  |
はてなキーワード:doubleとは
--------------
テニスにおける「エース」とは、主にサーバー（サービスを打つ人）が打ったボールを、相手プレーヤーがラケットに全く触れることができずにポイントになったサービスのことを指します。
これは正式には「サービスエース」と呼ばれ、サーバーにとって最も理想的な得点の形です。
テニスでは、エースと似た状況や、混同しやすい用語がいくつかあります。
* ウィナー（Winner）
ラリー中に、相手がラケットに触れることができなかったり、触れても有効な返球ができなかったりして得点につながったショット全体を指します。エースはサーブに限定されますが、ウィナーはラリー中のストロークやボレーなどで決まったノータッチのショットを指すことが多いです。
* ※注意点：日本語では「リターンエース」という言葉も使われますが、これは相手のサービスをレシーブしたボールがノータッチで決まった場合に使い、海外では「ウィナー」と呼ぶのが一般的です。
サービスエースの中でも、相手が全くボールに触れられなかったことを強調する場合に使われることがあります。
逆に、サーバーが1ポイントで2回連続してサービスを失敗し、相手にポイントを与えてしまうことです。サーバーにとって最も避けたい失点の形です。
--------
いいえ、『エースをねらえ!』の「エース」は、テニスの「サービスエース」だけを指しているわけではありません。
このタイトルの「エース」には、主に次の二つの意味が込められています。
主人公の岡ひろみが、鬼コーチの宗方仁の指導のもと、名門テニス部のトップ選手、つまり「エース」へと成長していくことを目指す、という意味が込められています。
テニスでエース（サービスエース）やウィナーといった、相手が手が出せない最高のショットを「ねらえ」という、技術的な目標も含まれています。
しかし、物語の主題は、テニスプレーヤーとして、そして一人の人間として、困難を乗り越えトップを目指して成長していく主人公の姿を描くことにあります。そのため、タイトルは**「最高を目指せ！」**という成長への強いメッセージを込めていると解釈するのが最も適切です。
ちなみに、宗方コーチがひろみに残した最期の言葉は、「岡、エースをねらえ！」でした。この言葉は、単なるサービスではなく、テニスのトッププレーヤー、つまり世界のエースを目指せ、という意味が込められています。
いわゆる独身税には多少思うところがあったけどこうして並べられてみると、負担したくないから健康、高所得、東京暮し、就業、不本意で重負担の育児をする（である）ことを止めようとはならんやろと感じられて、まあある程度の応能負担はしゃあないわなと思い直してしまった
「税」と名がつかなくても、給付・支援の対象外にされることで相対的に損をしている属性の人は、実質的に「○○税を払わされている」と感じることがあります。
以下に、制度の「恩恵を受けにくい人」が間接的に負担していると考えられる「実質的な〇〇税」をリストアップしてみます。
⇒子育て支援重視の政策が続く中、恩恵を受けられない独身者は「実質的な独身税」と言われます。
⇒健康でも保険料は負担し続け、使う機会がないという意味で「健康税」と感じる人もいます。
⇒給付を受けずに税と社会保険料だけを多く納めることから「逆累進の罠」とされることがあります。
⇒地方への支援が手厚い一方で、都市部住民がその財源を支えているという意味で「都会税」とも言えます。
年金・介護保険などの保険料を負担しながら、将来の給付は不確実
⇒世代間不公平により、若者が損をしているという意味で「労働税」「若者税」と表現されることがあります。
🔹 6.子どもがいない夫婦 →DINKs税（Double Income NoKids 税）
⇒社会保険制度の恩恵が薄い分、制度設計上の「損」をしていると感じやすいです。
🔹 8.不妊・子なし家庭 → 子なし税
| M-theory perspectivevia AdS7-CFT6 | F-theory perspective |
|---|---|
| 11d supergravity/M-theory | |
| ↓ Kaluza-Klein compactificationon S^4 | compactificationon elliptic fibration followedby T-duality |
| 7-dimensional supergravity | |
| ↓ topological sector | |
| 7-dimensional Chern-Simonstheory | |
| ↓ AdS7-CFT6 holographic duality | |
| 6d (2,0)-superconformal QFTonthe M5-brane with conformal invariance | M5-brane worldvolumetheory |
| ↓ KK-compactificationon Riemannsurface | double dimensional reductionon M-theory/F-theory elliptic fibration |
| N=2 D=4 super Yang-Millstheory with Montonen-Olive S-duality invariance; AGT correspondence | D3-brane worldvolumetheorywith type IIB S-duality |
| ↓ topological twist | |
