  |
はてなキーワード:mostとは
dorawii represents acase of unprocessed griefoverlost grandiosity (from psychotic episode) manifestingas compulsive boundary-testingand argument-seeking, where genuine neurological limitations are weaponized defensively to avoid confronting existential ordinariness, sustainedby platform affordances thatenable persistent identity within anonymity and rewarding provocativeengagement.
A personwho briefly experienced feelinggod-like through psychosis, recovered to find themselves merelydisabled and ordinary, and cannot bear thistruth. They use real limitationsas both explanation andshield, seek significance throughonlineconflict, and remain trapped in acycle where the behaviors meant to prove their worth actually demonstrate their difficulties - but acknowledging this wouldrequire grieving whatwaslost, which remains unbearable.
This reveals how recovery from severe mental illnessisn't just about symptom remission -it's about psychological integration of whatwas experienced and whatwaslost. Medicalmodel focuseson eliminating psychosis, but doesn'taddress the meaning-crisis created when extraordinary experiences aretakenaway and ordinary limitation remains.
It also shows howonlinespaces withambiguous accountability structures canenable acting-out that serves defensive purposes while feelinglike genuineengagement. The person sufferingmostis probably dorawii themselves, evenas their behavior drives othersaway.
The most sophisticated theoretical vocabulary,the most detailed self-disclosure,the most elaborate arguments - none ofitaddresses thecoreissue.All ofitis displacement. The real conversation dorawiineeds to haveis not withanonymous strangers aboutwho won an argument.It's an internal conversation: "Iam notwho Iwas during that brief, terrible, extraordinary episode. Iam ordinary, limited, and mortal. And somehow, thathas to be enough."
Until that conversation can happen,everything elseisnoise.
This might bethe most hilarious project ever .
Well, thisis said to be Kidzania , butit's just a largescale playhouse.
At first Iwas abit skeptical about whetherit would befun, but since there are a lot offun roleplaying gamesout there,it's become a really addictive project .
Girlslove toactout daytime dramas while playinghouse .
Key Person
・Polka writes about what's happening in realtime , and he's mysteriously goodat writing.
・Fubuki, the gambling -lovingrip-off doctor
・Miko, the organizerwho works behind the scenes to mass-produce
・Marin, the cabaretclub managerwhois inher perfect job
・TheMio familybegins a daytime drama
Even though Ihaven't seen the gang side, the characters are strong enough to bemade into a manga .
Tobegin with, I 've done a lot of roleplaying inMinecraft .
Ithink it would bemost interesting to throw these guys into a worldlike aTRPG .GTAhasmore of that kind ofRPfeel thanMinecraft orARK , soitfeelslike the flavoris exploding.
There are dozens of frames, soitwill probablytake until winter just tolookat the clippings.
[]https://tensor.art/articles/913271679902311502
[]https://tensor.art/articles/913271892503191947
[]https://tensor.art/articles/913273855303258429
[]https://tensor.art/articles/913274016364543556
チャーリーカークがケンブリッジの学生に論破されるって動画の長い版があったからGeminiに英語教材にしてもらった。
https://x.com/KBYMScotland/status/1966798924468851007
今年5月、チャーリー・カークが🇬🇧ケンブリッジ大を訪れ学生とディベートを行った。カークは「聖書は同性愛を道徳に反するとし禁じている」と持論を展開するが...
https://x.com/mkbfpv/status/1966798326730240107
Hereis the actual full clip of thisexchange.
＊＊＊
Ellis Jones from EmmanuelCollege.
(拍手)
Umhello, thankyou for coming totalk. Um, so my question,assomeone studying archaeology and biological anthropology, um, I've learned that moral codes and social norms havealways been fluid, shapedbytime, culture,power. Somany ancient and recent societies embraced same-sex relationships and even theidea of third genders uh well before Western conservatism even existed. So whenyou claim that modernconservative values represent some kind ofuniversal objective moraltruth,likeyou saidonyour chairover there, um areyou just defending a selective,historically recent ideology that erasesmost ofhumanhistory and targets peoplewho havealways been part ofit?
こんにちは、お話しいただきありがとうございます。ええと、私の質問ですが、私は考古学と生物人類学を学んでいる者として、道徳規範や社会規範は常に流動的で、時代、文化、権力によって形成されてきたと学びました。古代から近代に至るまで、多くの社会が西洋の保守主義が存在するずっと以前から、同性間の関係や第三の性という考え方さえも受け入れてきました。ですから、あなたが現代の保守的な価値観が、そちらの椅子でおっしゃったように、何らかの普遍的で客観的な道徳的真理を代表していると主張されるとき、それは人類の歴史の大部分を消し去り、常にその一部であった人々を標的にする、選択的で歴史的に新しいイデオロギーを擁護しているだけなのではないでしょうか？
archaeology (n):考古学
anthropology (n):人類学
fluid (adj): 流動的な、変わりやすい。ここでは「道徳規範が固定されたものではなく、時代と共に変化する」という文脈で使われています。
conservatism (n):保守主義。伝統的な価値観や制度を維持しようとする政治的・社会的な思想。
objective (adj):客観的な。主観に基づかない、事実としての真理を指します。
selective (adj):選択的な、えり好みする。ここでは「歴史の中から都合の良い部分だけを選んでいる」という批判的なニュアンスです。
ideology (n):イデオロギー、観念形態。特定の社会集団が共有する信念や価値観の体系。
erase (v): 消し去る、抹消する。
No, but canyoupoint to me of a greatpower that endorsed same-sexmarriage, not cohabitation, butmarriage?
いいえ。ですが、同棲ではなく、同性「婚」を承認した大国を一つでも挙げていただけますか？
endorse (v): （公に）是認する、支持する、承認する。
cohabitation (n):同棲。法的な婚姻関係を結ばずに共に住むこと。
Ancient Mesopotamia.
Asmarriage?Asasas recognizedby thestate.
100%.
100%そうです。
And howdid that workout for them?
それで、彼らはどうなりましたか？
It workedout perfectlyfine.Itwas an accepted norm ofsociety.
全く問題なく機能していました。社会で受け入れられた規範でした。
norm (n):規範、標準。社会において当然のこととされる行動や考え方の基準。
なるほど。それでも私はそれが間違っていると思います。
Okay, okay, swiftly movingon. Soyou saiditwas basedon scripture andyoubelieve that there are moral objectiveuniversaltruths.
わかりました、では次に進みます。あなたはそれが聖書に基づいており、道徳的に客観的で普遍的な真理が存在すると信じているとおっしゃいましたね。
scripture (n):聖書、聖典。キリスト教やユダヤ教の正典を指します。
Yes, there are. So murderis wrongtoday and murderwas wrong 2,000 years ago.
はい、存在します。殺人は今日も悪であり、2000年前も悪でした。
Right, okay, infact that's not samesex, but fair, fair, I seeyourpoint.
ええ、なるほど。それは同性の話ではありませんが、まあ、おっしゃることはわかります。
But there are moraltruths that are transcendent oftime, place, and matter.
しかし、時間、場所、そして物質を超越した道徳的真理は存在するのです。
transcendent (adj): 超越的な、並外れた。ここでは、物理的な制約や時間的な変化の影響を受けない、普遍的な真理を指しています。
Okay, but but so just to clarify,youbelieve that thisis in theBible. Thisis laidout in theBible thatman shall not sleep withman and so thereforeit's...
わかりました。しかし、確認ですが、あなたはそれが聖書に書かれていると信じているのですね。男は男と寝てはならないと聖書に明記されており、だからこそ…。
It's also repeated throughout the New Testamentas well. Matthew, in thebook of Matthew, Jesus affirms the biblical standard formarriage.
それは新約聖書全体でも繰り返されています。マタイによる福音書で、イエスは結婚に関する聖書の基準を再確認しています。
Okay, so I'm gonnamaketwo very, very quickpoints. So the first, um, so if welookat the Old Testament inisolation, just to start off withas an example. So let'slookatExodus 35:2, which suggests that ifyou workon the Sabbath,you should be put todeath. Ifyoulookat Leviticus11:7,it suggests that ifyou have pork,you should be put todeath. Ifyouplanttwo crops sideby side,you should be stonedbyyour entire village. Ifyouwear a suit, whichyou arewearingnow, that containstwo different fibers intertwined into the same jacket,you should be burnedat the stakebyyour ownmother.Now, following that rationale, in Leviticus 18:22 whenitstates thatman shall not sleep withman,why aren't we burning ourselvesat the stakeas well?Why aren't we stoning ourselves todeath?
