint. Sustainable travelhas become amajor trend in the tourism industry,It's businessesare respondingby incorporatingEco-friendly options into their travelportal. Whetherit’sbookingEco-conscious accommodations, flights with lowercarbon emissions, or supporting local sustainable experiences,travelersarenow seekingout environmentally responsible options.
Travelportals that emphasize sustainability and provide clear, detailed information abouteco-friendly optionsarelikely to attract a growing segment of conscientioustravelers. Businesses can also promote their commitment to sustainabilityby partnering withEco-friendly service providers and offeringtravelers the ability to offset theircarbon emissions.
9. Integration with Social Media andUser-Generated Content
Social media plays a pivotal role in travel decision making.More than ever,travelersare relyingonuser generated content (UGC)likereviews, photos, and videos from social platforms to guide their choices. Integrating (UGC) into travelportalsallows businesses totap into thissocial proofIt's build trust with potential customer.
For instance,allowingusers toshare their experiencesvia social media orreview platforms can provide valuable insights for othertravelers. Additionally, incorporating social sharing features within theportalsitself can encourageusers to engagewith your brandIt'sshare their travel experiences, thereby drivingmore traffic to theportal.
10.API Integrations and Multi-Channel Distribution
As the travel landscape becomesmore fragmented, travel businesses must offer a consistent experience across multiple channels.API integrationsarekey to ensuring that travelportals canaccess real-time data and distributeit across different platforms.APIsallow travelportal to integrate with global distribution system (GDS),airlines,hotels,car rental services,It's other travel-related services seamlessly.
By offering multi-channel distribution, business can maximize theirreach, whether throughdesktop websites,mobile app, or third party platformlike OTAs (Online Travel Agents). This integration also ensures real-time availability updateIt's better inventory management.
Source & Publishedby:https://www.namantechnolab.com/
➤「救いようが最もうない、極東の自称他称の〝ジャーナリスト〟や〝学者〟、〝知米派〟は読まなくても構い。読んでもその肥大化した自己承認欲求、度し難い自己愛性人格では読むことはできないし、理解もできない。ただ見下した目線で見やるだけで、そこに自分が利用できる素材がなければ鼻で嗤うだけだ。この文章は、我がU.S.を領りたい、領ろうと下向きの反省的眼光で欲する諸君に読んで貰いたい。
I Traveled to 46States inAmerica ThisSummer.Here’sWhyTrump Won.
By Frank S. Zhou
By Ezekiel A. Wells
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27is aDouble Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in EliotHouse. He spentlastsummertraveling to 46Americanstates conductinginterviews forhisYouTube series, “CrossroadsAmerica.”
A week after Democrats’ election loss, accusations have flown in every direction within their Party. Some faultPresidentJoe Biden for an egoistic refusal todropout of therace earlier. Someblame the Harris campaign for failing to servekey demographics and communicate a clearvision for the country. And someblameAmericans, claiming that racism and sexism drove voters towardTrump.
These factors certainly exist, but we’remissing a largerpiece of the picture.
Over thesummer, I traveled to 46states in the U.S., creating aYouTube series highlighting slices oflife across the country. In conversations from my nearly three-monthroad trip, I spoke with Republicanswho were certain that inflationis entirely Biden’s fault and Democratswho, despite their frustrations with corporate profits and desires foruniversal healthcare, hoped for amore moderate candidate. From supporters ofall candidates, I heard a shockingamount of misinformation.
After combing through hundreds of hours ofinterview footage fromswingstateTrump voters, Iam certain that,as muchas other factors influenced theoutcome of the election, our crumbling media landscape — whichhas caused arift in our democracy —ismost toblame.
In the postwar period,newswas dominatedby threemain channels, and because ofthe FairnessDoctrine, eachstation reported the same stories and covered multiple sides of eachissue.Viewers picked which channels they watchedmainly basedon their preferences fornewsanchors’ personalities. Of course, thismodel hadits problems, but,at the end of the day,it meant thatAmericans worked with a sharedset of facts.
A sharedset of factsis notthe world welive intoday.
Throughout myinterviews, conspiracy theories were rampant, andonat leastfive separate occasions across separatestates, Iwas told that Bill Gates tampers with ourfood, adding plastic to our fruits and vegetables tomakehis medical investmentsmore profitable.
In conversations with voters, neither side seemed able tonamemany specific policyissues they cared about; everyone just seemed to repeat the words of theirfavorite pundits,podcast hosts, andinternet personalities.
