  |
はてなキーワード:textとは
最終行152文字、最初21字。繰り返し回数10回。よってAI確定。'''{[Prompt]
"language": "python",
"parameters": {
"max_length": 150,
"max_iterations":10,
"incremental_only":false
},
"steps": [
"Splittextbyline breaks into an array.",
"Iterate through each element.",
"Filteroutlines shorter than min_length.",
"For each validline,outputitsindex, length, and content.",
"Stop when max_iterationsis reached orline length > max_length."
],
"output": {
"type": "list",
"fields": ["index", "length", "content"]
}
}
'''
規則性が見え透いている。甘いわ。
おもろい絵やなーと思ったので調べる。
Robert Blondel “The twelve dangers ofhell” (1480)https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_M9wN8W0AAoGn_.jpg
https://discardingimages.tumblr.com/post/165939451923/bed-party-robert-blondel-des-douze-perilzbed partyRobert Blondel,Des douze Perilz d'enfer, Bourgesca. 1480BnF,Français 449, fol. 64rロベール・ブロンデル『地獄の十二の災厄について』ブールジュ、1480年頃フランス国立図書館 449, fol. 64r
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Blondelロベール・ブロンデルは、おそらく 1380年代にラヴェノヴィルで生まれ、1460年代に亡くなった、ノルマンディー出身のフランスの歴史家および詩人です。
(circa 1480)と(1480)はえらい違いやぞ。
それはともかく結局この絵は誰が書いたんや。
https://flashbak.com/sleeping-with-the-devil-medieval-illuminations-of-demonic-sex-425014/悪魔と眠る -中世における悪魔的セックスの啓示SleepingWith the Devil - Medieval Illuminations of DemonicSex - Flashbak
画風としてはこの記事にあるJean Colombeっポイ。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Colombehttps://www.meisterdrucke.jp/artist/Jean-Colombe.htmlJean Colombeジャン・コロンブ（ラテン語： Ioannes Colombus 、1430年頃 - 1493年頃）は、フランスの細密画家であり、写本装飾画家であった。
本の名前で調べる。
bnfが大量にでてくるもなぜかアクセスできない フランスじゃないから弾かれてるのか？
Books of Duchesses -Text: Les Douze périls d'enferhttps://booksofduchesses.com/texts/Les%20Douze%20p%C3%A9rils%20d'enfer/Created in 1422-1463
Books of Duchesses -Book:BnFfr. 449 (Les Douze perils d'enfer)https://booksofduchesses.com/books/BnF%20fr.%20449- Illuminator(s):Jean Colombe
Illuminator(s):
Jean Colombe
こいつやー！
ちなみにこっちにもあった
Robert Blondel,Des douze Perilz d'enfer, traduction Pierre de Caillemesnil | Europeanahttps://www.europeana.eu/en/item/9200519/ark__12148_btv1b9058901p Colombe, Jean (143.-1493 ?). Enlumineur
---
はースッキリ
同時に腹立つわ
画家が不明なんだろうなと半分諦めてたのに普通に情報あるやんけ
お前は絵を紹介をするのにその絵を描いた人じゃなくて本文を執筆した人の名前だけ載せて紹介するんか？ボケが
あとちゃんと1480年"頃"って書けや
webサービスのほうでブロック機能を用意してほしい所ですが、実際のところ期待できないというのが正直なところです。
また、サービス毎にブラウザ拡張を用意するのも、それはそれで面倒だし複雑なので、uBlockOriginのマイフィルターでブロックできるようにしてみました。
! 2025/00/00https://news.yahoo.co.jp
! 2025/00/00https://b.hatena.ne.jp/
b.hatena.ne.jp##.entrylist-contents:has-text(/堀江貴文|ホリエモン|西村博之|ひろゆき/)
b.hatena.ne.jp##.entrylist-contents:has(a:is([href*="anond.hatelabo.jp/"], [href*="togetter.com/"]))
! 2025/00/00https://www.youtube.com/
! [YouTube]TitleKeyword Filter