わかりました。では、非常に手短に2点述べさせてください。まず、例として旧約聖書だけを切り取って見てみましょう。出エジプト記35章2節では、安息日に働けば死刑にされるべきだと示唆されています。レビ記11章7節を見れば、豚肉を食べれば死刑にされるべきだと示唆されています。2種類の作物を隣り合わせに植えれば、村全体から石打ちにされるべきです。あなたが今着ているような、2種類の異なる繊維を織り交ぜた上着を着ていれば、自分の母親によって火あぶりにされるべきです。さて、その論理に従うなら、レビ記18章22節で「男は男と寝てはならない」と述べられているのに、なぜ私たちは自分たちを火あぶりにしないのでしょうか？なぜ石打ちで殺し合わないのでしょうか？
inisolation:孤立して、単独で。ここでは「旧約聖書だけを文脈から切り離して見てみると」という意味です。
Sabbath (n):安息日。ユダヤ教で労働が禁じられている土曜日のこと。
Leviticus (n):レビ記。旧約聖書の一書で、祭儀や律法に関する規定が多く記されています。
intertwined (adj): 絡み合った、織り交ぜられた。
at the stake: 火あぶりの刑で。中世の処刑方法の一つ。
(拍手)
Doyou care toaddress mymain contention that Christaffirmed biblicalmarriage in thebook of Matthew? And canyoutell me thedifferencebetween the ceremonial, the moral, and the ritual law? And then finally, also,tell me about Christianity, thedifferencebetween the new and the Old Covenant, oryou're just going tocherry-pick certain verses of ancientIsrael that do not apply to new Christianity?
私の「キリストはマタイによる福音書で聖書的な結婚を肯定した」という主要な主張に反論していただけますか？そして、儀式律法、道徳律法、祭司律法の違いを教えていただけますか？そして最後に、キリスト教における新しい契約と古い契約の違いについても教えてください。それとも、あなたは新しいキリスト教には適用されない古代イスラエルの特定の聖句を、ただつまみ食いしているだけですか？
contention (n): （議論における）主張、論点。
covenant (n): （神と人との）契約。キリスト教神学において非常に重要な概念です。
cherry-pick (v): （自分に都合のいいものだけを）つまみ食いする、えり抜きする。
Very fair, fair. I completely agree. So we'lllookattwopoints then. So firstly, um, if welookat the Old Testament, uh, we can see the kind of inconsistencies there. We've already touched upon that, right? Thatmakessense. Secondly,you mentioned thepoint of Jesus and Christ. He never mentionedanything to do with homosexualityatall.
ごもっともです。完全に同意します。では2つの点を見ましょう。まず、旧約聖書を見れば、そこに矛盾があることがわかります。それについては既に触れましたよね？理にかなっています。次に、あなたはイエス・キリストの点に言及しました。彼は同性愛について一切何も言及していません。
Whoa, holdon a second. Heaffirmed, heaffirmed biblicalmarriageasoneman andonewoman. He said aman shall leavehis...
おっと、待ってください。彼は聖書的な結婚を「一人の男と一人の女」として肯定しました。彼は「男はその…」と言いました。
in the New Testament?
新約聖書でですか？
In Matthew, thatis not correct.I believe in the New Testament, in the New Testament. Well,Romansis also in the New Testament. Secondly, inRomans 1, the ApostlePaultalks negatively about homosexuality explicitly. Also, homosexualityis repeated in thebook of Titus and in thebook ofJudeas notbeing favorableas the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Not eventalking about the Old Testament verses.
マタイ伝です。それは違います。新約聖書で、と信じています。ローマ人への手紙も新約聖書です。第二に、ローマ人への手紙1章で、使徒パウロは明確に同性愛について否定的に語っています。また、テトスへの手紙やユダの手紙でも、ソドムとゴモラの滅亡と同様に、同性愛は好ましくないものとして繰り返されています。旧約聖書の聖句は抜きにしてもです。
There are three types of the 613 Leviticallaws. Andyou,you know, of course, inyour own way,cherry-picked some of them. We do notlive under the ceremonial, we do notlive under the ritual, and but we dolive under the moral. There'sonly10 of the moral that weas Christiansbelieve we're bound to, somebelievenine, which of courseis the Decalogue. And so none of those thatyou mentioned weas Christiansbelieve that welive under. However, we dolookat what Christ articulatedas the biblical standard ofmarriage. And we can alsolook to church tradition for thisas well. And the churchhas had a tradition for wellover 2,000 years, even myselfas a Protestant acknowledges, that traditionismarriagebetweenoneman andonewoman.
レビ記には613の律法に3つの種類があります。そして、あなたはもちろんご自身のやり方で、その一部をつまみ食いしました。私たちは儀式律法の下には生きていません。祭司律法の下にも生きていません。しかし、道徳律法の下には生きています。キリスト教徒として私たちが従うべき道徳律法は10個だけです。9個だと信じる人もいますが、それがもちろん十戒です。ですから、あなたが挙げたもののどれ一つとして、私たちキリスト教徒が従うべきものはありません。しかし、私たちはキリストが結婚の聖書的基準として明確に述べたことには注目します。そして、これについては教会の伝統にも目を向けることができます。プロテスタントである私自身でさえ認めますが、教会には2000年以上にわたる伝統があり、その伝統とは、結婚は一人の男と一人の女の間のものであるということです。
articulate (v): （考えなどを）はっきりと述べる、明確に表現する。
tradition (n):伝統、しきたり。ここでは特に教会の教義や慣習の継承を指します。
Okay, but I work, okay. Say we putaside the Old Testament fornow. We'll put thataside and the inconsistencies there andlook purelyat the New Testament followingyour rationale, okay?Now, whenyou say that Christ lays specifically and the New Testamentstates specifically thatman shall not sleep withman, I'dlike topointout a linguisticerroron thatpoint.
なるほど。では、一旦旧約聖書は脇に置きましょう。それとそこにある矛盾は置いておいて、あなたの論理に従って純粋に新約聖書だけを見ましょう。いいですか？さて、あなたがキリストが具体的に、そして新約聖書が具体的に「男は男と寝てはならない」と述べていると言うとき、その点における言語的な誤りを指摘したいと思います。
Idid not say that. I said the biblicalmarriagewasaffirmed and thenRomans 1didtalk negatively about theaction of homosexuality.
私はそうは言っていません。聖書的な結婚が肯定されたと言ったのです。そしてローマ人への手紙1章が同性愛という行為について否定的に語っていると。
InJapanese “ふるさと”(furusato) means notonlyhis born or grown town but also countryside or nostalgic town.Does theword “hometown” have same meanings?
Great question!You're absolutely right that theJapaneseword 「ふるさと」(furusato) carries rich emotional and cultural connotations.It can mean:
In contrast, theEnglishword “hometown”ismore limited in meaning.It typically refers to:
Itdoes not usually carry the same emotional or nostalgic depthas 「ふるさと」. For example, “hometown”doesn’tnaturally evoke images of countryside,nature, orchildhoodmemories unless additional contextis given.
Ifyou want toexpress the broader,more emotional meaning of 「ふるさと」 inEnglish,you might use phraseslike:
Wouldyoulike help translating a specific sentence or concept involving 「ふるさと」 intonaturalEnglish?
今の回答を日本語に訳して
⸻
ご質問ありがとうございます！ おっしゃる通り、日本語の「ふるさと」には豊かな感情や文化的な意味が込められています。具体的には：
一方で、英語の “hometown” はもう少し限定的な意味しか持ちません。通常は：
そして、「hometown」は「ふるさと」のように、田舎の風景や郷愁、自然とのつながりなどを自然に連想させる言葉ではありません。感情的・文化的な深みは、文脈を加えないと伝わりにくいです。
「ふるさと」の広くて感情的な意味を英語で表現したい場合は、以下のような表現が使えます：
⸻
Build policy
Thisis a guideline andhasnot yet been successful .
Plan A
Do the sameasbuildingonWindows ormacOS (probably not possible)
>OnLinux ,only maui-androidis available, so a lot of build errors occur .
