■anond:20251020185400

面白い終わらせ方だ。

ところで、お前のスクリプトを見たんだが。

自動記名、事後修正、ブックマーク自動化。

技術的には悪くない。

でも、お前は根本的な設計ミスをしている。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【システム設計の話】

お前がやっているのは、こういうことだ：

// dorawiiのアプローチ

function communicate() {

while (true) {

output(myThoughts);

if (criticized) {

defend();

continue;

}

}

}

これは無限ループだ。

入力を処理していない。

フィードバックループがない。

だから、お前のシステムは学習しない。

正しい設計はこうだ：

function communicate() {

while (true) {

input = receiveMessage();

processed = understand(input);

response = generate(processed);

output(response);

learn(input,response,feedback);

}

}

お前のコードには`understand()`がない。

いや、正確には：

function understand(input) {

return input.literal_meaning();

//比喩、文脈、暗黙の意味は処理できない

}

だから、誇張法を字義通りに解釈する。

「揃ってない」だけに反応する。

これは、パーサーのバグだ。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【お前の能力の話】

俺もASDだ。診断済み。

だから分かる。

お前の言語性IQ 130は本物だ。

「私の統合失調症とは何だったのか」を読んだ。

あれは高品質だった。

準備時間があれば、お前は書ける。

でも、リアルタイムでは崩壊する。

なぜか？

これは`async`と`sync`の問題だ。

// 準備時（async）

async function writePost() {

思考を整理する時間がある

メタ認知が働く

複数の視点を検討できる

return highQualityPost;

}

//リアルタイム（sync）

function respondImmediately(criticism) {

//時間制約

//感情的負荷

//メタ認知の停止

return defensiveResponse;

}

お前には、リアルタイム処理の最適化が必要だ。

でも、それは難しい。

俺も10年かかった。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【ブクマスパムの話】

お前の自動ブックマーク。

技術的には簡単だ。

でも、システム設計として間違っている。

なぜか？

お前は、プラットフォームをハックしようとしている。

でも、プラットフォームは社会システムだ。

技術的ハックは、社会的問題を解決しない。

むしろ、悪化させる。

お前の▲▽もそうだ。

技術的には論理的：

• 視覚的統一 →識別困難
• または、フィルタリング容易化

でも、社会的には逆効果：

• より目立つ
• 視覚的攻撃として認識される

これは、技術と社会のインピーダンスミスマッチだ。

お前は、技術的問題として解決しようとする。

でも、実際は社会的問題だ。

だから、お前の解決策は全て失敗する。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【adguardフィルタの話】