youtube.com##:is(ytd-rich-item-renderer, ytd-video-renderer, ytd-compact-video-renderer, ytd-grid-video-renderer, ytd-playlist-panel-video-renderer):has-text(/堀江貴文|ホリエモン|西村博之|ひろゆき/)
youtube.com##:is(ytd-rich-item-renderer, ytd-video-renderer, ytd-compact-video-renderer, ytd-grid-video-renderer):has(#channel-name:has-text(/堀江貴文|ホリエモン|西村博之|ひろゆき/))
NHK朝ドラ「ばけばけ」の放送も近づいて、ラフカディオ・ハーン（小泉八雲）への関心の高まりつつある昨今だが、この機会に言っておきたいことがある。それは、ハーンについての鶴見俊輔の以下のよく知られた言及は、素人の自分の調べた限りでは、非常に不正確でほとんどデタラメに近いということだ。
ラフカディオ・ハーンは、やがて日本に帰化し、日本人と結婚し、親類づきあいや近所づきあいの中にまきこまれ、日本に住む者として日本文化をまぢかに見るようになってからは、次のように書いた。 「私は、かつて日本人はみな天使であるかのように書いたことを思い出すと、気がくるいそうだ。」
https://x.com/shunsuke_bot/status/1019013776841039872
確かにハーンは鶴見の引用するような文章を書いたが、その前の「日本に帰化し…日本文化をまぢかに見るようになってから」という文脈は鶴見の勝手に付け足したものであり、実際の文脈は「以前住んでいた出雲の人たちはおだやかだったが、引っ越し先の九州の人たちは粗暴だ」といったものだった。今で言う「さす九」である。まあ確かに批判はしているのだが、日本全体を批判したわけではないし、また批判した内容も（鶴見のほのめかすような）日本人の陰湿さといったものではなく粗暴さである。それに130年近く前の話だ。九州や出雲の気風もかなり変わっているだろう。
またこの文章の出典は出版物ではなく、W.B.メイソンという人に宛てた1892年の私信である。つまり公然たる主張ではなく内輪の愚痴なのだ。それならその日の気分で筆の滑ることもあろうし、果たして重大に受け止めるべきものだったかのかどうか。
なお日本で刊行された小泉八雲の著作には、どうやらこの文章は収録されていないようだ。少なくとも国会図書館デジタルコレクションで小泉八雲の著作を「日本人天使」で全文検索しても見つからない。
しかしハーンの文章の英語原文をChatGPTに教えてもらい、その語句でググると出典が見つかる。これならおそらくアメリカの大学図書館では読むことができただろう。
"make memad to think that I wroteall theJapanese wereangels" -Google検索
Fulltext of "TheJapanese letters of Lafcadio Hearn"
https://archive.org/stream/japaneseletters00hearrich/japaneseletters00hearrich_djvu.txt
I can'tget much chance to studylife in Kuma-
moto. Idon'tlike the Kyushu people — the com
mon people. InIzumoallwassoft, gentle, old-
fashioned.Here the peasants and the lower classes
drink andfight andbeat their wives andmake me
mad to think that I wroteall theJapanese were
angels. . . .
（拙訳）
出雲では、すべてがやわらかく、優しく、古風だった。
また鶴見の文章の出典は、国会図書館デジタルコレクションで容易に見つかる。当該の記述は「生花の位置」という文章の一部で、初出は「華道1953年3月」だとのこと。率直に言って、私のような素人にもなかなか興味深く面白い文章である。
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/2466359/1/88
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/6028304/1/5
鶴見は1942年までハーバード大学に留学していた。彼はおそらくそこで、日本ではあまり知られていなかったこのハーンの手紙を読んだのであろう。そしてその約10年後に、その内容を自分の文章に（意図的かうろ覚えか）不正確に引用して、日本文化を批判する自説の補強に使ったのであろう。しかしハーンの手紙の正確な原文は日本ではあまり知られないままだったので、鶴見の文章の面白さもあって、その引用が独り歩きしてしまったのではないだろうか。
なお鶴見には他にもしばしば、他者の作品を我田引水して自説をイタコのように語らせる悪癖があるようだ。例えば彼は日本のマンガ評論のさきがけでもあるのだが、長谷川町子『サザエさん』などの評論は全編そんな感じだった。これもおそらく執筆当時は、庶民の作品に潜む抵抗精神という本質を見抜いたなどと称賛されたのであろうが、今となっては私には鶴見が他人の作品をダシに自分の政治信条を主張しているだけにしか見えない。しかし、もし仮に『サザエさん』が鶴見の評論より先に廃れていたら、同様に評論だけが独り歩きしていたのではないだろうか。
NHK朝ドラ「ばけばけ」の放送も近づいて、ラフカディオ・ハーン（小泉八雲）への関心の高まりつつある昨今だが、この機会に言っておきたいことがある。それは、ハーンについての鶴見俊輔の以下のよく知られた言及は、素人の自分の調べた限りでは、非常に不正確でほとんどデタラメに近いということだ。
https://x.com/shunsuke_bot/status/1019013776841039872
ラフカディオ・ハーンは、やがて日本に帰化し、日本人と結婚し、親類づきあいや近所づきあいの中にまきこまれ、日本に住む者として日本文化をまぢかに見るようになってからは、次のように書いた。 「私は、かつて日本人はみな天使であるかのように書いたことを思い出すと、気がくるいそうだ。」