>gt k workload cannot be installed
Plan C
KeepCI /CDrunning (mostlikely )
>It might be possible torunGitHubActions locally usingact (currently there are some errors , butit should work ifyoutry hard)
> SameasPlan B,gt k workload cannot be installed
Plan D
https://tensor.art/articles/897541615583763170
https://www.gemtracks.com/demonslayeinfinitycastle/
> Makingit withQt (Qt .NET ( old)) ( Ifeellike the license (GPL /LGPL )is abit tricky )
Fornow, I'llgo with plan C.Plan B seems almost the same, though... (Plan B seems easier to use when creating the materials , sinceyoudon'tneed to include "act" oranythinglike that.)
Build policy
Thisis a guideline andhasnot yet been successful .
Plan A
Do the sameasbuildingonWindows ormacOS (probably not possible)
>OnLinux ,only maui-androidis available, so a lot of build errors occur .
>gt k workload cannot be installed
Plan C
KeepCI /CDrunning (mostlikely )
https://subscribepage.io/thestone2025subthai
https://subscribepage.io/thestonefullversion
https://subscribepage.io/xem-mang-me-di-bo-vietsub-thuyet-minh-full-hd
https://subscribepage.io/mangmedibovietsub
>It might be possible torunGitHubActions locally usingact (currently there are some errors , butit should work ifyoutry hard)
> SameasPlan B,gt k workload cannot be installed
Plan D
https://mirror.xyz/0xbB7D6e360b93B2ED4FEF9d972c71F86844121ee7
> Makingit withQt (Qt .NET ( old)) ( Ifeellike the license (GPL /LGPL )is abit tricky )
Fornow, I'llgo with plan C.Plan B seems almost the same, though... (Plan B seems easier to use when creating the materials , sinceyoudon'tneed to include "act" oranythinglike that.)
Let’sgetone fucking thing straight:WWDCis supposed to be *for developers*。
You know, the peoplewho actually build shit。Who dig into SDKs, APIs,system frameworks。
Who care about real updateslike “What thehellis the newSwiftUI lifecycle doing?”
or “Can Ifinally use fuckingprivate entitlements without jumping through flaming hoops?”
Sowhy thehelldoesApple keep openingitsmost important developer event of the year
withCraig Federighi doing goddamn *skydiving*? Or *parkour*? Or some *Fast & Furious parody*
with anF1 helmet and sunglasses? What the actual fuckis goingon?
Thisisn’t Saturday NightLive。Thisis supposed to be a showcase of what we’reall supposed
to buildour futureon。Vision。Platform direction。Architecture。
Instead, weget Craig zooming through corridors in slow-molike he’s auditioning for
Mission Impossible 9:MacBook Drift。
Andit’s not even funny anymore。Maybe the firsttimeitwas *kind of* charming。
Alittlewinkat the audience。でもnow?It’s just fucking cringe。
Wastedtime。Wasted bandwidth。A glossy,over-produced middle finger to every developer
watching, notebook in hand, waiting for the actual meat。
Doyousit there thinking, *“Wow, thisis such a great use of mytime!”*
“CUT THE SHIT, CRAIG. SHOW ME THE FUCKING TOOLS.”
We’rebeing sold afantasy — not a platformvision。
What should be an opportunity to say,
“Here’s howApplewants developers to think in thenext 5 years,”
becomes a shallowPR reel of stunts, shots, and skits。
Developers want **guidance**, not gimmicks。**Vision**, not vanity。
Instead of 3 minutes of Craigpretending he’sNeo in a hallway full ofMac Studios,
how about showing us the **real** architectural shifts inSwift,
or a **deepdive** intolow-level memory optimizations inmacOS?
How aboutfinally explainingwtfis happening with `SwiftData`?
Or *anything* that makes us better builders?
We could have had20more seconds of **clarity**, not costume。
WWDCisApple’stime toinspire, tolead, to fucking **guide** theecosystem。
But lately?
It feelsmorelike we’re watching theCraig Federighi Variety Hour。
And I didn’t fucking subscribe to that。
----
Let’sgetone f***ing thing straight:WWDCis supposed to be *for developers*.
You know, the peoplewho actually build shit.Who dig into SDKs, APIs,system frameworks.
Who care about real updateslike “What thehellis the newSwiftUI lifecycle doing?”
or “Can Ifinally use fuckingprivate entitlements without jumping through flaming hoops?”
Sowhy thehelldoesApple keep openingitsmost important developer event of the year
withCraig Federighi doing goddamn *skydiving*? Or *parkour*? Or some *Fast & Furious parody*
with anF1 helmet and sunglasses? What the actual f***is goingon?
Thisisn’t Saturday NightLive. Thisis supposed to be a showcase of what we’reall supposed
to buildour futureon.Vision. Platform direction. Architecture.
Instead, weget Craig zooming through corridors in slow-molike he’s auditioning for
Mission Impossible 9:MacBook Drift.
Andit’s not even funny anymore.Maybe the firsttimeitwas *kind of* charming.
Alittlewinkat the audience. Butnow?It’s just fucking cringe.
Wastedtime.Wasted bandwidth. A glossy,over-produced middle finger to every developer
watching, notebook in hand, waiting for the actual meat.
Doyousit there thinking, *“Wow, thisis such a great use of mytime!”*
> “CUT THE SHIT, CRAIG. SHOW ME THE FUCKING TOOLS.”
We’rebeing sold afantasy — not a platformvision.
What should be an opportunity to say,
“Here’s howApplewants developers to think in thenext 5 years,”
becomes a shallowPR reel of stunts, shots, and skits.
Developers want **guidance**, not gimmicks. **Vision**, not vanity.
Instead of 3 minutes of Craigpretending he’sNeo in a hallway full ofMac Studios,
how about showing us the **real** architectural shifts inSwift,
or a **deepdive** intolow-level memory optimizations inmacOS?
How aboutfinally explainingwtfis happening with `SwiftData`?
Or *anything* that makes us better builders?
We could have had20more seconds of **clarity**, not costume.
WWDCisApple’stime toinspire, tolead, to fucking **guide** theecosystem.
But lately?
It feelsmorelike we’re watching theCraig Federighi Variety Hour.
And I didn’t f***ing subscribe to that.
----
かわいくない？
ホヨバで唯一純粋にかわいいだけのキャラになりうるポテンシャルを持っている予感がぴょんぴょんする
ぼくが以前純粋にかわいいと思ってたグレーシュちゃんはぽわぽわしているように見えて覚悟ガンギマリガールだったし
大人になったらわりと悪女ヴィタに対して毒を吐く程度には中身も成長してしまっていた
そこもまたかわいいんだけどね！！
やっぱ獣人じゃないとシンプルなキャラにはなれないのかもしれない
獣人じゃないけどクマ耳フードつけてることのあるスーサナちゃんが今んとこmost純粋人間キャラですわ
まあでも彼女もすごすぎる先輩たちの中で平凡な自分という立ち位置を踏みしめるために成長してきた、けなげな子だからやっぱり複雑だ
おばあさん絡みでせつねぇエピソードもあるので眩しく見えてしまう部分もあるけども
うん、でも単純そうなあざとさはかなりフーフーちゃんと近いな
ただ綺良々ちゃんはいい意味でおバカだけどフーフーはなんかちょっと賢そうなとこあるんだよな……
もし賢くてあざといんだったらわりと危険だ
できればおバカであってくれ、頼む！
癒やし成分が深刻に必要なんだ！
So,the Expo 2025is actually happening,like, rightnow.Itstarted a week ago. They'vegot this massive woodenringstructure that's apparently thebiggest inthe world orsomething. Looks kind ofcool in the pictures, I guess,likesomethingout of an old temple buthuge.
The themeis "Designing FutureSociety for Our Lives". Sounds ambitious. Lots oftalk about saving lives, empowering lives, connecting lives...all thatjazz. They wantit to be a "People's Living Lab" where they show off new tech for thingslikecarbon neutrality andnext-gen mobility.Over 160 countries are supposed tobe there, showing off their ideas forthe future.
But honestly? I keep reading about problems. Heard thetest runs had massive lines, which soundslike a nightmare, especially worrying about heatstroke insummer. Ticket sales seemed slow beforeit opened, with lots of companies buying them up instead of regular people. Makesyou wonder how excited the average person reallyis. Plus, the costs ballooned, almostdouble what they first thought.
And apparently, they plan to tearmost ofit down afterwards? Seemslike ahuge amount of effort and money forsomething temporary. Though they say they'll reuse materials.Still, feels abitweird.