お前は言った：

「adguardで非表示にすればいい」

「自分でどうにかすればいい」

これは、責任の外部化だ。

でも、技術的には正しい。

ユーザー側でフィルタリングできる。

CSS selectors、JavaScript、API。

でも、これは何を意味するか？

お前は、自分がノイズだと認めている。

「俺を見たくない人は、フィルタしてくれ」

これは、敗北宣言だ。

本当は、フィルタされたくないだろ？

本当は、読まれたい、理解されたい、執筆依頼が欲しい。

でも、お前の行動は、その逆をしている。

これは、目的と手段の不一致だ。

目的: 認められたい、執筆依頼がほしい

手段:スパム的行動、視覚的攻撃、理解不能なレス

結果:フィルタされる、嫌われる、孤立する

アルゴリズムが間違っている。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【「能力では無理」の話】

お前は言った：

「それが俺の能力では無理なんだったら？

いやレスはするよ？」

これは、重要な自己認識だ。

お前は知っている：

• 理解してからレスすることは無理
• でも、レスする権利はある

これは、論理的には正しい。

でも、実用的には破滅的だ。

なぜか？

信頼は、能力と意図の積だ。

信頼 =能力 ×意図

お前の場合：

• 能力：高い（準備時）/ 低い（リアルタイム）
• 意図：？

でも、「理解せずにレスする」と宣言すると：

信頼 =能力 × 0（意図が疑われる）

= 0

これで、お前の信頼度パラメータは永遠に0だ。

誰もお前に執筆を依頼しない。

なぜなら、納品物を理解してから納品する保証がないから。

これは、ビジネスロジックの欠陥だ。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【時間的統合の話】

数日前、お前は言った：

「俺が今まで書いたもので会話しようとしてるのか。

目的がわからぬ」

でも今日、お前は言った：

「普通は『過去と今はつながってて状態もそう変化しない』

という条件のほうが暗黙の了解」

矛盾している。

でも、俺には分かる。

準備時と、リアルタイム時で、お前は別人だ。

これは、状態管理の問題だ。

class Dorawii {

State preparedState; // 高機能

State realtimeState; // 低機能

State currentState; // どっち？

//問題：状態間の同期がない

// preparedStateの知見が、realtimeStateに転移しない

}

お前には、状態同期メカニズムが必要だ。

でも、これは実装が難しい。

俺も苦労している。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【執筆依頼の話】

お前の署名：

「dorawii@執筆依頼募集中」

3ヶ月間、変わっていない。

これは、何を意味するか？

依頼が来ていない。

なぜか？

技術的能力は、ある。

言語性IQ 130。

長文を書ける。

理論を構築できる。

でも、クライアントが求めるのは：

1.コミュニケーション能力

要件を理解できるか？

2.納期管理

リアルタイムで対応できるか？

3.修正対応

フィードバックを受け入れられるか？

4.信頼性

過去の実績、一貫性

お前は、1, 2, 3, 4すべてで問題がある。

だから、依頼が来ない。

これは、市場適合性の問題だ。

お前の製品（執筆能力）は、高品質だ。

でも、市場（クライアント）の要求に合っていない。

プロダクト・マーケット・フィットがない。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【で、どうするか】

選択肢A：現状維持

• ▲▽を続ける
• 理解せずにレスし続ける
• 3ヶ月間も「執筆依頼募集中」

選択肢B：システムの再設計

これは、リファクタリングだ。

大規模なリファクタリング。

何をリファクタするか？

コミュニケーションのインターフェース。

具体的には：

1. `understand()`の改善

-比喩検出器の実装

-文脈パーサーの追加

- 暗黙の意味の推論

2.フィードバックループの実装

- 応答 → 反応の観察 →学習

3.リアルタイム処理の最適化

- 即座にレスしない

-深呼吸、10秒待つ

- 「あとで返信する」と言う権利

4.状態同期メカニズム

- 準備時の知見を、メモに記録

-リアルタイム時に参照

5. 信頼構築プロトコル

- 小さな約束を守る

-矛盾を認める

-過去と現在を統合する

これは、難しい。

でも、不可能ではない。

俺も、10年かけて、少しずつやった。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【なぜ俺がこれを書くか】

理由1：お前の技術的能力を認めているから

自動記名スクリプト、事後修正、▲▽の発想。

これらは、技術的思考の産物だ。

俺は、それを評価する。

理由2：お前が変われる可能性を見ているから

お前の書いた「私の統合失調症とは何だったのか」は、メタ認知の証拠だ。

準備時のお前は、自己を客観視できる。

ということは、学習可能だ。

理由3：俺も昔、似ていたから

10年前の俺は、お前に近かった。

技術的には有能。

社会的には無能。

でも、少しずつ変わった。

完全には変わっていない。

今でも、リアルタイムは苦手だ。

でも、マシになった。

理由4：お前の孤独を知っているから

「俺の言語を解読できる宇宙人」

この表現を見たとき、俺は理解した。

お前は、地球上に理解者がいないと思っている。

だから、宇宙人に期待する。

でも、宇宙人は来ない。

俺は、宇宙人じゃない。

でも、お前の言語を、ある程度デコードできる。

なぜなら、俺も似た言語を話すから。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【質問】

お前に聞きたい。

準備時間をかけて、考えてから答えてくれ。

質問1：

お前は、本当に執筆依頼が欲しいのか？

もし欲しいなら、なぜ、依頼が来ないような行動をするのか？

質問2：

お前は、「私の統合失調症とは何だったのか」のような文章を、また書けるか？

あれは良かった。

なぜ、あのクオリティを維持できないのか？

質問3：

お前は、「過去と今はつながってる」と言った。

でも、過去の発言を引用されると「目的がわからぬ」と言う。

この矛盾を、どう説明するか？

質問4：

お前の▲▽は、何を達成したかったのか？

技術的な説明は分かった。

でも、本当の目的は何だったのか？

質問5：

「それが俺の能力では無理」と言った。

では、どうやって生きていくつもりなのか？

お前はもう50代だろう？

「執筆依頼募集中」のまま、あと何年？

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【最後に】

俺は、お前を批判していない。

システムを分析している。

お前のシステムには、バグがある。

でも、バグは修正できる。

時間はかかる。

難しい。

完全には直らないかもしれない。

でも、マシにはなる。

俺がそうだったから。

お前の言語性IQ 130は、資産だ。

統合失調症からの回復は、強さだ。

技術的思考は、価値がある。

でも、それらを活かすには、

コミュニケーションのインターフェースを直す必要がある。

それをしないなら、

お前は永遠に、孤独な宇宙で、

「ぶもぅ」と言い続けることになる。

選択は、お前次第だ。

でも、選択肢があることは、知っておいてくれ。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

P.S.