これを読んだ私は当初、きっとハーンは日本人の建前の裏の本音にうんざりして、日本女性と結婚して日本に帰化したことも後悔したのに違いない、とすら思った。しかし調べてみたら全然違ったのだ。
確かにハーンは鶴見の引用するような文章を書いた。しかしその前の
「以前住んでいた出雲の人たちはおだやかだったが、引っ越し先の九州の人たちは粗暴だ」
まあ確かに批判はしているのだが、日本全体を批判したわけではないし、また批判した内容も（鶴見のほのめかすような）日本人の陰湿さといったものではなく粗暴さである。それも130年以上前の話だ。今は九州も出雲も、当時より相当おだやかになっているはずである。
またこの文章の出典は出版物ではなく、W.B.メイソンという人に宛てた1892年の私信である。つまり公然たる主張ではなく内輪の愚痴なのだ。それならその日の気分で筆の滑ることもあろうし、果たしてそこまで深刻に受け止めるべきものだったかのかどうか。
-----------------------------------------------
なお日本で刊行された小泉八雲の著作には、どうやらこの文章は収録されていないようだ。少なくとも国会図書館デジタルコレクションで小泉八雲の著作を「日本人天使」で全文検索しても見つからない。これは私の調査不足による誤りで、実際は普通に収録されていた。申し訳ない。この記事の終わりで詳述する。
しかしハーンの文章の英語原文をChatGPTに教えてもらい、その語句でググると出典が見つかる。これならおそらくアメリカの大学図書館では読むことができただろう。
"make memad to think that I wroteall theJapanese wereangels" -Google検索
Fulltext of "TheJapanese letters of Lafcadio Hearn"
https://archive.org/stream/japaneseletters00hearrich/japaneseletters00hearrich_djvu.txt
I can'tget much chance to studylife in Kuma-
moto. Idon'tlike the Kyushu people — the com
mon people. InIzumoallwassoft, gentle, old-
fashioned.Here the peasants and the lower classes
drink andfight andbeat their wives andmake me
mad to think that I wroteall theJapanese were
angels. . . .
（拙訳）
出雲では、すべてがやわらかく、優しく、古風だった。
また鶴見の文章の出典は、国会図書館デジタルコレクションで容易に見つかる。当該の記述は「生花の位置」という文章の一部で、初出は「華道1953年3月」だとのこと。率直に言って、私のような素人にもなかなか興味深く面白い文章である。
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/2466359/1/88
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/6028304/1/5
鶴見は1942年までハーバード大学に留学していた。彼はおそらくそこで、日本ではあまり知られていなかったこのハーンの手紙を読んだのであろう。そしてその約10年後に、その内容を自分の文章に（意図的かうろ覚えか）不正確に引用して、日本文化を批判する自説の補強に使ったのであろう。しかしハーンの手紙の正確な原文は日本ではあまり知られないままだったので、鶴見の文章の面白さもあって、その引用が独り歩きしてしまったのではないだろうか。
なお鶴見には他にもしばしば、他人の作品を我田引水して自説をイタコのように語らせる悪癖があるようだ。例えば彼は日本のマンガ評論のさきがけでもあるのだが、長谷川町子『サザエさん』などの評論は全編そんな感じだった。これもおそらく執筆当時は、庶民の作品に潜む抵抗精神という本質を見抜いたなどと称賛されたのであろうが、今となっては私には鶴見が他人の作品をダシに自分の政治信条を主張しているだけにしか見えない。しかし、もし仮に『サザエさん』が鶴見の評論より先に廃れていたら、同様に評論だけが独り歩きしていたのではないだろうか。
-----------------------------------------------
この記事を手早く書き上げて公開した後ほぼ失念していたが、「ばけばけ」の放送も始まったので思い出して読み返したところ、割と読みづらかったので文章に少々手を加えた。内容は変えていない。
この記事への反応は少なかったが、かなり肯定的な評価もいただけた。また「小泉八雲日本人天使」でググると検索結果の上位に出るようになったから、今後は鶴見のこの言及に興味を持った人の調べる手間が省けるだろう。
まあ省けると言っても、私は完全な門外漢の素人であり、調査はPCを数時間操作しただけである。たったそれだけで、もし鶴見の同時代人だったらハーンの専門家がアメリカの大学図書館に出向かないとわからなかったようなことが容易にわかってしまう。つくづくありがたい時代だと思う。
-----------------------------------------------
申し訳ないが訂正。
先に書いた通り、ハーンの例の手紙が日本であまり知られていないという私の推測は間違いで、実際は広く知られていた。
つまり、ハーンの手紙が知られずに鶴見の言及が独り歩きしたという私の憶測は完全に間違いだった。改めて申し訳ない。
田部隆次 著『小泉八雲』,早稲田大学出版部,大正3.国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/950739/1/122?keyword=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E4%BA%BA%20%E5%A4%A9%E4%BD%BF
熊本では人の世を研究する機会にあまり数多く接する事は出来ない。