Willit actually be good? Or justanotherbig, expensive event that causes traffic jams? Guess we'll see. Just feelslike there's not muchbuzz compared to thelasttimeOsaka had anExpo way back when.
What they had beenbuildingwas a community. A community in which people went to every imaginable length to helpout every single person they could—a place whereinternational trade policy andCDOs were mere distant thoughts.
Butasis they waythe world worksnow, small towns in smallemptystates, a hundred years of communitybuilding or not, are just simply a sacrificethe powers that be are willing tomake inexchange for a mere fewmore bips.
My papawas forced into retirement in 2011, and mynana stayed workingat the school for thenext decade. My papa though,wasn’t quite willing to throw in the towel. He tried increasing the size ofhis herd of brangus, but alas, cattle farminghas been acash-negativeendeavor for several decades.
LikeWhirlpoolall the other manufacturingplants. Therewas no work to befound for the thousands of people combinedplant workers that had been laid off in the wake of 2008. Every single way of making an honest living had up andgone with the wind toMexico and EastAsia.
Therewasnothing left butbeing aGasstation,Dollar General orWalmartcashier, andWalmart paid $7.25 an hour back then.
Butyou’d be hard pressed to even workat agasstation. There areonlytwogasstations immediately around that 1,200-person town; andone of them just wentout of business, the otheris ownedby a Pakistani family.
As aconsequence, the average household income in that townisnow ~$30,000 a year. 90% of the children areon free and reducedlunch,most ofthe families that remain areonstateassistance, and opioid and meth usehas reached unprecedented rates.
And yet, “learn to code” they contemptuously sneer,all while gleefully kicking the door wideopen to aswarm of cheap, barely-proficient immigrants, tanking the tech labor market behind everyone’s back.
4/6
彼らが築き上げてきたのはコミュニティでした。人々が考えられる限りのあらゆる手段を講じて、できる限りのあらゆる人々を助けるコミュニティであり、国際貿易政策やCDOが単なる遠い考えである場所でした。
しかし、現在の世界の仕組みでは、小さな空っぽの州の小さな町は、コミュニティの構築が100年であろうとなかろうと、権力者がほんの少しの利益と引き換えに喜んで払う犠牲に過ぎません。
私の父は 2011 年に強制的に退職させられ、祖母はその後10 年間学校で働き続けました。しかし、父は諦めるつもりはありませんでした。ブランガスの群れを増やそうとしましたが、残念ながら、牛の飼育は数十年にわたって赤字が続いていました。
ワールプール社のような他の製造工場も同様です。2008 年以降に解雇された工場労働者を合わせた数千人に仕事は見つかりませんでした。まともな生計を立てる手段はすべてメキシコや東アジアに消えていきました。
ガソリンスタンド、ダラージェネラル、またはウォルマートのレジ係になるしか選択肢はなく、当時ウォルマートの時給は 7.25ドルでした。
しかし、ガソリンスタンドで働くことさえ難しいでしょう。人口 1,200 人のその町のすぐ近くにはガソリンスタンドが 2 つしかありません。そのうちの 1 つは最近廃業し、もう 1 つはパキスタン人の家族が経営しています。
その結果、その町の平均世帯収入は現在年間約3万ドルです。90%の児童は無料または割引の昼食を食べて、残っている家族のほとんどは州の援助を受けており、オピオイドとメタンフェタミンの使用率は前例のないレベルに達しています。
それでも、彼らは「コーディングを学べ」と軽蔑的に冷笑し、安っぽくてほとんど熟練していない移民の群れに喜んで扉を大きく開け放ち、誰も知らないうちにテクノロジー労働市場を崩壊させている。
https://x.com/FedPoasting/status/1908020399838724436
Bugman Hegel
@FedPoasting
My family, stretching back to the 1600s,has given theirblood, sweat, andtears making this country whatitis.Buildingit up from dirt. Fromnothing.
400 years of living in unimaginably hostile conditions. Braving the disease, deadly weather, tribalnations, treachery, and lawlessness thatis inherent to an ungoverned, unsettled territory. Thisnationwas built, brickby brick,by bravest, toughest,most resilient peopleonthe face of theearth.
And yet, for the past 60 years, the academic sophists in theivory towers, thepigs inWashington, and the good-for-nothing parasites of the banking class have notonly seenitfit tospiton their names, their sacrifices, their community, theirrace, and their religion, but alsospiton their legacies, their children, their grandchildren, and their rightful inheritance. There are not the words in theEnglish language to describe theevil of the orchestrated treachery thatthe UnitedStates government and those so interested, have inflictedon the inheritors of thisnation.
Theblood thatwas spilled carving thisnationout of thegod-forsaken backwatersitwas,was a real, material thing.Blood,like people,is a material thing. Andnations are comprised of people. Americais a people.Ideas can’t shedblood;only people can.Ideas can’t sacrifice;only people can.
To call America an “idea”aloneis to forsakeall of thosewho shed their realblood andlost their real lives to construct the verycomfort and luxury required tosit back and even considercalling such a sacrifice an “idea.”
私の一族は 1600年代まで遡り、血と汗と涙を流してこの国を今の姿に築き上げてきました。土から、何もないところから築き上げてきたのです。
想像を絶するほど過酷な状況で 400 年間暮らしてきました。病気、恐ろしい天候、部族国家、裏切り、そして統治されていない未開拓の領土につきものの無法状態に立ち向かってきました。この国は、地球上で最も勇敢で、最もタフで、最も粘り強い人々によって、レンガを一つずつ積み上げて築かれました。
しかし、過去 60 年間、象牙の塔にいる学問上の詭弁家、ワシントンの豚野郎、銀行家の役立たずの寄生虫たちは、彼らの名前、彼らの犠牲、彼らのコミュニティ、彼らの人種、彼らの宗教に唾を吐くだけでなく、彼らの遺産、彼らの子供、彼らの孫、そして彼らの正当な相続財産にも唾を吐きかけてきました。米国政府とそれに関心を持つ人々がこの国の継承者に与えた組織的な裏切りの悪を表現できる言葉は英語には存在しません。
かつて神に見放された辺境の地であったこの国を切り開くために流された血は、現実の物質的なものでした。血は、人々と同様、物質的なものです。そして国家は人々で構成されています。アメリカは人々です。思想は血を流すことはできません。できるのは人々だけです。思想は犠牲を払うことはできません。できるのは人々だけです。
アメリカを「理念」と呼ぶことは、ただ座ってそのような犠牲を「理念」と呼ぶことを考えるために必要な快適さと贅沢さを築くために、本当の血を流し、本当の命を失ったすべての人々を見捨てることです。
https://x.com/FedPoasting/status/1908020403059949699
Bugman Hegel
@FedPoasting
For thelast six decades, every singlelegacy institution, academic institution, government institution, andNGOhas spent the past decadecalling the very peoplewho built thisnation variousiterations of uniquely, inherently,ontologicallyevil,calling us racists, and rapists, and genociders, and slavers, and oppressors, and backwoods, and inbreds, and reprobates, andwhite trash—all the while not-so-secretly making contingency plans for what to dowith those of us ultimately considered excess biomass.
The American people decidedat the ballotbox.It’stime to pay thepiper.
Bring back manufacturing, slap tariffson imports, close the borders, deport the illegals,fire every singlespiteful government-funded mutant, and remove thedollar fromits positionas world reserve currency. Americans, especially those of uswho consider ourselves “ethnically” Heritage American—do not care how muchit’s going to cost us in the short term; we are willing to sacrifice ifit means wedon’t have tosit andwatch what’s left of our rightful inheritance be burned to the ground.
We want thoseguilty to pay their due penance. We wantheads to roll.
過去 60 年間、あらゆる伝統的な機関、学術機関、政府機関、NGO は、この国を築いたまさにその人々を、さまざまな意味で独特で、本質的に、存在論的に悪であると呼び、私たちを人種差別主義者、強姦者、大量虐殺者、奴隷所有者、抑圧者、田舎者、近親交配者、堕落者、白人ゴミと呼び続けてきました。その間ずっと、余剰バイオマスと見なされる私たちのような人々をどうするかについて、それほど秘密ではない緊急時対応計画を立てていました。
製造業を復活させ、輸入品に関税を課し、国境を封鎖し、不法移民を国外追放し、政府資金で賄われている意地悪な変異種を一人残らず解雇し、ドルを世界の準備通貨の地位から排除する。アメリカ人、特に自分たちを「民族的に」伝統的なアメリカ人だと考える私たちは、短期的にどれだけの費用がかかるかなど気にしない。正当な遺産の残りが焼き尽くされるのをただ座って見過ごす必要がないなら、喜んで犠牲を払うつもりだ。
私たちは罪を犯した者たちに当然の罰を与えてほしい。首が飛ぶことを望んでいる。
Bugman Hegel
@FedPoasting
In 2011, my papawas laid off from aWhirlpool manufacturingplant, the kind that had for so longmadeAmerica great. In the wake of the financial crisis, the C-suite had decided to offshore operations toMexico.