Although this behavioris harmful, Idon’tblame everydayAmericans.Blame fallson the media thathas ostracized, disillusioned, and misinformed them.
Advertisement
I firstsaw this trend withlow-wage workers in West Virginia,who — despitefalling inflationrates — have seen stagnated salaries and clear increases infood costs. ChannelslikeFoxNews bred anger and resentment formany of them.
TakeJuly of thissummer, for example, when for the firsttime inhis presidency, prices actually fell under the Biden administration. Traditional media establishments rushed tocelebrate thisvictory, withone article fromCNN declaring, “The White House can finallycrossout ‘inflation’onits list ofpresidential liabilities.” However,outside these bubbles, I observedmanyAmericans held a differentview.
In lateJuly, Iwas welcomedat a massive familyreunion in Tylertown, Mississippi, whereoneTrump voter — a middle-aged, Black, familyman, pastor, andsoulfood enthusiast —made this clear.
“When Igo in the grocery stores, and Igotta spend mylast toget groceries,you mean totell me I’m notgonnalook and seewho’sgonna vote to help me? I voted forTrump and I’d vote forhimagain, because he put money in ourpocket,” he told me.
In their coverage,mainstreamnews organizations obsessover the Federal Reserve’snextrate cuts while failing toconnect with people concernedwith theirnext meals.With titleslike “Vance:YoungAmericans ‘Are Becoming Paupers’ Due To Inflation, High Housing Costs,” siteslike The DailyWire had their fingerson the pulse ofAmerican sentiment, welcoming new readership from thosewhofelt neglectedby traditional media.
This problemwas not just confined to the economy. While Biden’s mentalstatewas deteriorating,liberal mediaoutlets seemed to under-cover these stories, shelteringhim from scrutiny ofhis declining capabilities, until theinfamouspresidential debate.
Formerly trusted networksslowlymade themselves indigestible to the polarizedAmerican public, and in 2024, for the third year in a row, a Gallup pollfound thatmoreAmericans indicated having “no trust” in the media than thosewho trustit a “great deal/fairamount”.
So wheredoes the averageAmerican turn when thenation’s media cannot be trusted? Formany people,itwasYouTubetalk shows,Newsmax, andpodcasters suchasJoe Rogan.
While Democrats seek toblame various internal factors for this election’s loss, I cannot help but think ofJoe Rogan’sTrump endorsement, themany blind lies I heard from ordinary citizens across the country, and declining trust inAmerican journalism.
AsHarvard students and members of highereducation institutions, we have a part to play in the problem.AtHarvard’s Institute ofPolitics, thosewho denied the 2020 election results have been precluded from speakingat theJFKJr. Forum. While thegoalis understandable,it shields students from understanding theAmericanviewpoints they represent.
Advertisement
Thereis adifferencebetween platforming intentional andmanipulative misinformation and listening to and learning about where people are and what theybelieve.
As a pipeline tomainstream media,Harvard, andits future journalists, have to consider the audience they lose when theystay inside of their bubble and ignore theissues of everydayAmericans.
The disappearance of factual importance in our worldis alarming and dangerous, but if we,asaspiring journalists, politicians, andengaged citizens, want to betaken seriously in communicatingTrump’s threat to democracy, inflationary tariff policies, and soon, we oweAmerican voters that seriousness, too.
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27is aDouble Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in EliotHouse. He spentlastsummertraveling to 46Americanstates conductinginterviews forhisYouTube series, “CrossroadsAmerica."