| topologicallytwisted N=2 D=4 super Yang-Millstheory | |
| ↓ KK-compactificationon Riemannsurface | |
| A-modelon Bun_G, Donaldsontheory |
「grokにファクトチェックさせている人は何も知らない」という記事が話題になっている。
そもそもこれ、みんながgrokにやらせているファクトチェックってのは実は「ダブルチェック」なんだよな。
ダブルチェックと言っても再発防止のアンチパターンとして忌み嫌われているアレじゃない。
ダブルチェックとは「こっちでも確認する」くらいの軽い意味だ。
例えば、サイトにアクセスできなくなったら、別PCでアクセスできるか同僚にダブルチェックを頼んでみたりとかね。
英語圏で「ダブルチェック」といえば基本的にこっちが主流で、「"@grokdouble-check"」とかXで検索すれば山ほどヒットする。
ダブルチェックしただけではまだ結論には遠いかもしれない。それを判定するのは発言者だ。
しかし会話の補助にはなる。
So,the Expo 2025is actually happening,like, rightnow.Itstarted a week ago. They'vegot this massive woodenringstructure that's apparently thebiggest inthe world orsomething. Looks kind ofcool in the pictures, I guess,likesomethingout of an old temple buthuge.
The themeis "Designing FutureSociety for Our Lives". Sounds ambitious. Lots oftalk about saving lives, empowering lives, connecting lives...all thatjazz. They wantit to be a "People's Living Lab" where they show off new tech for thingslikecarbon neutrality andnext-gen mobility.Over 160 countries are supposed tobe there, showing off their ideas forthe future.
But honestly? I keep reading about problems. Heard thetest runs had massive lines, which soundslike a nightmare, especially worrying about heatstroke insummer. Ticket sales seemed slow beforeit opened, with lots of companies buying them up instead of regular people. Makesyou wonder how excited the average person reallyis. Plus, the costs ballooned, almostdouble what they first thought.
And apparently, they plan to tearmost ofit down afterwards? Seemslike ahuge amount of effort and money forsomething temporary. Though they say they'll reuse materials.Still, feels abitweird.
Willit actually be good? Or justanotherbig, expensive event that causes traffic jams? Guess we'll see. Just feelslike there's not muchbuzz compared to thelasttimeOsaka had anExpo way back when.
「子なし夫婦」だと「共働き」(Double Income)の情報が抜けるよ。
じゃあ海外のアセクシャルコミュニティの掲示板行けば？(これ何度目だ？)
割と増田みてーな同人腐女子・生きづらいオタ女子が言いそうな発言とかも突っ込まれることなく、
穏やかにやりとりしてる(自分のアイディンティーなんて自己定義するものだからそれはそう)ので
ニコニコできるんじゃあないでしょうか？
たとえば『コンビニ人間』がAVENにアセクシャルとしてあげられていて草生えましたわ
I recently read 'TheConvenience StoreWoman'bySayaka Murata (English translation)
It's a quirky, funny and quick read. I would even recommendit to peoplewhodon'tlike reading, if I thought thestory/character/quirkiness would interest them. I'm actually going to give a copy to afriendas agift.
The central character also appears to be aroand ace.