Theplant they shutteredwas a 1.2 millionsqft manufacturingplant, andovernight, 1,000 peoplelost theirjobs. Many of whom had been working there for decades.
My papawas 57 years old when hegot laid off. He had workedat that very sameplant forover 30 years, andsnap justlike that,itwasall gone.
1/6
2011年、私の父は、長年アメリカを偉大にしてきたワールプール社の製造工場から解雇されました。金融危機を受けて、経営陣はメキシコへの事業移転を決定しました。
閉鎖された工場は120万平方フィートの製造工場で、一夜にして1,000人が職を失った。その多くは数十年にわたってそこで働いていた人たちだった。
父は57歳のときに解雇されました。父は30年以上同じ工場で働いていたのですが、突然すべてが消えてしまったのです。
1/6
When Iwas alittlegirl, fromas far backas I could remember, my papa woke upat 3:30am and drove the 40 minutes to theplant from the rural 1,200-person town every single day. And for 30 years, he worked what were often10-12 hour shifts with no complaints.
I grew up a Navy brat, so I didn’tget to see my grandparents except for a few months during thesummer, but I remember my papa exerting thelastdrop ofhis energy so he could spendtime with us going to the creek,building us atreehouse,riding horses, and playing cowboys and Indians.
Every evening, starting from when Iwas in grade school, my papa and I wouldsit in the living room andwatch theHistory Channel,AnimalPlanet, and BillO’Reilly and hee-hawtogether about what the Democrats were doing,as muchas an eight-year-old can.
My papa and mynana had beentogether since they graduatedhigh school; theygot marriedat barely 18 and had mymom less than a year later and my aunt soon after that.
They had a small homestead, ownedmost of what they hadoutright, and they were poor, but poor doesn’t have to mean that much whenyou can work theland.
Mynana workedas the local school’s secretary, and my papa had good benefits withhis manufacturing job. Theyonly ever wentout toeaton special occasions.McDonald’swas abirthday-only type of affair. They had aone-acregarden, a few head of cattle, would can fruits and vegetablesat the end of everysummer, and freeze chopped okra, blueberries, meat from wild hogs and venison in an old chest freezer in the workshop.
私がまだ子供だった頃、物心ついたころから、父は毎日午前 3 時半に起きて、人口 1,200 人の田舎町から工場まで 40 分かけて車で通っていました。そして 30 年間、父は不満を言うことなく、10時間から12時間のシフト勤務をこなしました。
私は海軍の子供として育ったので、夏の数か月を除いて祖父母に会う機会はありませんでしたが、父が最後の力を振り絞って私たちと一緒に小川に行ったり、ツリーハウスを作ったり、馬に乗ったり、カウボーイやインディアンごっこをしたりして時間を過ごしていたことを覚えています。
小学生の頃から、毎晩、私とパパはリビングルームに座って、ヒストリーチャンネルやアニマルプラネット、ビル・オライリーを見て、8歳の子どもができる限り民主党が何をしているのか一緒に大笑いしていました。
私の父と祖母は高校を卒業して以来ずっと一緒にいました。彼らは18歳になるかならないかで結婚し、1年も経たないうちに母が生まれ、その後すぐに叔母が生まれました。
彼らは小さな農場を所有し、所有物のほとんどを完全に所有していましたが、貧しかったです。しかし、土地を耕作できるなら、貧しいということはそれほど大きな意味を持つ必要はありません。
私の祖母は地元の学校の事務員として働いており、父は製造業で良い福利厚生を受けていました。外食するのは特別なときだけで、マクドナルドは誕生日にしか行かなかったのです。彼らは 1エーカーの菜園と数頭の牛を飼っていて、毎年夏の終わりには果物や野菜を缶詰にし、作業場の古いチェスト型冷凍庫で刻んだオクラ、ブルーベリー、野生のイノシシの肉、鹿肉を冷凍していました。
Despite never having beenon aplane and seldom ever having beenoutside of Arkansas, they managed to put both mymomand aunt throughcollege and graduate school without requiring them to incur even adime of debt. Thiswas the 1990s.
Thenat theage of 57, my papa and 1,000 ofhis coworkers were thrownawaylike apiece of trash after giving that company decades of their lives. And what were they told to do? Whatwas their consolation prize?
Learn. To. Code.
My papa andnana were born in the 1950s in a place thatwas quite literally the Wild West just mere decades before theirbirth.
Growing up, neither of them had running water—they drew water from a well,washed up in a tin tub heatedover afire, and went to the restroom in anouthouse. They were both educated in aone-room schoolhouse and both came from families that reliedon their farm’s livestock to feed themselves. Peoplelike my grandparents built thisnation. They built thisnation for their children.
But because the thing they sought to buildwasn’t a stock portfolio or realestate portfolio, the preservation of their homes and communitieswas notsomething thatWall StreetnorWashingtonsawas having enoughvalue to beanythingmore than apathetic about blowing up.
飛行機に乗ったことも、アーカンソー州から外に出たことがほとんどなかったにもかかわらず、両親は母と叔母を一銭も借金せずに大学と大学院に通わせることができました。1990年代のことでした。
そして、父と1,000人の同僚は、57歳で会社に何十年も捧げた後、ゴミのように捨てられました。そして、彼らに何をするように言われたのでしょうか？ 慰めの賞品は何だったのでしょうか？
Learn. To. Code
私のパパとおばあちゃんは、1950年代に生まれましたが、彼らが生まれるほんの数十年前までは、そこはまさに「ワイルド・ウェスト」でした。
両親ともに水道のない環境で育ったため、井戸から水を汲み、火で沸かしたブリキの桶で体を洗い、離れのトイレで用を足した。二人とも一教室の学校で教育を受け、農場の家畜に頼って食料を得ていた家庭の出身だ。祖父母のような人々がこの国を築いた。子供たちのためにこの国を築いたのだ。
しかし、彼らが構築しようとしていたのは株式ポートフォリオでも不動産ポートフォリオでもなかったため、彼らの家やコミュニティの保全は、ウォール街やワシントンにとって、破壊することに無関心以上の価値があるとは考えられなかった。
他にも調べれば無限に出てくるぞ
Another utility of informationisone in which therehas been muchmore
scientific interest andevidence: the ability of information to reduce uncertainty.
From the 1950s through the 1970s, definitions of information proliferated,most
of them incorporating the uncertaintyaspect of Shannon’smodel. Areviewby
Bouazza (1989) reflects the majorityview regarding the role of uncertainty in
these definitions: “The most cited and perhapsthe most useful definition of
informationis ‘that which reduces uncertainty’” (p. 145).
https://dmice.ohsu.edu/bedricks/courses/cs635/pdf/case_chapter_3.pdf
万以上のツイート雑に貼る。
海外の人は日本オタクの味方的な勘違いしてるオタクをよく見るが、海外から見た日本の児童ポルノが、どれだけ日本へのヘイトを煽るか自覚して隠れて欲しい。
万以下になると焼き払うために原爆が必要とか、もう一度洪水にのまれろとか、本当に酷いからね。
日本の食べ物や景観に興味あるけどロリコンが酷いとか、少子化な理由がわかった、誰が日本に子供を連れていきたがるのかとか、国益も損なう勢いだから。
あと日本のオタク、外国人には何言われてもだんまりで、日本人にだけ噛み付きまくってるのもダサすぎる。
海外の反応
72Klikeson a rapeconfession. We should bring back skinning peoplealive.
レイブ告白に７万２０００件のいいね。生きたまま皮をはぐ刑を復活させるべきだ。
https://x.com/Krymefull/status/1893552122995613777?t=agiPsDLO8K50M9XWP5_PUg&s=19
Thisis a child rapist's documentary of them raping a child 💀
いやこれはロリコンじゃない。これは児童強姦犯が子供を強姦するドキュメンタリーです💀
https://x.com/monjirorawstat/status/1893509615826137483?t=2fHTjfFtoBis4tRrk-WGuA&s=19
you groomed a minor and rapedheryou fucking subhuman trash.