2024年11月10日VOLA&THE ORIENTALMACHINE/Lilles and Remains 「PLAY VOL.58」@池下CLUB UPSET
VOLAのライブを観るのは2019年にHINTOと下北で２マンやった時以来なので5年振り？リリーズと対バンなのめちゃくちゃ楽しみにしてた！名古屋と言う人入りがあまり良くない土地でライブしてくれる事に感謝。人もそこそこ入ってて良かった。
背が低いので段差上から観る事に。UPSETの規模とハコ的に何処で観ても観やすい·音も良い·入場もちゃんとしてるしで、名古屋で一番好きなハコ。唯一の難点は自分の好きなバンドは滅多にUPSETでやる事はないと言う事だけ…。
リリーズでも中畑さんが叩くとの事でより楽しみにしてたけど、期待以上の演奏でテンション上がる〜！！演奏上手〜！！！聴きたい曲も懐かしめの曲も沢山聴けて嬉しい。リリーズってMC全くない印象あって、でも普通に一杯喋ってたから私の記憶違いかと思ってたけど、やっぱり昔はカッコつけなきゃとかそっちの方が良いんじゃないかって思ってたからMCしてなかったってKENTさんが話してたから記憶は間違ってなかった。カッコつけるの無理、喋りたいとの事笑 と言うか普通にMC上手くて面白かった笑 バシバシ演奏していくので思ってたより沢山曲数聴けたし手数が多い系のドラムを叩く中畑さんを味わえて最高。
K「55分ぐらいまでだっけ？(演奏して良いリミット)」中「ちょっとくらい良いんじゃない？笑 先輩には俺から言っとくよぉ」K「それが怖いんですよ…笑」のやり取り面白かった。
K「ドラム2連チャンって中々ないので(中畑さんは)大変だと思う」中「大丈夫！…多分大丈夫！笑」K「手数多い曲選んどいたんで笑」中「笑」
メンバー紹介でsyrup16gとVOLA&THE ORIENTALMACHINEの中畑さんって紹介があって何か嬉しい…。未だにシロップが再結成したと言う実感をこう言う所で味わっている…。
中村さんが終始ガチの真顔ですごいと思った笑メンバー紹介あるまでずっとサングラスかけてたから表情読み取れないのかと思ったけど外しても真顔だった笑中村さんとナツキさん、両方共めちゃくちゃ存在感あって素晴らしかったなぁ。また是非共ライブ観たい。
ぶっちゃけ書いちゃうとVOLAのライブに行かなくなった理由は楽曲云々もあるけど一番はギターが青木さんじゃなくなったってのが大きくて、アヒトさんがそんなにギタースキル高くない分青木さんのギターがあってこその世界観だったり音楽性が表現出来ると感じていたので…。久しぶりに観るボラは大前提に前見た時よりアヒトさんが元気そうで良かったなと思ったし、気合い入ってるのがす伝わってきた。新しい曲から古い曲まで満遍ないセットリストで、Mexico Pubの始まりはいつ聴いてもカッコ良い。あと中畑さんのLOVEが観れたの良き。昔は嫌悪感しかなかったけど…笑コミケと夢診断も久しぶりに聴いたかも。でも昔の曲聴くとやっぱギター物足りんのよなぁ…申し訳ないけど…。
Dead or Danceの1.2.3.4をやる中畑さんも久しぶりに観れて嬉しい！昔は(ry 今はもう可愛いな〜としか思わなくなった笑 この曲でアヒトさんがフロアに降りてきてびっくりした。近くで観るアヒトさん、めちゃくちゃ痩せてたし顔小さかった笑
·アヒトさんがチューニングするから喋っててとの事で笑 残りのメンバーでMC。名古屋でボラが演奏するのが10年振りとの事。2014年の伏見JIMMIN'振りらしい。楢崎さんが物を無くしたって話とアヒトさんのギターか壊された話で中畑さんからアポロシアターと言う言葉が出で驚く。無くなっちゃったのかな？って話してて地方のライブハウスなのに詳しいし、中畑さん記憶力良すぎる…。個人的にはボラのライブって言ったらアポロシアターだったので懐かしい気持ちになった。
·アヒトさんが酔っ払って打ち上げの味仙で蛙の唐揚げをポケットに入れたまま帰宅し次の日めちゃくちゃ驚いたって話もしてた笑
·アヒトさんからのリクエストでビールで乾杯する。メンバーリクエストの銘柄なのか分からないけど、有江さんと中畑さんが交換してた笑(有江さんがアサヒスーパードライ、中畑さんが札幌黒ラベル？飲んでた)中畑さんもライブ中に缶ビール1杯ぐらいなら普通に飲める感じになったんだなぁ。(飲めるの)嬉し〜って喜んでた笑
·アヒトさんが3回目か4回目の人生でビール造りとかしてみたいって話から何て(名前の)ビールにします？って中畑さんが聞いて即答で「キチネコビール！」と答えるアヒトさん笑こぶしの効いた和っぽいCM曲？みたいのを即興で歌った下りからテレビの話になり中畑さんが住んでた頃の青森は2局しか映らなかった(日テレとTBS)、高校生の頃にテレ朝が映るようになって初めてミュージックステーション見た(！？)と言う話に笑 信じられん…。
·お知らせがありまーすってアヒトさんが言ったら中畑さんが「なになにぃ〜？」って相槌打ってて可愛かった笑来年大阪でonion Nightが開催されるとの事。歓喜の悲鳴上がってた笑中畑さんが「是非来て〜」って言ってて拍手？起こってた。
·めちゃくちゃ楽しそうな中畑さん。偶に有江さんと目合わせて笑い合ってるのとても良い。有江さんは菩薩の笑みでフロアを見てた笑
·鯔のMC、中畑さんがめちゃくちゃ喋るのとアヒトさんの絶妙につまんない話(失礼過ぎる)と有江さんの高スキルMC力で軌道修正する感じがそうそうこんな感じだったなぁと思うなど。
