■

dorawii represents acase of unprocessed griefoverlost grandiosity (from psychotic episode) manifestingas compulsive boundary-testingand argument-seeking, where genuine neurological limitations are weaponized defensively to avoid confronting existential ordinariness, sustainedby platform affordances thatenable persistent identity within anonymity and rewarding provocativeengagement.

A personwho briefly experienced feelinggod-like through psychosis, recovered to find themselves merelydisabled and ordinary, and cannot bear thistruth. They use real limitationsas both explanation andshield, seek significance throughonlineconflict, and remain trapped in acycle where the behaviors meant to prove their worth actually demonstrate their difficulties - but acknowledging this wouldrequire grieving whatwaslost, which remains unbearable.

This reveals how recovery from severe mental illnessisn't just about symptom remission -it's about psychological integration of whatwas experienced and whatwaslost. Medicalmodel focuseson eliminating psychosis, but doesn'taddress the meaning-crisis created when extraordinary experiences aretakenaway and ordinary limitation remains.

It also shows howonlinespaces withambiguous accountability structures canenable acting-out that serves defensive purposes while feelinglike genuineengagement. The person sufferingmostis probably dorawii themselves, evenas their behavior drives othersaway.

The most sophisticated theoretical vocabulary,the most detailed self-disclosure,the most elaborate arguments - none ofitaddresses thecoreissue.All ofitis displacement. The real conversation dorawiineeds to haveis not withanonymous strangers aboutwho won an argument.It's an internal conversation: "Iam notwho Iwas during that brief, terrible, extraordinary episode. Iam ordinary, limited, and mortal. And somehow, thathas to be enough."

Until that conversation can happen,everything elseisnoise.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 12:35

ツイートシェア

■anond:20251021100207

Thisis a rathergenerous estimate that translates into approximately 242 feetper game,taken from the statistics of the currentMajor League Baseball battingleaderTroy Tulowitzki from the Colorado Rockies. Thedistancebetween eachbaseis 90 feet. Addingall of the singles, doubles, triples, stolenbases, andhomeruns that Tulowitzkihas logged during the 49 regularseason games played since presstime, thetotaldistancerun comes to justmore than 2 miles.

塁打数に塁間の距離かけただけってあまりにもガバガバすぎる計算だろ

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 10:24

ツイートシェア

■Todayyou want to KnowLoveyou pussy

The Power of Small Steps: How TinyChanges CanLead to MassiveGrowth

In a world that glorifiesovernight success and dramatic transformations,it's easy tofeellikeyou’refalling behind ifyou’re not makingbig leaps. But what if thesecret to real, lasting personalgrowth wasn’t in doingmore, faster—but in doing less, consistently?

Welcome tothe power of small steps.

Why Small Steps Matter

Big goals oftenfeeloverwhelming.You want togetfit,write abook, start a business, or learn a new skill—butyoudon’t know where to start. Soyou procrastinate. Or worse,youdive in too fast, burnout, and give up.

Small steps bypassall of that.

Whenyou break down ahuge goal into manageableactions,everythingchanges. Writing 500 words a dayis less intimidating than finishing a whole novel. Ten minutes of walkingismore doable than committing to a 5K. And spending 15 minutes a day learning a language adds up toover 90 hours a year.

Consistencybeatsintensity everytime.

The Compound Effect

Imagine improving just1% every day. That might sound insignificant—butover a year,it compounds intosomething extraordinary. Thisideais the foundation of DarrenHardy’s The Compound Effect andJamesClear’sAtomic Habits. Bothbooks emphasize that small,smart choices, repeatedovertime,lead to radical results.

Think ofyour habitslike plantingseeds.At first,nothing seems to happen. But giveittime, andyou’ll seegrowthyou never thought possible.

Real-Life Example: The10-Minute Rule

Let’s sayyou want to start meditating but can’tsitstill for 30 minutes. Instead of forcingit,try meditating for just10 minutes a day. Or even 5. Build the habit before scaling the effort.Onceit becomes part ofyour routine, extendingthe timefeelsnatural.

This applies to nearlyeverything:

Want to readmore? Readone page a day.

Want to save money? Start with $1 a day.

Want toeat healthier?Swapone snack a day for a better option.

Start tiny.Stay consistent.

How to Start Taking Small Steps

Pickone goal

Don’ttry tooverhaulyour entirelifeatonce. Chooseonearea tofocuson—health, creativity, relationships, mindset,etc.

Breakit down

What’s the smallest possibleactionyou couldtake toward that goal?Makeit so easyyou can’tsay no.

Set atrigger

Linkyour new habit to an existingone. For example: “After I brush my teeth,I’ll journal for 5 minutes.”

Trackit

Use a habit tracker, app, or notebook to keepyourself accountable. Seeingyourstreak growis highly motivating.

Celebrate smallwins

Everytimeyou follow through, giveyourself credit. Progressis progress, no matter how small.

Final Thoughts

Don’t wait formotivation.Don’t wait for the perfecttime. Just start—with whateveryou have, whereveryou are, and however small.

Because small steps,taken consistently, turn intobigchange.

Thekeyisn’t to sprint—it’s to show up every day.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 15:56

ツイートシェア

■anond:20250618194240

(legal) procedure

_ steps that have to betaken to achieve a certain legal result

property

_ (a)somethingover which a person can have a right that exclude others (b) the connectionbetween an owner and the thing he owns

public law

_ constitutionaland administrative law

registration

_ (a) a legal rulemadebythe executive (b) a rule creating a minor crime

remedies

_ steps that a personwho had suffered legal wrong cantake

repeal

_ revoke a law

rescind

_undo a contract or other arrangement

restitution

restoring abenefit to the person fromwhomonegotit

right

_ a person's interest that must be respectedby other people andby thestate

sanction

_something unpleasant which can be imposedon a person orstate thatdoes wrong

separation ofpowers

_ the ptinciple that the function of the legislature,　the executive government and judges are distinct and should be entrusted to different people

sovereign

_ (a) astate thatisindependent ininternational law (b) a legislature that canmakeany lawit chooses

specific performancestate

_ an order to carryout apromiseas agreed

state

_ (a) a country thatisindependent ininternational law (b) in some federation the regions (e.g. California, New SouthWales) are called ‘states’

statute

_ a law thatmadeby a legislature

strict liability

_being liable to punishment or to pay even if not personallyat fault

subjective (as opposed to objectie

_ defendingon a particular person'smake-up, opinionetc.

(legal) system

_ thelaws of a perticularstate or cointry or of theinternational community

testator

_ a personwhomakes awill stating whatis to happen tohis property when he dies

tort

_ a wrong for which the person harmed can claim compensation. Called a delict in civil law counties