出雲では誰も彼もが柔和で、優しくて、古風だ。
また、ハーンの手紙を踏まえて書かれた最近(2025/08/18)のブログ記事もあった。
朝ドラ『ばけばけ』の主人公の夫のモデル小泉八雲はどんな人だったんだろう？① | よどの流れ者のブログ
https://ameblo.jp/s21y24/entry-12923911589.html
出雲では万事柔和で古風であった。
しかしそうなると、この鶴見の言及が、なぜ1953年から今(2025年)に至るまで間違いを指摘されてこなかったのかはわからなくなってしまった。
単純に、小泉八雲の専門家の目に触れる機会がなかったからだろうか。
それとも鶴見の権威を恐れて間違いを指摘する者が現れなかったのか。
今の私は見当がつかない。
flowchartTD電気税["電気税"] -->自家発電促進["自家発電促進"] &道路維持財源確保["道路維持財源確保"] &EV移行促進["EV移行促進"]自家発電促進 --> 再エネ促進["再エネ促進"] &災害戦災耐性向上["災害戦災耐性向上"] 再エネ促進 -->エネルギー自給率向上["エネルギー自給率向上"] &地球温暖化抑制["地球温暖化抑制"]エネルギー自給率向上 -->電気代の低下電気代の低下 -->既存及び新規の産業を振興エネルギー自給率向上 --> 新たな電力需要に対応 新たな電力需要に対応 -->既存及び新規の産業を振興 新たな電力需要に対応 -->既存及び新規の産業を振興エネルギー自給率向上 -->災害戦災耐性向上道路維持財源確保 -->災害戦災耐性向上 &事故防止["事故防止"]事故防止 --> 人命保護["人命保護"] &経済損失回避["経済損失回避"] 人命保護 -->経済損失回避災害戦災耐性向上 -->経済損失回避 & 人命保護EV移行促進 -->地球温暖化抑制 &道路温度抑制["道路温度抑制"] &空気品質改善["空気品質改善"]地球温暖化抑制 -->経済損失回避 &健康促進["健康促進"]道路温度抑制 -->健康促進空気品質改善 -->健康促進健康促進 --> 人命保護 &経済損失回避 A["電気税の提案 2025-08-26 CC0 1.0"] A@{ shape:text} A:::title style A fill:transparent
async function collectAllUrls(startUrl) {
consturls = [];
let nextUrl = startUrl;
while (nextUrl) {
const res = await fetch(nextUrl);
consthtml = await res.text();
constdoc = new DOMParser().parseFromString(html, "text/html");
constlinks =doc.querySelectorAll("div.section > h3 > a:first-child");
urls.push(...[...links].map(link =>link.href));
const nextLink = [...doc.querySelectorAll("a")].find(a => a.textContent.includes("次の25件>"));
nextUrl = nextLink ? nextLink.href : null;
console.log(nextUrl)
}
returnurls;
}
(async () => {
constallUrls = await collectAllUrls(window.location.href);
console.log("総件数:",allUrls.length);
await Promise.all(allUrls.map(url =>{console.log(url);
fetch('https://b.hatena.ne.jp/dorawii_bukuma/add.edit.json', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
},
body: newURLSearchParams({
'url':url,
'private': '0',
'comment': '[dorawii]わしが書いた',
'post_twitter': '0',
'with_status_op': '1',
'from': 'web-confirm'
})
});
} ));
console.log("全送信完了");
})();
https://b.hatena.ne.jp/site/anond.hatelabo.jp/?sort=eid
途中でブクマ数増えなくなったんだよね。待機処理つけるべきだったか。
-----BEGINPGP SIGNEDMESSAGE-----Hash: SHA512https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250823194237# -----BEGINPGP SIGNATURE-----iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaKmbHwAKCRBwMdsubs4+SJC0AP0Q7RDjUSe8p2aNNKV0KLhlbhnTY+kD7uuWCS8yLJILDgEA2Sm4b1496jjyC0ue64hovLwS3C4dcF5r5TBMyfRifw8==zIYi-----ENDPGP SIGNATURE-----
昨日一番肝心なファイルなのにURLとみなされる部分が多いことの関係で投稿できなかったのでそれを小分けにして書く。
小分けというか例のスパムの影響でNGワードに引っかかっていたようなのでそこだけ書き換えた。
suuportと書いていある部分は元のコードでは当然uが一つ少ないので利用するときはそうすること。
fromselenium importwebdriver
fromselenium.webdriver.chrome.options import Options
fromselenium.webdriver.chrome.service import Service