ーーー
風変わりで、面白くて、あっという間に読めてしまう。読書が好きでない人にも、ストーリーやキャラクター、奇抜さに興味を持ってもらえると思えば、薦めたいくらいです。実際、友人にプレゼントするつもりだ。
Asexualityand Asexual Characters in Books & Comics - a Collection
日本で恋人を作らないと云々かんぬんとか寝言言ってるやつは、アセクシャルなのにゲイを名乗らないといけない世界を見て震えろって思うわ
これが本物のカップル圧ってやつだよ、神の愛を示せないやつに居場所はないの
そもそもなんだけど、伝統的な宗教価値観が支配するカップル文化が強烈な地域、つまり日本以外じゃないと、
アセクシャルで困ること特にないぞ。カップル圧の低い日本は理想郷なのでは？
あと、同性愛者だと思われて困ること特にないし、異性となんかあったんだな(トラウマがあるんだな)って思われて困ること特に無い
日本の自称アセクシャルの人は、こういう風に思われて、具体的にどう困るのか、逆に教えて欲しいのだわな
同性に告白されたことはあるけど、それは学生時代のことだし、増田やってる年齢になってもなお起こることじゃねーのよ
異性に関しては、高齢の親族に『お前は異性を必要としていないように見える』って言われるくらいなので、誰も寄ってこないぞ(平和な世界)
強いて言えばセックスアピールが強烈な人・モテに全力で価値を置いてる人とは男女とも相性が最悪
恋愛がトラウマとか思われてるなら『時期が来たらまた向き合いと思う🥺』とか適当に誤魔化せるでしょ
(そこまで踏み込まれることはまず無いんだけど。学生じゃあるまいし)
ゲイも、異性や恋愛にトラウマがある人も、モテない人も、異常者では無いけど(理解できる範疇にいる人)、
人に情を持たない、人をセクシーだと思わないヤツは、多くの人にとって理解できる範疇になくて、
映画に出てくるナイフ持ってニタついてるサイコパスみたいなヤツなのかな？って警戒されちゃうの
そもそも友達ゼロじゃなきゃ、こういうやり取りの末に、(きっとゲイなんだな)、(きっと異性や恋愛にトラウマがあるんだな)
(この話題には触れんでおこう)ってなってると思うよ
＞その実情が発達障害というダサくて劣った症状だと突き付けられたらすぐにその看板を下ろすだろう
ググればいくらで出てくるぞ。下記のように
double minorityasexualityasdadhd
Are AutismSpectrum Disorderand AsexualityConnected?
Asexualityis a lack of sexualattraction toanygender. Thereis someevidence to suggest that many self-identifiedasexuals have a formal diagnosis of autismspectrum disorder whichis characterizedby deficits in social interaction andcommunication,as wellasby restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors. Additionally, the literature shows thatasexuality and lack of sexualattraction orlow sexual interestis overrepresented in people with autismspectrum disorder compared withneurotypical samples. Nevertheless, no studies have been conducted to investigate the relationshipbetween autismand asexuality in depth. We conducted a systematicreview of the literature to examine whetherasexualityand autismspectrum disorder areconnected. We conclude thatasexualityand autismshare variousaspects, suchas a possible role of prenatal factors, reference to romantic dimensions of sexualattraction and sexual orientation, and non-partner-oriented sexualdesire, but future research should explore and clarify thislink.
無性愛とは、どの性別にも性的魅力を感じないことを指します。多くの自己認識された無性愛者が、自閉症スペクトラム障害（ASD）の正式な診断を受けているという証拠があります。ASDは、社会的相互作用とコミュニケーションの欠陥、ならびに制限された反復的な興味や行動によって特徴付けられます。さらに、文献によると、無性愛や性的魅力の欠如、または低い性的関心は、神経典型的なサンプルと比較して、自閉症スペクトラム障害を持つ人々に過剰に表れています。それにもかかわらず、自閉症と無性愛の関係を深く調査する研究は行われていません。私たちは、無性愛と自閉症スペクトラム障害が関連しているかどうかを調べるために、文献の体系的なレビューを行いました。私たちは、無性愛と自閉症が、出生前の要因の役割、性的魅力と性的指向のロマンチックな側面への言及、パートナー指向でない性的欲望など、さまざまな側面を共有していると結論付けましたが、将来の研究はこのリンクを探求し、明確にする必要があります。
あるものなんか下記から始まって笑っちゃったw そっかw一般的な概念だったんだw
This chapter challenges the commonly held notion that individuals withASD areasexual or inappropriate in their sexual behaviors.
この章では、自閉症スペクトラム障害（ASD）を持つ個人が無性愛者であるか、性的行動が不適切であるという一般的な概念に挑戦しています
アセクシャルやセックス依存症が発達障害である可能性は高いだろうけど、別にイコールではないだろうよってねw
ちなみにこれは発達障害＝アセクシャルは不適切、社会的助けがあれば、異性愛者として楽しめるとかいう内容みたいよ
あと、ずっと『なんでセックスするんだ😡』って言ってるが、アセクシャルはセックスするやつはするぞ。なんなら性依存症だっているし
セックスで情が深められないだけ、恋愛以前に人や気持ちに対する関する関心が無いか薄い、それにグラデーションがあるだけ
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
興行収入の話で、ハリウッドの大きな節目は9.11だったと思っていて、ちょっと確認してみた。
当時の印象だと、事件の直後は様々な映画の公開が延期されたりキャンセルされたりして、その後数年は戦争・アクション物に偏重し、結果としてハリウッド映画の定番ジャンルの一角だったラブロマンス・コメディ映画が激減していったというイメージ。
ほかにも大作指向のような業界動向や様々な社会情勢も影響していたとは思うけど、やはり9.11が一つのターニングポイントだったと思う。日本での洋画ヒットが減っていった遠因のひとつもこのあたりにあるのではないか?