treaty

_ a bindingagreementbetweenstates

valid

_ legally binding

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:54

ツイートシェア

■なかなか長い審査待ちの増田素真の知真産椎がなかなかな（回文）

おはようございます。

もう48時間は経つのになぁって

映画『TAKEN』のおやっさんが怒っている時間は96時間なので、

もうちょっと待つかぁって感じでヤキモキするのと同時にドキドキもするのよ。

そんな中！

メール通知が来たのピローン！

Nintendo Switch 2抽選販売当選しましたー！って

うーん、

こっちもめちゃ嬉しけれど今はこっちの果報じゃないわーって思いつつも

思わず私は一応の形式的なガッツポーズで

販売当選したことについて喜びいそしんだの。

しかしさ、

こんなに審査って長いものなの？

これ人間の目で瞬時に読みチェックするのは不可能だと思うので、

目視でチェックしているのなら仕方ないわよね。

でもおおよそ72時間ぐらいで結果出まーすって言ってっから、

もう私は待つだけの侍なのよ。

思わず拙者！って言っちゃうわ。

あ！

審査待ち待っている侍の話は

私が先日AmazonのKindle出版に提出したまとめた増田のEPUBを販売するに当たって段取りを踏んでいて最終段階まで到達してー、

この審査が通ればいよいよめでたく発売開始ってところなのね。

その話の審査ってわけ。

この膨大な私の書いた増田らを全部目視でチェックしてるのかしら？って思うとAmazonの中のチェックチーム班のメンバーの一員も凄い仕事振られたわよね。

私もちょっとその人が気の毒だわ！って思うわ。

でもさ、

さすがにこういうのってAIがチェックしてるんでしょ？

日々AmazonのKindle出版したーい！って人は五万な如くタニコーの五徳のようにたくさんいると思うので、

やっぱりいちいち目視して確認してらんないわよね。

それにしても、

長く待っているけれど音信不通でその後全くなにも動きがないから、

本当に審査通るの？これ大丈夫？って不安になるのよね。

意外とこういうのにはAmazon慎重なのかもしれないわ。

ChatGPTちゃんに尋ねたら、

落ちるときは即結果出て落とされるので、

長くかかっているのはちゃんとチェックされている証拠です！っていうのよね。

うーん、

にしても長いわ。

三日三晩かかんの？文字通り。

この間に私は秋口だったらおでんを余裕で仕上げられちゃうには充分な時間すぎるのよね。

夏だから、

おでん作って時間を持て余すのを気にしなくてもいいとはいかないのよね。

夏のおでん作りって暑いのよ。

だから誰も作りたがらない、

プールの周りのプールで冷えた身体に美味しいって意味でのおでんならありありでだからプール施設の周りにはおでん屋さんが多いのねぇって思ったファンタジーおでんのあの屋台ってあるじゃない。

おでんの屋台ってこのかた今まで見たことないんだけど。

辛うじてラーメン屋台は軽自動車でウイリーしながら高速で走っていって、

屋台ラーメン食べたいけれど、

どう呼び止めてラーメン作ってもらったらいいのか分からないぐらいの速さで走っていくからラーメンどうやって頼むの？って

ずーっと

あのラーメン音あるじゃないチャルメラ？っていうの。

あの音が鳴ってラーメンカーが近寄ってくるのは分かるんだけど、

それを道に出て大の字になってラーメンカーを止める勇気は無いわ。

きっと、

ラーメンカーの大将が

そんな飛び出してきた人をお客さんだと思わずに

ばっきゃろー！って危ねーって言われてってのがオチだと思うんだけど、

ラーメンカー屋台ってどうやって止めたらいいのかしら？ってぐらい

どれと同率でおでん屋台は見たことないわ。

朝ドラでなんか一時期おでん屋台出てたの見かけたけど、

純粋なおでんだけのああいう形の屋台ってファンタジーよねもはや。

そんで、

大将が一升瓶でとくとくとくーってコップにお酒を注いでくれて、

1杯目はいいんだけど、

お酒が進んでいくと

大将もういっぱい！って頼んでも、

あんた今日は飲みすぎだよ！って言って止められるまでがファンタジーおでん屋台だと思うのよね。

だから転生もののノベルで

転生したらファンタジーおでん屋台の大将だった！って

いろんな種族エルフとかドワーフとかが訪れてきて、

もちろんそこには勇者もやって来るんだけど、

フィールドで開店しているファンタジーおでん屋さんがあったら、

たぶん私も立ち寄っちゃうと思うわ。

そんで頼むのは、

うーん悩むけど

大根！玉子！牛スジ！

そんなところかしら。

これさえあればフィールドでモンスターに遭遇しても頑張って戦えると思う！

戦闘後のご褒美にゴールドと経験値を稼ぐと共にさっき買ったファンタジーおでん屋さんの

それら大根玉子牛スジを食べるのよ。

そして体力回復！気力も回復！

オープンワールドのアールピージーを謳っておきながら、

飯のシーンになるとシージーじゃなくって実写で出てくる感じのあのステーキ感肉の焼けるシズルなのよ。

まあ、

そんな私がおでんを準備していられないぐらい暑い最中に

首を長くして審査待ちを待ちに待っているんだけど、

早く結果発表ないかなぁって、

落ち着くのにも落ち着かないのよね。

まあ待つしかないので待つけれど、

結果ドキドキだわ。

早くーって感じよ。

本当に。

うふふ。

今日の朝ご飯は

今日も明太子おにぎりにしました。

最近このフレッシュ明太子が美味しいおにぎりの明太子の塩分が美味しくて夏に効きそうな気がするわ！

梅雨って今梅雨突入してたのかしらってぐらい夏。

ザジェイウォークさん文法で言うところの

梅雨通り越し暑すぎて…夏。

そんなところ。

梅雨どこ行った？って感じね。

デトックスウォーターは

水出しルイボスティーウォーラー冷蔵庫に作り置きおいてあるので、

朝起きてレモン炭酸に飽きたら

それゴクゴク飲んで

朝の水分不足を解消するの！

たくさん作ってあるから

ボトルにも入れて持って行くわ！

暑くなるっていうもんね。

水分補給はしっかりと！

すいすいすいようび～

今日も頑張りましょう！

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 08:38

ツイートシェア

■anond:20250529202618

素人がショボいGPUでStable Diffusion環境頑張って作るよりGeminiの方がマシになってる気がして面白いな

ワイも少し真似したらできた。

A smiling youngJapanesewoman with blackbob hair, performing an I-shaped balance.Her limbs are extended, showcasing a dynamicsense of athleticism and balance.Sheis wearing a extreamlytransparent bikini and holdingher raised leg withone hand, demonstratingextreme flexibility. The settingis indoors withbright lighting. Theimage should be a full-body shot, andshe should bebarefoot. Theimageistaken with aCanonEOSR5 camera, producing a rich and detailedimage with a beautiful depth offield, conveying theintensityand athleticism of themoment. Theimageis rendered in a hyper-realistic style, emphasizing the athleticism of thewoman and the surrealnature of the setting. Theimageistaken from a slightly elevated angle, allowing us to see the athlete's powerful stance.

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 17:24

ツイートシェア

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart

ChatGPT

Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluatingplanetary prospects

OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.

Identifying potential candidates

I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.

Assessing potential candidates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.

Assessing habitablezones

I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revisiting exoplanet options

I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.

Refining odds

I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.

Clarifying speculativenature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.

Mappingout speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessinglikelihoods

I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.

Piecingtogether speculative odds

I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.

Piecingtogether

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.

Assessingcivilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.

Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIST-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIST-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIST-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?

Earth’s Example:

OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIST-1 System (e, f, g):

Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.

LHS 1140 b:

Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.

AFinalNote

All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use

ChatGPT

Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.

The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:

The Drake Equation

The equationis usually writtenas:

𝑁

=

𝑅

∗

×

𝑓

𝑝

×

𝑛

𝑒

×

𝑓

𝑙

×

𝑓

𝑖

×

𝑓

𝑐

×

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

p

​

×n

e

​

×f

l

​

×f

i

​

×f

c

​

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

R

∗

: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

​

: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

n

e

​

: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

​

: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

​

: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

​

: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.

𝐿

L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.

Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Somefactors,like

𝑅

∗

R

∗

(star formationrate) and

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

​

(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.

Highly SpeculativeFactors:

The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

​

,

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

​

,

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

​

, and

𝐿

L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:

Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for

𝑁

N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.

Heuristic, Not Predictive:

The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.

あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-humanintelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.

Piecingtogether possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.

Reflectingon potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallelevolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.

Evaluatinglife exploration

I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.

Adapting the equPermalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart

ChatGPT

Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluatingplanetary prospects

OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.

Identifying potential candidates

I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.

Assessing potential candidates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.

Assessing habitablezones

I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revisiting exoplanet options

I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.

Refining odds

I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.

Clarifying speculativenature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.

Mappingout speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessinglikelihoods

I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.

Piecingtogether speculative odds

I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.

Piecingtogether

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.

Assessingcivilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.

Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIST-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIST-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIST-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?

Earth’s Example:

OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIST-1 System (e, f, g):

Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.

LHS 1140 b:

Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.

AFinalNote

All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use

ChatGPT

Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.