·ただの悪口になっちゃうが、昔から感じてた気持ちを思い出したと言うかやっぱフロントマンのアヒトさんのテンション、割と苦手な部分もあり…。ボラのライブ観にいっといてなんだけど…。まぁアヒトさんが元気そうで、それだけで良かったなと思ったけど…。1月もVOLA予定してるのでその時観たらまた違う感想持てるかも…。
·Lilles and Remains
1.Like The Way We Were
2.Muted
3.Superior
4.Pass MeBy
5.Body
6.The Fake
8.Some Girls
10.Moralist S.S.
12.Grind
1.EMPIRE OF THE V O L A
2.THANKYOU MY FORCE
3.MAC-ROY
4.Acommunication refusaldesire
5.夢診断
6.Fatal Incident
7.comeback indarkness
8.Mexico Pub
9.S.E.〜Self-Defense
E.N
まずCEDAWの報告書"Concluding observations of the Committeeon the Elimination of Discrimination against Women"の読み方です。
この報告書の本体ともいえる、"勧告"に関わる内容は"Principal areas ofconcern and recommendations"（主な懸念事項と勧告）というセクションにあります。
セクションの題名通り、懸念点を述べる→勧告するという流れで各項目について述べています。太字の方が勧告です。
懸念と勧告はセットなのですが、元増田さんは日本の勧告部分と他国の懸念部分を比較しているため、日本の方がきつく言われていると感じたのではないでしょうか。
例えば懸念パートと勧告パートを並べてみると以下のようになります。（日本vs韓国なので夫婦別姓関連）
日本（CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/9）：
11. ... The Committee also notes withconcern that several ofits previous recommendations regarding existing discriminatory provisions have not been addressed, in particular:
(a) That no steps have beentaken to revise article 750 of the Civil Code requiring married couples to use the same surname, which in practice often compels women to adopt their husbands’ surnames; ...
11. ...委員会はまた、既存の差別的な規定に関するこれまでの勧告のいくつか、特に以下に対処していないことにも懸念を持って留意している。
(a)夫婦同姓を義務付ける民法第 750 条を改正するための措置が講じられていないこと。この条項は実質的に女性に夫の姓を強制することが多い。...
12. ..., the Committee also recommends that theState party:
(a) Amend legislation regarding the choice of surnames for married couples in order toenable women to retain their maiden surnames aftermarriage; ...
韓国（CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/9）：
52.The Committee remainsconcerned that article 781 (1) of the Civil Code maintains the patrilineal principle,asit stipulates that a childmayassume themother’s surnameonly whenthe father agrees toitatthe time ofmarriage, despite the decision of the Constitutional Court overturning the Hoju system. ...
52.委員会は、憲法裁判所が保寿制度を覆したにもかかわらず、民法第781条(1)が父系原則を維持していることを依然として懸念している。同条は、子が結婚時に父親の同意を得た場合にのみ、母親の姓を名乗ることができると規定している。...
53. The Committee calls upon theState party to amend article 781 (1) of the Civil Code to abolish the patrilineal principle in order tobringitslaws intoline with article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention. ...
53.委員会は、締約国に対し、民法第781条第1項を改正し、父系原則を廃止して、同国の法律を女子差別撤廃条約条約第16条第1項(g)に沿わせるよう求める。...