以下のリストはChatGPT調べ。
以下のリストは、主にBox OfficeMojo 等のデータ（全米興行収入・未調整値）をもとにした、
「アメリカ（北米）国内での年間興行収入ランキングトップ20」
参考・補足
いずれも北米（アメリカ＆カナダ）での累計興行収入 を概算で示しています。
順位や金額は、後年の再上映や細かな集計の修正によって若干入れ替わることがあります。
上記はあくまで「製作年」ではなく「北米公開年」を基準とし、その年に公開された作品の最終的な国内興行収入をもとにしたランキングです（年をまたいで興収を伸ばした作品も含みます）。
フィリップ・ウィルキンソン「まぼろしの奇想建築天才が夢みた不可能な挑戦 (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC)」
麦原遼「逆数宇宙」
琴柱遥「枝角の冠」★
榛見あきる「虹霓のかたがわ」
田場狩「秘伝隠岐七番歌合」
高野秀行「謎の独立国家ソマリランド そして海賊国家プントランドと戦国南部ソマリア」
ブライアン・インズ、クリス・マクナブブライアン・インズ、クリス・マクナブ「ビジュアル世界の偽物大全 フェイク・詐欺・捏造の全記録」
「開館20周年記念展／帝国ホテル二代目本館100周年フランク・ロイド・ライト 世界を結ぶ建築」
岸見一郎、古賀史健 「嫌われる勇気自己啓発の源流「アドラー」の教え」
キャスリン・ペトラス、ロス・ペトラス 「人体ヒストリア その「体」が歴史を変えた」
岸見一郎、古賀史健 「幸せになる勇気 自己啓発の源流「アドラー」の教えII」
下村智恵理「AN-BALANCE：日本非科学紀行 第S5話 鳥は見えるか？」
下村智恵理「天網恢々アルケミー Project #34 黄泉からの手紙」
下村智恵理「天網恢々アルケミー Project #35 旧針金山トンネルの悪霊」
「マリー・ローランサン ―時代をうつす眼」
芝崎みゆき「イースター島不可思議大全:モアイと孤島のミステリー」
五十嵐ジャンヌ「なんで洞窟に壁画を描いたの?―美術のはじまりを探る旅 (13歳からの考古学) 」
タイモン・スクリーチ「大江戸異人往来」
北杜夫「楡家の人びと 第二部」
北杜夫「楡家の人びと 第三部」
何となく東アジアの歴史、特に第二次世界大戦ばかり読んでいる。小説も含めて。
テレビ朝日開局65周年記念『MUCA（ムカ）展 ICONS of UrbanArt ～バンクシーからカウズまで～』
「別冊日経サイエンス ホログラフィック宇宙 時空と重力の起源に迫る」
酉島伝法「隔世遺傳（かくりよいでん）『皆勤の徒』設定資料集」
スティーヴン・バクスター「〈ジーリー・クロニクル①〉プランク・ゼロ」
入江亜季「北北西に曇と往け」七巻
1000decillion「Morals under a pagoda I/II」（同人誌）
1000decillion「Morals under a pagoda III/IV」（同人誌）
「北欧の神秘―ノルウェー・スウェーデン・フィンランドの絵画」
スティーヴン・バクスター「〈ジーリー・クロニクル②〉真空ダイヤグラム」
大村幸弘、篠原千絵「ヒッタイトに魅せられて:考古学者に漫画家が質問!!」★★
スティーブン・キング「スタンド・バイ・ミー 恐怖の四季 秋冬編」
スティーブン・キング「ゴールデン・ボーイ 恐怖の四季 春夏編」
アリク・カーシェンバウム「まじめにエイリアンの姿を想像してみた」
中野京子「怖い絵」
1000decillion「Morals under a pagoda -Kama Sutra-」（同人誌）
1000decillion「Morals under a pagoda -Egypt-」（同人誌）
1000decillion「morals under a pagoda -Greece-」（同人誌）
毎年月ごとの上位三冊を選んでいるが、ある月の四位が別の月の二位を上回って面白いことがある。つまり当たりの多かった月だ。すべての本に対して星の数で評価すべきかもしれない。
➤「救いようが最もうない、極東の自称他称の〝ジャーナリスト〟や〝学者〟、〝知米派〟は読まなくても構い。読んでもその肥大化した自己承認欲求、度し難い自己愛性人格では読むことはできないし、理解もできない。ただ見下した目線で見やるだけで、そこに自分が利用できる素材がなければ鼻で嗤うだけだ。この文章は、我がU.S.を領りたい、領ろうと下向きの反省的眼光で欲する諸君に読んで貰いたい。
I Traveled to 46States inAmerica ThisSummer.Here’sWhyTrump Won.