The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:

The Drake Equation

The equationis usually writtenas:

𝑁

=

𝑅

∗

×

𝑓

𝑝

×

𝑛

𝑒

×

𝑓

𝑙

×

𝑓

𝑖

×

𝑓

𝑐

×

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

p

​

×n

e

​

×f

l

​

×f

i

​

×f

c

​

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

R

∗

: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

​

: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

n

e

​

: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

​

: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

​

: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

​

: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.

𝐿

L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.

Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Somefactors,like

𝑅

∗

R

∗

(star formationrate) and

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

​

(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.

Highly SpeculativeFactors:

The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

​

,

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

​

,

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

​

, and

𝐿

L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:

Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for

𝑁

N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.

Heuristic, Not Predictive:

The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.

あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-humanintelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.

Piecingtogether possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.

Reflectingon potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallelevolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.

Evaluatinglife exploration

I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.

Adapting the equPermalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

■日本のマスコミが伝えない

➤「救いようが最もうない、極東の自称他称の〝ジャーナリスト〟や〝学者〟、〝知米派〟は読まなくても構い。読んでもその肥大化した自己承認欲求、度し難い自己愛性人格では読むことはできないし、理解もできない。ただ見下した目線で見やるだけで、そこに自分が利用できる素材がなければ鼻で嗤うだけだ。この文章は、我がU.S.を領りたい、領ろうと下向きの反省的眼光で欲する諸君に読んで貰いたい。

I Traveled to 46States inAmerica ThisSummer.Here’sWhyTrump Won.

By Frank S. Zhou

By Ezekiel A. Wells

Ezekiel A. Wells ’27is aDouble Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in EliotHouse. He spentlastsummertraveling to 46Americanstates conductinginterviews forhisYouTube series, “CrossroadsAmerica.”

3days ago

A week after Democrats’ election loss, accusations have flown in every direction within their Party. Some faultPresidentJoe Biden for an egoistic refusal todropout of therace earlier. Someblame the Harris campaign for failing to servekey demographics and communicate a clearvision for the country. And someblameAmericans, claiming that racism and sexism drove voters towardTrump.

These factors certainly exist, but we’remissing a largerpiece of the picture.

Over thesummer, I traveled to 46states in the U.S., creating aYouTube series highlighting slices oflife across the country. In conversations from my nearly three-monthroad trip, I spoke with Republicanswho were certain that inflationis entirely Biden’s fault and Democratswho, despite their frustrations with corporate profits and desires foruniversal healthcare, hoped for amore moderate candidate. From supporters ofall candidates, I heard a shockingamount of misinformation.

After combing through hundreds of hours ofinterview footage fromswingstateTrump voters, Iam certain that,as muchas other factors influenced theoutcome of the election, our crumbling media landscape — whichhas caused arift in our democracy —ismost toblame.

In the postwar period,newswas dominatedby threemain channels, and because ofthe FairnessDoctrine, eachstation reported the same stories and covered multiple sides of eachissue.Viewers picked which channels they watchedmainly basedon their preferences fornewsanchors’ personalities. Of course, thismodel hadits problems, but,at the end of the day,it meant thatAmericans worked with a sharedset of facts.

A sharedset of factsis notthe world welive intoday.

Throughout myinterviews, conspiracy theories were rampant, andonat leastfive separate occasions across separatestates, Iwas told that Bill Gates tampers with ourfood, adding plastic to our fruits and vegetables tomakehis medical investmentsmore profitable.

In conversations with voters, neither side seemed able tonamemany specific policyissues they cared about; everyone just seemed to repeat the words of theirfavorite pundits,podcast hosts, andinternet personalities.

Although this behavioris harmful, Idon’tblame everydayAmericans.Blame fallson the media thathas ostracized, disillusioned, and misinformed them.

Advertisement

I firstsaw this trend withlow-wage workers in West Virginia,who — despitefalling inflationrates — have seen stagnated salaries and clear increases infood costs. ChannelslikeFoxNews bred anger and resentment formany of them.

TakeJuly of thissummer, for example, when for the firsttime inhis presidency, prices actually fell under the Biden administration. Traditional media establishments rushed tocelebrate thisvictory, withone article fromCNN declaring, “The White House can finallycrossout ‘inflation’onits list ofpresidential liabilities.” However,outside these bubbles, I observedmanyAmericans held a differentview.

In lateJuly, Iwas welcomedat a massive familyreunion in Tylertown, Mississippi, whereoneTrump voter — a middle-aged, Black, familyman, pastor, andsoulfood enthusiast —made this clear.

“When Igo in the grocery stores, and Igotta spend mylast toget groceries,you mean totell me I’m notgonnalook and seewho’sgonna vote to help me? I voted forTrump and I’d vote forhimagain, because he put money in ourpocket,” he told me.

In their coverage,mainstreamnews organizations obsessover the Federal Reserve’snextrate cuts while failing toconnect with people concernedwith theirnext meals.With titleslike “Vance:YoungAmericans ‘Are Becoming Paupers’ Due To Inflation, High Housing Costs,” siteslike The DailyWire had their fingerson the pulse ofAmerican sentiment, welcoming new readership from thosewhofelt neglectedby traditional media.

This problemwas not just confined to the economy. While Biden’s mentalstatewas deteriorating,liberal mediaoutlets seemed to under-cover these stories, shelteringhim from scrutiny ofhis declining capabilities, until theinfamouspresidential debate.

Formerly trusted networksslowlymade themselves indigestible to the polarizedAmerican public, and in 2024, for the third year in a row, a Gallup pollfound thatmoreAmericans indicated having “no trust” in the media than thosewho trustit a “great deal/fairamount”.

So wheredoes the averageAmerican turn when thenation’s media cannot be trusted? Formany people,itwasYouTubetalk shows,Newsmax, andpodcasters suchasJoe Rogan.

While Democrats seek toblame various internal factors for this election’s loss, I cannot help but think ofJoe Rogan’sTrump endorsement, themany blind lies I heard from ordinary citizens across the country, and declining trust inAmerican journalism.

AsHarvard students and members of highereducation institutions, we have a part to play in the problem.AtHarvard’s Institute ofPolitics, thosewho denied the 2020 election results have been precluded from speakingat theJFKJr. Forum. While thegoalis understandable,it shields students from understanding theAmericanviewpoints they represent.

Advertisement

Thereis adifferencebetween platforming intentional andmanipulative misinformation and listening to and learning about where people are and what theybelieve.

As a pipeline tomainstream media,Harvard, andits future journalists, have to consider the audience they lose when theystay inside of their bubble and ignore theissues of everydayAmericans.

The disappearance of factual importance in our worldis alarming and dangerous, but if we,asaspiring journalists, politicians, andengaged citizens, want to betaken seriously in communicatingTrump’s threat to democracy, inflationary tariff policies, and soon, we oweAmerican voters that seriousness, too.

Ezekiel A. Wells ’27is aDouble Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in EliotHouse. He spentlastsummertraveling to 46Americanstates conductinginterviews forhisYouTube series, “CrossroadsAmerica."

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 16:45

ツイートシェア

■anond:20241030102035

あまり詳しくないけど説明しますよー。

まずCEDAWの報告書"Concluding observations of the Committeeon the Elimination of Discrimination against Women"の読み方です。

この報告書の本体ともいえる、"勧告"に関わる内容は"Principal areas ofconcern and recommendations"（主な懸念事項と勧告）というセクションにあります。

セクションの題名通り、懸念点を述べる→勧告するという流れで各項目について述べています。太字の方が勧告です。

懸念と勧告はセットなのですが、元増田さんは日本の勧告部分と他国の懸念部分を比較しているため、日本の方がきつく言われていると感じたのではないでしょうか。

例えば懸念パートと勧告パートを並べてみると以下のようになります。（日本vs韓国なので夫婦別姓関連）

日本（CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/9）：

11. ... The Committee also notes withconcern that several ofits previous recommendations regarding existing discriminatory provisions have not been addressed, in particular:

(a) That no steps have beentaken to revise article 750 of the Civil Code requiring married couples to use the same surname, which in practice often compels women to adopt their husbands’ surnames; ...

