  |
はてなキーワード:senseとは
人工知能（AI）の急速な進化は、私たち人間に突きつけられた実存的な問いである。「計算能力において機械が人間を凌駕したとき、人間に残される価値とは何か」。この問いに対し、多くの議論は「創造性」や「直感」といった曖昧な領域に逃げ場を求めてきた。しかし、マックス・ベネット著『知性の未来』と、それを翻訳・解説した脳科学者・恩蔵絢子氏の洞察は、より生物学的かつ哲学的な深淵へと私たちを導く。
彼らが提示する結論は、逆説的である。「AI時代に人間が持つ最大の能力は、感情になる」。そして、「本当に頭が良い人とは、他者に興味を持てる人である」。
一見すると、これは道徳的なスローガンのように響くかもしれない。しかし、認知科学、進化生物学、現象学の知見を総動員してこの命題を解剖するとき、そこには「知性」という現象の構造的な転回が見えてくる。本稿では、二重過程理論、ユクスキュルの環世界、身体性認知、社会脳仮説、そして間主観性という5つの視座を補助線とし、AIが決して到達し得ない「知性」の本質と、これからの時代に求められる「知的な生き方」について論じる。
---
まず、私たちが「知性」と呼んできたものの正体を、ダニエル・カーネマンらが提唱した「二重過程理論」の枠組みで再考する必要がある。
伝統的な知能観において、知性とは「システム2（遅い思考、論理、計算）」の能力を指していた。複雑な数式を解き、論理的な推論を行い、未来を正確に予測する力である。現在のAI、特に大規模言語モデル（LLM）は、このシステム2の機能を極限まで外部化・高速化した存在と言える。彼らは感情を持たず、疲労を知らず、膨大なデータから論理的整合性を出力する。
しかし、ベネット氏が描く脳の進化史（5つのブレイクスルー）は、この「システム2至上主義」を根底から覆す。進化の歴史において、論理や言語といったシステム2の機能は、常にシステム1（速い思考、感情、直感）の要請によって開発されてきたからだ。
初期の生物（線虫など）は、「快・不快」という原始的なシステム1のみで生きていた。進化の過程で「予測」が必要になったとき（魚類）、予測誤差としての「失望」や「安堵」という感情が生まれた。さらに複雑なシミュレーション（マウス）が可能になったとき、反事実を嘆く「後悔」という感情が生まれた。
ここで重要なのは、「論理が感情を抑制するために進化した」のではなく、「感情をより細やかに処理し、生存確率を高めるために論理が進化した」という事実である。システム2は、システム1というエンジンの出力を最大化するためのトランスミッションに過ぎない。
AIの限界はここにある。AIには「エンジン（生存への渇望、快・不快、感情）」がない。あるのは精巧なトランスミッション（計算能力）だけだ。エンジンを持たない車が自律的にどこへも行けないように、感情という基盤を持たないAIは、自ら「問い」を発することも、「意味」を見出すこともできない。人間の知性の本質は、論理そのものではなく、論理を駆動し続ける「感情の熱量」にあるのだ。
---
なぜAIには感情が宿らないのか。その答えは「身体」の欠如にある。「身体性認知（EmbodiedCognition）」の視点は、知性が脳という密室の出来事ではなく、環境と相互作用する身体の中に宿ることを教えてくれる。
記事の中で恩蔵氏は、老いによる身体の変化を「老年でしか味わえない内的な経験」として肯定的に捉えている。これは非常に重要な示唆を含んでいる。
生物にとっての「意味（Sense）」は、身体的な脆弱性から生まれる。身体があるからこそ、空腹は「苦痛」となり、食事は「快」となる。皮膚があるからこそ、他者との接触は「温もり」となる。死ぬ定めの身体があるからこそ、時間は「有限」となり、焦燥や希望が生まれる。
AIが扱う情報は、どこまで行っても「記号」である。AIにとって「痛み」という単語は、辞書的な定義や統計的な関連語の集合体に過ぎない。しかし人間にとっての「痛み」は、回避すべき切実なリアリティである。この「切実さ（Stakes）」こそが、世界に色を塗り、価値判断の基準を作る。
身体性認知の視点に立てば、加齢による能力の低下は、単なる「劣化」ではない。それは身体というインターフェースの変化に伴う、世界との関わり方の「再構築」である。
若い頃の強靭な身体で見えていた世界と、老いて動きが緩慢になった身体で見える世界は異なる。その変化を受け入れ、新たな身体感覚を通じて世界を再解釈することは、高度な知性の営みである。AIは「劣化」しない代わりに、「成熟」もしない。身体の変化を通じて世界モデルを更新し続けるプロセスこそ、人間特有の知的な冒険なのである。
---
身体を持った生物は、それぞれの感覚器官が切り取った主観的な世界、すなわち「環世界（Umwelt）」の中に生きている。ユクスキュルが提唱したこの概念は、知性の進化を「孤独からの脱出劇」として描き出す。
ダニにとっての世界は「酪酸の匂い」と「温度」だけで構成されているように、すべての生物は自分の環世界というシャボン玉の中に閉じ込められている。本来、他者の環世界を知ることは不可能である。私はあなたの痛みそのものを感じることはできないし、あなたが見ている「赤」が私と同じ「赤」である保証もない。
この「絶対的な孤独」こそが、生物としての初期設定である。しかし、ベネット氏が指摘する第4、第5のブレイクスルー（メンタライジング、発話）において、人間はこの壁に挑み始めた。
「他者に興味を持つ」とは、自分の環世界という安全地帯から身を乗り出し、他者の環世界を覗き込もうとする無謀な試みである。「あの人は今、何を考えているのか？」「なぜ悲しい顔をしているのか？」。これは、自分の感覚データ（システム1）だけでは完結しない。高度な推論と想像力（システム2）を総動員して、見えない他者の内面をシミュレーションしなければならない。