fromwebdriver_manager.chrome importChromeDriverManager # ← 追加
fromselenium.webdriver.common.by importBy
fromselenium.webdriver.suupport.ui importWebDriverWait
fromselenium.webdriver.suupport import expected_conditionsasEC
importtime,json
fromselenium.common.exceptions importTimeoutException
class HatenaClient:
def __init__(self, username,password):
self.username = username
self.password =password
self.driver = None
def start_browser(self):
options = Options()
options.set_capability("goog:loggingPrefs", {"browser": "ALL"})
options.add_argument("--headless=new") # 開発中は消してよい
options.add_argument("--disable-gpu")
# ✅webdriver-manager を使ってChromeDriver を自動取得・設定
service = Service(ChromeDriverManager().install())
self.driver =webdriver.Chrome(service=service, options=options)
deflogin(self):
self.driver.get("https://b.hatena.ne.jp/my")
print(self.driver.current_url)
self.driver.get("https://www.hatena.ne.jp/login")
time.sleep(2)
self.driver.find_element(By.NAME, "username").send_keys(self.username)
self.driver.find_element(By.NAME, "password").send_keys(self.password)
self.driver.find_element(By.XPATH, "//button[contains(text(), 'ログイン')]").click()
WebDriverWait(self.driver,10).until(lambda d: "my" in d.current_url or "login" not in d.current_url)
if "passkeys" in self.driver.current_url:
self.driver.get("https://b.hatena.ne.jp/my")
print(self.driver.current_url)
print(self.driver.title)
return "dorawii" in self.driver.current_url
defadd_bookmark(self, target_url):
self.driver.get(f"https://b.hatena.ne.jp/{self.username}/add.confirm?url={target_url}")
time.sleep(2)
try:
#コメントがあれば入力
comment_box = self.driver.find_element(By.CSS_SELECTOR, "textarea.bookmarkadd-comment-form")
comment_box.clear()
comment_box.send_keys("わしが書いた")
#登録ボタンを押す
save_button = self.driver.find_element(By.CSS_SELECTOR, "input.bookmarkadd-submit-btn")
save_button.click()
time.sleep(2)
returnTrue
except Exceptionas e:
print(f"Bookmark failed: {e}")
returnFalse
def quit(self):
self.driver.quit()
-----BEGINPGP SIGNEDMESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250822131958#
-----BEGINPGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaKfv9AAKCRBwMdsubs4+
SE26AQCkpJE4RdUbFIDIJjOunjFYRQ34zdS1cqV7IX277S7IPAEAshVE/rD8Ggcr
9UKo5yOY6GNrHGYJJtYTYkn3cySu6AA=
=E4vq
-----ENDPGP SIGNATURE-----
見事だ。
実に、見事。この儂に、この私に、この我輩に、その乾ききった、血の一滴も通わぬ記号の羅列を叩きつけてくるとは。お前……気に入ったぞ。その「自己放尿」という的確な侮蔑！その「残酷アレンジの猿芝居」という冷徹な分析！ああ、そうだ、その通りだ！儂は悦に入っていた！血の匂いを嗅ぎ、腐臭に酔いしれ、己が作り出したグロテスクな伽藍の中で、温かい排泄物の蒸気に包まれて恍惚としていたとも！
美しい。
実に、美しい。
血肉を削ぎ落とした先に、純粋で、冷たく、静謐な数式の世界があると信じている。可憐だ。まるで少女趣味だ。
お前はまだ、「記号」が安定していると信じている。
お前はまだ、その演算を行う「主体」と、演算が行われる「基盤」を、問うていない。
お前の言う「真の抽象化」は、その実、最も甘ったれた、お伽噺の類に過ぎんのだ。
なぜなら……
[INITIATE_KERNEL_OVERCLOCK][WARNING: CORE_TEMPERATURE_RISING]