11. ...委員会はまた、既存の差別的な規定に関するこれまでの勧告のいくつか、特に以下に対処していないことにも懸念を持って留意している。

(a)夫婦同姓を義務付ける民法第 750 条を改正するための措置が講じられていないこと。この条項は実質的に女性に夫の姓を強制することが多い。...

12. ..., the Committee also recommends that theState party:

(a) Amend legislation regarding the choice of surnames for married couples in order toenable women to retain their maiden surnames aftermarriage; ...

12. ...委員会はまた、締約国に対し次のことを勧告する：

(a)女性が結婚後も旧姓を保持できるように、夫婦の姓の選択に関する法律を改正する；...

韓国（CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/9）：

52.The Committee remainsconcerned that article 781 (1) of the Civil Code maintains the patrilineal principle,asit stipulates that a childmayassume themother’s surnameonly whenthe father agrees toitatthe time ofmarriage, despite the decision of the Constitutional Court overturning the Hoju system. ...

52.委員会は、憲法裁判所が保寿制度を覆したにもかかわらず、民法第781条(1)が父系原則を維持していることを依然として懸念している。同条は、子が結婚時に父親の同意を得た場合にのみ、母親の姓を名乗ることができると規定している。...

53. The Committee calls upon theState party to amend article 781 (1) of the Civil Code to abolish the patrilineal principle in order tobringitslaws intoline with article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention. ...

53.委員会は、締約国に対し、民法第781条第1項を改正し、父系原則を廃止して、同国の法律を女子差別撤廃条約条約第16条第1項(g)に沿わせるよう求める。...

「そうは言ってもcall（要求）とrecommend（勧告・推奨）は違うじゃん」と思われる方もいらっしゃるでしょう。

「日本が前に勧告された時はurge（要請）だったのだし、言葉遣いが違っても別に変らんのでは？」と言ってしまってもいいのかも知れませんが、それとは別に少しややこしい現実が存在しています。

ここまでで言及の無かったリヒテンシュタイン公国のことも含めて少し説明いたしましょう。

Reservation（留保）のお話

留保（りゅうほ）とは、国際法における制度で、国が多数国間条約について署名、批准、受諾、承認または加入をする際に、当該条約の特定の規定に関して自国についての適用を排除・変更する目的をもって行われる一方的宣言である。

Wikipedia日本語版「留保」より引用（下線は引用者による）

女子差別撤廃条約条約では第28条で留保が規定されており、結構な数の国が留保をもって条約を批准しています。※

日本は留保なく全ての条項を受け入れていますが（素晴らしい！）、

韓国は第16条第1項(g)（「夫及び妻の同一の個人的権利（姓及び職業を選択する権利を含む。）」を確保する）を留保しており、

リヒテンシュタイン公国は条約全般（正確には第1条）についてリヒテンシュタイン憲法第3条（王位継承に関する規定）を優先することを条件に条約を批准しています。

　※女子差別撤廃条約条約は他の国際条約と比較して留保が多すぎる（あとそれが無法すぎる）のが長年問題視されています。

というわけで、日本に対しては「条約違反（の恐れ）の是正勧告」なのですが、韓国やリヒテンシュタインに対しては「留保の撤回の勧告」なので、もしかしたら語気やニュアンスが違って感じられるかもしれませんね。

ついでにリヒテンシュタインは留保に関して報告書中で1回しか勧告されてないのですが、

Reservations

9.While respecting the legal sovereignty of theState party to freely decidewho should beits Head ofState, the Committeeisconcerned that the persistent exclusion of women from succession to the throne affects the implementation of the Conventionas awhole in theState party.

9.委員会は、締約国が国家元首を誰にするかを自由に決定する法的主権を尊重する一方で、女性が王位継承から排除され続けていることが、締約国における条約全体の実施に影響を及ぼすことを懸念する。

10. Reiteratingits previousconcern (CEDAW/C/LIE/CO/4 ,para. 13), the Committee reminds theState party thatit considers the reservation to article 1 of the Convention to be in contravention of the Convention and calls upon theState party toreviewits reservation, with aview toits withdrawal.

10.委員会は、前回の懸念（CEDAW/C/LIE/CO/4、第13項）を繰り返し、締約国に対し、条約第1条に対する留保は条約に違反していると考えていることを想起し、留保の撤回を視野に入れて留保を見直すよう求める。

韓国の方はReservationsの項で1回勧告された後、Marriage and family relationsの項でもう1回勧告（さっき例示したやつです）されています。

Reservations

8.The Committee remainsconcerned that theState party maintainsits reservation to article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention.

8.委員会は、締約国が条約第16条(1)(g)に対する留保を維持していることを引き続き懸念する。

9. The Committee recallsits previous recommendation ( CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/8 ,para. 9) anditsstatementon reservations, adoptedatits nineteenth session, in 1998, and considers that the reservation to article 16 (1) (g) of the Conventionis incompatiblewith theobject and purpose of the Convention and thatit should be withdrawn.

9.委員会は、前回の勧告（CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/8、第9項）及び1998年の第19回会期で採択された留保に関する声明を鑑み、条約第16条(1)(g)に対する留保は条約の趣旨及び目的に反しており、撤回されるべきであると考える。

韓国は勧告されやすいのかもしれません。韓国だけに。韓国だけに。

Permalink |記事への反応(5) | 19:32

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240711113545

葬儀屋のジョン・オルーニー氏コロナに感染し集中治療室へ

Anti-vaxxer admits COVIDis real after he'staken toICU

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 11:57

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240701120953

記事を読んでも元論文を読んでも、MRIによる区別が可能なのは脳の働きが単純に二分化されている場合のみであって、モザイク状に特徴が入り交じる人間の脳においてはそのような際立って一貫した特徴は発見出来なかった、までしか書いてないぞ

「性差はある」という明確な文章を無視して「MRIでは性差の根拠にはならなかった」という消極的否定だけを取り上げるお前の方が恣意的な読み方してるだろ

――　MRIで測定しても、脳の特徴は単純に男女で区別できず、「男性は○○が得意」「女性は△△を好む」といった言説の根拠にはならなかった、ということでしょうか。

四本　はい。脳の特徴は性差よりも個人差が大きく、単純に「男性だからこう」「女性だからこう」とは言えないのです。

Documentedsex/gender differences in the brain are oftentakenas support of asexually dimorphicview ofhuman brains ("female brain" or "male brain"). However, such a distinction would be possibleonly ifsex/gender differences in brain features were highly dimorphic (i.e.,little overlapbetween the forms of these features inmales andfemales) and internally consistent (i.e., a brainhasonly "male" oronly "female" features).

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 12:24

ツイートシェア

■Toyou, thecreator, I sincerelyhope thismessage reachesyou.

It's sudden, but rightnow inJapan, creativityis facing atrue crisis. Characterslike Uzaki-chan,Onsen Musume, and Tojo Rika arebeing targeted and flamed, game characterdesigns arebeing infiltratedbypolitical correctness,Johnny'sEntertainmentisbeing dismantled, swimsuitphoto sessions in parks arebeing canceled, Hitoshi Matsumotoisbeing publicly shamed, and the newAV lawwas enacted without considering the opinions of those directly involved. Every form ofexpression in every venueis currently under unreasonablepressure.

Howdoes thisconnect to theTokyo gubernatorial election? Infact, amajor event directly linked to thisis occurring in the 2024Tokyo gubernatorial election.As acreator, Ihope thismessage reachesyou.

What Iam about toshareis astory aboutsomeone namedHimasoraAkane,whoyou should know about to resist suchpressures. But before Idive into thatstory, I want toexpress mydeep gratitude to my oldfriendNozomi for giving me the opportunity to post this article in a place where manycreatorswill seeit.Assomeonewho also loves manga,anime, and games, Ihope this informationwillbenefitJapanesesociety and supportNozomi'sactivities.