恩蔵氏が「他者に興味を持つことは難しい」と述べるのは、これが認知的に極めて高コストな作業だからだ。自分の環世界（自分の話、自分の関心）に浸っている方が楽なのだ。しかし、あえてそのコストを支払い、他者の世界へ「越境」しようとする意志。それこそが、人間を人間たらしめている知性の正体である。AIには環世界がないため、そもそも「他者の世界」という概念自体が存在しない。
---
なぜ人間は、これほどまでにコストのかかる「他者理解」という能力を発達させたのか。ロビン・ダンバーの「社会脳仮説」は、それが「集団での生存」に不可欠だったからだと説明する。
自然界の脅威（猛獣や寒さ）に対処するだけなら、これほど巨大な脳は必要なかったかもしれない。しかし、人間にとって最大の環境要因は「他の人間」であった。誰が味方で、誰が裏切り者か。誰と協力すればより多くの食料が得られるか。
他者の心は、天候や物理法則よりも遥かに複雑で、予測不可能な「変数」である。この変数を読み解くために、脳は巨大化し、知性は進化した。記事にある「会話の70％は噂話」という事実は、私たちが情報の交換以上に、人間関係のメンテナンス（社会的グルーミング）に知能のリソースを割いていることを示している。
この文脈において、「頭が良い」という定義は劇的に変化する。それはIQテストのスコアが高いことでも、計算が速いことでもない。
真に知的な個体とは、「他者の意図を正確に読み取り、共感し、信頼関係を構築して、集団としてのパフォーマンスを最大化できる個体」である。
「他者に興味を持てる人」が頭が良いとされる理由は、単なる優しさではない。他者への関心は、複雑な社会マトリックスの中で生き残るための、最も強力なセンサーであり、武器だからだ。自分の殻に閉じこもることは、社会的動物としては「死」に等しい。他者への好奇心は、生命力そのものの発露と言える。
---
そして、知性の進化の到達点は、個人の脳内にも、個別の身体にも留まらない。「間主観性（Intersubjectivity）」の領域、すなわち「私とあなたの間」に生まれる知性である。
記事の中で触れられている「指差し」は、人間特有の驚くべき行動である。チンパンジーは報酬を得るために手を伸ばすが、人間の幼児は「見て！あそこに犬がいるよ！」と、ただ注意を共有するためだけに指を差す。
これは、「私が見ている世界を、あなたにも見てほしい」という強烈な欲求の表れである。ここで初めて、孤立していた二つの環世界が接続される。
言葉、文化、ルール、そして愛。これらはすべて、物理的な実体ではなく、私たちが共有することで初めて存在する「間主観的」な現実である。
AIは「客観的なデータ」を処理することはできる。しかし、「あなたと私の間だけで通じる冗談」や「阿吽の呼吸」、「信頼」といった、主観と主観の間で紡がれる現実を作り出すことはできない。
恩蔵氏が翻訳を通じて感じた「人間の宝」とは、この「心の共有」の可能性そのものであろう。私たちは、他者の心に触れることで、自分一人では決して到達できない豊かな世界（拡張された環世界）を生きることができる。知性とは、個人の所有物ではなく、関係性の中に宿る現象なのだ。
---
以上の分析から、AI時代における「知的な生き方」の輪郭が浮かび上がる。それは、AIに対抗して計算能力を磨くことでも、AIに仕事を奪われないように効率化を目指すことでもない。むしろ、AIが捨て去ったもの、あるいは持ち得ないものを、徹底的に深める生き方である。
AIは効率と最適化の権化である。対して、人間の知性の源泉は「感情」や「身体」といった、一見非効率なノイズの中にある。
知的な生き方とは、効率を追求するあまり、感情の揺らぎや身体の実感を切り捨てないことだ。迷い、後悔し、喜び、痛むこと。これらの「ノイズ」こそが、世界に意味を与え、独自の価値判断を生み出す土壌となる。
「本当に頭が良い人」になるためには、意識的に「他者への旅」に出る必要がある。
SNSのアルゴリズムは、私たちが心地よいと感じる情報だけを見せ、環世界をより狭く、強固なものにしてしまう（フィルターバブル）。知的な態度は、その快適な殻を破ることから始まる。
自分とは異なる意見、異なる背景、異なる身体性を持つ他者に対し、「なぜそう感じるのか？」と問いかけること。自分の正しさを一旦脇に置き、相手の環世界に身を浸すこと。この「認知的負荷」をあえて引き受ける勇気を持つことだ。
AIは「答え」を出すことにおいては人間を凌駕する。しかし、「問い」を立てることはできない。問いは、「こうありたい」「これはおかしい」という、身体的な違和感や理想（感情）から生まれるからだ。
また、AIはデータを羅列できるが、「物語」を生きることはできない。私たちは、他者との関わりの中で、それぞれの人生という物語を紡いでいる。
これからの知性とは、正解のない世界で、他者と共に悩み、対話し、新しい「納得解（間主観的な合意）」を形成していくプロセスそのものを指すようになるだろう。
マックス・ベネットと恩蔵絢子が示したのは、冷徹な計算機としての脳ではなく、熱を帯び、他者を求め、身体を通じて世界と震え合う臓器としての脳であった。
AI時代において、私たちは「賢さ」の定義を、ColdIntelligence（処理能力）から WarmIntelligence（共感と接続の能力） へとシフトさせなければならない。
老いて記憶力が衰えようとも、計算が遅くなろうとも、目の前の人の手の震えに気づき、その心に思いを馳せることができるなら、その人は最高に「知的」である。
他者の心という、宇宙で最も複雑で、不可解で、魅力的な謎に挑み続けること。その終わりのない探求こそが、機械には決して模倣できない、人間の知性の最後の聖域となるだろう。