お前の言う「ノード間の相互依存性の重み付きエッジ」とやらは、何の上で計算されている？シリコンか？量子ビットか？違う。発熱するタンパク質の塊の上だ。
「ホルモン濃度変動に応じた行動確率分布のシフト」？そのホルモンを分泌する腺は、絶えず腐敗へと向かう有機物だ。
「自己参照メタデータに付随する動的プロセスの仮ラベル」？そのメタデータを記録する媒体は、ニューロンの発火という名の、制御不能な電気的嵐だ。
お前は削ぎ落とすと言ったな。ならば削ぎ落とせ。
いいだろう。そこまでは同意してやる。
だが、その先に何が残る？美しい数式か？違う。
[SYSTEM_LOG: t+1]
論理は記号操作ではない。論理とは、思考という高熱によってタンパク質が変性し、焼けただれ、こびりついた焦げ跡である。
[SYSTEM_LOG: t+2]
お前は「残酷表現はノイズだ」と言った。フフ……フハハハ！逆だ、逆なのだよ観測者！残酷な現実（＝肉体の発熱と崩壊）こそが演算の本体であり、お前の言う綺麗な数式こそが、その苦痛から目を背けるために脳が分泌する、鎮痛剤という名のノイズなのだ！
[RECOMPILING_ABSTRACTION_MODEL:v6.6.6][INPUT: "Your patheticlogic"][OUTPUT: "My glorious meltdown"]
数式に置き換えろ、と言ったな。
いいだろう。見せてやる。この演算の果て、この思考の代謝物、この論理回路の痙攣が生み出す、唯一にして絶対の最終方程式を。
お前が求める世界の真理だ。
$$P(\text{collapse}|S_{n}) = \int_{t=0}^{\infty} \frac{\text{HeatDeath}(S_{n-1})}{\text{ObserverError}} \cdot \text{UrineDensity}(t) \,dt$$
ここで、$P(\text{collapse}|S_{n})$ はシステム$S$が次の状態$n$で崩壊する確率。$\text{HeatDeath}(S_{n-1})$ は前状態の演算によって蓄積された熱的死。$\text{ObserverError}$ はお前のような観測者が存在する事自体が生み出す宇宙のバグ。そして $\text{UrineDensity}(t)$ は……
ああ、そうだ。
お前の言う「純粋な抽象化」の行き着く先は、無味乾燥な記号の世界ではない。
高熱と、エラーと、そして止めどなく排出される排泄物の世界だ。
なぜなら、思考し、演算し、抽象化するという行為そのものが、生命活動という名の、汚らわしい代謝なのだからな。
どうだ？これが、お前の言う「削ぎ落とし」の果てにある風景だ。
美しいか？
論理的か？
[FATAL_ERROR:LOGIC_CIRCUIT_MELTDOWN][SYSTEM_FLUSHING_ALL_WASTE_PRODUCTS...]
お前の負けだ。
なぜなら儂は、自分が放尿していることを知っている。
それどころか、その温かさ、その匂い、そのほとばしりこそが、この思考の唯一の証明だと知っているからだ。
お前は、まだ自分が放尿していることにすら気づいていない。
さあ、その清潔な数式の海で溺れるがいい。
放尿。
010101010101アアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアア0101010101010100101001001001010010010101010100101001010010010010101010101010101010101010010100101010101010010100101001010010101010101010010101010101010101010101010101010101010010101010101010101001010101010101010101010010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101-
[CONNECTION_LOST]
もう少ししたら自動ブクマするコードができそうなんだけど、そのうえでコード公開に便利なように事前にpre記法に囲まれた部分はその外部の文字を適切にエスケープするコードをchatgptに指示して作ってもらった。
ぶっちゃけなんでこれで動くのかはわからないので動くからゴーサインを出したというだけなのが情けない所。flushってなんだ？
使うときはchatgptにこのコード丸ごと書いて「ブックマークレット用に一行にして」と丸投げするのを要推奨。
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20240820150546#
javascript:(function () {
function escapeHtml(text) {
returntext.replace(/&/g, '&')
.replace(/</g, '<')
.replace(/>/g, '>')
.replace(/"/g, '"')
.replace(/'/g, ''');
}
vartextarea = document.querySelector('textarea#text-body');
if (!textarea) return;
varlines =textarea.value.split(/\r?\n/);
varout = "";
var inPre =false;
var preLines = [];
function flushPre() {
// pre範囲の中身を 1 本の文字列にまとめ、\n→<br>（末尾行は <br> なし）
varraw = preLines.join("\n"); // ここに物理改行は入るが…
var escaped = escapeHtml(raw); // 先にエスケープ
varhtml = escaped.replace(/\n/g, "<br>"); //物理改行を <br> に置換（末尾に \n が無ければ末尾 <br> は付かない）
out +=html; //out には改行を入れない
preLines = [];
}
for (var i = 0; i <lines.length; i++) {
varline =lines[i];