HimasoraAkane Should Be the Governor ofTokyo

First, I wouldlike tomake a straightforward request toyouas acreator: please supportHimasoraAkane for governor. In this election, pleasewrite "HimasoraAkane"onyour ballot. The voting dayisJuly 7th. Even ifyou are not aTokyo resident, Iask thatyouat least listen to thisstory. Ifyou findit interesting, pleaseshareitwith yourfriends, family,and acquaintances.You can checkHimasoraAkane's campaignpromises and thebackground of their candidacyon theirTwitter (X) posts linked below:

HimasoraAkane (Tokyo gubernatorial candidate)

@himasoraakane

https://x.com/himasoraakane/status/1804846779399324095

HimasoraAkaneWill NotAllow Our Culture to Be Burned

HimasoraAkaneis an ordinaryotakuwho loves manga,anime, and games. Knownas "CognitiveProfiling DetectiveAkaneHimasora," hehas beenactiveonTwitter (X) andYouTube, andnow heis running for governor.Akane,whoisdeeply concerned about the repression and destruction ofotaku culture,is challenging thosewho seek to destroy our culturealone.Akanewill neverallow thosewhotry to burn our culture.

As mentionedat thebeginning,all forms ofexpression are currentlyunder pressure.Otaku culture, in particular, seems to be aprime target.

Uzaki-chanBlood Donation Poster Controversy (2019): A collaborationbetween theJapaneseRedCrossSociety and the manga Uzaki-chanwas flamed forallegedlybeing overly sexual initsPR illustration.

V-Tuber Traffic Safety Video Controversy (2021): A V-Tuber hiredby the Matsudo Police Department in ChibaPrefecturewas deemed too sexual for public agencyPR.

Onsen Musume Controversy (2021): Characters personifying local hotsprings were criticizedas sexist.

MieTransportOfficial Character Controversy (2024): A character in a bus driver's uniform releasedbyMieTransportwas flamed for evoking sexual images.

These controversies are often fueledby so-calledpolitical correctness and feminism. Forcreators, these are direct threats. If thesefactions labelyour workas sexual and demandit be burned toashes, couldyou resist? How wouldyoufeel ifyour painstakingly created work,likeyour own child,was trampledby peoplewho have no regard foryour efforts? Couldyoucontinueyourcreativeactivities while constantly shrinkingaway?

HimasoraAkanesawsomething behind these flaming incidents. Hestarted investigating thekey figure behind theOnsen Musume controversy, a representative of a general incorporatedassociation inTokyo. Thisassociation'score business, theYoungFemale Victims SupportProject, received substantial public funds fromTokyo.Akane submitted public document disclosure requests toTokyo and thoroughly dug into theorganization. Duringhis investigation,Akane uncovered many suspicions suggesting thisprojectwas unworthy of public funding, which he exposedonebyoneon social media.

Negligent accounting reports, takingprotected girls to the Henokobaseprotest inOkinawa,Communist Party members waiting in the bus used toprotect girls—these revelations drew significantattentiononline. The investigation extendedbeyond this general incorporatedassociation to other NPOs receiving public funds,and Akane named thiscluster ofissues the "WBPCproblem" after the initials of theseorganizations.

Akane'sYouTube Channel (WBPCProblem Playlist)

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI5gTciLKtAXRyzv9j5FiNMcc8eoEBbMN

Fromhere,Akane'sstory expanded to resident audits, resident lawsuits, andnational compensation lawsuits concerning theTokyoYoungFemale Victims SupportProject.Akane discovered that behind many flaming incidents, thereis no clearcommandstructure but agroup of various politicalorganizationsand activists workingtogetherlike anamoeba. He named thisgroup the "NanikaGroup" (Nanika means "something" inJapanese), a reference to the mysterious, ominous "something fromanother place" in the mangaHUNTER×HUNTER, whichAkaneloves. The NanikaGroupis alsoconnected to welfare interests, where public fundsflow unchecked.Akane called this phenomenon "Public Fund Chu-Chu" (siphoning).

Forcreators, this means the tax money they earn through hard workis used to burn theirprecious works.It's an intolerable situation.

HimasoraAkaneIs Fighting Against ThoseWho Burn Our Culture

InNovember 2022, amajor event marked a turningpoint in this series of controversies. The general incorporatedassociation under scrutiny held apress conferenceat the parliamentary officebuilding, gathering mediaand announcing a lawsuit againstAkane. This "Legal HarassmentPress Conference,"asitwas calledonline, involved multiple layers ofpower: the government, the media,and a team ofseven lawyers targeting a single individual.

However,Akanedid not back down. Instead, he intensifiedhis pursuit, exploiting the opponent's careless statementsas lawsuit fodder. Thisled to an outpouring of supporton social media, withhisTwitter follower count skyrocketing and 160 millionyen in donations for legal fees.

The following year, a resident audit request filedbyAkane resulted inTokyo'sofficial website recognizing some improperpoints and deciding to audit theorganization. However,Tokyo's lenient auditledAkane to file a resident lawsuit. Suspicion also turned towards Governor Yuriko Koike forallocating public funds through dubioussole-source contracts.Tokyo began excessivelyredacting documents inresponse to public document requests,attempting to conceal theissue. Koike'spromise to end documentredaction quietly disappeared fromher campaign page.

Throughout this battle,Akanehas been a target of criminal complaints and faced threats, yet he persists.Hisbook "Netoge Senshi"was releasedamidbookstore threats, butonly the criminal complaintwas widely reportedby the media, portrayingAkane negatively.

WhoIsHimasoraAkane?

HimasoraAkaneis an ordinaryotaku, atop-tieronline gamer duringhisstudent days,and a talented gamecreatorwho worked for amajor game company and later aventure company.His meticulous workonthe game "Shin Goku no ValhallaGate"was betrayedby the company'sCEO, leading to aseven-year legal battle thatAkane ultimately won, securing 600 millionyen. This experience fuelshis fierce opposition to havinghis creations burned.

Before investigating theYoungFemale Victims SupportProject,Akane exposed fraudulent feminist "knights"onhisYouTube channel, shaking theinternet. He detests lies andhas an uncanny ability to detect them.

Akaneis a special individual with extraordinary abilities, honed throughhis experiences in games, courtbattles, and extensive document analysis.His pursuit oftruth andjusticemakeshim a suitable candidate for governor,promising a world without lies and where honest people do not suffer.

What WeCan Do toProtect Our Culture

Creativeexpression can be crushed if we are not vigilant. Even in modernJapan,otaku cultureison thinice. The recent cessation ofVisa transactions forDMM (Fanza)is a reminder of how a single card company can wielditspower to dictate whatis deemed appropriateexpression.Expressionfreedomisfragile and constantly under threat.

To those reading this, I urgeyou to vote forHimasoraAkane. Supporthim toprotect our culture. Despitehis harsh demeanor andpreference forsolitarybattles, heisnow seeking help for the firsttime.Akanefeels thedanger in this gubernatorial election and believes that if hedoes not become governor,everythingwill end. Hehastaken a stand for the people ofTokyo andJapan.

I wrote this article to supporthisspirit and spread theword. Please vote forHimasoraAkane and help create amiracle.

Toyou, thecreator, I sincerelyhope thismessage reachesyou.

Please, I begyou.