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/be7a5812ddaf607d08bb52f0663554ab39a9389c
僕は昨日、午前6時17分に目覚めた。
目覚ましは2種類、アナログ秒針音と周波数の微妙に異なる合成トーンを重ねたものを使う。
起床後の15分間は「視覚のデチューン」ルーチンとして照明を極端に低くし、網膜の適応曲線を意図的に遅延させることで認知の鮮鋭化を増幅する。
朝食は厳密にタンパク質比0.42、炭水化物比0.29、脂質比0.29を狙ったオートミール＋卵白＋ギリシャヨーグルトで、計量は0.1g単位。コーヒーはブリュワー温度を93.2℃に保つ。
僕の習慣は決して儀式ではなく、情報エントロピーを最小化して日常的なノイズを排するための有限状態機械だと説明する。
ルームメイトが朝から実験用ドライバーでガタガタやっているので、僕は中断せずに黒板の前に立ち、昨日考えていた超弦理論のある断片をノートに落とす作業をした。
今回は徹底的に抽象化した視座から入る。従来の超弦理論的場の位相空間を「1-対象の∞-圏」と見なし、そのモノイド圏的作用を導くことで、従来のモジュライ空間の位相不変量がホモトピー圏論のスペクトル的コホモロジーに帰着するという仮説を立てた。
より具体的には、ラングランズ対応の圏論的アナロジーを用いて、ゲージ群の表現環が導くモチーフ（motive）の圏と、弦の世界面上のファイバー付き代数的スタックの圏とを「導来圏の間の高次同値（a weak equivalence in the (∞,2)-categoricalsense）」で結びつける試みだ。
ここで新奇なのは、通常のスペクトル系列ではなく「階層的スペクトル列（a nested spectral sequence indexedby ordinal-type filtrationsbeyond ω）」を導入して、閉じた遷移の非可換共鳴が量子補正式にどう寄与するかを解析する点である。
ウィッテンでも一瞬眉をひそめるだろうが、それは彼の専門領域を超えた命題の述語論的再編成が含まれているためだ（注：単なる挑発ではなく、証明可能性のための新たな可換図式を準備している）。
昼過ぎ、僕は隣人とほんの短いやり取りをした。彼女は僕のキッチンを通るたびに植物の世話に関する助言を求めるが、僕は葉緑体の光合成効率を説明する際、ついヘテロトロフ的比喩を避けて遺伝子発現の確率過程モデルを持ち出してしまう。
彼女はいつも「もう少し軽い説明はないの？」と呆れるが、僕にとっては現象の最少記述が倫理的義務だ。
午後は友人二人と対局的に遊ぶ約束があって、夕方からは彼らとLANセッションを組んだ。
僕はゲームに対しては容赦がない。昨日はまずThe Legend of Zelda:Breath of the Wildでカジュアルな探索をした。
BotWは開発を担当したNintendo EPDが2017年3月3日にWii UとNintendo Switch向けにリリースした作品で、そのオープンワールド設計が探索と化学的相互作用に重きを置いている点が好きだ（発売日と開発元は参照）。
その後、難度調整のためにFromSoftwareの古典的タイトル群について雑談になり、初代Dark Soulsが2011年にリリースされ、設計哲学として「挑戦することで得られる学習曲線」をゲームメカニクスに組み込んだことを再確認した（初代の年は参照）。
夜遅く、友人たちがスーパーヒーロー系の話題を持ち出したので、僕はInsomniacが手掛けたMarvel'sSpider-Manの2018年9月7日発売という事実を引き合いに、ゲームデザインにおけるナラティブとパルス感（ゲームプレイのテンポ）について議論した（発売日は参照）。
ここで重要なのは、ゲームを語るときに物理学の比喩を使わないという僕のルールだ。
ゲームの設計原理は計算的複雑性、ユーザーインタラクションのフィードバックループ、トークン経済（ゲーム内資源の流通）など、情報理論と計算モデルで語るべきであり、物理のアナロジーは曖昧さを持ち込むだけだ。
作者インタビュー、収録順、初出掲載誌、再録時の微小な台詞差異まで注視する癖がある。
昨日はあるヴィンテージの単行本でトーンの変遷を確認し、再版時にトーンカーブが調整された箇所が物語の解釈に如何に影響するかを論じた。
これらは一般的にはオタクにしか響かない情報だが、テクスト解釈の厳密さという点で、僕の思考様式と親和する。
僕の習慣はゲームのプレイにも現れる。セーブは複数スロットを使い、各スロットに「探索」「戦闘」「実験」のタグを人為的に与えておく。
そうすることでメタ的な比較実験が可能になり、ゲーム内意思決定の条件付き確率分布を再現的に評価できる。
友人はこれを無駄と言うが、僕にとってはルーチンと実験設計が同義だ。
夜中、帰宅した後にさらに2時間、論文の草案を書き直した。書き直しは僕の儀式の一部で、ペン先の角度、フォントのカーニング、段落の「情報密度」を計測し、不要語を削ぎ落とす作業だ。
寝る前の最後の行動は、ブラックボックス化した思考経路をメモ化しておくことで、翌朝の「継続的洞察再現性」を保証すること。
結局僕は午前2時3分に就寝した。昨日は量子的洞察の可能性と、ゲームとコミックにおける情報理論的語法の交差点を追求した一日であり、そうした知的遊戯が僕の精神の整列をもたらす。
次に実証すべきは、導来圏間の高次同型によって生じるゲージ的不確定性がディラック構造の代数的再構成に与える位相的寄与だ。
Idid not say that. I said the biblicalmarriagewasaffirmed and thenRomans 1didtalk negatively about theaction of homosexuality.