By Frank S. Zhou
By Ezekiel A. Wells
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27is aDouble Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in EliotHouse. He spentlastsummertraveling to 46Americanstates conductinginterviews forhisYouTube series, “CrossroadsAmerica.”
A week after Democrats’ election loss, accusations have flown in every direction within their Party. Some faultPresidentJoe Biden for an egoistic refusal todropout of therace earlier. Someblame the Harris campaign for failing to servekey demographics and communicate a clearvision for the country. And someblameAmericans, claiming that racism and sexism drove voters towardTrump.
These factors certainly exist, but we’remissing a largerpiece of the picture.
Over thesummer, I traveled to 46states in the U.S., creating aYouTube series highlighting slices oflife across the country. In conversations from my nearly three-monthroad trip, I spoke with Republicanswho were certain that inflationis entirely Biden’s fault and Democratswho, despite their frustrations with corporate profits and desires foruniversal healthcare, hoped for amore moderate candidate. From supporters ofall candidates, I heard a shockingamount of misinformation.
After combing through hundreds of hours ofinterview footage fromswingstateTrump voters, Iam certain that,as muchas other factors influenced theoutcome of the election, our crumbling media landscape — whichhas caused arift in our democracy —ismost toblame.
In the postwar period,newswas dominatedby threemain channels, and because ofthe FairnessDoctrine, eachstation reported the same stories and covered multiple sides of eachissue.Viewers picked which channels they watchedmainly basedon their preferences fornewsanchors’ personalities. Of course, thismodel hadits problems, but,at the end of the day,it meant thatAmericans worked with a sharedset of facts.
A sharedset of factsis notthe world welive intoday.
Throughout myinterviews, conspiracy theories were rampant, andonat leastfive separate occasions across separatestates, Iwas told that Bill Gates tampers with ourfood, adding plastic to our fruits and vegetables tomakehis medical investmentsmore profitable.
In conversations with voters, neither side seemed able tonamemany specific policyissues they cared about; everyone just seemed to repeat the words of theirfavorite pundits,podcast hosts, andinternet personalities.
Although this behavioris harmful, Idon’tblame everydayAmericans.Blame fallson the media thathas ostracized, disillusioned, and misinformed them.
Advertisement
I firstsaw this trend withlow-wage workers in West Virginia,who — despitefalling inflationrates — have seen stagnated salaries and clear increases infood costs. ChannelslikeFoxNews bred anger and resentment formany of them.
TakeJuly of thissummer, for example, when for the firsttime inhis presidency, prices actually fell under the Biden administration. Traditional media establishments rushed tocelebrate thisvictory, withone article fromCNN declaring, “The White House can finallycrossout ‘inflation’onits list ofpresidential liabilities.” However,outside these bubbles, I observedmanyAmericans held a differentview.
In lateJuly, Iwas welcomedat a massive familyreunion in Tylertown, Mississippi, whereoneTrump voter — a middle-aged, Black, familyman, pastor, andsoulfood enthusiast —made this clear.
“When Igo in the grocery stores, and Igotta spend mylast toget groceries,you mean totell me I’m notgonnalook and seewho’sgonna vote to help me? I voted forTrump and I’d vote forhimagain, because he put money in ourpocket,” he told me.