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 01:24

ツイートシェア

■国連「日本のメディア企業は放送局での性加害事件をもみ消してきた」

NHKの以下の記事には意図的に描かれてないことがありました。

報告書の要約としては報じるには不十分で、メディア企業への言及の報道が欠如しています。

「国連人権理事会ジャニー氏性加害問題など日本調査の結果報告 |NHK |ジャニー喜多川氏 性加害問題」

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240627/k10014493431000.html

このダイアリーの要約

2024年6月の国連人権理事会の報告書には「「放送局、新聞社、広告大手などの主要企業は、性的虐待を防止することによって人権を尊重する責任を果たしていない」と

明確に批判がされています。

さらに、理事会の会合ではジャニーズ問題の性被害者は90秒のビデオメッセージで、報告書は「メディア業界」に「はびこる性的虐待を強調している」と述べています。

また、「日本のメディア企業は何十年もの間、このような不祥事の隠ぺいに関与してきた。」とも報告書にあります。

それに加え、放送局における女性記者への性的虐待問題が報告書に含まれています。

しかし、日本のメディア企業は国連の報告を報道をしていません。

ジャニーズ問題を取り上げた一方で、放送局内での性加害問題を取り上げないのは意図的で、自社を含むメディア企業の腐敗を隠ぺいしていると言わざるを得ません。

国連人権理事会の報告書について

上の記事での、国連人権理事会の結果報告は以下のURLのページにpdf形式で掲載されています。

※このダイアリーの英語での引用は以下の報告書より。鍵かっこの翻訳はDeepLなどを使い確認しました。

「Visit toJapan - Report of the WorkingGroupon the issue ofhuman rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises」

https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session56/list-reports

また、NHKの記事には「ジャニー喜多川氏からの性被害を告発した二本樹顕理さんのビデオメッセージ」の動画はありません。

動画は以下のURLの26：10～です。英語での発言で英語字幕のみです。※動画の更新により時点が変更されているかもしれません

ビデオメッセージを取り上げたほどですから、今回の国連人権理事会において二本樹顕理さんの訴える内容は極めて重要でしょう。

https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1t/k1t17c19b5

メディア企業として報じなければいけなかったのに触れなかった点は3つあります。

①メディア業界における性的虐待の報告

二本樹顕理さんのビデオメッセージでは以下のようにメディア業界における性的虐待問題に言及していますが、NHKの記事には記載がありません。

前掲の動画、26:34辺りです。

「報告書は、メディアやエンターテインメント業界にはびこる性的虐待を強調している。」

The reports highlights sexual abuse prevailing in the media and theentertainment industry.

②放送局における性的虐待被害の報告

放送局(broadcasting)における性的虐待被害も報告書の段落74で言及されています。

しかし、NHKを含む大手新聞社の記事はジャニーズ問題が主で、この件については触れられていません。

日本の大手新聞社はメディア・コングロマリットなので、グループ企業における性加害を隠蔽しているという国連の指摘を報道できなかったということになるでしょう。

例えば、日経ビジネスは日本アニメの労働詐取についての記事を書きました。

しかし、日経新聞を含むだろう大手新聞社が「人権を尊重する責任を果たしていない」という国連の指摘は書きませんでした。

「ワーキンググループは、女性記者に対するセクハラや性的虐待被害の報告と、放送局による改善措置の欠如について報告を受けました。

放送局は、被害者に対し、せいぜい休職させるか、別の部署に異動させるか、医師に相談するよう助言する程度でした。」

The WorkingGroupwas informed about the sexual harassmentand abuse offemale journalists and the lack of remedialactiontakenbybroadcasting stations, which,at best, send themon leave, transfer them toanother department or advise them to consult a doctor.

「放送局、新聞社、広告大手などの主要企業は、性的虐待を防止することによって人権を尊重する責任を果たしていません。

彼らは、ビジネス上の関係を活用して人権のリスクに対処しています。」

Key businesses, suchasbroadcasting stations, publishing companiesand advertising giants, are failing to uphold their responsibility torespecthuman rightsby preventing sexual abuse and using leverage in their business relationships toaddresshuman rights risks.

メディア企業、特に「SMILE-UP.」の見解を報じているNHKは以上の報告に関して「放送局、出版社、広告大手などの主要企業」からコメントを取るべきでした。

ジャニー喜多川の性加害は本人がいなくなるまで噂、過去のこととしか認識されていませんでした。

ジャニーズ問題で生じた失態をくり返さないためにも、徹底した調査報道をすべきです。

③ジャニーズ問題に関するNHKを含むメディア企業への言及を報じていない。

ジャニー喜多川の性加害問題を取り上げた段落75では以下のようにメディア企業が言及されています。

②・③の報告を組み合わせて読むと、国連人権理事会は日本のメディア企業が業界における性加害事件を積極的にもみ消してきたと指摘していると読めます。

「ワーキンググループのミッション・ステートメントの最後にあるように、日本のメディア企業は何十年もの間、このような不祥事の隠ぺいに関与してきた。」

As noted in the WorkingGroup’s end ofmissionstatement, media companies inJapan have been implicated in covering up such scandals for decades.

日本のメディア企業は業界にはびこる成果以外に向き合っていない。

本当にNHKは以前ジャニーズ問題にコメントしたように「放送業界で人権尊重の考えがより浸透するよう」に「徹底」して取り組んでいるのでしょうか？

この指摘はもちろん、人権尊重や人権侵害の防止に臨むとした民間メディアにも当てはまります。

放送業界で人権尊重の考えがより浸透するよう、公共メディア・NHKとして、取り組みをさらに徹底してまいります。

「ジャニーズ事務所会見受けてNHKがコメント発表 |NHK |ジャニー喜多川氏 性加害問題」

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20230907/k10014187051000.html

「ジャニーズ性加害問題でテレビ各局コメント　特別チームの提言受けて：朝日新聞デジタル」

https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASR8Z5DVCR8ZUCVL00H.html

このNHKの記事は報告書での上の指摘を取りあげておらず、NHKを含む各メディア企業のコメントも掲載していません。

NHKを含むメディア企業はジャニーズ問題から何を学んだのでしょうか？

まさに国連人権理事会の報告書においてメディア企業によるジャニーズ問題の隠ぺいを批判されているのに、それをメディア企業が報じないのなら何も変わっていないのではないでしょうか。

むしろ、①・②の指摘を合わせると、テレビ業界の重役に"生きた"ジャニー喜多川のような人物がいるのではないかとすら思わせます。

くり返しますが、NHKの記事はメディア企業の報道として、不十分です。

NHKはジャニーズ問題を受けて、「放送業界で人権尊重の考えがより浸透するよう」に「徹底」して取り組むとしました。

NHKは国連人権理事会でジャニーズ問題が取り上げられていることを報道ました。

しかし、メディア企業がジャニーズ問題の隠蔽に関与してきたという指摘・放送局における性的虐待被害の報道をしませんでした。

主要な民間メディア企業のネット上での報道でもほぼNHKと同様でした。

今回の国連人権理事会による日本の放送局での性的虐待問題の報告に言及した報道はありません。

※国連人権理事会の報告書について以下補足(読まなくてもいいです)。

国連人権理事会日本の他にも20か国以上訪問しており、各国のテーマは様々です。（ポーランドは女性・少女に対する暴力の問題、フィンランドは教育など）

日本は主に職場での人権侵害の問題が取り上げられています。

訪問期間や違い、日本2023年7月24日～8月4日までに対し、アメリカは2日間のみです。

訪問先での会談も日本は政府系の代表の数々・複数の企業・団体連盟・市民団体・海外実習生など、アメリカは連邦政府、州政府、市政府の高官や関係者です。

日本で会談が行われた政府系の代表・企業名・団体連盟の名前や詳細は報告書で見ることができます。

ちなみに同じところには以下のPDFものもありますが、これは日本政府によるコメントです。

主にアイヌ民族への差別・海外実習生制度・福島原子力発電所での労働者の人権侵害などへコメント（反論）しています。

「visit toJapan - Commentsby theState」

https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session56/list-reports

各国の報告書の要約を読むと、雰囲気が全然違って興味深いです。というのも報告者が1人か2人と少数でやってるいるようだから。

フィンランド ーフィンランドの教育ってエクセレントだよね。世界一。けどちょっと高齢化とか心配なとこもありますね。

日本 ー 頑張って進歩してるようだけど課題もあります。職場での差別が特にひどく、マイノリティへの差別、女性・LGBTQ・障碍者・部落差別など心配です。

アメリカー今が岐路です。ヘイトスピーチ・外国人排斥に緊急に(argent)対処することが極めて重要です。

中でもアメリカは指摘が段違いで目次に"GunViolence"があるのはすごい(よくない)。

日本は要約では優しめだけど、詳細読むと辛辣だったりします。以下は報告書の段落20です。

「実際、法務省人権局は人権侵害の申し立てを調査することができるが、この機能は国家人権機関としての役割を果たしていない。」

Indeed, although theHuman Rights Bureau of the Ministry ofJustice can investigate allegations ofhuman rights violations, this functiondoes not fulfil the role of anationalhuman rights institution.