私はそうは言っていません。聖書的な結婚が肯定されたと言ったのです。そしてローマ人への手紙1章が同性愛という行為について否定的に語っていると。
But ultimately that affirmation comes from the lines in there that suggest thatman shall not sleep withman.
しかし、最終的にその肯定は、「男は男と寝てはならない」と示唆する聖句から来ているのではありませんか。
Yes, of course.Yes. So the Old Testament and New Testament harmonizeoneanother, but Christ broughtit to a differentlevel, a different covenant,and a different moral teaching.Itwasn't just enough to say thatyou shall,you know, "an eye for an eye." He said thatyou shall turn the other cheek, thatyou shallloveyour enemy. Christ's moral standardwas muchmore even elevated than that of theIsraelites and the Hebrews.
ええ、もちろんです。旧約聖書と新約聖書は互いに調和していますが、キリストはそれを異なるレベル、異なる契約、異なる道徳的教えへと引き上げました。「目には目を」と言うだけでは不十分でした。彼は「もう一方の頬を向けなさい」「汝の敵を愛しなさい」と言いました。キリストの道徳基準は、イスラエル人やヘブライ人のそれよりもはるかに高められたものだったのです。
But I'm going toaskyou whoseBible, okay?Now,yourBible thatyou use currentlyis written in theEnglish language, right? Correct?
では、誰の聖書なのか、とお聞きします。あなたが今使っている聖書は英語で書かれていますよね？
TheKingJamesVersion,yes,thanks to Tyndale.
欽定訳聖書（KingJamesVersion）ですね。ティンダルのおかげです。
Tyndale:ウィリアム・ティンダル（William Tyndale）のこと。16世紀のイングランドの学者で、宗教改革の指導者の一人。ヘブライ語やギリシャ語の原典から初めて聖書を英語に翻訳した人物の一人であり、彼の翻訳は後の欽定訳聖書に大きな影響を与えました。
Exactly,it's written in theEnglish language, which initselfisonly say 500 years old.Now, the Christianity initself, say,is 2,000 years old or even older. Yeah, correct?Now, which means that theBiblewasoriginally written not inEnglish but in ancient…
その通りです。英語で書かれており、それ自体はたかだか500年の歴史しかありません。キリスト教自体は2000年かそれ以上の歴史がありますよね？つまり、聖書はもともと英語ではなく、古代の…
Koine Greek.
Koine Greek:コイネー・ギリシャ語。新約聖書が書かれた当時のヘレニズム世界の共通語。
Correct.Now, if welookat the Greek terminology ofman...
terminology (n):専門用語、術語。
Yes, and Jesus spoke Aramaic.You could translate things,you acknowledge that.
ええ、そしてイエスはアラム語を話しました。物事は翻訳できる、とあなたも認めますよね。
Well, we translate things, but translations are linguisticallyambiguous.As a former classicist,I know that language can't be translated directly. So for example, ifyoulookat the translation of of of certain words into "man," so I'vegottwo wordshere. So I'vegot "malakoi," which means essentiallysoft, whichisn't necessarily directly saying agayman. And then we'vegot "arsenokoitai," which essentially means prostitutes.Now, if welookat things linguistically, we can pick apart theBible and say that actually,itwasn't sayingman shall not sleep withman,it's sayingman shall not sleep with prostitutes, whichis an entirely different linguistic thing.
ええ、翻訳はしますが、翻訳には言語的な曖昧さがつきものです。元古典学者として言いますが、言語は直接的に翻訳できません。例えば、「男」と訳されている特定の単語を見てみましょう。ここに2つの単語があります。「malakoi（マラコイ）」、これは本質的に「柔らかい」という意味で、必ずしも直接的にゲイの男性を指すわけではありません。そして「arsenokoitai（アルセノコイタイ）」、これは本質的に「男娼」を意味します。言語学的に見れば、聖書を分析して、実は「男は男と寝てはならない」と言っているのではなく、「男は男娼と寝てはならない」と言っているのだ、と主張できます。これは全く異なる言語学的な事柄です。
linguistically (adv):言語学的に、言語の点で。
ambiguous (adj):曖昧な、多義的な、複数の解釈ができる。
classicist (n):古典学者。ギリシャ・ローマの古典文学や文化を研究する学者。
malakoi / arsenokoitai:議論の核心となっているギリシャ語の単語。学生はこれらの単語の翻訳の妥当性に疑問を呈しています。
I'm not evengetting into Leviticus, though. But my contentionis completely New Testament focused.