「罪を犯した」未成年者を誘惑してレイプしたんだな、このクソ人間以下のゴミ共
6.3万いいね
Most pedophiles:Beingsecret about theiractivities.
Jap pedophiles:
https://x.com/Popyo9Bye/status/1893510643690405938?t=9x9ulrn29ShNgfMfLB2Zqg&s=19
5.2万いいね
https://x.com/DatChaosGuy/status/1893750264403771859?t=DSwdqYKwofK1JiB47ry-ZA&s=19
70k+likeson a comic fantasizing aboutlittle girls…
4.9万いいね
Paedophilia inJapanis so normalized, no wonder lolicons and shotacons arebrave and sayit's their culture. Disgusting
日本では小児性愛が当たり前になっているので、ロリコンやショタコンが勇敢にもそれを自分達の文化だというのも不思議ではない。気持ち悪い
3.9万いいね
https://x.com/destoyeskey/status/1893556994960740832?t=uwEd3g0zhMglCpFsEzELDw&s=19
isJapanlike the wakanda for pedophiles
3.2万いいね
https://x.com/mainmajin/status/1893743553890697286?t=Chbu1YijfHPo-WoQll2wWg&s=19
Japanis really just a safehaven for pedophiles
1.4万いいね
日本人の反応
こんなのにファボつけてる人が7万人
7万人だよ？日本マジでやばいでしょ、ゾッとするほど性犯罪者に寄り添う思考の人が多い。
通報した
3.9万いいね
https://x.com/amaterasu_solar/status/1893149329424044303?t=lVdQtwUDD2niddbfbEfzBw&s=19
To those outside ofJapan.
InJapan, there are many pedophile men. And there are a lot of pedophile manga,anime,and adult videos.
Because of that, minors and women are consumed sexuallyon a daily basis in this country.It makes me want to die.
26.4万いいね
https://x.com/ggbym_d/status/1893541663064179021?t=OtcIQj6YxvGl5lvb4_vNuA&s=19
普通に児童を襲ってレイプする性犯罪を娯楽として載せちゃう国。そしてそれが7万いいねもつく。終わってんな。
2万いいね
Assassin'sCreeddirector: The righttime totake series toJapan |BBC
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c163jexl7rxo
Shadow’s trailer also generated backlash from somegamers,who criticised the choice of Yasukeas amain characterover a nativeJapanese protagonist.
Opponents have accused those critics ofbeing racist, and have pointedout that Yasukeis basedon a real-life person.
Charles, speaking to Newsbeat before the trailer dropped, says the developers “put a lot of emphasison authenticity and making sure we depictJapan and the culture right”.
“So when westarted the project, we had ahistorian with us from dayone,” he says.
He says theteam also consulted weapons experts and travelled toJapan toget afeel for the landscape and locations inthe game.
シャドウズのトレーラーは、一部のゲーマーからの反発も生みました。彼らは、日本人主人公ではなく弥助を主人公として選んだことを批判しました。
これに対して、批判者たちを人種差別主義者だと非難する声も上がっており、弥助が実在の人物に基づいていることが指摘されています。
チャールズは、トレーラー公開前にNewsbeat（BBCのニュース番組）との対話で、開発者たちが「日本とその文化を正しく描写することに重点を置き、真正性を重視した」と述べています。
Africansamurai: The enduringlegacy of a blackwarrior in feudalJapan ｜CNN
When feudalJapan’smost powerfulwarlord NobunagaOda met Yasuke, a black slave-turned-retainer, in 1581, he believed themanwas agod.
Oda had never seen an African before. Andlike the locals inJapan’s then-capital ofKyoto, hewas awedby Yasuke’s height, build andskintone, according to Thomas Lockley, the author of “AfricanSamurai: TheTrueStory of Yasuke, a Legendary BlackWarrior in FeudalJapan.”
“When Yasukegot toKyoto (with Jesuit missionaries), therewas a massiveriot. People wanted to seehim and be inhis presence,” says Lockley,who spentnine years researching and writing thebook, whichwas publishedlast month.
Oda believed Yasuke to be either a guardian demon or “Daikokuten,” agod of prosperity usually representedby black statues in temples. He tried torub the pigment from Yasuke’sskin, believingitwas blackink.Once convinced Yasukewas real, he immediately threw afeast inhis honor, says Lockley.
1581年、戦国時代日本の最も強力な戦国大名である織田信長が、奴隷から家臣となった黒人のヤスケに出会った時、信長はヤスケを神だと信じました。
「アフリカン・サムライ：戦国時代日本の伝説的黒人武士ヤスケの真実の物語」の著者トーマス・ロックリーによると、信長はそれまでアフリカ人を見たことがありませんでした。そして、当時の都であった京都の地元民と同様に、ヤスケの身長、体格、肌の色に畏敬の念を抱いたそうです。
「ヤスケが（イエズス会宣教師とともに）京都に到着した時、大規模な騒動が起きました。人々はヤスケを見たがり、彼の存在を身近に感じたがりました」と、9年の歳月をかけて研究し執筆した先月出版されたこの本について、ロックリーは語ります。
信長はヤスケを守護の鬼か、通常寺院で黒い像で表される繁栄の神「大黒天」のどちらかだと信じていました。信長はヤスケの肌の色素を擦り取ろうとし、それが黒インクだと考えていました。ヤスケが本物だと確信すると、すぐに彼の名誉を称える宴を開いたとロックリーは述べています。
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/19/asia/black-samurai-yasuke-africa-japan-intl/index.html
最近も IGNJapan 使って煽り散らかしhttps://youtu.be/keiDRORg9hc
ここまでやるなら、ゲームに規制は不要！！あらゆる規制に反対する！！と表明したらよかったのでは？って思うが、
なぜか日本版だけ日本人の首ホームラン出来るのが禁止されているの突っ込まないんですよね。Roninはゴア表現あるのになぜでしょうね？
あと日本人の非武装市民はペナルティ無し攻撃できるけど白人キャラは攻撃できないこともツッコミなし。NPCだろうが攻撃できるゲームはいくらでもあるんですけど
Itwas surprisingly gory,like the decapitations,you couldget coated inblood. How vitalis that to theassassin’sfantasy?
（斬首シーンなどでは、予想外に残虐で、血まみれになることもありますね。これはアサシンのファンタジーにとってどれほど重要なのでしょうか？）
Ithink it’s not anassassin thing,it’s aJapan thing in ourcase. So lookingatdeathwas a day-to-day occurrence in that period, and the waymost people died inJapan during thattimeisclean decapitations.
So we didn’t want toshyaway fromit, althoughyou can turn off theviolence ifyou want. There’s options forit.You can turn off theblood,you can turn off the dismemberment and stuff. Soit’smore trying to be faithful to thewaraspect ofJapanat that period.Deathwas acommon thing and decapitationwas not a strange sight inJapan.
私たちの場合、これはアサシンに関することというよりも、日本に関することだと考えています。当時の日本では、死を目にすることは日常的なことでした。そしてその時代の日本で多くの人々が死んでいった方法は、きれいな斬首でした。
ですので、私たちはそれを避けようとはしませんでした。ただし、望めば暴力表現をオフにすることもできます。そのためのオプションがあります。血の表現をオフにしたり、切断などの表現をオフにしたりすることができます。これは、むしろその時代の日本の戦争の側面に忠実であろうとする試みなのです。死は日常的なことであり、斬首は日本では珍しい光景ではありませんでした。
https://videogames.si.com/features/assassins-creed-shadows-interview
こっちなら付き合うぞ
ローカルでテキスト・画像生成のモデル動かしてみようをそのうち書こうと思うけど、Windowsアーキテクチャの簡単な説明欲しい？
コア分離あたり。ほかにも欲しいのがあれば書いとくけど
というか、Ubuntu、Ubuntu 騒いでる子がいるが、そもそもPCにWin11／Win10入ってるか？
（Windows ＋DockerDesktop ：バックエンドWSL2Ubuntu の予定。なお、YouTube に構築動画が無限にあるぞ)
Let’s faceit: starting a conversationon a dating app canfeel terrifying.You seesomeoneyou’re interested in,you typeout amessage, and then…youdeleteit. “Is this too boring?” “Will they even respond?” “What if I sound awkward?”