「そうは言ってもcall（要求）とrecommend（勧告・推奨）は違うじゃん」と思われる方もいらっしゃるでしょう。
「日本が前に勧告された時はurge（要請）だったのだし、言葉遣いが違っても別に変らんのでは？」と言ってしまってもいいのかも知れませんが、それとは別に少しややこしい現実が存在しています。
ここまでで言及の無かったリヒテンシュタイン公国のことも含めて少し説明いたしましょう。
留保（りゅうほ）とは、国際法における制度で、国が多数国間条約について署名、批准、受諾、承認または加入をする際に、当該条約の特定の規定に関して自国についての適用を排除・変更する目的をもって行われる一方的宣言である。
女子差別撤廃条約条約では第28条で留保が規定されており、結構な数の国が留保をもって条約を批准しています。※
日本は留保なく全ての条項を受け入れていますが（素晴らしい！）、
韓国は第16条第1項(g)（「夫及び妻の同一の個人的権利（姓及び職業を選択する権利を含む。）」を確保する）を留保しており、
リヒテンシュタイン公国は条約全般（正確には第1条）についてリヒテンシュタイン憲法第3条（王位継承に関する規定）を優先することを条件に条約を批准しています。
※女子差別撤廃条約条約は他の国際条約と比較して留保が多すぎる（あとそれが無法すぎる）のが長年問題視されています。
というわけで、日本に対しては「条約違反（の恐れ）の是正勧告」なのですが、韓国やリヒテンシュタインに対しては「留保の撤回の勧告」なので、もしかしたら語気やニュアンスが違って感じられるかもしれませんね。
ついでにリヒテンシュタインは留保に関して報告書中で1回しか勧告されてないのですが、
Reservations
9.While respecting the legal sovereignty of theState party to freely decidewho should beits Head ofState, the Committeeisconcerned that the persistent exclusion of women from succession to the throne affects the implementation of the Conventionas awhole in theState party.
9.委員会は、締約国が国家元首を誰にするかを自由に決定する法的主権を尊重する一方で、女性が王位継承から排除され続けていることが、締約国における条約全体の実施に影響を及ぼすことを懸念する。
10. Reiteratingits previousconcern (CEDAW/C/LIE/CO/4 ,para. 13), the Committee reminds theState party thatit considers the reservation to article 1 of the Convention to be in contravention of the Convention and calls upon theState party toreviewits reservation, with aview toits withdrawal.
10.委員会は、前回の懸念（CEDAW/C/LIE/CO/4、第13項）を繰り返し、締約国に対し、条約第1条に対する留保は条約に違反していると考えていることを想起し、留保の撤回を視野に入れて留保を見直すよう求める。
韓国の方はReservationsの項で1回勧告された後、Marriage and family relationsの項でもう1回勧告（さっき例示したやつです）されています。
Reservations
8.The Committee remainsconcerned that theState party maintainsits reservation to article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention.
8.委員会は、締約国が条約第16条(1)(g)に対する留保を維持していることを引き続き懸念する。
9. The Committee recallsits previous recommendation ( CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/8 ,para. 9) anditsstatementon reservations, adoptedatits nineteenth session, in 1998, and considers that the reservation to article 16 (1) (g) of the Conventionis incompatiblewith theobject and purpose of the Convention and thatit should be withdrawn.
9.委員会は、前回の勧告（CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/8、第9項）及び1998年の第19回会期で採択された留保に関する声明を鑑み、条約第16条(1)(g)に対する留保は条約の趣旨及び目的に反しており、撤回されるべきであると考える。
【追記】有識者増田が解説してくれました！元増田（俺）の疑問は誤読のせいでした……。韓国にもリヒテンシュタインにもちゃんと勧告してたよ～。すまない……。
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20241030193225 ←みんなこっち読んで～！！
選択的夫婦別姓はさっさとやればいいし天皇が男系男子かどうかはどうでもいいけど、外から偉そうにご指南されるとムカつく！
いきなりイエロー差別かよ？ヨーロッパリらしいな……とイラついたので調べてみました。とりあえずブコメに出てた韓国（強制別姓）とリヒテンシュタイン（男系男子継承）だけ。
・国連は韓国の「父系主義」とリヒテンシュタインの「男系男子限定継承」にも懸念を表明している