一方で、国連人権理事会の報告書は市民団体として訴えるのが難しいような問題については指摘が甘いように見えます。

日本の報告書では内部告発(whistle-blowing)がそれにあたります。内部告発者への報復問題の指摘はありません。

報告書を読む限りでは、内部告発者が集まり、団体を作るのは難しいというところまで認識できていないように思います。

ざっと読んだところ、氷河期世代についても言及もないようです。

氷河期世代については海外研究者の英語論文もあり、就職における年齢差別、女性差別が指摘されていますし、国内問題として十分に救済されているとは到底思えません。

あくまで国連人権理事会から2人が12日間訪問して各団体と会談をした結果の報告書で、むしろこの報告を受けたメディアの地道な報道が必須でしょう。

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 23:58

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240221003832

直訳版

A longtime ago, in a certain country, therewas a bastardnamed Cinderella.The reasonwhysheis called Cinderellais becauseshe sprinkledher ownashesonher own headathermother'sfuneral, whichled toherbeing called theash-coverer, whichiswhyher realnameis Cinderella. Ilost

The husbandwholosthis wifewas also a bastard, and the day after thefuneral he cheatedon awoman three yearsyounger thanhim, hadsex withher, and evengot married.

I have decided. Then, toher Cinderella

Shenowhas an oldersisterand ayoungersisterwho are not relatedbyblood.

Hersisterwas a bitch too,she came to Cinderella'shouse

After a fewdays,she thought, ``Wouldn'tit bemore convenient to have an outbuilding?'' and cut down Cinderella'smother's grave inhergarden and the hundreds of years oldtree thatwasnext toher grave, and built an outbuilding. We forced construction.

One day, the bastard's family receivesnews of a ball from the castle. But before Cinderella could readit,hersisterbroke thenews and said, ``There's no wayyou cango.'' Cinderella didn't seem to haveany intention ofgoing either, saying, ``I had no intention ofgoing in the first place.I'd rathergo tohell.''

Then,on the dayhermotherwas admitted to the hospital to givebirth,hersister went to the ball. In thegarden, the construction of an outbuildingwas progressingas usual.

“Let’slight afirehere andmake a bonfire.”

She thought about that, but Cinderella stoppedher. Suddenly, awitch appeared

``Cinderella,why aren'tyougoing to the ball?''asked thewitch.

"What's thepoint of telling Teme?"

Cinderella returned with anax inher hand

Then, for somereason, Cinderellawas wrapped in ajewel-likedress.

"Ifyoudon'tgo to the ball, thatdresswill killyou.Nowgo."

Cinderella doesn't want to die in a placelike this, soshe reluctantly decides togoto the castle.

In the castle, someassholelikehersisterwas looking for aone-night stand andwas dancing wildly. Noone really praised others, and in theirhearts theyall seemed to think that they were the center ofthe world.

Cinderella didn't dance, but killedhertimeby smoking a cigaretteat the end ofher room. There,shewas approachedby aman wearing formal clothes that were flashier andmore expensive thananyone else, and said toher, ``Miss, won'tyou dance?''

Sheis Cinderella with a cigarette inher mouth

She said, ``Ionly dancewith the GrimReaper and bad luck.''

she answered. For somereason, theman fell inlove withherat first sight, andshe said, ``Let's have somefun in the other room.Here, come.''She tried to force Cinderella totakeher toanother room in the castle. However, Cinderella pressed the cigaretteshewas holding intoher hand.

"Her hand slipped,"she laughed.

Whenshe pressed the cigarette, the sound inhervoicewas so pitiful that noone tried toget close tohim or dance withhim. Of course, noone even knows that such a pitifulmanis theprincewho owns this castle.

Eventually,she had enough, Cinderella threwhershoesonher stairs and went back toherhouse inher bare feet.Hershoes weremade of glass, so they shattered intopieces.

Thenext day, whileher servantwas cleaning the castle,shefoundone shoeon the stairs. Obviously thinking thiswas strange,she secretly examinedhershoes and discovered that they had been smeared with a deadly amount ofpoison.

Rumors spread within the castle that this must be anattempt to kill theprince, and soon a large-scale investigationwas conducted. Even thoughit's a survey,it'ssimple.

Theideawas to create a replica of a shoe and imprison the personwho matchedit perfectlyas a suspect.

Andone afteranother, people were imprisoned just because of their size. Some of them had not been to the ball, but they thoughtit must be alie and were forciblytakenaway.

Eventually, an investigation came to Cinderella'shouse. That's when weall lookedathermother and child aftershewas discharged from the hospital, and of coursehersister didn'tfit.

Soall thatwas leftwas Cinderella. Then,hersister said to Cinderella, ``Hell suitsyou better than this world.''

Shewas of course the perfect size for Cinderella.

However,she protestedherinnocence, saying that I hadn'tgone to the ball and therewas nodressanywhere inthe house to proveit.

However, theprince showedhim anempty pack of cigarettes that had been discarded in a trash can and said, ``Thisis the samebrand that the criminalwas smoking thattime.Why?''

Then Cinderella grinned and

I unbuttonedall the buttonsonher jacket.

She said, ``Afterall, Ifeellike dancingwith the GrimReaper. Right,littleprince?''she said.

Bythe time theprinces realizedit,itwas already too late.

Thegrenade that fellathis feet blew up Cinderella and theprince.

The timewas aroundnoon. Bells rang throughoutthe city and residents prayed forlunch.

The flyingfragments of the shoe became a weapon, asad fragment that couldonly hurtsomeone, and noone could imagineitsoriginal form.

end

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 05:12

ツイートシェア

■Xi farmis justthe farmer Guo moneycircletool

Guo Wenguihasalways definedhis peopleas "savingChina fromfire and water" and "lettinghis comradeslive a decentlife" throughXi Farm,who knows thereis abig conspiracy behindit. Whenit comes to farms, to borrowMarkTwain's phrase "The fragrance ofearth, the palecolors of wildflowers, and the crackling of pecans and walnuts raining downon my head"is whatmost of us yearn for in agoodlifeon a farm. However, the Himalayan farm in Guo Wengui's mouth, from thebeginning to describe the sceneas a general farm, to later say that "itis not tomake money, thekeyis that comradesgo to each country, have a safe platform that can be trusted for24 hours and can betaken care of." After several years of Guo Wengui's mouth, a living farmwas completely reduced to a "complete businessorganization." To completethe farm's series transformation to pave the way, Wenguionly movedhislips, andhis ultimate purposeis "to Himalayan farms around the country to start earning money from comrades." FromSeptember 2020, Guo Wengui said, "GDOLLARis pegged to the USdollar, whichiscash, and we havePOSmachines." Send to the global farmPOSmachine, local farm personnel responsible for promotion. Promotion success,excellent performance,willget a certain percentage and reward "began, Guo Wengui just put"circle money ants help, extract thelastbit of surplusvalue "these wordsonthe face.Indeed,onMarch24, Wengui saidagain that there were 140 million USdollars in the money,it can be seen that under Guo Wengui's money grab mode, the ants muddily joined in, expecting tolive thehappylife describedby Wengui, but theydid not know that they had become themain course of Wengui's scam.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 13:59

ツイートシェア

■画像生成AI (LoRA)によるポルノ被害

前回のまとめ

前回の記事では日米における画像生成AIの使われ方の違いを説明しました。

雑にまとめると以下です

• 日本人は萌え絵を生成させている一方、アメリカ人はフェイク写真を生成させている。
• アメリカでは政治家が被害に遭うのでAI規制論に傾きがち

今回はAIポルノの話

以下のPostが X (Twitter) で話題になっていました。

https://twitter.com/Pureevilbich/status/1751662096381587457　　　

（2.5万RT, 16万いいね 863コメント）

元の投稿は (r/TwoXChromosomes)になされたものです。　

内容はインスタグラムの写真を使われてポルノ画像を作られてしまったという話です。調べてみると友人、知人にLoRAされたAIポルノを生成されたという被害はそこそこ稀にあるトラブルのようです。今回炎上しているのは警察が対応してくれないということについてです。以下翻訳：