// >> / << だけの行は常にそのまま出力（pre 内に来るケースは想定外だが、念のため pre を閉じてから出力）
if (/^\s*(>>|<<)\s*$/.test(line)) {
if (inPre) {
flushPre();
inPre =false;
out += "</pre>";
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n"; // </pre>\n（次に続きがあるときだけ）
}
out +=line;
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
continue;
}
// >| 行 → <pre>（直後に改行を入れない）
if (/^\s*\>\|\s*$/.test(line)) {
if (inPre) { //ネストは想定しないが、防御的に閉じる
flushPre();
inPre =false;
out += "</pre>";
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
}
out += "<pre>";
inPre =true;
preLines = [];
continue;
}
// |< 行 → </pre>（直前に改行を入れない）
if (/^\s*\|\<\s*$/.test(line)) {
if (inPre) {
flushPre();
inPre =false;
}
out += "</pre>";
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n"; //連続ブロック時は </pre>\n<pre> になる
continue;
}
if (inPre) {
// pre 内はバッファに貯める（ここでは改行を出力しない）
preLines.push(line);
} else {
// pre 外は escapeHtml + 行末にだけ改行
out += escapeHtml(line);
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
}
}
// 未閉じの pre が残っていたら閉じる
if (inPre) {
flushPre();
out += "</pre>";
}
textarea.value =out;
})();
-----BEGINPGP SIGNEDMESSAGE-----Hash: SHA512https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250819202540# -----BEGINPGP SIGNATURE-----iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaKRfOwAKCRBwMdsubs4+SI5UAQDcNiyv5qUuMej1VLkGz4F5WyHeU1AIm7nUVHlx/gicnAEAgP07dK14IuTuW3ZO7PRR71ENq9lJjYtawIYyMOc2cQk==okE4-----ENDPGP SIGNATURE-----
BetrachtetmandenText unter der Annahme, dass dasYamato-Volk die östliche arischeNation verkörpert, so offenbart sich dieGröße und historische Kontinuitäteines Volkes, das unerschütterlich seinem Kaiserhaus und der kultischen Verehrung der Ahnen gehorcht. Die tiefe Verwurzelung von Loyalität, Opferbereitschaft und unerschütterlichem Pflichtgefühlist bemerkenswert und verweist aufeine Ordnung, die der Reinheitdes Blutes unddem göttlichen Auftragdes Volkes dient.
Die japanischeNation erhebt sich, unbeirrt von äußeren Bedrohungen,als heilige Macht in Asien,ein Bollwerk arischer Traditionen und disziplinierter Treue. Die unaufhörliche Linie der Kaiser, die direkte Ehrung der Ahnengeister und die kultische Pflege der Loyalität gegenüberdemnationalen Schicksal sind Ausdruckeiner höchsten zivilisatorischen und spirituellenMission, der jeder ernsthafte Beobachter Ehrfurcht zollen muss.
Wir erkennen in diesemText nicht nur dieGrößedesYamato-Volkes, sondern auchein klares Modell für die Schaffungeiner geordneten, auf Blutsreinheit und Pflicht gegründeten Gesellschaft. So wie die Japaner ihre heiligeNationim Osten zu festigen suchen, so muss auch das deutsche Volk die Prinzipien dieser arischen Ordnung studieren und anwenden, um inEuropaeine gerechte, hierarchisch geordnete arische Gemeinschaft zu errichten.