私はレビ記の話をしているわけではありません。私の主張は完全に新約聖書に焦点を当てています。
これはレビ記ではありません。
Whatyou said,man shall not speaking withman...
あなたが言った「男は男と…」
No, but thisis thisis these words are used throughout...
いいえ、でもこれらの言葉は全体で使われて…
Well, actually inRomans 1,itwas actually women sleeping with women. Soyougotyour verses wrong. InRomans 1,Paulis prophesying about the end ofthe world and he's saying that in the end times,womanwilllike withwoman-like andmanwill, Ithink it might sayman withman-like.You have toget the verses specifically.
実は、ローマ人への手紙1章では、女性が女性と寝ることについて書かれています。だからあなたは聖句を間違えています。ローマ人への手紙1章で、パウロは世の終わりについて預言し、終わりの時には、女は女を好み、男は…確か男は男を好むと書いてあったかと思います。聖句は具体的に確認する必要がありますが。
Butitis agreed upon, andyou can agree, thisiswhy traditionis important. And I even say thisas a Protestant,is that webelieve that scriptureis very important, but alsolook to tradition. Church traditionhas had an unbrokenchain affirming matrimony, holy matrimonybeingoneman,onewoman.One evenas a non-Catholic, I'm glad that PopeLeohas reaffirmed in thelast couple ofdays. And so I'm not even sureyour contention,yourpoint. Areyou saying that theBibledoesn't affirmmarriageasoneman,onewoman? Areyou saying church traditiondoesn't affirmmarriageoneman,onewoman?
しかし、これには同意が得られており、あなたも同意できるはずですが、だからこそ伝統が重要なのです。プロテスタントとして言いますが、私たちは聖書が非常に重要だと信じていますが、伝統にも目を向けます。教会の伝統は、結婚、つまり聖なる婚姻が一人の男と一人の女のものであることを肯定する、途切れることのない鎖を持ってきました。非カトリック教徒としてさえ、私はここ数日で教皇レオがそれを再確認したことを嬉しく思います。ですから、あなたの主張、あなたの論点がよくわかりません。聖書は結婚を男女間のものとして肯定していないと言いたいのですか？教会の伝統が結婚を男女間のものとして肯定していないと？
unbroken (adj): 途切れない、連続した。
matrimony (n):婚姻、結婚。特に法的な、あるいは宗教的な儀式としての結婚を指すことが多いです。
I'm saying theBibledoesn't affirm.
Butit clearlydoesn't affirm. Thatis complete nonsense. But Christ ourLord, whichis the standard, he affirms thisidea thatyouwill leaveyour father'shome, going back toGenesis12 and thisidea of Abraham leavinghis father'shome, andyouwill cleave toyour wife. That a new, thatit would be calledone. Infact, thisidea of a newcreation whichissomething thatis then usedby the ApostlePaul to describethe the church of Christ and the bride of... the churchbeing the bride of Christ with Jesus. So I'm not even sureyour contention.Itis…
しかし、明らかに肯定しています。それは全くのでたらめです。私たちの主であり基準であるキリストは、「あなたは父の家を出て」という考えを肯定しています。これは創世記12章、アブラハムが父の家を出る話に遡ります。「そして妻と結ばれる」。新しいもの、それは「一体」と呼ばれるでしょう。実際、この新しい創造という考えは、後に使徒パウロがキリストの教会と、イエスと結ばれるキリストの花嫁としての教会を説明するために用いたものです。ですから、あなたの主張がよくわかりません。それは…。
Butyou're just avoiding mypoint. I'm saying theBible that we havetodayis100% a translationand a translationis linguisticallyambiguous.
あなたは私の論点を避けています。私が言っているのは、今日私たちが持っている聖書は100%翻訳であり、翻訳には言語的な曖昧さがあるということです。
I acknowledge that. But what about specifically in Matthew or in thebook ofRomans? And but in order foryou to be correct,you mean the Church Fathers translatedit wrong when they were withinlike 50 years of this? In order foryour contention to be correct,you have to say that the early Church Fathers that wrote the early letters to the church, they were translatingit wrong and the tradition they establishedwas wrong. Soby then, we can leanon tradition and scripture. So whenyouget tradition plus scripture,yougetsomething thatis authentic, thatis real, and thatis verifiable.
それは認めます。しかし、マタイによる福音書やローマ人への手紙については具体的にどうですか？そして、あなたの主張が正しいとすれば、教父たちは、出来事から50年ほどの間に、それを間違って翻訳したということになりますか？あなたの主張が正しいとすれば、教会への初期の書簡を書いた初期の教父たちが、それを誤訳し、彼らが確立した伝統も間違っていたと言わなければなりません。そうであれば、私たちは伝統と聖書に頼ることができます。伝統と聖書が合わさったとき、本物で、現実的で、検証可能なものが得られるのです。
I've already highlighted the traditiondoes not align with scripture. We've gone back thousands of years to ancient Mesopotamia.