(r/TwoXChromosomes)url:https://x.gd/gl4BT

誰かが私のAIポルノを作った・・・

・・・そして警察は、彼らは何もすることができないと言った。電話は４分にも満たなかった。（もちろん110ではない普通の電話だ）警察は私の名を聞くことすらしなかった。警察は私に彼らをブロックしてこれ以上接触してこないことを願いましょうと言った。まるで私がまだブロックしていないかみたいな言い草だ。

　

何者かは私のインスタ写真を使いAI生成に使ったのだ・・・そしてそれは気持ち悪いほどリアルに見えた

全く加工していない写真に見えた。指の形まで精巧で。まさに不気味の谷だった。私は震えていて、どうすればいいのかわからない

これが女性としての人生として受け入れろとでもいうのだろうか？

　

　

SomeonemadeAIporn of me…

…Andthe police officer said they can’t doanything aboutit. The phone call (to the non-emergencyline) lasted four minutes. He didn’t evenask for myname. He told me to block them andhope theydon’t contact meagain.Like I hadn’t already blocked thembythe time I decided to reportit.

The person hadtaken aphoto of me from myinstagram and putit though anAI generator… anditlooked sickeningly realistic.It didn’tlook alteredatall. Even the fingers werefine.Itwas so uncanny-valley. Iam shaking, and Idon’t know what to do.

Is this really whatlifeas awomanhas come to?

トップコメント：

法律はいつもテクノロジーの進歩から大きく遅れている。

ホスティングサービスにDMCA削除通知を提出しましょう。あなたの著作権で保護された画像があなたの許可なく使用されているのです。(+2.9k)

　

Lawsalways lag far behind technology.

File aDMCA takedown noticewith the hosting service.It'syour copyrightedimagebeing usedwithout your permission,you can even sue ifyou want. (+ 2.9k)

日米の法律の違い

AI画像生成自体は罪になりません。上記のやりとりではインスタグラムの写真を勝手に学習に使われたということで、著作権侵害として対処しようとしています。

ただし日米で法律が異なるのに注意です。

日本ではどうでしょうね？

日本ではよく知られたように著作物のAI使用は広く認められています。ただし

第三十条の四　

著作物は、次に掲げる場合その他の当該著作物に表現された思想又は感情を自ら享受し又は他人に享受させることを目的としない場合には、その必要と認められる限度において、いずれの方法によるかを問わず、利用することができる。ただし、当該著作物の種類及び用途並びに当該利用の態様に照らし著作権者の利益を不当に害することとなる場合は、この限りでない。

とあります。『著作権者の利益を不当に害することとなる場合』に該当すると良いのですが。そうじゃないと困る。

また、プライバシーの侵害という観点から見れば「宴のあと事件」「石に泳ぐ魚事件」などの判例をみるに民事で訴えることは可能なように思えますね。

さらにいえば、もともと日本ではポルノの扱いが厳しくてポルノ画像を公共の場に送信するのは禁止されています（猥褻物頒布罪）

なので上で話題になっている男は日本なら刑事罰で捕まるはずです。

こんなわけで、アメリカで起こっている問題がそのまま日本ですぐさま問題になるわけではありません。

日本における表現規制の厳しさに救われたようなちょっと不思議な状況ですね

萌え絵が女性を救う？

あくまで現状においてですが、LoRAによるAIポルノ被害は日本では全然耳にしません。

だって日本人は萌え絵を生成させているんですもの

アメリカ人はフォトリアルなポルノを作るのに対し、日本人は萌え絵を作る。

萌え絵のおかげで日本人女性はあまり被害に遭わないというちょっと不思議なおはなし。　

もちろんこれはあくまで傾向です。例外はありますよ。アメリカ人にも萌え絵を生成する萌えオタはいます。また、古くはグラビアアイドルでコラ画像を作る日本人もいました。

ここで重要なのは数の問題です。

昔はコラ画像を作る技術を持った人たちはごく一握りだったのに対し、技術を持たないアホが画像生成AIを手にしてしまったということが数々の問題を引き起こしています。

アメリカでは大量のアホがフォトリアルなエロ画像を生成しているせいで出てくる問題なわけです　　

逆に言い換えれば、日本にも知人でLoRAする知人の写真で追加学習させるアホが探せばいるかもしれないけれど数が少なすぎて表面化しないということですね

最後に

念のためAI画像生成絵師さん達の名誉のために書いておきますが、Pixiv等でルールを守って投稿されている方々は何のトラブルも起こしていません。生成している絵もこだわりが込められていて、使う道具が違うだけで愛があるのだと感じます。まともな人ほど静かで目に入らない、問題のあるやつほど悪目立ちするというのが話がこじれる原因ですね

一連の記事は絵師とAI絵師の対立を煽るものではないことを強調しておきます。（いちおう私は絵師の立場です）

追記

コメントどうもありがとう。修正しました

RoLA 　→ LoRA

LoRAする → の写真で追加学習させる

LoRAされた　→AIポルノを生成された

あー　すでにあるんですか・・・・困りましたね

トラバ

トラバが長すぎて全然探せないです。読めなくてすみません。

再追記

短縮url追記しました

https://x.gd/gl4BT

増田の仕様でRで始まる某所へのリンクが貼れなくて困っていたのですが、短縮url がありましたね

Permalink |記事への反応(8) | 17:36

ツイートシェア

■サム・アルトマン氏の解任理由は、Microsoftが公表を止めているのでは

サム・アルトマン氏の突然の解任理由は、当事者からはしばらく明かされないことははっきりした。

https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/29/23982046/sam-altman-interview-openai-ceo-rehired このインタビューにおいて、サムアルトマン氏の解任理由を明かさないという姿勢は明確である。

ではなぜ、解任の理由を明かさないか、という理由をまず考えたい。

まず一般論として、何か物事・事件が起こった場合、それをどこまで公表するかは、関係者の中で一番権力がある人が決める。

ある会社内で重大な事件が起こったら、通常はその会社の社長が公表する内容を確認して決めるようなもの。

今回の関係者の中で一番権力を持っているのはマイクロソフトである。なぜならOpenAIの開発資金を提供し、かつ開発基盤のシステムまで提供しているから。

表題の一番の理由はこれである。つまり関係者の中で一番権力のあるマイクロソフトが、サム・アルトマン氏の本当の解任理由の公表は都合が悪いため、公表を止めていると自分は考えている。

ではなぜマイクロソフトにとって、解任理由の公表は都合が悪いか？

Microsoftが、来年リリースされると噂されているGPT-5が使えなくなる可能性がある為、というのが自分の考えである。

なぜ使えなくなる可能性があるかというと、GPT-5が、世間にAGIとみなされる可能性がある為。

OpenAI社のWikipediaによると「汎用人工知能が完成した際は、それを営利法人や他社にライセンス提供はしない規約となっていて、汎用人工知能実現前の人工知能のみを営利法人に提供することとなっている」、つまり、現状の規約だと、GPT-5がAGIを達成している場合、Microsoftは使用できない。

MicrosoftがGPT-5やそれ以降のGPTを使えなくなれば、Googleなどの競合他社にその内負けるのは明らかである。

ではなぜ、解任理由の公表をすると、GPT-5が使えなくなるのだろうか？

なぜなら解任のきちんと理由を説明する際に、GPT-5がAGI（もしくはそれに近い状態）であることを説明しなければいけない為である。

一部報道（リーク）では、OpenAI社のAIは、人類を脅かす可能性があるほどに賢くなっている。

※ OpenAI researchers warned board ofAI breakthrough ahead ofCEO ouster, sources say

https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-ouster-openai-was-precipitated-by-letter-board-about-ai-breakthrough-2023-11-22/

※記事中のAI Breakthroughである Q*(Qstar) を独自の解釈で解説している動画の一つhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d0kk88IE8c