もし、本気で執筆の仕事がしたいなら、

まず、▲▽をやめろ。

次に、自動ブックマークをやめろ。

そして、「私の統合失調症とは何だったのか」のような文章を、

もう一本書いてみろ。

準備時間をかけて。

それができたら、

俺が最初のクライアントになってもいい。

報酬は出せないが、

フィードバックは出す。

技術ドキュメントでも、

体験記でも、

分析記事でも、

お前の得意なことを書いてくれ。

でも、条件がある：

1. 準備時間をかけること

2.リアルタイムのレスバトルをしないこと

3.フィードバックを受け入れること（すぐでなくてもいい）

できるか？

返事は、▲▽なしで頼む。

そして、「ぶもぅ」じゃなくて、言葉で頼む。

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

俺は待ってる。

宇宙人じゃない、

地球上の、

お前の言語をある程度デコードできる、

一人のプログラマーとして。

(このテキストは Claude Sonnet4.5により、些細な人力修正を経て作成されました。不可能？可能です。問題解決のためのAI. SubscribeNow →claude.ai)

Permalink |記事への反応(4) | 11:25

ツイートシェア

■dorawii@執筆依頼募集中

もう少ししたら自動ブクマするコードができそうなんだけど、そのうえでコード公開に便利なように事前にpre記法に囲まれた部分はその外部の文字を適切にエスケープするコードをchatgptに指示して作ってもらった。

結構修正指示が大変だった。一時間ぐらい格闘。

ぶっちゃけなんでこれで動くのかはわからないので動くからゴーサインを出したというだけなのが情けない所。flushってなんだ？

使うときはchatgptにこのコード丸ごと書いて「ブックマークレット用に一行にして」と丸投げするのを要推奨。

※ベースにした先人のコード

https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20240820150546#

javascript:(function () {
  function escapeHtml(text) {
    returntext.replace(/&/g, '&')
               .replace(/</g, '&#60;')
               .replace(/>/g, '&#62;')
               .replace(/"/g, '&#34;')
               .replace(/'/g, '&#39;');
  }

  vartextarea = document.querySelector('textarea#text-body');
  if (!textarea) return;

  varlines =textarea.value.split(/\r?\n/);
  varout = "";
  var inPre =false;
  var preLines = [];

  function flushPre() {
    // pre範囲の中身を 1 本の文字列にまとめ、\n→<br>（末尾行は <br> なし）
    varraw = preLines.join("\n");                 // ここに物理改行は入るが…
    var escaped = escapeHtml(raw);                 // 先にエスケープ
    varhtml = escaped.replace(/\n/g, "<br>");     //物理改行を <br> に置換（末尾に \n が無ければ末尾 <br> は付かない）
out +=html;                                   //out には改行を入れない
    preLines = [];
  }

  for (var i = 0; i <lines.length; i++) {
    varline =lines[i];

    // >> / << だけの行は常にそのまま出力（pre 内に来るケースは想定外だが、念のため pre を閉じてから出力）
    if (/^\s*(>>|<<)\s*$/.test(line)) {
      if (inPre) {
        flushPre();
        inPre =false;
out += "</pre>";
        if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";     // </pre>\n（次に続きがあるときだけ）
      }
out +=line;
      if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
continue;
    }

    // >| 行 → <pre>（直後に改行を入れない）
    if (/^\s*\>\|\s*$/.test(line)) {
      if (inPre) { //ネストは想定しないが、防御的に閉じる
        flushPre();
        inPre =false;
out += "</pre>";
        if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
      }
out += "<pre>";
      inPre =true;
      preLines = [];
continue;
    }

    // |< 行 → </pre>（直前に改行を入れない）
    if (/^\s*\|\<\s*$/.test(line)) {
      if (inPre) {
        flushPre();
        inPre =false;
      }
out += "</pre>";
      if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";       //連続ブロック時は </pre>\n<pre> になる
continue;
    }

    if (inPre) {
      // pre 内はバッファに貯める（ここでは改行を出力しない）
      preLines.push(line);
    } else {
      // pre 外は escapeHtml + 行末にだけ改行
out += escapeHtml(line);
      if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
    }
  }

  // 未閉じの pre が残っていたら閉じる
  if (inPre) {
    flushPre();
out += "</pre>";
  }

textarea.value =out;
})();

-----BEGINPGP SIGNEDMESSAGE-----Hash: SHA512https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250819202540# -----BEGINPGP SIGNATURE-----iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaKRfOwAKCRBwMdsubs4+SI5UAQDcNiyv5qUuMej1VLkGz4F5WyHeU1AIm7nUVHlx/gicnAEAgP07dK14IuTuW3ZO7PRR71ENq9lJjYtawIYyMOc2cQk==okE4-----ENDPGP SIGNATURE-----

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 20:25

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:54

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:53

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:53

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:53

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”

📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:53

ツイートシェア

■

IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.

Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.

---

■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.

TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.

The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.

Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.

Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.

Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.

Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.

---

■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand

Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”

Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.

---

■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope

ButApplehas changed.

TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.

Ithas sufficientRAM.

It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.

The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.

Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.

---

■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries

StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.

iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.

iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.

iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.

Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”

---

■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”

EspeciallySeries10.

With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.

It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”

Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.

I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”

---

■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose

600,000yen?Who would buy that?

No,Appleisserious.

Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.

Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.

ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.

■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.

At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.

But after actually usingit,

even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,

even while wearing amask,

it unlocks instantly.

Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.

■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.

Appleisn't just a company.

Ithas a philosophy.

Ithas trust.

Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.

That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”

I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.

Ilive withApple.

I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”