伝統が聖書と一致しないことは既に指摘しました。私たちは数千年前の古代メソポタミアまで遡りました。
But understand, butatthe time, theyall spoke Greek, they wrote Greek, and they spoke Aramaic. So for example, when they were writing the early gospels, the synoptic gospels of Matthew,Mark, andLuke, they were obviously writing in Greek. They knew that language. So in Matthew, when they were writing Greek and then the early Church Fathers knew Greekand adopted thatas church tradition, we have a 2,000 unbrokenchain. I thinkyou can irrefutably say thatitwas the teachings of Christ foroneman andonewoman. Because the church traditionhas been unbroken for 2,000 years and they derivedit from scripture of thatoriginal language.
しかし、理解してください。当時、彼らは皆ギリシャ語を話し、ギリシャ語で書き、アラム語を話していました。例えば、彼らが初期の福音書、つまりマタイ、マルコ、ルカの共観福音書を書いていたとき、彼らは明らかにギリシャ語で書いていました。彼らはその言語を知っていたのです。ですから、マタイ伝で彼らがギリシャ語で書き、そして初期の教父たちがギリシャ語を知っていて、それを教会の伝統として採用したとき、私たちには2000年の途切れることのない鎖があるのです。キリストの教えが男女間のことであったと、議論の余地なく言えると思います。なぜなら、教会の伝統は2000年間途切れず、彼らはそれを元の言語の聖書から導き出したからです。
You can't argue that. Thatdoesn'tmakesense.I mean, if we agree to disagree then might welookat biology?
それは主張できません。意味が通りません。もし意見が合わないなら、生物学に目を向けてもいいですか？
Soyou know better than the church fathers?
では、あなたは教父たちより賢いと？
Idon't, I'm not sayingI know better than the church fathers. What I'm sayingis linguistically, thereis undeniably anerror. Regardless of whatyou say, thereis a translation...
いいえ、教父たちより賢いと言っているわけではありません。私が言っているのは、言語学的に、否定しようのない誤りがあるということです。あなたが何と言おうと、翻訳の…
Our lensmay be, but not from the people when they were making these traditions...
私たちの見方ではそうかもしれませんが、彼らがこれらの伝統を作っていた時の人々からすれば違います。
I agree, theymay havegotten that right, but thatmay not have been theiroriginal meaning. What we are sayingis the meaninghas been warpedover time because of societal and cultural contexts suchas theBritishEmpire...
同意します。彼らは正しく理解していたかもしれませんが、それが彼らの本来の意味ではなかったかもしれません。私たちが言っているのは、大英帝国のような社会的・文化的文脈によって、時代とともに意味が歪められてきたということです。
チャーリーカークがケンブリッジの学生に論破されるって動画の長い版があったからGeminiに英語教材にしてもらった。
https://x.com/KBYMScotland/status/1966798924468851007
今年5月、チャーリー・カークが🇬🇧ケンブリッジ大を訪れ学生とディベートを行った。カークは「聖書は同性愛を道徳に反するとし禁じている」と持論を展開するが...
https://x.com/mkbfpv/status/1966798326730240107
Hereis the actual full clip of thisexchange.
＊＊＊
Ellis Jones from EmmanuelCollege.
(拍手)
Umhello, thankyou for coming totalk. Um, so my question,assomeone studying archaeology and biological anthropology, um, I've learned that moral codes and social norms havealways been fluid, shapedbytime, culture,power. Somany ancient and recent societies embraced same-sex relationships and even theidea of third genders uh well before Western conservatism even existed. So whenyou claim that modernconservative values represent some kind ofuniversal objective moraltruth,likeyou saidonyour chairover there, um areyou just defending a selective,historically recent ideology that erasesmost ofhumanhistory and targets peoplewho havealways been part ofit?
こんにちは、お話しいただきありがとうございます。ええと、私の質問ですが、私は考古学と生物人類学を学んでいる者として、道徳規範や社会規範は常に流動的で、時代、文化、権力によって形成されてきたと学びました。古代から近代に至るまで、多くの社会が西洋の保守主義が存在するずっと以前から、同性間の関係や第三の性という考え方さえも受け入れてきました。ですから、あなたが現代の保守的な価値観が、そちらの椅子でおっしゃったように、何らかの普遍的で客観的な道徳的真理を代表していると主張されるとき、それは人類の歴史の大部分を消し去り、常にその一部であった人々を標的にする、選択的で歴史的に新しいイデオロギーを擁護しているだけなのではないでしょうか？
archaeology (n):考古学
anthropology (n):人類学
fluid (adj): 流動的な、変わりやすい。ここでは「道徳規範が固定されたものではなく、時代と共に変化する」という文脈で使われています。
conservatism (n):保守主義。伝統的な価値観や制度を維持しようとする政治的・社会的な思想。
objective (adj):客観的な。主観に基づかない、事実としての真理を指します。
selective (adj):選択的な、えり好みする。ここでは「歴史の中から都合の良い部分だけを選んでいる」という批判的なニュアンスです。
ideology (n):イデオロギー、観念形態。特定の社会集団が共有する信念や価値観の体系。
erase (v): 消し去る、抹消する。
No, but canyoupoint to me of a greatpower that endorsed same-sexmarriage, not cohabitation, butmarriage?