In their coverage,mainstreamnews organizations obsessover the Federal Reserve’snextrate cuts while failing toconnect with people concernedwith theirnext meals.With titleslike “Vance:YoungAmericans ‘Are Becoming Paupers’ Due To Inflation, High Housing Costs,” siteslike The DailyWire had their fingerson the pulse ofAmerican sentiment, welcoming new readership from thosewhofelt neglectedby traditional media.
This problemwas not just confined to the economy. While Biden’s mentalstatewas deteriorating,liberal mediaoutlets seemed to under-cover these stories, shelteringhim from scrutiny ofhis declining capabilities, until theinfamouspresidential debate.
Formerly trusted networksslowlymade themselves indigestible to the polarizedAmerican public, and in 2024, for the third year in a row, a Gallup pollfound thatmoreAmericans indicated having “no trust” in the media than thosewho trustit a “great deal/fairamount”.
So wheredoes the averageAmerican turn when thenation’s media cannot be trusted? Formany people,itwasYouTubetalk shows,Newsmax, andpodcasters suchasJoe Rogan.
While Democrats seek toblame various internal factors for this election’s loss, I cannot help but think ofJoe Rogan’sTrump endorsement, themany blind lies I heard from ordinary citizens across the country, and declining trust inAmerican journalism.
AsHarvard students and members of highereducation institutions, we have a part to play in the problem.AtHarvard’s Institute ofPolitics, thosewho denied the 2020 election results have been precluded from speakingat theJFKJr. Forum. While thegoalis understandable,it shields students from understanding theAmericanviewpoints they represent.
Advertisement
Thereis adifferencebetween platforming intentional andmanipulative misinformation and listening to and learning about where people are and what theybelieve.
As a pipeline tomainstream media,Harvard, andits future journalists, have to consider the audience they lose when theystay inside of their bubble and ignore theissues of everydayAmericans.
The disappearance of factual importance in our worldis alarming and dangerous, but if we,asaspiring journalists, politicians, andengaged citizens, want to betaken seriously in communicatingTrump’s threat to democracy, inflationary tariff policies, and soon, we oweAmerican voters that seriousness, too.
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27is aDouble Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in EliotHouse. He spentlastsummertraveling to 46Americanstates conductinginterviews forhisYouTube series, “CrossroadsAmerica."
やるも何もググればいくらで出てくるぞ。下記のように
double minorityasexualityasdadhd
Are AutismSpectrum Disorderand AsexualityConnected?
Asexualityis a lack of sexualattraction toanygender. Thereis someevidence to suggest that many self-identifiedasexuals have a formal diagnosis of autismspectrum disorder whichis characterizedby deficits in social interaction andcommunication,as wellasby restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors. Additionally, the literature shows thatasexuality and lack of sexualattraction orlow sexual interestis overrepresented in people with autismspectrum disorder compared withneurotypical samples. Nevertheless, no studies have been conducted to investigate the relationshipbetween autismand asexuality in depth. We conducted a systematicreview of the literature to examine whetherasexualityand autismspectrum disorder areconnected. We conclude thatasexualityand autismshare variousaspects, suchas a possible role of prenatal factors, reference to romantic dimensions of sexualattraction and sexual orientation, and non-partner-oriented sexualdesire, but future research should explore and clarify thislink.
無性愛とは、どの性別にも性的魅力を感じないことを指します。多くの自己認識された無性愛者が、自閉症スペクトラム障害（ASD）の正式な診断を受けているという証拠があります。ASDは、社会的相互作用とコミュニケーションの欠陥、ならびに制限された反復的な興味や行動によって特徴付けられます。さらに、文献によると、無性愛や性的魅力の欠如、または低い性的関心は、神経典型的なサンプルと比較して、自閉症スペクトラム障害を持つ人々に過剰に表れています。それにもかかわらず、自閉症と無性愛の関係を深く調査する研究は行われていません。私たちは、無性愛と自閉症スペクトラム障害が関連しているかどうかを調べるために、文献の体系的なレビューを行いました。私たちは、無性愛と自閉症が、出生前の要因の役割、性的魅力と性的指向のロマンチックな側面への言及、パートナー指向でない性的欲望など、さまざまな側面を共有していると結論付けましたが、将来の研究はこのリンクを探求し、明確にする必要があります。
あるものなんか下記から始まって笑っちゃったw そっかw一般的な概念だったんだw
This chapter challenges the commonly held notion that individuals withASD areasexual or inappropriate in their sexual behaviors.