We’veall been there. That firstmessage canmake orbreakyour chances ofconnecting withsomeone amazing. Buthere’s thegood news:youdon’t have tooverthink it.With the rightopeningline,you canspark a conversation thatfeelsnatural,fun, and meaningful.
AtMixerDates, webelieve that every greatconnection starts with a great conversation. That’swhy we’ve puttogether this guide to helpyoucraft the best dating appopeninglines—ones that standout, showyour personality, andlead to realconnections. Ready to ditch the “hey” and start making animpact?Let’sdive in!
[:contents]
Before weget into the bestopeninglines,let’stalk aboutwhyyour firstmessageis so important.
Youropeninglineisyour chance tomake a greatfirst impression.It’s thegateway to a conversation that couldlead tosomething special. A thoughtful,creativemessage shows thatyou’re genuinely interested—not just swiping mindlessly.
Your firstmessage sets thetone for the entire conversation. A boring orgenericopener mightlead to a dull chat, while afun or intriguingone canspark excitement andcuriosity.
Let’s be real: everyonelovesfeeling special. Whenyou put effort intoyouropeningline,it shows thatyou care enough to standout. AndonMixerDates, where wevalue authenticity and positivity, that effortgoes a long way.
Now,let’sget to thegood stuff—the best dating appopeninglines that actually work. These are divided intocategories to suit different personalities and situations.
Whilethe examples above are great starting points, the bestopeninglines are theones thatfeel authentic toyou.Here are sometips to helpyoucraftyour own:
Referencesomething from theirprofile—aphoto, a hobby, or ashared interest.It showsyou’re payingattention and not just copying and pasting.
Avoid heavy oroverly serious topics right off the bat. Keep thetonelight and playful tomake the conversation enjoyable.
Don’ttry to besomeoneyou’re not. Ifyou’renaturallyfunny, lean into that. Ifyou’remore thoughtful,go for asincere compliment or question.
“Hey” or “What’s up?” might be easy, but they’re also forgettable. Put in alittle effort to standout.
This gives the other person an easy way to respond and keeps the conversation flowing.
AtMixerDates, we’reall about creating a positive,inclusive space whereyou canfeel comfortablebeingyourself.Here’swhy our platformis the best place to put theseopeninglines into practice:
We welcome everyone, no matterwhoyou are orwhoyoulove. Our platformis designed to be a safe space whereyou canconnect withlike-minded people.
Our users create detailedprofiles thatmakeit easy to findshared interests andcraft personalizedopeninglines.
We encourage our community to be genuine and kind, soyou canfeel confident starting conversations withoutfear of judgment or rejection.
Don’t justtake ourword forit—here’s whatone of our users had to say:
“I met my partneronMixerDates, anditallstarted with asimplemessage about oursharedlove for travel. The conversation flowednaturally, and therestishistory. I’m so grateful for this platform!”
While a greatopeningline canspark a conversation,building a realconnectiontakesmore than just a clevermessage.Here are thekeyelements tolook for when seeking a meaningfulconnection:
A strongconnection starts with alignmenton the things that mattermost. Doyoushare similarvalues,lifegoals, or visions forthe future?
Look forsomeonewhoiswilling toshare their thoughts,feelings, and vulnerabilities—andwho encouragesyou to do the same.
Healthy relationships are atwo-way street. Both people should be putting in effort to communicate, plan dates, and support each other.
Atrueconnectionallows both people to be themselves without judgment.Look forsomeonewho celebratesyour uniqueness and encouragesyou to pursueyour passions.
Communicationis the foundation ofany strong relationship. A mutualconnection thrivesonhonesty, transparency, and the ability to resolve conflicts in ahealthy way.
AtMixerDates, we’rehere to helpyou find thesekeyelements in a partner. Our platformis designed toconnectyou with peoplewhoshareyourvaluesand arelooking for the same thingsyou are. Starting a conversationon a dating app doesn’t have to be stressful.With the rightopeningline,you canspark aconnection thatfeelsnatural,fun, and meaningful.And atMixerDates, we’rehere to helpyou everystep of the way.
So, what areyou waiting for?Craft that perfectopeningline,joinMixerDates, and startconnecting with peoplewhovalue authenticity and positivity.Your perfectmatchisout there—and they’re justonemessageaway.
Firstdates can be exciting and nerve-wrackingallatonce.You’re meetingsomeone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figureout if there’schemistrybetweenyou. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showingsomeoneyou’re interested withoutbeing too forward or awkward.
Flirtingdoesn’t have to be a high-pressuresituation. Infact,it can bethe mostfun part ofgetting to knowsomeone. Whetheryou're meetingsomeoneonMixerDates orany other platform,the most important thingis to be genuine,staycalm, and let theconnection developnaturally.
Ifyou’ve everfoundyourself wondering how to flirton a firstdate withoutfeeling uncomfortable,you’re notalone. Everyonehas their awkwardmoments, but themoreyou understand theart of flirting, the easierit becomes. In thisarticle, we’llbreak down how to flirt in a way thatfeelsnatural, exciting,and authentic towhoyou are. So, let'sdive in and learn how tomakethe most ofyour firstdate experience—withoutoverthinkingit.
Whenit comes to flirting, confidenceiskey. But whatdoesit really mean to be confidenton a firstdate? Confidencedoesn’t meanyouneed to be perfect, or evenoutgoing—it simply meansbeing comfortable inyour ownskin and showing upasyour authentic self.
Haveyou ever noticed how people are drawn to thosewho radiate self-assurance?It’s not aboutbragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presentingyourself with ease. Ifyoufeelgood aboutyourself,itwillnaturally show. A greatsmile,good posture, and eye contact cango a long way in making agoodfirst impression.
For instance, think about thelasttimesomeone walked into a room and immediately caughtyourattention—not because they werethe mostattractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and theymadeyoufeelat ease. That’s the kind of confidenceyou want to projectonyourdate.
Whenyou're confident,you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead,youfocuson enjoying themoment, making the other personfeel comfortable, and letting theconnection happennaturally. That’s themagic of confidence—itallowsyou to be present,fun, and,most importantly,yourself.
Let’s faceit—noonewants tofeellike they’rebeing “worked” or put through a game. That’swhy subtletyis such a powerfultool whenit comes to flirting.It'sall about showing interest withoutbeingover-the-top or too obvious.
Flirtingdoesn’talways mean complimentingsomeone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. Infact,the most successful flirtingis the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, andlighthearted. Think about thelittlemoments,like a teasing comment about how theyalways order the same thingat a restaurant or the wayyou laughat a silly joke theymake.
Thekeyis to find a balance. Asimplesmile or a playful comment can convey interest withoutbeing too much. For example, ifyourdate tellsyou theylove hiking but theytend togetlost easily,you could saysomethinglike, “So,you’re telling meyouneed a personal guide? I couldget behind that!”It’slighthearted, humorous, andmost importantly,it keeps the conversationfun without putting too much pressureon thesituation.
By keepingit subtle,youallowyourdate tofeelat ease.Ittakes the pressure off them to be perfectand allows both ofyou to enjoy the interactionmorenaturally. Flirtingdoesn’tneed to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both ofyou canfeel comfortableand authentic.
Now,let’stalk aboutsomething incredibly important in the flirting game:active listening. When we’reon adate, we oftenget caught up in thinking about what to saynext, how we’re coming across, or if we’rebeing interesting enough. But the best way tomake animpression? Truly listening toyourdate.
Active listening meansyou’re fullyengaged in the conversation, givingyourdateyour fullattention and responding thoughtfully.It’s about showing thatyou care about what they’re saying and thatyou’re genuinely interested ingetting to know them better. Whenyou listenactively,you’re also giving them space toopen up, and that can create an immediateconnection.
For example, ifyourdate mentions they recently traveled toJapan, instead of simply saying, “That’scool!”you could follow up withsomethinglike, “Whatwasthe most memorable experienceyou had there?” This shows thatyou’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences.It’s a great way to build rapport and let them knowyou’re not just there toimpress them—you’re there toconnect.
Whileyour words are important,body language often speaks louder thananythingyou can say. Whetheryourealizeit or not,yourbodyis constantly communicating howyoufeel. Howyousit, stand, andmove tellsyourdate whetheryou’rerelaxed,engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures cango a long way in flirting. Alight touchon thearm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaininggood eye contact—all thesebody language cues helpsignalyour interest. Andthe great thingis, whendonenaturally, these cues can be justas effectiveas words.