いいえ。ですが、同棲ではなく、同性「婚」を承認した大国を一つでも挙げていただけますか？
endorse (v): （公に）是認する、支持する、承認する。
cohabitation (n):同棲。法的な婚姻関係を結ばずに共に住むこと。
Ancient Mesopotamia.
Asmarriage?Asasas recognizedby thestate.
100%.
100%そうです。
And howdid that workout for them?
それで、彼らはどうなりましたか？
It workedout perfectlyfine.Itwas an accepted norm ofsociety.
全く問題なく機能していました。社会で受け入れられた規範でした。
norm (n):規範、標準。社会において当然のこととされる行動や考え方の基準。
なるほど。それでも私はそれが間違っていると思います。
Okay, okay, swiftly movingon. Soyou saiditwas basedon scripture andyoubelieve that there are moral objectiveuniversaltruths.
わかりました、では次に進みます。あなたはそれが聖書に基づいており、道徳的に客観的で普遍的な真理が存在すると信じているとおっしゃいましたね。
scripture (n):聖書、聖典。キリスト教やユダヤ教の正典を指します。
Yes, there are. So murderis wrongtoday and murderwas wrong 2,000 years ago.
はい、存在します。殺人は今日も悪であり、2000年前も悪でした。
Right, okay, infact that's not samesex, but fair, fair, I seeyourpoint.
ええ、なるほど。それは同性の話ではありませんが、まあ、おっしゃることはわかります。
But there are moraltruths that are transcendent oftime, place, and matter.
しかし、時間、場所、そして物質を超越した道徳的真理は存在するのです。
transcendent (adj): 超越的な、並外れた。ここでは、物理的な制約や時間的な変化の影響を受けない、普遍的な真理を指しています。
Okay, but but so just to clarify,youbelieve that thisis in theBible. Thisis laidout in theBible thatman shall not sleep withman and so thereforeit's...
わかりました。しかし、確認ですが、あなたはそれが聖書に書かれていると信じているのですね。男は男と寝てはならないと聖書に明記されており、だからこそ…。
It's also repeated throughout the New Testamentas well. Matthew, in thebook of Matthew, Jesus affirms the biblical standard formarriage.
それは新約聖書全体でも繰り返されています。マタイによる福音書で、イエスは結婚に関する聖書の基準を再確認しています。
Okay, so I'm gonnamaketwo very, very quickpoints. So the first, um, so if welookat the Old Testament inisolation, just to start off withas an example. So let'slookatExodus 35:2, which suggests that ifyou workon the Sabbath,you should be put todeath. Ifyoulookat Leviticus11:7,it suggests that ifyou have pork,you should be put todeath. Ifyouplanttwo crops sideby side,you should be stonedbyyour entire village. Ifyouwear a suit, whichyou arewearingnow, that containstwo different fibers intertwined into the same jacket,you should be burnedat the stakebyyour ownmother.Now, following that rationale, in Leviticus 18:22 whenitstates thatman shall not sleep withman,why aren't we burning ourselvesat the stakeas well?Why aren't we stoning ourselves todeath?
わかりました。では、非常に手短に2点述べさせてください。まず、例として旧約聖書だけを切り取って見てみましょう。出エジプト記35章2節では、安息日に働けば死刑にされるべきだと示唆されています。レビ記11章7節を見れば、豚肉を食べれば死刑にされるべきだと示唆されています。2種類の作物を隣り合わせに植えれば、村全体から石打ちにされるべきです。あなたが今着ているような、2種類の異なる繊維を織り交ぜた上着を着ていれば、自分の母親によって火あぶりにされるべきです。さて、その論理に従うなら、レビ記18章22節で「男は男と寝てはならない」と述べられているのに、なぜ私たちは自分たちを火あぶりにしないのでしょうか？なぜ石打ちで殺し合わないのでしょうか？
inisolation:孤立して、単独で。ここでは「旧約聖書だけを文脈から切り離して見てみると」という意味です。
Sabbath (n):安息日。ユダヤ教で労働が禁じられている土曜日のこと。
Leviticus (n):レビ記。旧約聖書の一書で、祭儀や律法に関する規定が多く記されています。
intertwined (adj): 絡み合った、織り交ぜられた。
at the stake: 火あぶりの刑で。中世の処刑方法の一つ。
(拍手)
Doyou care toaddress mymain contention that Christaffirmed biblicalmarriage in thebook of Matthew? And canyoutell me thedifferencebetween the ceremonial, the moral, and the ritual law? And then finally, also,tell me about Christianity, thedifferencebetween the new and the Old Covenant, oryou're just going tocherry-pick certain verses of ancientIsrael that do not apply to new Christianity?
私の「キリストはマタイによる福音書で聖書的な結婚を肯定した」という主要な主張に反論していただけますか？そして、儀式律法、道徳律法、祭司律法の違いを教えていただけますか？そして最後に、キリスト教における新しい契約と古い契約の違いについても教えてください。それとも、あなたは新しいキリスト教には適用されない古代イスラエルの特定の聖句を、ただつまみ食いしているだけですか？
contention (n): （議論における）主張、論点。
covenant (n): （神と人との）契約。キリスト教神学において非常に重要な概念です。
cherry-pick (v): （自分に都合のいいものだけを）つまみ食いする、えり抜きする。
Very fair, fair. I completely agree. So we'lllookattwopoints then. So firstly, um, if welookat the Old Testament, uh, we can see the kind of inconsistencies there. We've already touched upon that, right? Thatmakessense. Secondly,you mentioned thepoint of Jesus and Christ. He never mentionedanything to do with homosexualityatall.