この章では、自閉症スペクトラム障害（ASD）を持つ個人が無性愛者であるか、性的行動が不適切であるという一般的な概念に挑戦しています
アセクシャルやセックス依存症が発達障害である可能性は高いだろうけど、別にイコールではないだろうよってねw
ちなみにこれは発達障害＝アセクシャルは不適切、社会的助けがあれば、異性愛者として楽しめるとかいう内容みたいよ
あと、ずっと『なんでセックスするんだ😡』って言ってるが、アセクシャルはセックスするやつはするぞ。なんなら性依存症だっているし
セックスで情が深められないだけ、恋愛以前に人や気持ちに対する関する関心が無いか薄い、それにグラデーションがあるだけ
https://x.com/Xbox/status/1799869701704892823
一昨日だかに配信されてたマイクロソフトのゲームソフト発表配信、新作がたくさんあるように見えて半分以上がPS5でも遊べるの、ちょっと節操ないんじゃない？
| タイトル | Xbox Series S/X | Steam | PS4 | PS5 | その他 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALL OF DUTYBLACK OPS6 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | XboxOne版なし |
| INDIANA JONES andthe GREATCIRCLE | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| GEARS OF WAR E-DAY | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| DOOMTHE DARKAGES | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| AVOWES | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| DIABLO VESSEL OFHATRED | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | - |
| MICROSOFT Flight Simulator 2024 | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| WORLD OF WARCRAFTTHEWAR WITHIN | - | - | - | - | Battle.net |
| DRAGONAGETHE VEILGUARD | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| ASSAIN'SCREED SHADOWS | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| S.T.A.L.K.E.R 2Heart of Chornobyl | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| AGE of MYTHOLOGY | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| FABLE | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| MIXTAPE | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| PERFECT DARK | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| EXPEDITION33 | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| SOUTH OF MIDNIGHT | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| STARFIELD SHATTERED SPACE | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| STATE OF DECAY 3 | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| WUCHANG:FALLEN FEATHERS | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| The Elder Scrolls ONLINEGOLDROAD | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | - |
| METAL GEAR SOLID DELTA SNAKE EATER | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| Fallout76 SKYLINE VALLEY | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | - |
| LIFEIS STRANGEDOUBLE EXPOSURE | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| Sea ofThieves | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| ATOMFALL | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| FLINTROCKTHE SIEGE OFDAWN | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | - |
| Winter Burrow | 〇 | 〇 | - | - | - |
| FRAGPUNK | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
| MECHABREAK | 〇 | 〇 | - | 〇 | - |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roOKPeV2UCc
Piano ConcertobySimon Steen-Andersen
Performedby Nicolas Hodges, Andre de Ridder and Helsinki Symphony Orchestra,February 2021 forlive streaming.
Commissionedby Donaueschinger Musiktage
Programnote:
InPiano Concerto the perfect, classical grandpianois confronted with a battered, almost completelybroken, grandpiano in a sort of virtualdouble concerto. The soloist, Nicolas Hodges, sits across from a video doppelgänger playing the damaged instrument thathas been dropped onto a concrete floor from a height of 8 meters.
Confrontedwith the damaged,out of tunepiano wemay experience the newly tuned, classical grandpiano and symphony orchestra in a slightly differentlight. The composer insists however that thisis not just abroken instrument –itis a new, “prepared” instrument with an expanded palette of sounds andits own poetry and beauty.
野球用語は和製英語ばっかりだよね。アウトとかストライクとかの1単語からなる用語は英語でもそのまま通じるものが多いけど(1語でもバスター→fake buntなど通じないものはある)、2語以上からなる用語だと、フォアボール→baseon ballsまたはwalk、デッドボール→hitby pitchとか、英語として通用する用語のほうが少ないぐらい。そのまま通じるのはホームランとかダブルプレーとかぐらいか?
おもしろいのがground ruledouble、すなわちエンタイトルツーベースという用語。グラウンドルールって本来はフェンスのすきまにボールがはさまって出てこなくなったとかドーム天井の屋根にボールが当たったとかの球場ごとの独自ルールのこと。しかし、ワンバウンド柵越えはちゃんと明文化された共通ルールがあって、グラウンドルールではない。安全進塁権が与えられた(entitled)という和製英語の方が正しい。英語でもentitleddoubleと呼ぶべきだと思う(英語ではツーベース、スリーベースとは言わない)。