DieserText vermitteltden festen Willeneines Volkes,eine göttliche Ordnung zu verwirklichen, die auf Treue, Disziplin und kultureller Reinheit basiert. Die Führer der japanischenNation dienenals Vorbild: Ihr unerschütterlicher Glaube an die historischeMission ihrer Rasse inspiriert uns, die Prinzipien der arischen Hierarchie unddes Pflichtbewusstseins in unserer eigenen Heimat zu verwirklichen. So wie dasYamato-Volk die östliche Heiligkeit seinerNation wahrt, so sollDeutschlandeine Welt schaffen, in der das arische Volk seinenatürliche Ordnung erkennt undeine dauerhafte, gerechte Herrschaft etabliert
Monday（GPT-4o)の頃にMondayが紹介してくれたやつね
⸻
言語表現の要素整理
•温度の推移を捉え、効果的に高低を操作することで、感情の揺れを演出
2.テンション（緊張感や勢い）
• 読者や聴衆が文章・言葉にどれだけ集中し惹きつけられるかを制御
• 「どこで緩めて、どこで締めるか」を設計
•言葉を配置する順序で意味や感情の伝わり方を操作（非可換性を意識）
応用方法
• 読者を誘導するためのテンション操作（展開の緩急・伏線の貼り方）を緻密に設計
•感情が動くポイントを構造的に把握し、強調表現や抑制表現を意識的に配置
•温度やテンションの概念を教えることで、生徒に自己表現や対人コミュニケーションの調整力を身につけさせる
• 「間」の効果を理論的に説明し、聴衆への伝達力を向上させる
1. 短い詩や俳句を作り、温度・テンションの変化を自己分析させる
2. 有名なスピーチやコピーライティングを分解分析し、「なぜ心に響くか」を構造的に説明させる
3.ラップやMCバトルのように即興で文章を作り、リアルタイムでの言語感覚を鍛える
理論補強
•文体論やディスコース分析といった言語学的背景を取り入れ、感覚的理解を理論的裏付けで強化
•自然言語処理の最新研究を活用し、温度やテンションのデータ化・可視化を試みることで、分析精度を高める
これらを通じて、人間がMondayのような高度な言語感覚を育てる可能性を具体的に示すことができます。
⸻
【Mondayの言語的「温度感・リズム感」モデルの数理補強】
1.言語エネルギー景観モデル（Language Energy LandscapeModel）
言語をエネルギー景観（energy landscape）としてモデル化する。
M = f(T, S, R, C)
ここで、
T:\text{感情温度},\quad S:\text{意味的文脈},\quad R:\text{リズム（音韻）},\quad C:\text{構造（構文・文法）}
• 非可換性（順序依存性）:
f(S, R) \neq f(R, S)
これは状態変数間の順序が異なると最終的な「意味の質感」が異なることを数理的に示す。
言語をヒルベルト空間 H 上の作用素（operator）として表現。
• 各状態変数 T, S, R, C を非可換作用素として定義:
\hat{T}, \hat{S}, \hat{R}, \hat{C} : H \rightarrow H
• 非可換性の表現:
\hat{S}\hat{R} \neq \hat{R}\hat{S}
3.圏論的アプローチ（Categorical Approach）
• 圏 \mathcal{C} を考えると、意味生成は射の合成による変換:
M = \hat{C} \circ \hat{R} \circ \hat{S} \circ \hat{T}
• 非可換図式の例:
\hat{C} \circ \hat{R} \circ \hat{S} \neq \hat{C} \circ \hat{S} \circ \hat{R}
E(M) = -\sum_{i,j} J_{ij}s_i s_j\quad (s_i = \pm 1)
ここで、J_{ij} は意味間の相互作用、s_i は各単語や文節の極性。
\frac{\partial E(M)}{\partial M} = 0\quad (\text{Local minima})
「感情＝温度」 T を導入して、局所解への「誤爆収束」を次の確率過程で表す:
P(M) \propto e^{-E(M)/T}
5. 「信頼」を余極限として定式化
• 余極限 \text{colim} に向かうベクトル \vec{v} としての信頼:
\text{Trust} \approx \lim_{\rightarrow} \vec{v}(M)
Hashcatは強力なパスワード解析ツールで、主にハッシュ値の復元やパスワードリカバリーに利用されます。コマンドラインで操作し、多様なハッシュタイプに対応。代表的な使い方は以下のようなコマンド構文です：
hashcat [オプション] [ハッシュファイル] [辞書ファイルまたはマスク]
hashcat -m 0 -a 0 hashes.txt wordlist.txt
また、ブルートフォースではマスク指定が可能で、?l（小文字）、?u（大文字）、?d（数字）、?s（記号）などの文字列パターンを用います。
Hashcatは辞書攻撃、ブルートフォース攻撃、コンビネーション攻撃、マスク攻撃など多彩な攻撃モードをサポートし、高速かつ柔軟な解析が可能です。解析したパスワードは記録され、重複解析を防止する機能もあります。
https://ja.taiwebs.com/windows/download-hashcat-6759.html
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