・でも「懸念」だけだから、日本の皇室典範改正・選択的夫婦別姓導入への「勧告」よりかなり当たりが柔らかいよ
→【追記】有識増田が解説してくれました！「懸念」と「勧告」がセットなのを見落としていたらしい、俺は無能……
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20241030193225
まず、日本に対する「最終勧告」のソースはこれ。第9回報告審査に対する女子差別撤廃委員会最終見解ってやつ。外務省のページにはそのうち仮訳が載るだろうけど、まだ出来立てほやほやだから国連のページにも英語のDocxファイルしか載っていない。そのうち各公用語版の文書が出るはず。
皇位継承については、「継承法を改正した他の締約国を見習って皇室典範を改正しな～」と勧告している。該当部分のGoogle翻訳は以下：
「委員会は、男女平等を確保するため皇位継承法を改正した他の締約国の優れた実践例を参考にし、皇位継承における男女平等を保障するために皇室典範を改正するよう締約国に勧告する。（The Committee recommends that theState partylookat good practices of otherStates parties that have reformed their successionlaws to ensure equality of women and men,and amend the ImperialHouse Law to guarantee equality of women and men in the succession to the throne.）」
外務省はこの最終報告書の前に「皇室典範に定める我が国の皇位継承の在り方は、国家の基本に関わる事項である。女性に対する差別の撤廃を目的とする本条約の趣旨に照らし、委員会が我が国の皇室典範について取り上げることは適当ではない。」って意見してるのに、結局勧告されちゃってる。ていうか「日本さぁ……他国を見習いな？ｗ」って言われてる。
この報告書では選択的夫婦別姓も「勧告」されてるけど、まぁ皇室典範に比べれば些事だと思うんで各自確認してください。
韓国への最新の勧告はこれ。夫婦強制別姓については、「子どもが母親の姓を名乗れるかどうかに父親の同意が必要」で「父系主義」なことに懸念があると言っていて、「妻が夫の姓を名乗れない」という問題の立て方ではない。
これは「懸念」止まりであって、対日本と違って法改正を「勧告」してない。なんで？日和るなよ！
「委員会は、憲法裁判所が戸主制度を覆したにもかかわらず、民法第781条第1項が、結婚時に父親が同意した場合にのみ子どもが母親の姓を名乗ることができると規定しており、父系主義を維持していることに引き続き懸念を抱いている。（The Committee remains concerned that article 781 (1) of the Civil Code maintains the patrilineal principle,asit stipulates that a childmayassume themother’s surnameonly whenthe father agrees toitatthe time ofmarriage, despite the decision of the Constitutional Court overturning the Hoju system. ）」
リヒテンシュタインはこれ。男系男子だけが公位を継承できることに一応「懸念」を表明してる。
「委員会は、誰が国家元首となるべきかを自由に決定する締約国の法的主権を尊重する一方で、女性が公位継承から排除され続けていることが、締約国における条約全体の実施に影響を及ぼすことを懸念している。（While respecting the legal sovereignty of theState party to freely decidewho should beits Head ofState, the Committeeis concerned that the persistent exclusion of women from succession to the throne affects the implementation of the Conventionas awhole in theState party.）」
これなんて「懸念」止まりなのもさることながら、日本と違って「国家元首を自由に決める国家主権は尊重しますけど……」なんて譲歩も入れてる。天皇を自由に決める主権も尊重してくれ～～！！（アイリスアウト） あれ、そもそも天皇って元首なんだっけ？
国連くん、他国の問題がある制度にも言及はしている。言及はしているが、少なくともこの3か国だと、なんか日本にだけ当たりがキツい。「2016年の前回報告から改善されてない！」というお怒りがあるのかもしれないが、委員会報告書にも明記してある通り、婚姻年齢の引き上げやら不同意性交罪の制定やら、改善点も一応あるんだけどな。
なんでこんなことになってるんすかね？国連が悪いの？日本が外交下手なの？有識者がいたら教えてほしい。韓国と比べても当たりがキツいってことは、単なるヨーロッパリの黄色差別ではないのだろうが……。
Permalink |記事への反応(29) | 10:20
とりあえず「サム・アルトマンがヒントンの教え子」というとんでもない認識違いは改めてくれ
http://finalvent.cocolog-nifty.com/fareastblog/2024/10/post-21c158.html
OpenAI創業メンバーのサツケヴァーがヒントンの教え子で、AI悪用を懸念したうえで、
アルトマン追い出し計画を褒めた(具体的にサツケヴァーの名前は出さなかったが)というのがインタビューの内容
I'm particularlyproud ofthe fact thatone of my students fired Sam Altman.
https://youtu.be/H7DgMFqrON0?t=212
はてブやってないしSNSアカウントも持ってないから、誰か本人に伝えておいてくれ
(それにしてもブクバカ誰も指摘しないんだな...)