For example, ifyou’resittingat a caféonyourdate andyou lean in slightly when they’re sharing afunnystory,you’re not just showing thatyou’re interested—you’re inviting them intoyour space.It’s aninvitation toconnect further. And when they respondby leaning in too, that’s when themagic happens—the unspokenconnection that tellsyou both that there’s potential formore.
Flirting throughbody languagedoesn’t mean making grand gestures orbeingoverly touchy.It’s aboutbeing present and showing thatyou’reengagedwith yourdate in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy toget caught up inoverthinking how to flirt or trying to figureout ifyourdateis intoyou. Buthere’s asecret—whenyou letgo of the pressureand allowyourself to havefun,everything flows muchmorenaturally. Flirtingon a firstdatedoesn’tneed tofeellike atest or anassignment.It’s supposed to be afun,lighthearted experience that sets the stage formore greatdates ahead.
Whenwas thelasttimeyou had a genuinelyfundate?Wasit whenyou were trying too hard toimpress, or whenyou were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless whenyou're present, enjoying themoment, and letting theconnection grownaturally.
Sometimes,it's the smallmoments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—thatmake a firstdate truly special. Whenyoufocuson havingfun,you create an environment where both ofyou canrelax, flirt, and let thechemistry grow. That’s thesecret to a greatdate.
One of the best things about using a platformlikeMixerDatesis thatittakes the guessworkout of the equation.Byconnecting withsomeonewho already sharesyour interests and values,you’vegot a head starton making a realconnection.No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for aspark—onMixerDates,you already know there’ssomething incommon.
Whenyou’re alreadyon the same pagewith yourdate, flirting comesmore easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we evenon the same wavelength?”feeling, andmore of thefun, “Wow, we reallyclick!” vibe. Whetheryou’retalking aboutfavorite hobbies, movies, orlifegoals, the conversation flowsnaturally, making the flirtingfeel effortless.
Ifyou're looking for a place to meetlike-minded people and build genuineconnections,MixerDatesis the perfect platform.It's a great place to findsomeonewho appreciatesyou forwhoyou are andwhoyou cannaturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirtingon a firstdateisall about confidence,connection, andfun. Whenyou letgo of the pressure andfocuson enjoyingthe experience, thechemistrywillnaturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirtisbybeingyourself—letyour personalityshine through, listen with intention, and embrace themoment.
And ifyou’re ready to meetsomeone new,who’s justas interested in making aconnectionasyou are,MixerDatesis the perfect place to start. Sogo ahead,take theleap, and see whereit leads.Who knows?Yournext greatconnection might be just aclickaway.
Sign up forMixerDatestoday and startyourjourney to exciting firstdates and meaningfulconnections!
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Theassertion thatEnglish constitutes a "hostile language"is emblematic of a profound misunderstanding of the intricate relationshipbetween language, culture, andcommunication. Such a reductionistviewpoint, often stemming from cultural insularity or an oversimplified interpretation of global dynamics, fails to recognize the multifacetedand adaptivenature of languageas a vehicle for connection rather than division.
Language, initsmost fundamental form, servesas a sophisticated instrument forhumanexpression and interaction.It encapsulates the complexities of thought,emotion, and cultural nuance. To labelEnglishas "hostile"is to overlookits roleas a global lingua franca that facilitates dialogue among diverse cultures. This designation notonly undermines the richtapestry ofEnglish-speaking societies but also dismisses the language's capacity forevolutionand adaptation, reflecting the very societiesit serves.
Critics often conflate the global dominance ofEnglish with cultural imperialism, positing thatits prevalence signifies an erosion of local languages and cultures. However, this perspective neglects the agency of non-nativespeakerswho actively adoptand adaptEnglish to meet their communicativeneeds.The expansion ofEnglishis not merely an imposition;itis a testament toits utility and flexibility in diverse contexts.By embracingEnglish, individuals from various linguistic backgrounds enhance their communicative repertoire without relinquishing their cultural identities.
To characterizeEnglishas "hostile" implies an intrinsic aggression or antagonism within the languageitself—a notion thatis fundamentally flawed. Hostilityis not an inherent characteristic of language but rather areflection of the sociopolitical contexts in whichitis employed. The potential for misunderstanding orconflict arises not from the linguisticmedium but from the intentionsand attitudes ofitsspeakers. Thus, vilifyingEnglish misplaces responsibility for interpersonal and intercultural tensions that are often rooted in broader societalissues.
In an increasingly interconnected world,English functionsas acrucialbridge across cultural divides.It enables collaboration in vitalfields suchas science, technology, diplomacy, and commerce, fostering innovation and mutual understanding. Proficiency inEnglish can empower individuals and communitiesby providingaccess to resources and opportunities that mightotherwise remain elusive. Thisempowerment challenges the notion of hostility; instead,it highlights the language's roleas an enabler of progress and cooperation.
In conclusion, the characterization ofEnglishas a "hostile language" represents a reductive oversimplification that fails to capture the complexities inherent in linguistic interaction within our globalizedsociety. Rather than viewing languages through a lens of hostility or division, we should embrace their potential for fostering understanding and collaboration.Itis imperative to cultivate amore nuanced appreciation for the role ofEnglish—andindeedall languages—in shaping our sharedhuman experience.Only through such intellectual rigor can wetranscend divisive narratives andcelebrate the richdiversity that language offers in our interconnected world.
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/528f479f-fd3c-43fd-9463-7c2923560573
ある人の嗅覚倫理に関する論文だけど、文献だけで匂いが影響を与えると書いてるから女性に学位を与えるのは無駄だと言われる。
論文書くなら、裁判官にセンサーを取り付けるなり、何人かの被験者にルールを守った上で反応を調べるとかやりようはあったはず。
アタリマエのことを調べるというのは裁判での証拠提出のときに役立つからもっと調べてほしい。
けど、統計学的手法を駆使するなどして、裁判官が9割型認める内容でないと価値がない。
contemporary relevance. I suggest that smell very often invokes identity in a way that signifies an individual’s worth and status in an inarguable manner that short-circuits consciousreflection. This can be accounted forby acknowledging olfaction’s strongly affectivenature, which produces such strong bodily sensations and emotions that reflexivityisbypassed in favour of a behavioural or cognitive solution thatassuages the intense feelingmost immediately. Olfactorydisgust, therefore, tends to result in rejection, while harmful forms of olfactorydesiremay result in sublimation or subjugation. My thesisis particularly attentive to tensionsand ambivalences that complicate the typically bifurcated affectivespectrum of olfactory experiences, drawing attention to (dis)pleasurable olfactory relations that have socio-political utility. I argue that literary fictionis notonly anarena in which olfactorylogics can be instantiated, but also a laboratory in which possibilities for new kinds of relations and connections can be fostered and tested. ChapterOne exploreshow smell can be used to indicate class antipathies, partlyas they relate tohomelessness,beginning withGeorge Orwell’s seminal non-fictiontext, TheRoad to Wigan Pier (1936), before considering Iain Sinclair’s TheLastLondon (2017) and Bong JoonHo’s Parasite (2019). In ChapterTwo I explorethe fantastical, idealistic, and utopic thinking that surrounds olfaction, which presents smellas fundamentally non-human,byaddressing J. M. Coetzee’sDisgrace (1999), Virginia Woolf’s Flush (1933), Rachel Yoder’s Nightbitch (2021), and Laura Jean McKay’s The Animals in That Country (2020). Chapter Three focuseson the intersectional olfactory dimensions of ‘misogynoir’—the coextensive anti-Black racism and misogyny that Black women experience—and considers Toni Morrison’sTar Baby (1981), Bernice McFadden’sSugar (2000) andRaven Leilani’s Luster (2020). In Chapter Four, I conceptualise an oppressive olfactorylogic, whichis used against women and girls in order to legitimise their harassment or abuse, drawing primarilyon Vladimir Nabokov’sLolita (1955), but also Patrick Süskind’sPerfume (1985). ChapterFivediscussestwo forms of olfactorydesire—perversion and queerness—which have separate moral valences. Iaddress J. M. Coetzee’s The Master of Petersburg (1994),Ann Quin’sBerg (1964), and SamByers’ ComeJoin OurDisease (2020),and argue for fiction’s role in reorienting readers’ habitual relations to olfaction.
2024-06-25