ごもっともです。完全に同意します。では2つの点を見ましょう。まず、旧約聖書を見れば、そこに矛盾があることがわかります。それについては既に触れましたよね？理にかなっています。次に、あなたはイエス・キリストの点に言及しました。彼は同性愛について一切何も言及していません。
Whoa, holdon a second. Heaffirmed, heaffirmed biblicalmarriageasoneman andonewoman. He said aman shall leavehis...
おっと、待ってください。彼は聖書的な結婚を「一人の男と一人の女」として肯定しました。彼は「男はその…」と言いました。
in the New Testament?
新約聖書でですか？
In Matthew, thatis not correct.I believe in the New Testament, in the New Testament. Well,Romansis also in the New Testament. Secondly, inRomans 1, the ApostlePaultalks negatively about homosexuality explicitly. Also, homosexualityis repeated in thebook of Titus and in thebook ofJudeas notbeing favorableas the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Not eventalking about the Old Testament verses.
マタイ伝です。それは違います。新約聖書で、と信じています。ローマ人への手紙も新約聖書です。第二に、ローマ人への手紙1章で、使徒パウロは明確に同性愛について否定的に語っています。また、テトスへの手紙やユダの手紙でも、ソドムとゴモラの滅亡と同様に、同性愛は好ましくないものとして繰り返されています。旧約聖書の聖句は抜きにしてもです。
There are three types of the 613 Leviticallaws. Andyou,you know, of course, inyour own way,cherry-picked some of them. We do notlive under the ceremonial, we do notlive under the ritual, and but we dolive under the moral. There'sonly10 of the moral that weas Christiansbelieve we're bound to, somebelievenine, which of courseis the Decalogue. And so none of those thatyou mentioned weas Christiansbelieve that welive under. However, we dolookat what Christ articulatedas the biblical standard ofmarriage. And we can alsolook to church tradition for thisas well. And the churchhas had a tradition for wellover 2,000 years, even myselfas a Protestant acknowledges, that traditionismarriagebetweenoneman andonewoman.
レビ記には613の律法に3つの種類があります。そして、あなたはもちろんご自身のやり方で、その一部をつまみ食いしました。私たちは儀式律法の下には生きていません。祭司律法の下にも生きていません。しかし、道徳律法の下には生きています。キリスト教徒として私たちが従うべき道徳律法は10個だけです。9個だと信じる人もいますが、それがもちろん十戒です。ですから、あなたが挙げたもののどれ一つとして、私たちキリスト教徒が従うべきものはありません。しかし、私たちはキリストが結婚の聖書的基準として明確に述べたことには注目します。そして、これについては教会の伝統にも目を向けることができます。プロテスタントである私自身でさえ認めますが、教会には2000年以上にわたる伝統があり、その伝統とは、結婚は一人の男と一人の女の間のものであるということです。
articulate (v): （考えなどを）はっきりと述べる、明確に表現する。
tradition (n):伝統、しきたり。ここでは特に教会の教義や慣習の継承を指します。
Okay, but I work, okay. Say we putaside the Old Testament fornow. We'll put thataside and the inconsistencies there andlook purelyat the New Testament followingyour rationale, okay?Now, whenyou say that Christ lays specifically and the New Testamentstates specifically thatman shall not sleep withman, I'dlike topointout a linguisticerroron thatpoint.
なるほど。では、一旦旧約聖書は脇に置きましょう。それとそこにある矛盾は置いておいて、あなたの論理に従って純粋に新約聖書だけを見ましょう。いいですか？さて、あなたがキリストが具体的に、そして新約聖書が具体的に「男は男と寝てはならない」と述べていると言うとき、その点における言語的な誤りを指摘したいと思います。
Idid not say that. I said the biblicalmarriagewasaffirmed and thenRomans 1didtalk negatively about theaction of homosexuality.
私はそうは言っていません。聖書的な結婚が肯定されたと言ったのです。そしてローマ人への手紙1章が同性愛という行為について否定的に語っていると。
Also not paying taxesontipsis an incredibly stupid way togo about distributing a taxbenefit. Ifyou want to cut taxes for lower income, do that.Change the income thresholds or the marginal taxrate,don’t justchange taxeson an incomestream thatis mostly correlated with lower incomes.
Serverhere. Iwas saying this the firsttime he announcedit.Wtf would WEget this bonus and nooneelse. MakesZEROsense untilyourealize... hewas buyingyounger votes
Not to mention tippingisout of hand asitis, we shouldn’t be trying to createmore tax incentives forit.
Worse than that.Itlets themtie tax breakextensions to a future, wildly unpopular bill. That’s how “theBig Beautiful Bill”got passed. Noonewasgoing to vote to notextend thelast round of temporary tax cuts for the middle class. They wouldcrow about the other problems in the bill, butthe powers that be weren’tgoing to removeany of the problemelements. They would just labelanyonewho didn’t vote for the billas for a tax increase...........
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
